feeling into them
Online, is it possible or even desirable to overcome our assumptions about those with whom we interact? Instead of assuming they are like us and share our experiences, imagine always that they are not us, do not share our experiences?
confuse or misuse the concept of “empathy” as simply another or more intense version of “sympathy,”
Can sympathy be a point of access into empathy? Online, how do we perhaps create connections that are qualitatively different in the form of a "shared space" that leads to sympathy, that leads to empathy? To what extent do digital/online spaces hide experiences/identities/conditions of being (disability, race, gender, socio-economic status, etc) that are potential points of sympathy/empathy? Is that empowering, or not? Is the choice to "disclose" empowering, to what extent should a recipient have a say in whether the sympathetic/empathetic relation is formed?
This is the first annotation for this reading.
This is my page note.
Week 1 High = 180 Low = 0 Average = 47.8
This is an annotation.
If you ever have questions about what kind of evidence you need to provide to document your participation and how to submit it, stop by during office hours or ask the question before or after class. You’ll earn points for the office hours visit, asking the question,
The Mohegan manu’da, or basket, pictured here is in the collection of the Connecticut Historical Society. I
This is the first sentence.
Technical communication is a broad field and includes any form of communication that exhibits one or more of the following characteristics:
This is a broad definition of technical communication.
This is a page note.
Is it really?