He painted those fighting peacocks — the just-plain-angry ones, not Waterston's gut-wrenching birds
I think those fighting peacocks are symbolic of something else.
He painted those fighting peacocks — the just-plain-angry ones, not Waterston's gut-wrenching birds
I think those fighting peacocks are symbolic of something else.
"She chides him about that and says, 'You know, Jimmy, a gentleman's house isn't an exhibition' — meaning: Get out there and make some money and make some things that are going to sell," says Glazer. "And so, always listening to his mother — Whistler was kind of a Momma's boy — he did invite the press in to watch him work in the Peacock Room."
His mother loves him very much. In order to reduce his mother's concerns, he listened to his mother's advice. I think he was not only a talented artist but also is a good son.
and the 2,000 pounds that Whistler wanted to be paid for it (about a quarter of a million dollars today)
Such a big number for him.
"Whistler talks about being up on the scaffolding at 6 in the morning and not coming down until 9 at night," says Glazer. " 'I'm blind with sleep and blue peacock feathers,' he says."
'6am to 9 pm' we can see that Whistler spent a lot of time and attention to decorating this room, it is successful because he was passion on it.
The patron asked the artist to just make some modest adjustments in his new dining room. Glazer says Whistler put a few wavy dabs of gold paint here, some metal color there, "and everyone was very happy with that."
I can imagine the sense of harmony of blue and gold
The most vivid, even yuck-making example is what Waterston's done to Whistler's two golden peacocks; in this remix, the birds aren't just fighting, they're eviscerating each other.
It is vivid, butI think this is quite 'excessive interpretation', why he thinks it in a negative way?
Waterston says. "It is so filled with excess and this incredible consumption, this insatiable consumption of the object and of aesthetics."
That why we call it art.
Here, Waterston says he wanted to show the volatility of beauty.
It shows that the idea development and why he wants to design this like that.
"There's a sense of danger," says Waterston. He seems cheerful and sweet, but don't be fooled: "My work absolutely has a perversity," he says. "There's always an underbelly to it."
Everything have advantage and disadvantage. Maybe that is Wabi-sabi.
The original room feels claustrophobic in its excess. The remix feels scary as if there's been an earthquake and another tremor is coming any minute.
This room looks gorgeous but ordinary, but I feel depressed and stressful through the message.
which means "dirty money." This "Peacock Room Remix" looks as if a wrecking ball has been slammed into Whistler's work. The priceless Asian vases in the original are smashed — their shards litter the floor.
Is a negative design? or just someone's own opinion.
Sackler Museum of Asian Art
Whistler paints his wealthy patron as a golden peacock, at one end of the dining room. Nearby, another peacock — representing the "poor" artist. "They're actually in a face-off," Glazer says.
Two peacocks represent two different groups of artists. I think this is very meaningful.
The Peacock Room is a gorgeous, gilded cage. "You have no sense whatsoever of the outside world," says Glazer. "It's a world in which art has completely overtaken life."
So agree with this.
Even though it's a room, it's really a six-sided painting that you literally walk into. ... You have no sense whatsoever of the outside world. It's a world in which art has completely overtaken life
'The Peacock Room' is a room but it also is a artwork.
"Blue is my favorite color, and whenever I wear jewelry it's gold,"
Blue and gold are the main colours.
Freer Gallery
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/tour/museums/freer-gallery-art/
Peacock Room
After watch this video I have better understanding about Peacock Room. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ATaaVkiYmc
The Peacock Room at the Freer Gallery is an actual dining room from London, decorated by James McNeill Whistler in 1876. Its blue-green walls are covered with golden designs and painted peacocks. Gilded shelves hold priceless Asian ceramics. It's an expensive, lavish cocoon, rich in beauty with a dab of menace.
It is a great design, the designer mixed the culture between western and eastern, and makes them really balance.
Filthy Lucre
Is from Bible? sorry about that I still confuse about it, According to the internet show that 'The English word "lucre" originated from a French word, lucre, which itself originated from a Latin word, lucrum, which meant to gain or to profit'.
nouveau-riche
According to Wikipedia, "Nouveau riche" is a term, usually derogatory, to describe those whose wealth has been acquired within their own generation, rather than by familial inheritance. The equivalent English term is the "new rich" or "new money" (in contrast with "old money").
But, for a great spell that peaked in the Peacock Room, he achieved a unity of avant-garde spirit and civil decorum which, like other abandoned experiments from the artistic laboratory of the late nineteenth century—now that modernism is defunct—newly excites.
I admit that it is a great design, but now it is out of the time.
Whistler missed the express train to modernism when he moved from Paris to London, in the eighteen-sixties, and set up as a bad-boy darling of high society—suing John Ruskin for a negative review, volleying zingers with Oscar Wilde, and, having taxed the Victorians’ scant indulgence of self-promoting upstarts, becoming a frequent laughingstock.
At that time, the rapid development of culture led him to miss modernism.
Oscar Wilde
Japanese aesthetics
French Impressionists
https://www.pariscityvision.com/en/giverny/the-impressionnists
Sheer sensibility, innocent of scholarship, was Freer’s ideal, as it had been Whistler’s—a solvent for the exoticism of Eastern cultures as they challenged Western imaginations. In the room’s artificial but passionate paradise, East is West, and vice-versa, without the slightest whiff of either sentimentality or condescension.
In that period, most of artist and collector are interest in western artwork or architecture, except Whistler, he combined the merits of Eastern and Western cultures and did not violate the sense of harmony.
Freer’s highly varied, largely age-worn authentic pots are better art than Leyland’s china, which was, for the most part, export ware from the Kangxi period of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.
In Europe at that time, the most of the china was from the Qing Dynasty.
He closed the room’s three sets of tall shutters, and painted them and the walls Prussian blue and resonant blue-greens, gilded the shelving, covered the neo-Gothic ribbed ceiling (nearly fourteen feet high) in overlapping petals of Dutch metal (brass oxidizing to green and gold), and filled every incidental surface with freehand abstract patterns and images of peacocks in gold and blue. The whole plainly anticipates Art Nouveau, but without that style’s rote longueurs. It realizes a synesthetic fusion of dazzling spectacle and intimate touch, evoking music and something like a subliminal, ambrosial perfume. Seeing the room as the reinstallation was being completed, with the shutters open, I got to gauge the impact when they were closed. It was like the onset of a deep bass chord out of Wagner. Illuminated by eight pendant ceiling fixtures (which I wish could be gaslights again, as they were in 1877), the room seemed at once to fall asleep and to come fully alert, vividly dreaming.
This is the process of build this room, but I think it's hard to imagine the room just by the sentences because the pictures that are built on people's mind are different.
with walls covered in embossed and floral-patterned, bright-yellow leather
This is creative and very Victorian‘s style aesthetic.
but his relationship with Whistler had ended in 1879—as had his marriage to Frances, perhaps partly owing to her at least emotional closeness to the artist. Further ancient gossip holds that Thomas Jeckyll was driven mad by Whistler’s overhaul of his design, but it seems that the architect’s mental illness was organic.
I think most of the artists' marriage is not good. I guess it is because their ideas are too ethereal and dreamy.
in a style that was notionally Oriental, to accommodate Leyland’s porcelains, and had hung, over the fireplace, his early Whistler painting of a celebrated beauty of the day, Christina Spartali, as “The Princess from the Land of Porcelain” (1864-65)
White lady plays dress-up in Whistler's Rose and Silver: The Princess from the Land of Porcelain. Japan was all the rage at this point and served as inspiration for this Caucasian woman’s wardrobe.
Symphony in Flesh Color and Pink
'For the wife of his chief patron of the 1870s, Whistler created an Aesthetic masterpiece in which subject and setting form one harmonious visual field. The gossamer fabrics of Frances Leyland’s gown, which Whistler himself designed, seem to dissolve into a formless passage of paint at the bottom of the picture.' In my opinion. the tone of this picture is pink, it makes me feel warm and comfortable.
Leyland’s collection was long gone by then
Because it is from a long time ago, has the 'The Peacock Room' ceased to exist? So they make a fake one in the museum? Sorry I didn't understand. I think this can be explained more clearly.
Freer Gallery, a museum rich in Asian and Islamic art, in Washington, D.C.
“Harmony in Blue and Gold: The Peacock Room,”
I've seen this room before it is amazing. The mixed culture between eastern and western such as the gold wall with china, an England lady wearing Kimono. This type of aesthetics was not common in that period. https://artsandculture.google.com/asset/harmony-in-blue-and-gold-the-peacock-room-detail/SgFj2oqxaI774A?ms=%7B%22x%22%3A0.5%2C%22y%22%3A0.5%2C%22z%22%3A9.21864028647534%2C%22size%22%3A%7B%22width%22%3A1.8333333333333337%2C%22height%22%3A1.2375000000000003%7D%7D
A mania for things Asian raged in England then, in concert with the aestheticist movement—a reaction, exalting unalloyed beauty, against the moralistic constraints of Victorian taste.
His style is 'Asian style' we can see lots of Japanese style in his collection. Here is the website we can see a young Western lady wearing Kimono. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/the-story-behind-the-peacock-rooms-princess-159271229/
Frederick Leyland
Frederick Richards Leyland was one of the largest British shipowners, running 25 steamships in the transatlantic trade. He was also a major art collector, who commissioned works from several of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood painters. Leyland's first commissions were to Dante Gabriel Rossetti and James McNeill Whistler, and date from 1864 and 1867.
James McNeill Whistler altered
'James Abbott McNeill Whistler changed the course of art history with his radical techniques and adoption of Asian design principles, which emphasised a two-dimensional flattening of painted forms and their arrangement into abstract patterns. A London-based expatriate, Whistler embraced and promoted the doctrine that art should not serve narrative, but rather project the artist’s subjective feelings through the handling of the medium. His revolutionary methods changed existing approaches to oil paint, pastel, watercolour, etching—even interior design and the decorative arts. The flat, expressive, and radically simplified forms in his Venice pastels, and his use of fluid blue and gray pigments in his abstract nocturnes, altered how his contemporaries like Édouard Manet and Edgar Degas saw and understood art'.
James McNeill Whistler altered
https://www.artsy.net/artist/james-abbott-mcneill-whistler?page=1&sort=-partner_updated_at
Japanese philosophy/aesthetic
https://uxplanet.org/japanese-aesthetic-principles-digital-product-design-and-top-gun-c13abf130d05
don’t let them crowd out your life — don’t prioritize aesthetic order over spontaneous afternoon delight on a newly upholstered sofa or having your geriatric neighbor cruise over for chocolate fondue.
I think this is the best realm of life.
Wabi-sabi should never be a rationalization to quit trying. But we all have to let some things go
https://www.apartmenttherapy.com/decorating-the-wabisabi-way-70317
There is more beauty associated with letting nature, and inevitable decay, take its course
The beauty of nature growing and wane are perfect. Don't deliberately pursue perfection.
That’s wabi-sabi — embracing the imperfect and the impermanence of nature... and life. I have a casual familiarity with this Japanese philosophy/aesthetic, but my takeaway is to enjoy the transience of everything. Perfection should never be a goal
I think perfection is not a goal, perfect is the process in our life.
A house is really only a stage for your life and the lives of your loved ones.
I think this is a very poetic sentence because Kathryn told us that the house is just a stage and that the people who live in the house need to perform. What most important things are the process that we experience on the stage (house), it is called life.
One of the reasons I always love rehabilitating “ruined” properties is because I will not obliterate the patina of age — I honor it and respect it as a reminder of what’s truly important
I'm confuse with this? Does she mean that there are many memories of past life in this old house? and she loves to fix it because she respects the memories.
Generations that went through war and deprivation understand that what’s important is life, and not aesthetics
I'm sure that the old generation is different with the young generation because they experience the struggle period and understand that which one is important (pf course is life). But now, the majority of countries are no war, so people start pursuit of aesthetics.
Getting everything to match and conform seamlessly to some ideal of perfection was never an option for me.
I am so agree with this!!! Because even human beings are not perfect, everything has its own advantages and disadvantages. We need to learn to accept and enjoy the perfect and the imperfect in our life.
I never had to unlearn this style because I’ve never been fastidious, thank God. I’ve never let a warped floorboard ruin my life. My aesthetic yardstick is, and always has been, comfort. Who cares if the table tops are not quite true? If the scale of upholstered furniture is slightly off? If some turned table legs are cabriolet and others are claw and ball?
This is wabi-sabi, which is to accept everything thing even it is not perfect. She is not pursuing excessive perfection, and she enjoys the flaws in her life. Because the lives belong yours, you cannot let un-perfect things ruin your mood.
Earth’s bastion of hyper-personal grooming and size zeros cruising around with flutes of un-drunk champagne. The décor equivalent of this Angeleno would be a monochromatic white on white living room with blonde on blonde furnishings, everything lined up and relined up, all square, with cadres of cushions and pillows fluffed and dented, coffee table art books perfectly stacked into pyramids and never cracked. And walls mirrored to maximize the impact of perfection through infinity
When I read this text, I can generally imagine what the room looks like. But I think it is too illusory.
If a room isn’t inviting, what’s the point? Nevertheless, people still chase those perfect rooms. (Be careful, because you can’t actually do it and it’s no fun if you can.)
The author then explains the disadvantage of ‘over-pursuit of perfection’. It cannot be denied that there is a group of people who only pursue aesthetics but do not pursue spiritual satisfaction.
“Perfect”
Does all of the people know what is perfect? Is that mean everything being orderliness? or means you got everything you want? We can't define what is perfect, I think my understanding of perfect is when I first time see it and makes me feel comfortable. Different people have different opinion.
“drop” a glass of red wine onto the rug and then grind a little foie gras into the stain immediately, so that you can get it over with and start living.
Art comes from life.
more fear. Instead of waiting for wear and tear to happen naturally, throw something imperfect into the tableau so the wait’s over.
I agree with this view, because not all of the things are perfect, and designers can‘t design 100% perfect works. I think the too much human intervention will make the whole design looks unreal.
“Perfect” interior décor can be captivating in photographs, but underlying the flawless arrangement of drapery, wallpaper and furnishings is a palpable fear of anticipation
In my perspective, I think it is depent on the light lamp, the colour could be cold or warm. We often see a lot of perfect interior decoration online or in the magazines. It may depend on photographers or use photoshop.
Visually perfect in every way,but ultimately inhospitable. No oxygen left in the composition for laughter or old people or anyone who doesn’t have perfect balance. No room for kids or dogs. No place to live.
The author believes that a house without family members or pets is not a complete home. I agree with what she said because I think there are many of the interior decorations are particularly beautiful, but they do not look like homes. Instead, they look like a palace.
Every now and then, a client will tell me how they want their home to look, and I cringe, because they’re describing a pristine museum-like set piece scenario.
Some clients are too demanding about the house, it will make designers find it difficult and embarrassing.
By Kathryn M. Ireland
Born in England and raised in London and Scotland, Kathryn Ireland arrived in Los Angeles in 1986. Prior to launching her interior design business in the early '90s, Kathryn was an actress, clothing designer, and filmmaker. Today she is considered one of the most influential interior and textile designers in the world. https://www.kathrynireland.com/
Wabi-Sabi
Wabi-sabi is a Japanese-style aesthetic, and it is normally is imperfect. The beauty of wabi-sabi is sometimes described as "imperfect, impermanent, incomplete." It is derived from the concept of Buddhism.
Self-checkout debuted in 1992, just a few years before the World Wide Web made online shopping widely accessible to everyone. Amazon and eBay, both launched in 1995, taught us to be even more self-sufficient shoppers—at this point, the two Internet giants offer everything you’d find at Wal-Mart and more. Other online retailers, like Zappos and ModCloth, focus on the kinds of fashion you’d find at department stores. Of course, Wal-Mart, Target, Kmart, Nordstrom, Macy’s, JCPenney, Sears, and IKEA all offer robust selections online as well. In exchange for all this convenience, perhaps we’re less concerned making a mistake, by wasting our money ordering the wrong thing.
It depends on the consumer groups. Self-checkout can save time, and online shopping can save time. But for the elderly and children, it seems that in-store shopping is more convenient.
Eames shell chair
Eames shell chair is common in everyday life: https://www.hermanmiller.com/products/seating/side-chairs/eames-molded-plastic-chairs/
William Pahlmann
William Carroll Pahlmann was a New York-based, mid-twentieth-century interior designer who popularized the eclectic style of design. https://www.architecturaldigest.com/story/pahlmann-article-012000 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Pahlmann
Eventually, malls became all about pleasure and replaced grocery stores with food courts, arcades, movie theaters, and specialized retail.
Many shopping malls have changed, firstly they only sell clothes and then become a multi-purpose mall. If you are tired and hungry, you can go get some food on the ground floor. If the child is noisy, you can bring them to the children's area. To be honest, I will spend one day to relax and shopping in that shopping mall.
Initially, they would still expect those people to come into the city store on occasion. But by the ’60s, stores started to realize people weren’t coming in to downtown anymore; they were staying at their suburban locations. Those branches were outperforming the city stores. Sometimes companies even closed down the city stores.”
They have to know the target market, not all of people live in the city, there are maybe people live in remote suburbs, shopping is inconvenient for them. Many shops are open in the suburbs is undoubtedly convenient to the majority of people.
For example, Loewy employed a combination of incandescent and new fluorescent lighting, as well as spotlights, to emphasize particular items for sale. Wood says, “he created an atmosphere where people’s eyes would feel relaxed, and they could be directed towards certain products.”
Not only need to know how customers feel when they shopping, all the details in the shopping mall must be noticed, including whether the lights are comfortable or not. I think that if you want to make a department store become famous, you have to go beyond the other stores in the details of the design.
“The Raymond Loewy plan wasn’t just about the aesthetics,” Wood says. “He did in-depth studies of how these department stores functioned including what managers and salespeople were doing. He’d basically present the store with a plan on the best way to run their business. He found that people wanted to be able to go into a store and not have to wait for help. They wanted to be able to see everything in stock. They wanted to be able to have it instantly, and that’s what would facilitate selling.”
The process of how does Raymond Loewy develops his plan. It definitely will attracting the customer.
most notably Jock Peters, who designed each department to reflect the emotional tone of the goods it offered. Because the experience of the design was such a priority, clothes and accessories were displayed in flat glass cases on rosewood stands or on live mannequins so that hanging racks wouldn’t interfere with the view.
In this way, the products can be better displayed. Because they have to suit changing customer tastes, many department stores have to adopt new marketing strategies.
A.T. Stewart
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Alexander-Turney-Stewart
the department stores offered and displayed more, like the same purse in five colors. There was a new desire to let shoppers see and touch all the merchandise. Before this change, department stores would have everything behind the glass case, with just one sample out. You’d have to ask the salesgirl, ‘Hey, do you have any other colors?,’ and she would search the stockroom for you. The new stores would have had everything out so shoppers could walk around, see it all, and then choose something on their own and take it to the sales counter.”
I think this is very reasonable, because it saves time for both parties and guests are free to shop.
Modular and movable, they could house stock within them and grow or shrink, depending on the merchandise that you wanted to display that season or that month.”
This invention is undoubtedly successful and it is more convenient for shopping. Until now, there are still many shopping malls are like this.
Victorian department store
There are some images of Victorian department store https://www.rtbookreviews.com/blog/124677/lisa-kleypas-talks-victorian-department-stores
Victorian department stores were not only sectioned off into myriad departments, they were also dark, crowded places, with merchandise stuffed in imposing glass cases and dense wood furniture
If the surroundings of a shopping mall are poor and dark, the guests will don't want to shopping anymore.
And Loewy’s plan wasn’t just about how shoppers experienced the space, but how the stores could more efficiently sell their merchandise.”
He is a genius, I think this is a really good idea because of the customer can see the products on the escalator rather than in-store. The sales also have more opportunity to sell the products.
With the booming middle class and the introduction of credit cards, the shopping experience is much more about what you can have.”
The issuance of credit cards has also boosted the increase of the economy.
Raymond Loewy
The media called him: 'the man who designed everything'. He was a French-born American industrial designer who achieved fame for the magnitude of his design efforts across a variety of industries. Among his designs were the Shell, Exxon, TWA and the former BP logos, the Greyhound Scenicruiser bus, Coca-Cola vending machines, the Lucky Strike package, Coldspot refrigerators, the Studebaker Avanti and Champion, and the Air Force One livery. He also involved with numerous railroad designs.https://www.theverge.com/2013/11/5/5068132/raymond-loewy-the-man-who-designed-everything
xBut 60 years ago, these same department stores, particularly the new branches installed in fledging suburban shopping malls, were the way to the future.
The pace of economic development is so fast, people from 60 years ago would never have thought that online shopping became so popular in just a few decades.
It seems that the 2008 recession and dominance of the Internet—where you can buy anything and everything with a few clicks
Online shopping began to being popular since 2008, which is undoubtedly a big loss to shopping malls. People can buy everything online, and send the product to their homes. As online shopping becomes more and more developed and convenient, only a small group of people choose in-store shopping.
The once-vibrant shopping mall has one foot in the grave these days. About 20 percent of the 2,000 largest U.S. malls were failing in 2008, and by 2012, only 1,513 remained in operation. Current numbers predict more than 200 existing big malls will collapse in the next 10 years.
The author uses data to show that there are many shopping malls gradually being replaced, many famous department stores are going to close down. Through these data, I speculate that the Internet and online shopping have led to the decline of the real economy. She expects online growth to outpace sales in stores for the foreseeable future.
Sheila Levrant de Bretteville
Sheila Levrant de Bretteville is an American graphic designer, artist and educator whose work reflects her belief in the importance of feminist principles and user participation in graphic design. http://sheilastudio.us/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNDa2RD0aS0 http://www.eyemagazine.com/feature/article/reputations-sheila-levrant-de-bretteville
my classroom is probably filled with 80% women. And yet when I go out into the world, or when you hear from business owners or from creative directors, it’s not the same percentage.
In this website shows that the distance between male and female in Australia, and the image are clearly show that female earn less money than male even they have same job. https://www.humanrights.gov.au/education/face-facts/face-facts-gender-equality-2018
She names a few: oversights in the organization of jury panels, lack of female representation in anthologies and survey publications and a propagation of blogs reinforcing strict ideas of gender.
Yes, I'm agree with this, In order to eliminate gender discrimination, we must start with ourselves first. Now, in many job areas, there are no female representatives. This doesn't mean that women did nothing. Maybe they just not stand out in the public view.
Almost every institution I’ve looked at, the women earned on average anywhere from $5,000 to $10,000 less in the same positions [held by men]. So that inequality we experience generally out in the world is also reflected in education.
I'm being shocked, they are in the same company and did same work but why female earn lower than male? This is unfair, and she says this is normal. I think people should really think about gender discrimination and equality between female and male.
Denise Gonzales Crisp
She is an is professor female designer of Graphic Design. This is some information about her: https://design.ncsu.edu/staff/denise-gonzales-crisp/
Women in Graphic Design
It is unfair if the female designer is good enough, but just because she is a woman so she can not get this job.
young female designers could greatly benefit from a change in the exposure and representation of women in graphic design. “I know from the classroom that student designers are thirsty for diverse insights on design methodologies, outcomes, and advice on how to create a strong life and work balance,” Horne explains. “I’d like to see females become more confident in publishing their process, ideas, and experiences. I see this as a continuity of tradition that we have inherited from the artists and designers who fought hard for us to sit at the table
It is unfair if the female designer is good enough, but just because she is a woman so she can not get this job.
For far too long, history has either marginalised or excluded many women from being entered into the design history books and as a result, the design canon. Whilst acknowledging that over the last decade such gender concerns have begun to be readdressed by historians, educators and the design profession at large, much more can still be done
Gender discrimination exists in many industries.
In the US, some 70% of design students are female, yet their education is scattered with gaps.
As a design student I'm so agree with this because majority of my classmate is female.
Why does design history still teach about male designers 80% more than women designers? Why do we have 80 % women in the student body (in our [RISD] department) and 80% men in the faculty?
The fact is that female designers and teachers are less than men in our real life.
Lucinda Hitchcock is
http://lucindahitchcock.com/ https://www.risd.edu/people/lucinda-hitchcock/ She is a typography, visual and dimensional language, spatial narrative and book designer.
Design history has long overlooked women in our narrative, despite continuously having a large group of women active in the field of graphic design over the past century
In the design field, there are more female students than male students. But female designers who really become designers are much less than male.
There is a line of forgotten women in our history. I argue that sexism is somewhat less obvious in our workplace today, far subtler than it might have been in the 1950s and 60s, but perhaps we still accept some mores of old, underlying currents that flow through our design culture, much like that lecture in 2011.
It may be that sex discrimination is even more severe in the 1950s or 60s. Women are under the pressure and feudal thinking.
sinister pressures of socially-accepted sexism and segregation discouraging, or even disqualifying, the career ambitions of capable women.
I think the reason about why most people have gender discrimination is also from society, cultural, and family influences. For example, a person's mother is a housewife, the only job is to cook, do housework and take care of children, that will also influence that child's mind, they will think that 'my mother has not worked'. There are also many women who choose to work after becoming a housewife for a long period of time. However, they do not understand the workplace anymore. Because they have less contact with society for a long time and they can do nothing. That's why many people have gender discrimination.
In a basic sense, women’s careers have rarely followed the same path of men’s, since there has historically been immense pressure placed on women to be solely homemakers and nurture families (s
I think that all countries in the world cannot achieve gender equality. For many professions, men (even women) are treated them with ‘coloured glasses’. In their mind, they believe female can't do.
In the design field, many women may have been assistants or “office girls” and so few held the top titles, such as art director or creative director.
I'm so agree with this, Most of the movies or TV I have watched are not female directors.
Forty or fifty years ago, the workforce was overwhelmingly a man’s world. In the design field, many women may have been assistants or “office girls” and so few held the top titles, such as art director or creative director. In a basic sense, women’s careers have rarely followed the same path of men’s, since there has historically been immense pressure placed on women to be solely homemakers and nurture families (see: Beyond The Glass Ceiling: an open discussion, Astrid Stavro, Elephant #6) with more sinister pressures of socially-accepted sexism and segregation discouraging, or even disqualifying, the career ambitions of capable women.
The author use percentage to compare female designer in US and UK, which clearly shows that different attitude in two countries. But my question is lots of female chosen study design but how female graphic designer become that a few?
three hundred and twenty-three independent designers listed — twenty-two women. In the history of graphic design, my classmates and I were learning about just twenty-two women. That was only 6% of the overall canon. Surely this was a mistake.
Only 22 female graphic designers in the class?? I think this is a severe imbalance in the curriculum, and it’s not the problem of just one institution. Though there were and are many men to impact the history and world of graphic design, there have been great female designers right alongside them.
Tori Hinn, of Women of Graphic Design
https://forcreativegirls.com/tori-hinn/ She started on the premise of solving the problem of imbalance in Design history. Although the Graphic Design department at RISD, where this project began, is 71% female, only 6% of the designers’ students learn about in Graphic Design history are women.
Combining new transportation methods that encourage the principles of a healthy life style with traditional roads can raise land values, attract investment and activate the urban environment
Improve the speed of economic development and attract more investors. I think this is not just the promotion of the Boris bike, but also the economic development of countries that introduce shared bicycles.
Active transportation routes and linear parks, on the other hand, regenerate their surroundings, bringing activity and value to blighted sections of the city. They also radically alter the political situation for the suburb and its inevitable commute. Of course, the creation of these green networks need not be at the expense of the motorist. On the 10th July London’s Transport Commissioner Peter Hendy launched a study for London that envisaged burying sections of the North and South Circular ring roads, and stretches of road close to the Thames. The initiative would create linear parks overhead, much as the Big Dig did for Boston
Increase the convenience of transportation and promote the development of the suburbs.
“Park + Jog” was treated as a curiosity; we still describe it as a “ utopian scheme.” But nowadays, it seems less and less fanciful.
Only a few people will have such a lifestyle, so I do not quite agree with this proposal.
Fietsenstalling,
https://www.klaverfietsparkeren.nl/producten/fietsenstalling
Imagine that the Boris Bike docking stations outside railway stations and in key public spaces might incorporate general cycle parking.
I believe this is a good idea, but it will be difficult to implement because it is impossible to make all the people accept the bicycles in a short time, the reason is bicycle is not convenient than cars.
Imagine: whilst it may not be possible to ban the car outright, it ought to be possible to keep HGVs and delivery vans out during the day, when their impact on the physical environment and the safety of pedestrians and cyclists is most evident.
The popularity of bicycles can reduce traffic accidents
This monumental feat of engineering offers us the best precedent for the impact the bicycle might have on London or any city for that matter. Cycling offers us, for the first time in more than a century and a half, the chance to build an infrastructure that will bring with it significant public health improvements. In our auto-centric world, we have unprecedented levels of health problems - obesity, diabetes, etc - all associated with our sedentary lifestyles. Cycling should mean a fitter population and a longer life expectancy, which would take pressure off the National Health Service and bring huge economic benefits. It would of course also reduce energy consumption.
Reduce energy consumption and promote sports
For much of its history London had been associated with poor living conditions and disease. By the late 1850s the scale of the city was making things worse: London’s sewage was deposited into the River Thames, out of which the city’s drinking water was being collected.
The pollution of the air and water caused by the industrial revolution.
An Act of Parliament was passed that introduced building inspectors to ensure that buildings be built from brick and not timber (a law which predated the fire, but that hadn’t been enforced)
Wood is flammable and therefore cannot be used as a material for the house.
the Great Fire of 1666.
The Great Fire of London was a major conflagration that swept through the central parts of the English city of London from Sunday, 2 September to Thursday 6 of September 1666. The fire gutted the medieval City of London inside the old Roman city wall. It threatened but did not reach the aristocratic district of Westminster, Charles II's Palace of Whitehall, and most of the suburban slums. It consumed 13,200 houses, 87 parish churches, St Paul's Cathedral, and most of the buildings of the City authorities. It is estimated to have destroyed the homes of 70,000 of the City's 80,000 inhabitants.
Towards the end of my trip, it occurred to me that this explosion in cycling, ought to be put into an historic context, in order to enable the politicians and the public to recognize the scale of the opportunity, the change it might bring to our cities and our lives. Save this picture!
It has promoted the development of the country and gave many office workers and people who love sports an opportunity.
. Indianapolis had recently completed their “Cultural Trail,”
Named "the biggest and boldest step by any American city" by Project for Public Spaces in New York City, this $63 million, internationally-acclaimed 8-mile biking and walking trail connects all six of Indy's Cultural Districts. From Mass Ave to White River State Park and Fountain Square, the trail is a safe, healthy and convenient way to explore the city.
Indianapolis had recently completed their “Cultural Trail,”
When we were in Chicago at the end of June, the city launched its own bike share scheme
580+ stations. 5,800 bikes in Chicago. https://www.divvybikes.com/
city-cycling culture and the political initiatives that are emerging in the US.
Maybe the government started publicity the Boris bike. (?)
I believe so. I believe that cycling might just be the catalyst for a 21st Century urban renaissance.
I agree with this, firstly, this is can save money because we can pay less money to ride the bike. Secondly, you can also exercise by riding a bicycle. Boris bike has become so popular which is shows people's attitudes.
Wikipedia reports that there are 535 cycle-share schemes in 49 countries, employing more than half a million bikes worldwide.
Many people began to choose to ride a bicycle rather than drive, which also shows that people start to notice protection of the environment.
“Boris Bike” - London’s cycle hire scheme,
Some information about Boris Bike: http://www.wired.co.uk/article/boris-bikes-london-redesign-tfl-bike-hire-santander-cycle
There are now more than 8,000 Boris Bikes and 550+ docking stations in Central London. And the trend’s not anomalous to London: Wikipedia reports that there are 535 cycle-share schemes in 49 countries, employing more than half a million bikes worldwide.
The numbers such as '550', 'more than 8000', '535 cycle-share', '49 countries‘, the data shows that 'Boris Bike' is very popular.