- Mar 2015
-
ipfs.indy0.net ipfs.indy0.net
-
Ability to have several personas for them to use when annotating for different purposes. This should be without the need to log out and in again.
Good points overall. I especially liked this point.
-
people might want a different persona for work and for play.
I think this is key. Some people will want more than one handle because some of their work will be high quality and they may not want people following them if they are making comments that is for fun.
-
Hypothes.is will need site specific filtering out of particular individuals or groups. For example someone may be happy to read jokers’ annotations when reading the Daily Mail but want to exclude them when reading the Scientific American
This may need more than just to follow someone. Because what if you like reading one person on one site, but prefer reading a different set of users on another site.
-
Implications of helping reader who want to share annotations they have read
This reminds me of the retweet feature.
-
People might use Hypothes.is to seek additional information about a web page for a range of reasons including:
Another one is.
- Seeking answers to a question they have about the material on the webpage.
-
Privacy seems a crucial issue to me
This is a crucial concern of mine as well, as i don't want to see hypothes.is turn into a facebook or google where they are now collecting data on users, which freaks me out and is why i use duckduckgo.com now. Ideally hypothes.is would encrypt all the data, so that not even hypothes.is can see who belongs to what group etc..
-
Being able to follow a stream of their own, an author’s or a group’s annotations, independent of the websites they are on
This would be an amazing feature.
-
people might want a different persona for work and for play
I think this is key. Some people will want more than one handle because some of their work will be high quality and they may not want people following them if they are making comments that is for fun.
-
Hypothes.is will need site specific filtering out of particular individuals or groups. For example someone may be happy to read jokers’ annotations when reading the Daily Mail but want to exclude them when reading the Scientific American
This may need more than just to follow someone. Because what if you like reading one person on one site, but prefer reading a different set of users on another site.
-
Implications of helping reader who want to share annotations they have read
This reminds me of the retweet feature.
-
People might use Hypothes.is to seek additional information about a web page for a range of reasons including
Another one is.
- Seeking answers to a question they have about the material on the webpage.
-
Privacy seems a crucial issue to me.
This is a crucial concern of mine as well, as i don't want to see hypothes.is turn into a facebook or google where they are now collecting data on users, which freaks me out and is why i use duckduckgo.com now. Ideally hypothes.is would encrypt all the data, so that not even hypothe.is can see who belongs to what group etc..
-
Being able to follow a stream of their own, an author’s or a group’s annotations, independent of the websites they are on.
This would be an amazing feature.
-
-
jonudell.net jonudell.net
-
annotate the course material
This hints at their being a structure to the material. So it is sorted in such a way that the teacher guides the student in a specified order.
-
But the user can change this and post it to their Research group instead for instance
It would be nice to post an annotation to multiple groups.
-