https://www.jstor.org/stable/43818277?seq=2

When somebody migrates to a different country, through provision of information on the foreign country or by increased demand for goods from their countries of origin, they essentially stimulate trade which contributes to the overall country's development, as stated by the source above.

An individual's income depends on their endowments on the income resulting from reach item in their set of endowments. Free trade agreements facilitate the exchange of goods and services between countries with fewer barriers like tariffs and quotas. This can increase the market size for indivuals, allowing them to sell their products and purchase products to and from a larger customer base. Migration can allow individuals to diversify their sources of income. When people move to new countries, they can access different job markets and income opportunities. This diversification can reduce their risk and increase overall income.

https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/sanctions/restrictive-measures-against-russia-over-ukraine/sanctions-against-russia-explained/

This source explains quite nicely how Russia is impacted. "As part of the economic sanctions, the EU has imposed a number of import and export restrictions on Russia. This means that European entities cannot sell certain products to Russia (export restrictions) and that Russian entities are not allowed to sell certain products to the EU (import restrictions)." An important distinction to note here, however, is that products pertaining to consumption and health are not not excluded, meaning that Russia's population itself is not harmed.

Economic sanctions on Russia firstly may not deter Russia from acting, as there are varying degrees of sanctions, but it isolates Russia's economy from the global economy, which would negatively impact its trading, investing, and financial instituions, diminishing long-term economic growth, trading with other countries, and external investment.

Reminds me of this article: https://globalizationandhealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12992-021-00677-5. More globalized countries have a tendency to engage in protectionism, banning travelers, as to first prevent the further spread of the virus, commit to existing trade agreements, exhibit a greater desire to ‘learn from others’ and also perhaps of ‘confidence’ in a government’s ability to deal with a pandemic through its health system and state capacity.

This answers the inquiry question which is "What is the relationship between trade and development?" As countries engage in comparative advantage and trade in what they specialize it - what they can produce most efficiently at the lowest cost - they are able to operate at a greater efficiency, going from a point inside the PPC to on the PPC with constant resources, and are able to experience economic growth, or increased prospects of growth compared to their previous capabilities.

This article, https://www.oecd.org/economy/greeneco/global-forum-on-environment-2016.htm, correlates with what this article is talking about. "The environment essentially provides resources to the economy, and acts as a sink for emissions and waste. Natural resources are essential inputs for production in many sectors, while production and consumption also lead to pollution and other pressures on the environment." This elucidates how the environment provides resources to established companies and, in return, these companies will take advantage of the environment which damages it.

This directly responds to the inquiry question on how does economic growth affect the environment? Through increased productivity and industrilization, there will be increased factories and, overall, increased output. This will translate into more CO2 emissions which generates greenhouse gases, destroying the ozone layer and exaggerating the sun's detrimental impact on the climate and temperature

Same thing that the video was talking about. The poor has too much to worry about and, yes, they may be forced to rely on automatic decision making more, but they also may just give up and not bother to try anymore/

Along with prejudice and implicit biases that often imapct how we think and act.

Highly relatable to me, tending how I get my information/habits from those around me.

These strategies centralized around the concept of teamwork and collaboration are well known and are highly effective.

What I find interesting about this is that this is a pretty bold assumption. Societal conformation exists, but to the extent where it is centered around a single point of destruction, to me, is highly unlikely. There may be one group that is, but there may be another group that challenges said point too.

As there is too much information for one to process, it is broken up into two different modes for the human mind to process better.

Key limitation of automatic thinking,

Important distinction here.

Example of pathos here, appealing to one emotionally/

This is a response to the question. When people do not have much money, they tend to pay attention to money much more than anyone else would. So, to make sure that their money is being spent appropriately, they structure what their money could be spent towards, just like the video addressed how half of one's money is spent towards food, tabacco, religious festivals, etc.

Three principles that help guide the new approach that takes the human cognitive ability, behavior, etc into account.

This is kind of a condition. Only when the porofit-making bottom line is imapcted is when the development community pays attention to the capacity of the human cognitive ability. If they were to do it perpetually, then their profits could increase substantially.

The downside has to be addressed. By considering everyone to be the same and ignoring external influences, it poses a great threat as it is not accurate at all.

Main idea of the Report

This is an example of an effect of paying attention to a person's cognitive ability.