49 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2019
    1. Skills learned today are apt to be out-of-date all too soon. The concept of life-long learning – a term used all too glibly – is now more important than ever.

      Do careers of today need to take this into account in offering time and training for professionals to stay up-to-date? Or is it the responsibility of the individual, in their own time, learn to stay competitive within their field?

    2. In the 20th century, the approach to education was to focus on ‘learning-about’ and to build stocks of knowledge and some cognitive skills in the student to be deployed later in appropriate situations. This approach to education worked well in a relatively stable, slowly changing world where students could expect to learn one set of skills and use them throughout their lives.

      'Learning about' worked when careers were more static.

    3. For those who are too shy to speak out, find speaking in English challenging, or who are more contemplative, the classroom blog can serve as a way to participate in a class discussion.

      I have seen this happen often, students that need more processing time, or are afraid to speak up in front of others, often thrive during online class discussions.

    4. For today’s students, who are used to multiple windows being opened on their desktops and multiple things happening simultaneously, this space seems second nature.

      It may be familiar, but is it helpful? It provides tons of input simultaneously, but lacks depth of focus on a singular item.

    5. The fact that all can see the collage does provide a bit of a social constraint on what gets surfed

      It is also perhaps an opportunity to teach the public nature of technology/internet use

    6. Nothing need be said

      It seems to me to really foster discussion, explanations should go along with what is being projected (interjected). I also wonder if the visual interjections would be a distracter from the content rather than an enhancer?

    7. that although this technology is beautifully simple, its potential is realized only when it is coupled to new teaching practices.

      Again, technology must be paired with teaching practice in the classroom.

    8. At this moment you could stare the student down, you could ignore him, or you could turn this moment into a critical, Socratic learning event.

      I imagine in order to do this well, I would need to anticipate these challenges otherwise my reaction in the moment wouldn't be towards a "Socratic learning event". However, I see the value in being able to prepare yourself for these learning moments.

    9. To fully utilize a new teaching technology you often need to invent new teaching practices as well. And to do that you need to have the desire, freedom and time to experiment with and refine these new practices.

      Desire, freedom, and time to experiment.. yes, all those are needed and frequently lacking in many teaching contexts.

    10. Maybe new teaching practices tuned to this new kind of learning environment were needed.

      This is an example of how in teaching there is a need to evolve constantly or "pick up new skills" as is expected in the "New Context for Learning" on page 2

    11. Also consider how students in studios start to pick up skills from each other,

      As students observe each others' work their own work becomes more refined. The same mistakes are less likely to appear.

    12. students in either India or China you can’t help but be impressed with their passion to learn and the energy they bring to this pursuit.

      Interesting.. it makes me wonder if culture elements such as collectivism play an important role in these differences (compared to the US).

    13. our students will need to feel comfortable working in cross disciplinary teams that encompass multiple ways of knowing.

      Working as a team, but in a way that values what each individual has to contribute.

  2. Jun 2018
    1. possible that com-panies would have an even greater incentive to innovate ifthey could not rely on a near twenty-year monopoly.

      maybe more incentive would exist among increased competition..

    1. This is good internet citizenship. Articles on the web that repurpose other information or artifacts should state their sources, and, if appropriate, link to them. This matters to creators, because they deserve credit for their work. But it also matters to readers who need to check the credibility of the original sources.

      This is how it ties into digital citizenship.

    1. Our normal inclination is to ignore verification needs when we react strongly to content, and researchers have found that content that causes strong emotions (both positive and negative) spreads the fastest through our social networks

      Important to note that these are strong emotions, both positive and negative!

    1. In other words, this guide will help you become “web literate” by showing you the unique opportunities and pitfalls of searching for truth on the web. Crazy, right?

      Web Literacy is then knowing how to check validity of information based off of using specific tools and techniques.

    2. As many people have noted, the web is both the largest propaganda machine ever created and the most amazing fact-checking tool ever invented.

      Crazy dichotomy, but important for web users to understand.

    1. The barrier to everyone having a copy of the album no longer has anything to do with distribution costs or fidelity and everything to do with copyright

      Copyright is the only limiting factor.

    2. This definition, of course, will be provisional, revisable and temporary as it relies upon contexts remaining the same — which they seldom do for long! !The advantage of an emergent approach to digital literacies is that stakeholders don’t see the process as being done to them. They feel part of it, as if digital literacies are something inclusive, something they have control over, and something continually changing. Which, of course, is absolutely correct.

      The definition is adjustable, changing, open for editing and revision.

    3. If educational institutions are to prepare young people for the wider world, they need to be showing them how to navigate across various digital contexts and cultures.

      Important to note the differences in culture of a professional workplace, and a social context.

    4. We saw earlier in this chapter that literacy is already a problematic term. Therefore, adding a modifier (e.g. digital literacy) not only adds another layer of ambiguity, but raises the question of the relationship between the two words.

      The term digital literacy is ambiguous, hence the confusion related to thinking about what all digital literacy entails.

    5. As new tools for communication have been introduced — for example, email, social networking, video-sharing sites — so new forms of literacy are needed to understand them.

      "Micro-literacies"pop up as new technology is introduced, these literacies make-up a larger digital literacy.

    6. Literacy, however, also depends upon a different kind of knowledge. There has to be both something that is being communicated through the writing as well as an ability to use tools to do that communicating. I shall call this content-knowledge.

      Content-knowledge. Something being communicated + the ability to use the tools in order to communicate.

    7. Literacy is a characteristic acquired by individuals in varying degrees from just above none to an indeterminate upper level. Some individuals are more or less literate than others but it is really not possible to speak of illiterate and literate persons as two distinct categories.”

      Literacy is more of a scale or range rather than two categories.

    1. Digital literacy is not about the skills of using technologies, but how we use our judgment to maintain awareness of what we are reading and writing, why we are doing it, and whom we are addressing.

      Interesting.. relating digital literacy with judgment and discernment while engaging and creating online.

    2. We also need to recognize the risks of blogging/tweeting, which include opening avenues for abuse.

      Students already see this abuse, some of them are active participants in it. However, teachers need to be acutely aware of this, be ready to address issues students already have experience with, and how to re-evaluate their technology use.

    3. what posting a photo today might mean for their future employment opportunities?

      I think this is something that students hear, but they are not often asked more in-depth questions about technology that would help influence decisions about their technology use.

    4. Digital skills focus on what and how. Digital literacy focuses on why, when, who, and for whom.

      We tend to teach digital skills. I think digital literacies are touched on here and there, but there definitely less of a focus than with the skills.

    5. Digital literacies are not solely about technical proficiency but about the issues, norms, and habits of mind surrounding technologies used for a particular purpose. —Doug Belshaw, educational researcher

      The new piece for me here is that he defines "issues" and "habits" fall into the realm of digital literacy.

    1. Giving students their own digital domain is a radical act. It gives them the ability to work on the Web and with the Web, to have their scholarship be meaningful and accessible by others. It allows them to demonstrate their learning to others beyond the classroom walls.

      Isn't this what we want in education? Students demonstrating learning?

    2. This can be a way to track growth and demonstrate new learning over the course of a student’s school career — something that they themselves can reflect upon, not simply grades and assignments that are locked away in a proprietary system controlled by the school.

      Sounds familiar to the way our professor in ED 654 views grades vs. demonstrating new learning.

    3. These portfolios can contain text, images, video and audio recordings, giving students opportunities to express themselves in a variety of ways beyond the traditional pen-and-paper test or essay. One student uses her domain to showcase her artwork. Another chronicled her semester abroad

      These really could be used across the curriculum, showcasing work and thoughts for all courses.

    4. Today, UMW and a growing number of other schools believe that students need a proprietary online space in order to be intellectually productive.

      "In order to be intellectually productive..." this is a very strong claim.

    5. But almost all arguments about student privacy, whether those calling for more restrictions or fewer, fail to give students themselves a voice, let alone some assistance in deciding what to share online. Students have little agency when it comes to education technology — much like they have little agency in education itself.

      This practice about leaving students out of the picture also leaves them not understanding how their data is used, thus the have little to no understanding about the WHY behind sharing online.

    1. To provide students the guidance they need to reach these goals, faculty and staff must be willing to lead by example — to demonstrate and discuss, as fellow learners, how they have created and connected their own personal cyberinfrastructures.

      Within the "personal cyberinfrastructure" students and teachers are fellow learners. They are figuring it out together. Teachers aren't necessarily the experts, and humbly come alongside students as they themselves re learning.

    2. Without such fluency, students cannot compete economically or intellectually, and the astonishing promise of the digital medium will never be fully realized.

      Two claims here, without the fluency described:

      1. students are disadvantaged "economically" and "intellectually"
      2. using digital medium to it's full potential will not be achieved
    3. Many students simply want to know what their professors want and how to give that to them. But if what the professor truly wants is for students to discover and craft their own desires and dreams, a personal cyberinfrastructure provides the opportunity.

      This rings a bell! In ED654, the creative route is encouraged, the straight-forward answer to "what does our professor want?" is not there. So as students, we have freedom to be creative, and explore ideas that we may not have explored otherwise.

    4. In building that personal cyberinfrastructure, students not only would acquire crucial technical skills for their digital lives but also would engage in work that provides richly teachable moments ranging from multimodal writing to information science, knowledge management, bibliographic instruction, and social networking

      Integrated digital citizenship/literacy across content areas.

    5. Here's one idea. Suppose that when students matriculate, they are assigned their own web servers — not 1GB folders in the institution's web space but honest-to-goodness virtualized web servers of the kind available for $7.99 a month from a variety of hosting services, with built-in affordances ranging from database maintenance to web analytics.

      I believe this could work also at the secondary level. Although there may potentially be some pushback from parents, teachers, and admin who are wary of student engagement in public domains.