Lowood forces the children to actually prey on each other in order tosurvive.
darwinism
Lowood forces the children to actually prey on each other in order tosurvive.
darwinism
institutionalized children who stay healthy actuallygrow stronger.
survival of the fittest, the resources and the ability to go out and exercise in the springtime strengthen them
he devotes onlyabout five paragraphs to narrating the epidemic, and this narrative isinterrupted by Helen’s death of consumption.
the death of helen fits the mold but stands out from the epidemic of the rest of the girls and makes a seperate statement
ice and ticks that lived in dirty clothes.
note the part where brocklehurst only allows the girls one set of clothes
he boys are isolated, abused physically and pittedagainst instructors who are either hostile or helpless. By contrast,Brontë’s Lowood depicts an environment where teachers and studentsally with each other against the patriarchy.
valid but how does that relate to the sickness
Brontë’s sister Maria atCowan Bridge Clergy Daughters’ School,
aha so she did lose someone to the epidemics
ut also because it could not be classifiedmorally.
why do diseases have to be classified morally in the first place
yphoid fever, like cholera, was part of what is nowknown as “The Water Crisis” in England—
so not due to the pooors lack of hygeine but their lack of clean water
yphus
typhoid food and water, typhus fleas
oo, believed disease wascaused by unhealthy places.
her desciption of lowood seems to suggest that she believes the place caused the illness as much as the conditions
Board of Health she envisions in Jane Eyre had a more humaneview of the sick
i hope so. It is kind of sad when a book like jane eyre where more than half of the children died... has a better outlook that reality
by want of sufficiency of food,
similar to lowood school.
“a second wave of cholera developed in Attercliffealong the route taken by the cleansing team
sad
but could be forced to pay the costs for the removal.15
why is it that progress is always at the cost of rights
Unfortunately, ready access to running water meant ready access towater closets,
makes it sound like something that simply must happen in order to learn from it
uberculosisaccounted “for one-third of all deaths from disease in the Victorianperiod.”
makes me wonder if the author might have lost a friend or family member...
Unlike many of their contemporaries who ignoredthe epidemic, Charlotte Brontë made it a point to bring contagiousdiseases to her readers’ attention and to challenge the stigmatizationof the ill,
she challenges a lot...perhaps thats why she didn't use her name
housands of people all over England were dying fromdiseases such as small pox, cholera, typhus, and typhoid fever.
goes back to flannery occonor and not tidying up the world
he or she is likely to die before the end of thenovel.
well thats kinda sad
joy of procreation
why does she focus so little on the fact that jane has children... bronte spends more time addressing the continues relationship with adele who is not jane's own child
not only responsible for her husband’s life, but becoming an extension of his male body as she functions as his eyes and right hand.9
but then why does he get his vision back if he is meant to be dependent on her
for Bertha, that same territory is the only assurance she has for her own survival.
then why kill herself after jane leaves
she must rely on physical acts of violence
okay i suppose
insanity has frequently been ascribed to women who fail to perform housewives’ tasks, or who deviate from the ‘average’ norms of expected behavior.
right so why is bertha the devolved character if we cant really trust her insanity
while situating Rochester as the feminized mate to be won through that competition.
hey thats what i said
fittest”
that seems to imply that jane and bertha are in the male's position of fighting for the mate
The male fear of female sexuality is reflected in Rochester’s treatment of his first wife, Bertha
he doesn't seem to fear it with all his mistresses
passionate, angry
but isn't her passionate nature supposed to be what makes her more evolved
abomination
the more i read this article the morei disagree
They are generally stronger and larger than the females, and are endowed with the requisite qualities of courage and pugnacity.
and yet rochester is considered rather ugly and is a cripple by the time he and jane marry
its training does not improve survival chances beyond its walls.6
but it definitely helps jane, she would never have been able to support herself without her lowood education... maybe that is only because she is so evolved?
However, since these rules are stagnating, in an environment demanding adaptation, Helen cannot survive.
but helen is a lot more accepting of the conditions in the school then jane... she withstood the punishments with calm, she knew her faults and she was very bright and devoted. We have no evidence that Jane handled the conditions at lowood well at only, in fact she may have only survived it because the conditions changed for the better shortly after helen's death
It is this campaign for territory against John Reed that inspires Jane’s aunt to send her to Lowood, thereby freeing her poor son from his little competitor and reestablishing the old natural order.
i never saw it that way but i suppose you could make that arguement
flourish
aha flourishing
assertive, self-validating, and aggressive
but isn't it these same characteristics that later make bertha out to be the savage and less evolved character. What makes bertha and jane different, and does jane even maintain these characteristics as an adult?
“survival of the fittest”
this is true
retreats to an academic sphere
but isn't she forced into retreating to acedemia rather than choosing it, and does she not crave and strive for attention when she can get it.
i.e. the Victorian home
but thornfield is far from your average example of a Victorian home
very culturally-signified perfection ultimately renders her incapable of adapting to the world that creates her,
i do agree with this reading, she is so perfect that there is nothing unique or interesting about her... which makes her poorly adapted because people mostly use women for entertainment and she is boring
methods of surviving
but did jane really do anythig to survive or was she just lucky enough to have a strong immune system?
small society
i wouldn't exactly call lowood a society
developmental in nature;
her heightened mental activity is also evidence of her being more evolved although we don't exactly have anything to compare it to
“different”
this makes sense when you look at how jane constantly situates herself in relation to others, how she seems to handle things better or at the least differently... and also how all of the other characters seem to be representations of some specific role that most men or women of that time didn't stray from
reveals a correlation between the “supernatural” and the markedly devolved figure of Bertha Mason with whom the highly evolved example of Jane comes into direct conflict at Thomfield Hall
everything supernatural is related to Bertha...the less evolved savage... thus we are moved away from that throughout the novel and also in society. But wasn't the church becoming more prominent at this time even with science being more prominant and also one of the most major spiritual moments is when Jane and Rochester connect and it has nothing to do with bertha
Jane Eyre’s place in the gothic genre complicates a realistic and scientific reading of the novel.
as we were discussing briefly in class, there is a clash between the scientific and the mystical/spiritual elements
nfluence of the physical conditions in which it lives. . . . there are authentic instances of a people originally well-formed and good- looking, being brought, by imperfect diet and a variety of physical hardships, to a meaner form
so jane is a representation of flourishing, due to the flourishing of england at the time?
exual selection
so the fact that jane and rochester still want to be together despite them both being deemed unattractive by society is an example of humans evolving to choose a mate for reasons other than just looks.
support
instead of a novel on development, one on evolution... is jane the evolution of bertha?
in writers who probably did not know any science first hand, who could have been ‘influenced’ by Darwin only indirectly”
looking for subconscious influences
Jane Eyre is a Darwinian exploration of sex and gender and the evolutionary competition of nineteenth-century courtship.
so women are evolving and courtship is evolving along with it
it is an experiment in scientific thought
thats interesting?
consequences for defying one’s role within the household
meaning being locked in the attic? i feel like thats an extreme consequence... but then again not many women defied their role
Bertha is both a threat and a warning
agreed
engage with and challenge multi-field and multi-disciplinary conversations.
Victorian studies cannot be an island all its own
The conceptual problems, political quandaries, and theoretical issues they broached remain pressing and contentious.
gender and sexuality
rethinking of form and formalism.
didn't Utell mention something about the works we are studying having interesting forms??
tout court
with no addition, simply
If many of us share a dissatisfaction with the state of the field, we also internally disagree about how it might otherwise be shaped.
this makes me feel better about my confusion.
originating in our period
so thinking about the period through the lens of what we know today
institutional mode is the instrumentalist evisceration of humanistic ways of knowing.
lots of big words here... is it saying that by focusing on only the surface of the period they erase the human dynamic and the motives behind the events taking place? or is it suggesting that the disembowelment of ways of knowing is opening it up to the eyes of readers... i think that is making more sense. I'm still a little confused about if this mode of inquiry is being supported or criticized?
It fails to
take into account the grand scheme of things/the full picture
The serial killer known as Jack the Ripper
i think i saw a crime show based on this
Clean water, sanitation, and public health facilities were inadequate;
growth/progress failing to meet demands of growing population
English family life increasingly became compartmentalised
similar to the seperate social spheres for men and women, work and home were kept seperate
increase in numbers
see ^
The Victorian frame of mind is largely composed of their characteristic modes of thought and feeling
makes sense as the middle class is usually the largest so once they had more time to be involved politically rather than just work, they had a good influence
The long-term effect of the reform movements was to tightly link the nonconformist element with the Liberal party
whoosh...?
Railways had a major impact on industrialization.
And industrialization had a lot of impact on society, hence on literature.
Natural history became increasingly an "amateur" activity. Particularly
People had a lot of free time then
and Oscar Wilde's The Picture of Dorian Gray (1891).
Should be an interesting read then
Separate spheres,
not necessarily below just seperate
extension of scientific assumptions
This kind of answers my question, they felt social problems should be solved more scientifically rather than based on religion.
Nonconformists fighting bitterly against the established status of the Church of England, especially regarding education and access to universities and public office.
it seems like the church was having a positive effect on these changes, so why so much push back?
Their movement, often called "Philosophic Radicalism," fashioned a formula for promoting the goal of "progress" using scientific rationality, and businesslike efficiency, to identify, measure, and discover solutions to social problems.
I feel like we could use some of this today
rapid rise of the middle class, in large part displacing the complete control long exercised by the aristocracy.
I find this interesting since (at least in jane eyre) there seemed to be a lot of reflection of aristocracy in the novel
Britain was a plenipotentiary at the Treaty of Berlin
a lot of treaties and acts being passed affecting multiple countries
The princely states were not affected and remained under British guidance.[17]
So basically Britian was getting a lot more land/power and after this im guessing stuff kinda went quiet politically?
There were unprecedented demographic changes: the population of England and Wales almost doubled from 16.8 million in 1851 to 30.5 million in 1901,[3] and Scotland's population also rose rapidly, from 2.8 million in 1851 to 4.4 million in 1901.
people have lots of kids in peaceful/prosperous times (following war)
sensibilities
it keeps reminding me of sense and sensibility
romanticism and even mysticism with regard to religion, social values, and arts
interesting that romanticism is matched with the higher moral values rather than rationalism.
The period was peaceful among the Great Powers
Focus on internal change rather than changing their presence in the world
There was a strong religious drive for higher moral standards
I'm wondering what happened in the Georgian period that made them want higher morals?