Diary of a flipped teacher - Second Saturday. Just one student has commented.
:(
Diary of a flipped teacher - Second Saturday. Just one student has commented.
:(
Q̶u̶e̶ ̶n̶a̶d̶a̶,̶ ̶e̶s̶t̶e̶ ̶t̶e̶x̶t̶o̶ ̶é̶ ̶m̶i̶t̶o̶l̶ó̶g̶i̶c̶o̶.̶ ̶U̶a̶u̶!̶
A Internet, com sua natureza multicultural e multilinguística, converte-se em excelente ferramenta para o ensino do inglês em sua dimensão sistêmica de regras e normas, além de promover e facilitar a comunicação entre os aprendizes das mais diversas culturas.
A autora pontua que ferramentas (aplicações) demonstram valia e até quando poderão ser utilizadas, sempre nas nuvens.
Para Magda Soares (2003), a alfabetização refere-se ao aprendizado de uma técnica.
Sobre o assunto, abordado de forma mais específica, recomendamos a leitura do texto "Media and Information Literacy", da UNESCO.
participação em discussões entre membros de comunidade Internet;
Esta discussão pode ser escrita, fílmica ou gravada, independe da mídia ou do sistema semiótico. Tomemos por exemplo a plataforma disqus, ou esta que utilizamos neste momento, a Hypothesis.
O advento da Internet, a rede mundial de computadores, trouxe também uma mudança radical no comportamento das pessoas.
Importante ressaltar que, ao que parece, na conjuntura de publicação deste texto inexistiam smartphones.
um crescente e precioso auxílio, oriundo das novas tecnologias de informação e comunicação em ambientes de ensino-aprendizagem.
Que elementos pontuamos em sala de aula: ISTE, Coursera, Edx, Apple for Education, Facebook for Education, Microsoft Edu (e seus diversos projetos anteriores), Adobe Education, etc.
and which Hegel called "the epic of the middle-class world" -- is perceived by its would-be executioners as the virulent carrier of the patriarchal, colonial, canonical, proprietary, hierarchical and authoritarian values of a past that is no longer with us.
Great comment! In fact we have thousand new publishing methods (Scribd, Issuu, Epub, PDF, etc.) nowadays, and this is an implosion of old formats when we think about "classical-modern" literature.
As the ryber prefix indicates, the text is seen as a machine-not metaphorically but as a mechanical device for the production and consumption of verbal signs. Just as a film is useless without a projector and a screen, so a text must consist of a material medium as well as a collection of words. The machine, of course, is not complete without a third party, the (human) operator, and it is within this triad that the text takes place. (21)
It must, at minimum sense, to be operated by the human choice, click, pause, play, etc. I really forgot this ability we have.
"A cybertext is a machine for the production of variety of expression." This includes works in which texts can be added by the reader, or in which texts can be generated differently from fixed initial materials, or in which connections between texts can change in different states of the work.
Whoa! It's really a great definition to think about GIF literature and related stuff, for example. :D
Just as the WTh1P (Windows, Icons, Menus, and Pointers) interfaces of modern computers provide a context for much digital literature, it is also important to note that other digital literature embeds its computation and data in utterly different contexts. Perhaps it will help clarify the issues if we ask ourselves another puzzling question, such as one first posed to me by Roberto Simanowski: How do we understand the difference benveen Guillaume Apollinaire's "Il Pleut" and Camille Utterback and Romy Achituv's Text Rain? Apollinaire's poem is made up of letters falling down the page like rain. Utterback and Achituv's installation takes a video image of the audience standing before it and projects that image on the wall in front of the audience, Vlith the addition (m the video scene) of the letters of a poem falling down like rain and resting on the bodies of their readers. Obviously, one difference is the passage of time in Text Rain1 and another difference is that Text Rain is audience interactive (lifting up a hand on which letters rest causes them to be raised as well). But, at least as fundamentally, another difference is that Text Rain is situated in a physical space other than a printed page or a computer screen, in which the method of interactiori is the movement of the readers' bodies (which are represented within the work itself).
We should deepen this point of discussion. The book as its only support was in fact trying to be re-signified (mirrored reading, page disposition, text flow). E-literature presents itself as an intersemiotic active support, as the Raymond Queneau digital version of A hundred thousand billion sonnets we've seen on http://www.growndodo.com/wordplay/oulipo/10%5E14sonnets.html.
Raymond Queneau's One Hundred Thousand Billion Poems (1961). This work consists of ten sonnets, each of 14 lines. While one might expect, then, that this work would be more suitably titled Ten Poems1 there is something in the construction of each poem that causes the number of potential poems to be much larger than ten. To wit: a reader can construct alternate poems by reading the first line of any of the original sonnets, followed by the second line of any sonnet, followed by the third line of any sonnet--and find that the whole work is artfully constructed so that any reading of this sort produces a sonnet that functions syntactically, metrically, and in its rhyme scheme. And here we see combinatory literature as (rndependently) discovered by a writer. Strachey's generator contains many more possible variations in each few lines of output, but there need be nothing artful in the selection of words-a thesaurus search for terms related to love will do the trick. Queneau's Poems, on the other hand, is a high-wire act of writing. He has created a process, but a process that only works when real attention is given to the words.
Maybe you would like to read "Un conte a votre façõn, by Raymond Queneau. It's digital version is an updated/upgraded version of the printed "traditional" one. I think you're going to love. It's free and online here: www.e-critures.org/conte/
<3 Thanks to Prof. Mark Sample, DavidsonX and Hypothesis.
You would also like to read "Un conte à votre façon, by Raymond Queneau". It's is a short story guided by the reader. In the printed "traditional" version the story comes forth and back by the answers of the reader and the movement of pages. In the digital "post-modern" versions you have an extra "soundtrack" and the same pages dynamic.
You can read it for free here: http://www.e-critures.org/conte/
<3 Thanks, Hypothesis, Prof. Mark Sample, and DavidsonX.
the love letter generator's more restrained combinatory vocabulary made it possible for most (rather than only a few) words to change from output to output. It is clear, however, from Strachey's contribution to Encounte0 that he also understood the other side of combinatory literaturethe view of the system itself when one steps back from the individual outputs, the remarkable diversity that can be produced by a simple plan.
E-literature is sometimes best explained by the term "combinatory literature", take a look at #Newspaper Blackout. :)
the love letter generator
This is pure art, poetry, and technology altogether. \o/
That summer he developed-'With some aesthetic advice from his sister Barbara, using Turing's random number generator, and perhaps in collaboration 'With Turing-a Mark I program that created combinatory love letters. This was the first piece of digital literature, and of digital art, predating by a decade the earliest examples of digital computer art from recent surveys (e.g., Paul).
It's the time you say to yourself: "you gotta watch The Imitation Game now".
I mean literary work that requires the digital computation performed by laptops, desktops, servers, cellphones, game consoles, interactive environment controllers, or any of the other computers that surround us.
When we were asked for a definition to Electronic Literature I haven't read this text yet. Now, that I got this highlight here, I feel even more confident about the definition I've written to this subject (some past exercises before). In fact I have spent some researches about digital-electronic literature while accomplishing my masters in theory of literature, but after reading Noah Wardrip and watching the classes of Professor Mark Sample I feel extremely eager to study more about E-literature. Thanks!