ECU Digital Tools Checklist.pdf
The checklist feels too extensive for what we would ask a student to do. Suggest pairing it back alot or sticking with the 3 S style of short evaluation. Just Part B comparison for example.
4 Matching Annotations
- Dec 2025
-
courses.ecu.edu.au courses.ecu.edu.au
-
-
courses.ecu.edu.au courses.ecu.edu.au
-
how to acknowledge AI use
I feel like the title discussing transparency doesn't completely match the content. Should it be discussing and acknowledging.
-
-
courses.ecu.edu.au courses.ecu.edu.au
-
Exploring bias in AI
I think this is a good opportunity to have an activity that relates to bias in written articles and the need to check facts. https://ecu.au.libguides.com/generative-ai/limitations
-
-
courses.ecu.edu.au courses.ecu.edu.au
-
AI gives you a list of journal articles to use in your research. Two references look unfamiliar, but you include them without checking. What is the best description of this behaviour?
It's more likely students will ask AI a question on a research topic and within the answer false references will emerge. Student then need to verify them. It's also unlikely students would look at a list of references and then not recognise a few. Likely they would not recognise any if they haven't done any searching of journals. All of this practice is dishonest, not just potentially. Add link to Library evaluating outputs page. https://ecu.au.libguides.com/generative-ai/critical-assessment
-