24 Matching Annotations
  1. Dec 2021
    1. The punishment is worse for Richard. Udvari kicks him out of the game.

      I think the punishment is fair, but I do not think it's fair that Richard received this punishment while others did not.

    2. In the second period, the Canadiens’ star tripped Laycoe and sent him spinning across the ice but escaped a penalty. Richard was further aggravated by the fact his team was losing 4-1.

      It seems like a lot has been built up between the two of them to lead up to this event.

    3. Laycoe, the Bruins forward had nailed Richard in the first period. He served two minutes for charging. But the hit lit the fuse of Richard’s infamous temper.

      I think it's interesting they use the word "infamous" when describing his temper.

    1. After the riot, the NHL began to crack down on all-out brawls (especially carrying your stick into one), though it would take another 25 years for the changes to take effect with the institution of the third-man-in rule. 

      It is good they were creating change within the NHL, but 25 years seems like a long time for these changes to take place.

    2. revenge was on some fans' minds

      I understand being upset over the event and possibly complaining about it for the next week or so, but seeking revenge seems extreme.

    3. Richard's story had linesman Cliff Thompson holding him back, arms pinned, while Laycoe was allowed to smack away. Rocket said he warned the linesman three times to let him go before he finally clocked the official.

      I never thought to think hockey would ever have conspiracy theories. This depicts half of the story, and we see Laycoe's side beneath this section.

    4. Sticks were high, fists flew, blood often smeared the ice, and the owners thought this was all manly and a great way to sell tickets.

      Very brutal details.

    5. in order to understand the events leading up to the riot of March 17, 1955 that forever bears his name, it was crucial to know how violent the National Hockey League was in those days.

      I know hockey can be an intense impact sport, but I did not realize how violent it could get.

    1. Two years ago, shortly after the minister moved to Montreal, he and one of his students decided the university should offer the opportunity to study whether the Canadiens are, in fact, a faith.

      This would be an interesting study, but it doesn't seem realistic.

    2. The arena is their temple, the players are their saviours, and those who worship them pray that the sacrifices made on the ice — of blood, sweat and tears — will lead them to glory.

      Again, a very bold statement comparing aspects of hockey to religion. I wonder if people found this offensive.

    3. Graduate course set to debate whether one of Quebec's biggest passions is a religion

      This is a very bold statement comparing a hockey team to a religion, it shows the fan's intensity and passion for the team.

    1. The Richard Riot is generally considered the firstexplosion of French-Canadian nationalism, the beginning of asocial and political dynamic that shapes Canada to this day.

      It's interesting that this event at a sporting event could turn political, as well as leave a lasting impact on Canada today.

    2. Richard had twice viciouslyslashed his nemesis, Hal Laycoe of the Boston Bruins, and thenassaulted a linesman.

      I know hockey can be an intense sport, but this seems a little much, did fans promote/respond positively to this behavior?

    3. as the suspensionthat NHL president Clarence Campbell had handed Richard the daybefore all hell broke loose.

      This is a great hook/setup for the story, I am eager to learn more.

    4. On the night of Thursday, March 17, 1955, the haze was aghostly yellowish white. Smoke from a tear-gas canister haddriven thousands of hockey fans into the streets, sparking afour-hour rampage that yielded the requisite fires, shatteredwindows, looted stores, overturned cars and 137 arrests.

      This is a very intense description of that night, I can truly envision what had happened.

    1. God has admirable consolations for those who fear him, he has much greater ones for those who love him.

      God wants us to have faith in him and love him, rather than fear him, but we should still respect him.

    2. On the first of November, seeing a woman with child at the point of death, we made a vow to saint Joseph that, in case she recovered, the child should be baptized. Immediately she began to improve, and some time afterward gave birth to a daughter, who by Baptism has been brought within the ranks of the children of God.

      Very interesting story, is saint Joseph the saint of healing?

    3. As to death, I believe that all of us would have been very glad to submit to it for the defense of the Cross.

      I think this is a bold statement, saying that everyone would die in the name of Christ and his death.

    4. Baptism principally impart life to the soul, and not to the body. However, they have the opinion so deeply rooted that the baptized, especially the children, are no longer sickly, that soon they will have spread it abroad and published it everywhere. The result is that they are now bringing us children to baptize from two, three, yes, even seven leagues away.

      Again, very interesting, especially how people would come from far away.

    5. They seek Baptism almost entirely as an aid to health.

      This is an interesting take on Baptism. Typically I associate Baptism as a way to purify the soul, not aid to health