70 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2018
    1. To understand why autism is next to non-existent for the Amish, consider that the Amish have been “cut off” from American scientific and medical “progress” for centuries, thus they’

      Exaggerated/minimized claims

      Highlight where the author uses exaggerations/minimizations or seems to represent things in a proportional manner

    2. Exaggerated/minimized claims

      Does the author use exaggerations/minimizations or generally seems to represent situations and events in a proportional manner?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.17.01:Yes, there are a mix of exaggerations and minimizations", "1.17.02:Yes, there are exaggerations", "1.17.03:Yes, there are minimizations", "1.17.04:No, the text seems generally proportional (avoids exaggeration and minimization)" ]</div>

    3. Emotional valence

      Is the language extremely negative, extremely positive, or somewhere in the middle?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.16.01:Extremely negative", "1.16.02:Somewhat negative", "1.16.03:Neither negative nor positive", "1.16.04:Somewhat positive", "1.16.05:Extremely positive" ]</div>

    4. e. In fact, the recent autism spectrum disorder (ASD) spike over the past two decades in the USA

      Acknowledgement of uncertainty

      Highlight uncertainty example

    5. Acknowledgement of uncertainty

      Does the author acknowledge uncertainty, or the possibility things might be otherwise?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.15.01:Yes", "1.15.02:Sort of", "1.15.03:No" ]</div>

    6. Confidence in claims made by sources

      To what extent does the author's confidence in claims made by sources seem justified?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.14.01:Completely justified", "1.14.02:Mostly justified", "1.14.03:Somewhat justified", "1.14.04:Slightly justified", "1.14.05:Not at all justified" ]</div>

    7. Other types of sources

      Are any experts, organizations, or studies separate from the central study quoted in the article?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.13.01:Yes", "1.13.02:No" ]</div>

    8. Types of sources

      Does the article cite sources?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.08a.01:Yes", "1.08a.02:No" ]</div>

    9. Single study?

      Is the article primarily about a single scientific study?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.07.01:Yes", "1.07.02:No" ]</div>

    10. The Amish, who don’t get vaccinated, rarely get autism, cancer, or heart disease – coincidence?

      Clickbaitiness

      What clickbait techniques does this headline employ?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.05.01:Listicle (\"6 Tips on ...\")", "1.05.02:Cliffhanger to a story (\"You Won't Believe What Happens Next\")", "1.05.03:Provoking emotions, such as shock or surprise (\"...Shocking Result\", \"...Leave You in Tears\")", "1.05.04:Hidden secret or trick (\"Fitness Companies Hate Him...\", \"Experts are Dying to Know Their Secret\")", "1.05.05:Challenges to the ego (\"Only People with IQ Above 160 Can Solve This\")", "1.05.06:Defying convention (\"Think Orange Juice is Good for you? Think Again!\", \"Here are 5 Foods You Never Thought Would Kill You\")", "1.05.07:Inducing fear (\"Is Your Boyfriend Cheating on You?\")", "1.05.08:Other" ]</div>

    11. The Amish, who don’t get vaccinated, rarely get autism, cancer, or heart disease – coincidence?

      Clickbaitiness

      Is the headline clickbaity?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.04.01:Very much clickbaity", "1.04.02:Somewhat clickbaity", "1.04.03:A little bit clickbaity", "1.04.04:Not at all clickbaity" ]</div>

    12. The Amish, who don’t get vaccinated, rarely get autism, cancer, or heart disease – coincidence?

      Title Representativeness

      Please describe other ways in which the title is not representative

      Answer: [[test answer]]

    13. The Amish, who don’t get vaccinated, rarely get autism, cancer, or heart disease – coincidence?

      Title Representativeness

      How is the title unrepresentative? (select all that apply)

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.03.01:Title is on a different topic than the body", "1.03.02:Title emphasizes different information than the body", "1.03.03:Title carries little information about the body", "1.03.04:Title takes a different stance than the body", "1.03.05:Title overstates claims or conclusions in the body", "1.03.06:Title understates claims or conclusions in the body", "1.03.07:Other" ]</div>

    14. The Amish, who don’t get vaccinated, rarely get autism, cancer, or heart disease – coincidence?

      Title Representativeness

      Does the title of the article accurately reflect the content of the article?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.02.01:Completely Unrepresentative", "1.02.02:Somewhat Unrepresentative", "1.02.03:Somewhat Representative", "1.02.04:Completely Representative" ]</div>

    15. Overall Credibility

      Rate your impression of the credibility of this article

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.01.01:Very low credibility", "1.01.02:Somewhat low credibility", "1.01.03:Medium credibility", "1.01.04:Somewhat high credibility", "1.01.05:High credibility" ]</div>

    1. Exaggerated/minimized claims

      Does the author use exaggerations/minimizations or generally seems to represent situations and events in a proportional manner?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.17.01:Yes, there are a mix of exaggerations and minimizations", "1.17.02:Yes, there are exaggerations", "1.17.03:Yes, there are minimizations", "1.17.04:No, the text seems generally proportional (avoids exaggeration and minimization)" ]</div>

    2. Emotional valence

      Is the language extremely negative, extremely positive, or somewhere in the middle?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.16.01:Extremely negative", "1.16.02:Somewhat negative", "1.16.03:Neither negative nor positive", "1.16.04:Somewhat positive", "1.16.05:Extremely positive" ]</div>

    3. he fish is very nutritionally deficient and doesn’t contain omega-3 oils or other essential nutrients found in natural fish. It may be decent in taste, but the Basa fish is very dangerous for your health, which is why you should avoid it.

      Acknowledgement of uncertainty

      Highlight uncertainty example

    4. Acknowledgement of uncertainty

      Does the author acknowledge uncertainty, or the possibility things might be otherwise?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.15.01:Yes", "1.15.02:Sort of", "1.15.03:No" ]</div>

    5. Acknowledgement of uncertainty

      Does the author acknowledge uncertainty, or the possibility things might be otherwise?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.15.01:Yes", "1.15.02:Sort of", "1.15.03:No" ]</div>

    6. Confidence in claims made by sources

      To what extent does the author's confidence in claims made by sources seem justified?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.14.01:Completely justified", "1.14.02:Mostly justified", "1.14.03:Somewhat justified", "1.14.04:Slightly justified", "1.14.05:Not at all justified" ]</div>

    7. Other types of sources

      Are any experts, organizations, or studies separate from the central study quoted in the article?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.13.01:Yes", "1.13.02:No" ]</div>

    8. er essential nutrients found in natural fish. It may be decent in taste, but the Basa fish is very dangerous for your hea

      Organizations

      Highlight organization

    9. cted with antibiotics and hormones that are supposed to make the fish bigger. The meat was found to contain hormones that accelerate the growth and reproduction of the fish, and is then sold in partnership with big companies that have no regard for human health. The Basa fish is sold at a very low price which attracts super

      Organizations

      Highlight organization

    10. polluted rivers in the world. The fish is cultivated in sewage pools which contain high levels of toxins and bac

      Organizations

      Highlight organization

    11. The Basa fish ( Pangasius Fillets) is cultivated near the Mekong River in Vietnam, one of the most polluted rivers in the world. The fish is cultivated in sewage pools which contain high levels of toxins and bacteria that end up in the meat. Besides this, the meat has been found to contains heavy metals, chlorate, isomers, hexachlorobenz

      Organizations

      Highlight organization

    12. Types of sources

      Which of the following are cited?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.08.01:Experts", "1.08.02:Studies", "1.08.03:Organizations", "1.08.04:Other" ]</div>

    13. Types of sources

      Does the article cite sources?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.08a.01:Yes", "1.08a.02:No" ]</div>

    14. Single study?

      Is the article primarily about a single scientific study?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.07.01:Yes", "1.07.02:No" ]</div>

    15. NOT EAT THIS FISH, IT IS VERY DANGEROU

      Clickbaitiness

      What clickbait techniques does this headline employ?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.05.01:Listicle (\"6 Tips on ...\")", "1.05.02:Cliffhanger to a story (\"You Won't Believe What Happens Next\")", "1.05.03:Provoking emotions, such as shock or surprise (\"...Shocking Result\", \"...Leave You in Tears\")", "1.05.04:Hidden secret or trick (\"Fitness Companies Hate Him...\", \"Experts are Dying to Know Their Secret\")", "1.05.05:Challenges to the ego (\"Only People with IQ Above 160 Can Solve This\")", "1.05.06:Defying convention (\"Think Orange Juice is Good for you? Think Again!\", \"Here are 5 Foods You Never Thought Would Kill You\")", "1.05.07:Inducing fear (\"Is Your Boyfriend Cheating on You?\")", "1.05.08:Other" ]</div>

    16. NOT EAT THIS FISH, IT IS VERY DANGEROU

      Clickbaitiness

      Is the headline clickbaity?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.04.01:Very much clickbaity", "1.04.02:Somewhat clickbaity", "1.04.03:A little bit clickbaity", "1.04.04:Not at all clickbaity" ]</div>

    17. NOT EAT THIS FISH, IT IS VERY DANGEROU

      Title Representativeness

      How is the title unrepresentative? (select all that apply)

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.03.01:Title is on a different topic than the body", "1.03.02:Title emphasizes different information than the body", "1.03.03:Title carries little information about the body", "1.03.04:Title takes a different stance than the body", "1.03.05:Title overstates claims or conclusions in the body", "1.03.06:Title understates claims or conclusions in the body", "1.03.07:Other" ]</div>

    18. NOT EAT THIS FISH, IT IS VERY DANGEROU

      Title Representativeness

      Does the title of the article accurately reflect the content of the article?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.02.01:Completely Unrepresentative", "1.02.02:Somewhat Unrepresentative", "1.02.03:Somewhat Representative", "1.02.04:Completely Representative" ]</div>

    19. Overall Credibility

      Rate your impression of the credibility of this article

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.01.01:Very low credibility", "1.01.02:Somewhat low credibility", "1.01.03:Medium credibility", "1.01.04:Somewhat high credibility", "1.01.05:High credibility" ]</div>

    1. ed or perhaps reversed slightly in the 21st century, but scientists believe the ice is still catching up to the higher temperatures.

      Exaggerated/minimized claims

      Highlight where the author uses exaggerations/minimizations or seems to represent things in a proportional manner

    2. Exaggerated/minimized claims

      Does the author use exaggerations/minimizations or generally seems to represent situations and events in a proportional manner?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.17.01:Yes, there are a mix of exaggerations and minimizations", "1.17.02:Yes, there are exaggerations", "1.17.03:Yes, there are minimizations", "1.17.04:No, the text seems generally proportional (avoids exaggeration and minimization)" ]</div>

    3. Emotional valence

      Is the language extremely negative, extremely positive, or somewhere in the middle?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.16.01:Extremely negative", "1.16.02:Somewhat negative", "1.16.03:Neither negative nor positive", "1.16.04:Somewhat positive", "1.16.05:Extremely positive" ]</div>

    4. ckman, a lead researcher for Project Midas. “This is a big change. Maps

      Acknowledgement of uncertainty

      Highlight uncertainty example

    5. Acknowledgement of uncertainty

      Does the author acknowledge uncertainty, or the possibility things might be otherwise?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.15.01:Yes", "1.15.02:Sort of", "1.15.03:No" ]</div>

    6. Acknowledgement of uncertainty

      Does the author acknowledge uncertainty, or the possibility things might be otherwise?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.15.01:Yes", "1.15.02:Sort of", "1.15.03:No" ]</div>

    7. Confidence in claims made by sources

      To what extent does the author's confidence in claims made by sources seem justified?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.14.01:Completely justified", "1.14.02:Mostly justified", "1.14.03:Somewhat justified", "1.14.04:Slightly justified", "1.14.05:Not at all justified" ]</div>

    8. Other types of sources

      Are any experts, organizations, or studies separate from the central study quoted in the article?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.13.01:Yes", "1.13.02:No" ]</div>

    9. nk of floating ice that weighs more than a trillion metric tons broke away from the Antarctic Peninsula, producing one of the largest icebergs ever recorded and providing a glimpse o

      Expert sources

      Highlight expert source

    10. Types of sources

      Which of the following are cited?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.08.01:Experts", "1.08.02:Studies", "1.08.03:Organizations", "1.08.04:Other" ]</div>

    11. Types of sources

      Does the article cite sources?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.08a.01:Yes", "1.08a.02:No" ]</div>

    12. Single study?

      Is the article primarily about a single scientific study?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.07.01:Yes", "1.07.02:No" ]</div>

    13. An Iceberg the Size of Delaware Just Broke Away From Antarctica

      Clickbaitiness

      What clickbait techniques does this headline employ?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.05.01:Listicle (\"6 Tips on ...\")", "1.05.02:Cliffhanger to a story (\"You Won't Believe What Happens Next\")", "1.05.03:Provoking emotions, such as shock or surprise (\"...Shocking Result\", \"...Leave You in Tears\")", "1.05.04:Hidden secret or trick (\"Fitness Companies Hate Him...\", \"Experts are Dying to Know Their Secret\")", "1.05.05:Challenges to the ego (\"Only People with IQ Above 160 Can Solve This\")", "1.05.06:Defying convention (\"Think Orange Juice is Good for you? Think Again!\", \"Here are 5 Foods You Never Thought Would Kill You\")", "1.05.07:Inducing fear (\"Is Your Boyfriend Cheating on You?\")", "1.05.08:Other" ]</div>

    14. An Iceberg the Size of Delaware Just Broke Away From Antarctica

      Clickbaitiness

      Is the headline clickbaity?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.04.01:Very much clickbaity", "1.04.02:Somewhat clickbaity", "1.04.03:A little bit clickbaity", "1.04.04:Not at all clickbaity" ]</div>

    15. An Iceberg the Size of Delaware Just Broke Away From Antarctica

      Title Representativeness

      How is the title unrepresentative? (select all that apply)

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.03.01:Title is on a different topic than the body", "1.03.02:Title emphasizes different information than the body", "1.03.03:Title carries little information about the body", "1.03.04:Title takes a different stance than the body", "1.03.05:Title overstates claims or conclusions in the body", "1.03.06:Title understates claims or conclusions in the body", "1.03.07:Other" ]</div>

    16. An Iceberg the Size of Delaware Just Broke Away From Antarctica

      Title Representativeness

      Does the title of the article accurately reflect the content of the article?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.02.01:Completely Unrepresentative", "1.02.02:Somewhat Unrepresentative", "1.02.03:Somewhat Representative", "1.02.04:Completely Representative" ]</div>

    17. Overall Credibility

      Rate your impression of the credibility of this article

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.01.01:Very low credibility", "1.01.02:Somewhat low credibility", "1.01.03:Medium credibility", "1.01.04:Somewhat high credibility", "1.01.05:High credibility" ]</div>

    18. Overall Credibility

      Rate your impression of the credibility of this article

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.01.01:Very low credibility", "1.01.02:Somewhat low credibility", "1.01.03:Medium credibility", "1.01.04:Somewhat high credibility", "1.01.05:High credibility" ]</div>

    1. Overall Credibility

      Rate your impression of the credibility of this article

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.01.01:Very low credibility", "1.01.02:Somewhat low credibility", "1.01.03:Medium credibility", "1.01.04:Somewhat high credibility", "1.01.05:High credibility" ]</div>

    2. Overall Credibility

      Rate your impression of the credibility of this article

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.01.01:Very low credibility", "1.01.02:Somewhat low credibility", "1.01.03:Medium credibility", "1.01.04:Somewhat high credibility", "1.01.05:High credibility" ]</div>

    1. Exaggerated/minimized claims

      Does the author use exaggerations/minimizations or generally seems to represent situations and events in a proportional manner?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.17.01:Yes, there are a mix of exaggerations and minimizations", "1.17.02:Yes, there are exaggerations", "1.17.03:Yes, there are minimizations", "1.17.04:No, the text seems generally proportional (avoids exaggeration and minimization)" ]</div>

    2. showing coconut oil increased LDL ("bad") cholesterol in seven out of seven controlled trials. Researchers didn't see a difference between coconut oil and other oils high in saturated fat

      Emotional valence

      Highlight where any language is extremely negative or extremely positive

    3. Emotional valence

      Is the language extremely negative, extremely positive, or somewhere in the middle?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.16.01:Extremely negative", "1.16.02:Somewhat negative", "1.16.03:Neither negative nor positive", "1.16.04:Somewhat positive", "1.16.05:Extremely positive" ]</div>

    4. Still, it might not be a bad idea to opt for vegetable oils or olive oil, Sacks said. Plus, coconut oil can still be an effective moisturizer or hair conditioner.

      Acknowledgement of uncertainty

      Highlight uncertainty example

    5. Acknowledgement of uncertainty

      Does the author acknowledge uncertainty, or the possibility things might be otherwise?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.15.01:Yes", "1.15.02:Sort of", "1.15.03:No" ]</div>

    6. Confidence in claims made by sources

      To what extent does the author's confidence in claims made by sources seem justified?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.14.01:Completely justified", "1.14.02:Mostly justified", "1.14.03:Somewhat justified", "1.14.04:Slightly justified", "1.14.05:Not at all justified" ]</div>

    7. Other types of sources

      Are any experts, organizations, or studies separate from the central study quoted in the article?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.13.01:Yes", "1.13.02:No" ]</div>

    8. Types of sources

      Does the article cite sources?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.08a.01:Yes", "1.08a.02:No" ]</div>

    9. Single study?

      Is the article primarily about a single scientific study?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.07.01:Yes", "1.07.02:No" ]</div>

    10. Coconut oil isn't healthy. It's never been healthy.

      Clickbaitiness

      What clickbait techniques does this headline employ?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.05.01:Listicle (\"6 Tips on ...\")", "1.05.02:Cliffhanger to a story (\"You Won't Believe What Happens Next\")", "1.05.03:Provoking emotions, such as shock or surprise (\"...Shocking Result\", \"...Leave You in Tears\")", "1.05.04:Hidden secret or trick (\"Fitness Companies Hate Him...\", \"Experts are Dying to Know Their Secret\")", "1.05.05:Challenges to the ego (\"Only People with IQ Above 160 Can Solve This\")", "1.05.06:Defying convention (\"Think Orange Juice is Good for you? Think Again!\", \"Here are 5 Foods You Never Thought Would Kill You\")", "1.05.07:Inducing fear (\"Is Your Boyfriend Cheating on You?\")", "1.05.08:Other" ]</div>

    11. Coconut oil isn't healthy. It's never been healthy.

      Clickbaitiness

      Is the headline clickbaity?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.04.01:Very much clickbaity", "1.04.02:Somewhat clickbaity", "1.04.03:A little bit clickbaity", "1.04.04:Not at all clickbaity" ]</div>

    12. Coconut oil isn't healthy. It's never been healthy.

      Clickbaitiness

      Is the headline clickbaity?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.04.01:Very much clickbaity", "1.04.02:Somewhat clickbaity", "1.04.03:A little bit clickbaity", "1.04.04:Not at all clickbaity" ]</div>

    13. Coconut oil isn't healthy. It's never been healthy.

      Title Representativeness

      Does the title of the article accurately reflect the content of the article?

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.02.01:Completely Unrepresentative", "1.02.02:Somewhat Unrepresentative", "1.02.03:Somewhat Representative", "1.02.04:Completely Representative" ]</div>

    14. Overall Credibility

      Rate your impression of the credibility of this article

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.01.01:Very low credibility", "1.01.02:Somewhat low credibility", "1.01.03:Medium credibility", "1.01.04:Somewhat high credibility", "1.01.05:High credibility" ]</div>

    1. Overall Credibility

      Rate your impression of the credibility of this article

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.01.01:Very low credibility", "1.01.02:Somewhat low credibility", "1.01.03:Medium credibility", "1.01.04:Somewhat high credibility", "1.01.05:High credibility" ]</div>

    1. Overall Credibility

      Rate your impression of the credibility of this article

      Choices:

      <div>[ "1.01.01:Very low credibility", "1.01.02:Somewhat low credibility", "1.01.03:Medium credibility", "1.01.04:Somewhat high credibility", "1.01.05:High credibility" ]</div>