I found this interesting because I usually think consistency is a good thing, but this made me realize real people are inconsistent sometimes and that actually makes them more believable.

This line made me pause because it shows that being random isn't the same as being complex. A character has to surprise us in a way that still makes sense.

I really liked this idea, it makes me feel like good writing requires a lot more background thinking than we actually see. It also explains why some people feel "empty" and it's because the writer probably didn't fully know them.

This made me realize how much character really matters in a story. It reminded me that emotional connection is the main goal.

The author is saying she got bored with the same old beginning - middle - end stories and that sort of structure. She wanted to find new ways stories could work.

This rule feels unrealistic to me, but I feel like it's supposed to symbolize control. Ellen's future is being treated like a challenge to be conquered.

This stood out to me because it explains why authors go off topic. Digressions help stretch time and make the story feel more full.

I take this to mean that meandering stories wander on purpose. They explore ideas and moments instead of moving straight to the conclusion.

This turns workshop into an active discussion instead of just opinions. I think it helps people think more deeply.

This feels very organized and practical. I like that it can break the story into manageable pieces.

This method makes writing feel less fixed and more changeable. I think it helps writers see that drafts aren't permanent.

This gives writers a lot of control, which could help them feel a lot more comfortable. I like that it respects different comfort levels.