29 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2023
    1. while Pong dock was a citizen (despite being of Mongolian descent), he was, according to the Kentucky constitution, a member of neither the white nor the black race and therefore was not entitled to an education in the state.

      this is crazy

    1. Right here in camp, during the summer months, we have a sort of 'summer school' conducted for the benefit of all children, to t~ach them the fundamentals of the Spanish lan-guage. It may be surprising to note that the teacher's services are free. Surely, one that is unselfish enough to do this for nothing must be reward-ed for his efforts by knowing that his pupils are learning.

      YAY!

    2. "1fn the other hand, nearly all educators agreed that Mexican were poetic in nature, philosophical, artistic, and more adept at handwork-~~ at a-~~ work.

      is this supposed to be a compliment?

    1. In addition to school segregation, many northern white school au-thorities during the first four decades of the twentieth century urged separate "tracks" for black (and, in some instances, certain immigrant) children with different curricula on the grounds that they were intel-lectually ill-equipped to engage in rigorous academic study.

      Student tracking begins

    2. They have no tradition of civilization and educa-tion as we have .. . . They are still dirty, lazy, loud and not too pleasant to have living nearby. »

      They know absolutely nothing about their culture.

    3. they know how to treat colored people down there .. .. Why, if these peo-ple had done in Texas what they've done here, or had done it in any of the Southern states, they' cl have been lynched. They would have gone to whatever school the whites told them to and be mighty glad to have the chance."

      Saying that Texas is better? Or worse?

    4. Mauy white education scholars argued that black chtlclren would fare better iu separate schools under _the \utelage _of ?lack teadit.:rs

      The fact that they have black teachers who share their experiences may be true, but everything else seems unfair.

    5. The problem of retardauon 1s more serious among colored chil-dren than among any other racial group. I am inclined to be lieve that the further extension of segregation . . . is the only real practical solution."

      Only made things worse. So ignorant

    6. the n~wly ar~1ved sou~hern migrant children were not equipped to engage m studies alongside white chil-dren because of their poor educational backgrounds

      And this was because of their own doing. ("they" being white school policymakers/teachers/school boards)

    7. but the NAACP made few claims of intentional segregation during the 19:20s and 1930s and of-fered the New York City elementary schools as a model for other cities ~o emulate.

      good!!

    8. [i]n 1910, colored men could be entertained in the best hotels in Cleveland, Detroit and Chicago. Today [in 1934], th ere is not a single Northern city, except New York, where a Negro can be a guest at a first-class hotel."

      What changed?? It reminds me of the fact that Roe v Wade was overturned after years of it being in place.

    9. White demands for segregation in public accommodations, housing, and education sharply increased during the 1920s.

      My question that I don't know if anyone has the answer to is simply.. "why? why did whites want segregation in areas that already were starting to be integrated?"

    10. Some migrants were drawn northward by the promise of better ed-ucational opportunities, as southern black schools were grossly un-derfunded.

      Having read this far, I don't think the outcomes of this will be positive

    11. white Oberlin students be-gan to protest having to eat at the same dining hall tables with black students.

      Why did these ideals change so drastically? Why did they want to more back in history?

    12. By the onset of World War I ' many hotels and restaurants in Cleveland that had once freely served black customers had implemented a color line

      Why did they feel a need to reverse what they have already done?

    1. "Progressive educators" encouraged teachers to understand Indian children as products of a "different civilization" rather than a "lower civilization." Tea-chers began to incorporate Indian music and other arts and crafts into the curriculum. They attempted to improve students' facility with English by motivating them to retell tribal legends or describe aspects of home life in their writings.

      this is good!!! We need to get back to this.

    2. Indian "uplift" policies, it was sometimes charged, encouraged attitudes of dependency rather than self-reliance and individual initiative. Government programs designed co feed, clothe, and house as well as educate Indian youth were thought by some to reward laziness and create an expectation chat the government would and should provide for those who do not provide for themselves.

      created a dialogue that people who could not provide for themselves could rely on the government. Government wanted to hold power of those who were less independent...?

    3. The commissioner observed that over the previous 33 years, the government had spent over $240 million in an attempt to move Native Americans from dependency to self-reliant citizenship.

      why would they spend all that money to "help" people that already knew how to live??

    4. although as in the case of different immigrant groups, inconsistencies in the application of policies and wide variations in responses among individual Indians and their tribal groups work against neat generalizations.

      what does this mean?

    5. The explanation offered for this is that as Irish gradually moved into positions of political, economic, and social power and came to occupy more teaching positions in the public schools, the school achievement of their children rose substantially.

      More of a reason to succeed and try to do well

    6. sought to remove corrupt school management from city schools. For centralizers, much of the corruption found in urban neighborhoods and exploited by urban machine politicians resulted from the presence of immigrant communities that did not understand American culture.

      Why would this be the case?

    7. The academic track appealed mainly to upper-and middle-class students of Anglo descent, the commercial track was populated largely by middle-class girls, and the vocational track was reserved for lower-class boys, quite often from immigrant families.30

      seems accurate for this time period

    8. The NSPIE quickly became involved in advocating for industrial (or trade) schools, where students could learn the skills needed for industrial and manufacturing jobs.

      good

    9. They wanted to see the high schools offer commercial subjects and also work in manual training like woodworking and metallurgy.

      skills for jobs that maybe less fortunate people could go into but need experience with

    10. It quickly became known as a conservative document because it refused to accommodate those who wanted to diversify the high school curriculum to include subjects considered practical and relevant in the commercial and industrial worlds. From their perspective, the Committee of Ten had turned its back on the world in which many if not most of the high school students would take their places.

      I am confused on what this is trying to say

    11. This group was further offended by the assumption that college-bound students did not need a curriculum that differed substantially from that of the non-college-bound.

      of course. competitevness/people feeling more deserveing of a better education is starting to show

    12. First, the committee believed that no difference in the course of study should exist for college-bound and non-college-bound students.

      Does this mean for studies in high school should not be different? I am confused

    13. The fundamental issue that both critics raised was the prob-ability that the public schools were becoming less and less schools of the people, alienated from the ordinary working citizens they were supposed to serve.18

      I would agree with this.