11 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2021
    1. How did GUM get hit by what started as a run on the Thai currency in July 1997? Why did the crisis ripple from country to country and end up leaving Russia facing hunger and economic chaos, with 30 percent of Russians living below the poverty line, up from 18 percent at the end of 1996? And why has it now hit Brazil and shaken financial markets in Argentina, Colombia and Mexico?

      https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/government-economy/singapore-dollar-prospects-worst-since-98-as-asia-losses-spread

      This relates to an article about Singapore's dollar today and in 1998 during when the Thai currency dropped. When the Thai currency crashed, it not only affected countries around the world like Russia or Mexico, but also Singapore; Singapore's dollar dropped 15% during the year because of this. This demonstrates how free international financial markets can cause countries to be overdependent on other countries, so when the economy in one one country crashes, it can have devastating effects on development in many others.

    1. Countries like Thailand and Russia and Brazil are in trouble today largely for internal reasons, including poor banking practices and speculation that soared out of control. But some economists also say that if those countries had weak foundations, it is partly because Washington helped supply the blueprints.

      Though free international financial markets can be very helpful for developing nations, they can often have negative consequences in the long run. With this example, American involvement helped countries like Thailand to grow at first, but this caused many development problems in the future.

    1. Millions of Americans have become, like the Paonis, the unknowing financiers of developing countries, as money swishes around the world today from Cantrall to Russia to Brazil to China, connecting the most unlikely people. Among them are Mrs. Paoni and an Indonesian rickshaw driver named Salamet, a 27-year-old with a drooping mustache, an angry wife and three hungry children.

      Free international financial markets here can help development in developing countries; here, it can be seen that many Americans are unwittingly supporting the development of countries across the world like Indonesia or Vietnam due to free international financial markets which allows money to flow between countries freely.

    1. The problems on the Burrus farm, a sprawling collection of 14 hog buildings with temperature controls and automatic curtains on the windows, underscore how the economic crisis that began 19 months ago in Thailand is knocking on the gates of the American heartland. The only real chance of a rescue for Burrus would come through an economic revival on the other side of the globe, in Asia, where his hogs usually end up between chopsticks.

      This shows how international financial markets can often hinder development once countries get too dependent on international financial markets; in this case, the U.S pork industry became too independent on consumers in Thailand, which caused problems with development for U.S hog farmers.

    1. Companies embraced global supply chains, giving rise to a tangled web of production networks that wove the world economy together. The components of a given product could now be made in dozens of countries.

      https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/090315/10-major-companies-tied-apple-supply-chain.asp

      One example of a company which has embraced global supply chains is Apple. As one of the biggest companies in the world, they manufacture their products in dozens of countries around the world from various different countries as this article describes.

    2. he conventional wisdom about globalization is that it created a thriving international marketplace, allowing manufacturers to build flexible supply chains by substituting one supplier or component for another as needed. Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations became the wealth of the world as businesses took advantage of a globalized division of labor. Specialization produced greater efficiency, which in turn led to growth.

      Trade helps to cause development because it allows for specialisation since countries are able to produce what they are relatively best at producing due to trade. With countries producing what they have a comparative advantage in, the most products will end up being produced, thus promoting development.

  2. Aug 2021
    1. In cases like this, taxes can increase the polluter’s marginal private cost of production so that it equals the marginal social cost, resulting in the socially optimal level of production (and pollution). We canvassed a variety of solutions to the environmental problem (the external effects of the pesticide on the downstream fisheries), including bargaining between the organizations of fishermen and the plantation owners, and legislation (in the real-world case that inspired our Weevokil model, the government eventually banned the chemical).

      https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/04/climate/tax-polluting-companies-climate.html

      One example of these taxes that increases the polluter's marginal private cost of production is a carbon tax. Producers emitting carbon generate a negative externality, so carbon taxes increase the marginal private cost of production so that its equal to the marginal social cost, causing the company to produce at the socially optimal level.

    2. Rapid changes like the Grand Banks cod disappearance are referred to as ecosystem collapse, and result from environmental vicious circles. In the Amazon, for example, change may become self-reinforcing due to the positive feedback processespositive feedback (process) A process whereby some initial change sets in motion a process that magnifies the initial change. See also: negative feedback (process).close illustrated in Figure 20.4. Past a certain level of deforestation, the process becomes self-sustaining even without further expansion of farming.

      One way economic growth affects the environment is by degrading it to the point where it is unusable to humans economically and also destroyed environmentally. This can be seen through public resources that anyone has access to like fish in the ocean with the Grand Banks cod disappearance, where people overfished the cod for economic growth until there were no more cod. This not only had devastating effects on the environment, but it also made the area useless economically and hurt the livelihoods of thousands of fishermen.

    1. This paper mentions that "inequality in the modern world largely results from the uneven dissemination and adoption of technologies"; I agree with this viewpoint as the paper explains how the other factors that could affect global inequality like culture, geography, or ignorance are incorrect. It also makes sense that adoption of technologies would cause economic growth and be the most influential factor since technology will affect productivity much more than things like culture or geography; new machines would increase the productivity of farmers far more than simply a better work ethic. Because of this, I feel that the main factor that causes economic growth and development is adoption of technologies.