52 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2025
    1. Postcolonial scholarship has been primarily concerned with cultural translation,that is, translation understood guratively as movement between cultures, and has had less regard forlanguage issues, while translation studies has emphasized the complexity of translation as a linguisticpractice that involves intercultural mediation.

      Setting up dichotomy between related fields of study that could be reconciled by cross-field dialogue

    Annotators

    Annotators

  2. Oct 2023
    1. the concept isn’t just philosophically conservative in its premises but alsopolitically conservative in its consequences

      Argues the perhaps unintentional consequences of popularizing grit as a means of conservative political achievement in educational reform

    2. Grit issometimes sold as a tool to accomplish whatever goals one chooses, but in practice the focus is ontraining children to accomplish the goals imposed on them by adult

      Implied thesis

    3. If enjoying a complex mentallife interferes with performance in a one shot contest to see who can spell more obscure words correctly,is that really an argument for grit?

      Argues we should value psychological health/satisfaction/creativity over competitive performance success

    4. persistent students get higher grades, that may not make a case for grit so much as a case against usinggrades as a marker for success

      Argues for systems like grading to fit the individual rather than asking the individual to fit the system

    5. n one study conducted by Duckworth and her colleagues, freshman cadets at West Pointwho scored high on a grit questionnaire (“I finish whatever I begin”) were less likely to quit during thegrueling summer training program. But what does this prove other than that people who are persistent . .. persist?

      Questions basis of Duckworth's study as tautological

    6. Proponents of grit rarely ask: Do kids love what they’re doing?Or are they driven by a desperate (and anxiety provoking) need to prove their competence? As long asthey’re pushing themselves, we’re encouraged to nod our approval.

      Poses a foundational question towards the basis of grit in educational reform: what is the purpose of this?

    7. Gritty people sometimes exhibit what psychologists call “nonproductive persistence

      Introduces 'nonproductive persistence', and argues that persistence in itself may have a negative impact on those with grit

    8. To begin with, not everything is worth doing, let alone doing for extended periods, and not everyone whoworks hard is pursuing something worthwhile. People who are up to no good often have grit to spare.Persistence is just one of many attributes that can sometimes be useful for reaching a (good or bad)outcome, so it’s the choice of goal that ought to come first and count more

      Dissects grit as a value, disseminating that choice of goals is more valuable than persistence towards it

    9. Yet ironically, the heart of what’s being disseminated is a notion drummed into us by Aesop’s fables,Benjamin Franklin’s aphorisms, Christian denunciations of sloth, and the 19th century chant invented to

      Notes the recurring valuation of 'grit' informally throughout Western and particularly American history

    10. “Grit” — defined by its most prominent proponent, AngelaDuckworth, as “the tendency to sustain perseverance and passion for challenging long term goals” — hasbeen greeted with a degree of breathless enthusiasm unmatched since — well, since the last socialscience craze

      Notes Duckworth's work, and its widespread effect of making the conservative argument for 'grit' popular in education reform discussion

    11. . It’s self control and grit that occupy Tough formuch of the book

      Notes the rhetorical devices Tough uses in hooking audiences with familiar ideas of curiosity and self-confidence to then neglect them in favor of his actual argument towards valuing self-control and grit

    12. it’s usually in the context of a conservative narrative that features not altruism orempathy but something that sounds very much like the Protestant work ethic

      Arguing that 'grit' shifts the context of the use of emotional intelligence from its original context of altruism and empathy towards conservative values centered on individual work ethic

    13. Cognitive ability isn’t the only factor that determines how children will fare in school, let alone in life.Drawing on a substantial body of research, science writer Dan Goleman reminded us of that fact almosttwenty years ago in his book Emotional Intelligence

      Argument in conversation of Dan Goleman's 'Emotional Intelligence' in addition to Duckworth's 'Grit...'

    14. This is an expanded version of the published article, which appeared in the Post‘s Sunday “Outlook”section. It has been adapted from chapter 7 of The Myth of the Spoiled Child: Challenging theConventional Wisdom about Children and Parenting.

      Edited version of original publication for the Post (which Post?), adapted from Kohn's own book

    15. WASHINGTON POSTApril 6, 2014

      Publication context: for (lib. bias) Washington Post readers in 2014, within window of relevant conversation of Duckworth's argument

    Annotators

    1. Pedro Noguera is a professor of education at NYU and the director of the Metropolitan Center forUrban Education. Anindya Kundu, a doctoral student in Education at NYU, contributed to thiscolumn.

      Author's have an academic background in pedagogical research, tone of writing suggests this is for a general audience to communicate their findings more broadly

    2. Unlike grit, agency is about empowering young people to use education to take control of their lives.As they come to understand that knowledge is a source of power, students become more invested aslearners and more able to see the relevance of school in shaping their future outcomes.

      Argues 'grit' is an attitude towards success for the sake of success, while 'agency' is an attitude towards success for concrete, beneficial outcomes

    3. The costs of allowing so many Americans to remain under-educated are daunting. Education should beconsidered an investment in a country’s labor force, where underachievement harms economic growth.Almost five years ago, a McKinsey study showed that if America could narrow its achievement gapbetween white students and black and Latino students, G.D.P. would be between $310 billion to $525billion higher, or roughly 4% of total G.D.P.

      Reframes issue of academic and educational achievement gaps as a social problem as opposed to an individual problem

    4. poorest neighborhoods only 10% of high school seniors graduated from high school college-ready. Inthe wealthiest neighborhoods the vast majority of students were college-ready

      Argues individual achievement does not necessitate success in the face of environmental conditions

    5. Teachers encouraged him to apply to college without knowing that Miguel wasundocumented and in the country illegally. All the grit in the world would not make it possible for himto get the financial aid he needed to pay for his college education.

      Argues the limits of grit and individual achievement in the face of societal issues out of individual control

    6. Clearly, these accomplishments suggest that Miguel possessed more than his share of grit; heepitomizes what can be achieved through sacrifice and determination.

      Exemplifies grit in academic setting

    7. Why Students Need More than 'Grit'

      Potential audiences: students, teachers, school administrators, politicians, general public (esp. incl. parents)

      Purpose: to persuade

    Annotators

    1. Without such deep, attentive listening, anycritique you make wtll be superficial and dectdedly uncritica l.It will be a critique that says more about you than about thewriter or idea you're supposedly responding to

      Dialectical analysis prepares you to respond to an argument through thorough deconstruction and comprehension that may lead to your own views changing as a result

    2. We hope it is clear that critical reading is a two-way street.It is just as much about being open to the way that writerscan challenge you, maybe even transform you, as it is aboutquestioning those writers.

      Restating the thesis, put analysis into practice to have better understanding

    3. Therefore,when you translate, do not try to fit the ideas of such writersinto your preexisting beliefs, but instead allow your own vtewsto be challenged

      When restating, don't insert your own beliefs but try to best explain for yourself what the author believes

    4. But readers who break down this passage into its essentialparts will find that it is actually a lucid piece of writing thatconforms to the classic "they say/ I say'' pattern.

      Arguments most often come in the 'they say/I say' pattern and can be broken down as such

    5. Sometimes it is difficult to figure out the views th at writersare respondmg co not because these writers do not identify18 2Readmg for the Conversationthose views but because their language and the concepts theyare dealing with are particularly challenging.

      Reconstruct in your own words challenging to read text to have a better understanding of an argument

    6. Constructing this counter-argument can also help you recognize how Draut challengesyour own views, questioning opinions that you previously tookfor granted

      Allow yourself to entertain views contrary to your own to see how much stock you really put in them or your current views

    7. other writers assumethat their readers are so famili<~r with these views that they neednot name or summarize them. ln such cases, you the readerhave to reconstruct the unstated "they say" that is motivatingthe text through a process of inference

      Be mindful of the context and target audience of the text you're reading. Author's write to communicate with their targets, so you must educate yourself and position yourself as their target

    8. The assumption these students are mak-ing is that if something appears on the page, the author mustendorse it.

      Be careful not to conflate the discussion of ideas with the endorsement of them

    9. It asks that you determine not only what theauthor chinks, but how what the author thinks fits with wharothers think, and ultimately with what you yourself think

      Combines analysis and synthesis into a more unified step

    10. Since they were now dealing not with one argumentbut at least two (the author's argument and the one[s] he orshe was responding to), they now had alternative ways of see-ing the topic at hand.

      Dialectical analysis of rhetoric is more effective than plain analysis for college readers

    11. The results were often striking. The discussionsthat followed tended to be far livelier and to draw in a greaternumber of students. We were still asking students to look fo{the main argument, bur we were now asking them to see thatargument as a response to some other argument that provokedit, gave it a reason for being, and helped all of us see why weshould care about it.

      Focusing on connections you as a reader have with the text and the author's argument makes for better discussion and comprehension of the reading

    12. now that we had determined what the author was saying, whatdid we ourselves have ro say?

      Only engaging with the text through a removed lens leads the reader to not think of how they feel about the content of an author's argument

    13. "W HAT IS THE AUTHOR's ARGUMENT? What is he or shetrying to say?" For many years, these were the first questions wewould ask our classes in a discussion of an assigned reading. Thediscussion that resulted was often halting

      Directly attempting to analyze the author's intent without first looking at context leads to difficulty in pinpointing positions

    Annotators