15 Matching Annotations
  1. Jan 2022
    1. Because most of our science is supported by limited public funds, evolutionary biologists and ecologists should support and participate in efforts to help the public understand the issues and the value of scientific understanding. Science in general and evolutionary science in particular are often politicized, exactly because of their fundamental importance to human society.

      This is something that we can all look at and understand the importance of. This is one of the most important steps in solving most of the problems we face today. As I have gotten older I have realized and learned that there are a lot of things that we can learn from others, even when you may think that they do not have much to offer. This mentality that science must not be shared with the common man is outdated and must change if we want to progress.

    2. We strongly support the movement toward open access for the scientific literature to accelerate research and allow more investigators to participate.

      Opening the scientific community up to the general public and limiting the gatekeeping that we do in todays society is something that we need to do if we want to progress in the scientific field.

    3. Understanding the diversification of species and the origin of adaptations poses a number of challenges for evolutionary biologists,

      When thinking about all of the undiscovered species that we have today, I wonder if we will ever come to discover all of these species and the impact that they can have on an environment.

    4. To date, most ecosystem studies have assumed that all individuals that compose a population within a community are equivalent ecologically. But individuals within a population are variable, and this variation may lead to ecological interactions that are in a continual state of evolutionary flux as ecologically driven evolutionary change feedbacks to alter the ongoing ecological interactions [88]–[90].

      The equivalence and variability of individuals in a community is very interesting to me and I find myself wondering whether or not these interactions of individuals play a role in the declining environmental variability.

    5. This capability, together with the realization that evolutionary change can occur on ecological timescales [69], provides an important new window on real-time evolution.

      I would like to look at the ecological timescales and the progress of real time evolution.

    6. Such multilevel data are giving rise to whole new fields of study (e.g., population genomics and metagenomics) as well as to new theoretical, computational, and data management challenges.

      This revelation in science that is giving rise to new fields and jobs is very exciting to think about and I wonder if there is any new fields that have been already created in 2022.

    7. Models of mutation, inheritance, and selection have inspired the development of computational evolutionary algorithms that are used to solve complex problems in many fields

      I am excited to read that there is a lot of research going into these issues and that there are models and algorithms that can predict certain things and solve complex problems. I question though if these are super accurate, or if they are a baseline to predict a broad issue.

    8. Evolutionary approaches also can be used to determine the origins of invasive species [46]–[48] and to help design effective remediation

      Although I may be wrong, I feel like invasive species are something that goes under the radar in terms of biological issues that are prioritized in the U.S. Places such as New Zealand seem to take this much more seriously, for example they don't allow tourists to bring food on planes because of the chance of bringing in invasive and harmful species.

    9. Unfortunately, genetically modified crops are genetically uniform and so do not represent a long-term solution against the evolution of either herbicide or Bt resistance.

      I am interested if there is an estimation on how long term of a solution GMO products will be for and if there is a lot of active research on other solutions that we can use in the future.

    10. The new field of “evolutionary medicine" [24]–[26] posits that understanding our evolutionary past can inform us of the causes of perplexing common diseases. For instance, diabetes and autoimmune diseases such as asthma may represent mismatches between evolutionary adaptation to the environments in which humans evolved and current conditions. In addition, some age-related conditions, such as cancer, can be understood as the outcome of selection for early reproduction, when humans faced dying of disease or predation at an early age.

      Since we look at the past and for solutions to current day diseases and medicine, I wonder if there will be a time where we look back at COVID-19 and find a way to stop or prevent another pandemic or endemic similar to this one.

    11. Much human activity, however, is changing Earth's climate and habitats, with uncertain but potentially severe environmental stresses on many other species [15]–[18], and the solutions to the many resulting problems may well require understanding evolutionary interactions among species and their mutual dependencies.

      I wonder if there was a lack of human activity, there would be less interactions among species and less mutual dependency. I assume there would be much less because as a species, we interact with a lot of different species.

    12. four broad challenges for biology: develop better crops to feed the world, understand and sustain ecosystem function and biodiversity in a changing world, expand sustainable alternative energy sources, and understand individual health.

      These four broad challenges, while not solved i the slightest, have been a point of research in the last couple of decades. For example for the challenge of developing better crops, we now use genetic modification to grow crops at a faster rate, can survive harsher conditions and many other obstacles that non GMO crops would have faced.

    13. “nothing makes sense in biology except in the light of evolution.

      As I can see right now, evolution is one of the main things mechanisms that scientists point to when looking at a variety of problems in terms of biology.

    14. Solutions to many of the world's most pressing problems—feeding a global population, coping with climate change, preserving ecosystems and biodiversity, curing and preventing genetically based diseases—will rely heavily on biologists, collaborating across disciplines.

      This is something that I find very interesting in terms of the political side to biology and the funding and backing that this sort of research gets from the government. We all know that the pharmaceutical industry in particular gets a lot of funding, but at the same time also makes a lot of money as well. Is this something that inhibits this sort of research from becoming a priority, and if so how much?

    15. Technological advances have made data collection easier and cheaper than we could ever have imagined just 10 years ago.

      I wonder if these technological advancements will continue to happen at a similar rate over the next 10 years or if this rate will slow down or decline.