- Mar 2024
-
drive.google.com drive.google.comview3
-
believes that good ideascan come from anyone, not just designers, clinicians, and therapists
Reminds me of the book "The Creative Act: A way of Being"
-
The material is sketchlike, under construction, with enough malleability tobe edited, reshaped, or even discarded without too much preciousness.Cardboard has the virtue of being provisional, and it retains its experimentalspirit even while it offers its sturdy strength. That unlikely-seemingcombination of virtues—contingency and strength—is just right forfostering the design of adaptive furniture. It’s also a great match for thenear-magical plasticity that marks the development of young children,including Niko.
Perhaps I'm too much of skeptic, but I find the idea of utilizing cardboard as a final material a little far fetched in terms of durability. I feel like the only "paper" based chair I've seen is the cabbage chair by Nendo
-
You can find adaptive and assistive chairs incatalogs, of course, but this chair was made for Niko and no one else.
I wonder as I'm reading the intro and processing the individualistic needs of Niko, could this notion of adaptive design of focusing on tailored made-one-of a kind objects be applied to our idea as a whole? How can we apply a more democratic approach to objects we consume and design?
-
- Feb 2024
-
drive.google.com drive.google.comview3
-
Dangerous? Certainly, some people may opt to work less, butthen that’s precisely the point. A handful of artists and writers (“allthose whom society despises while they are alive and honorswhen they are dead” – Bertrand Russell) might actually stop doingpaid work altogether. There is overwhelming evidence to suggestthat the vast majority of people actually want to work, whetherthey need to or not.54 In fact, not having a job makes us deeplyunhappy.55One of the perks of a basic income is that it would free the poorfrom the welfare trap and spur them to seek a paid job with trueopportunities for growth and advancement. Since basic income isunconditional, and will not be taken away or reduced in the eventof gainful employment, their circumstances can only improve.
I continuously question throughout this article where these preconceived notions derive from? Why develop systems trapping those in a welfare system that ultimately costs the state more money?
-
poor people are poor is because they don’t have enough money,”notes economist Charles Kenny, “and it shouldn’t come as a hugesurprise that giving them money is a great way to reduce thatproblem.”14
A big "make sense" moment. Why does our society create such bureaucratic systems that does the opposite of helping lower income people? Where did this deep seated distrust come from instead of evaluating the economic crisis and wage gap divide?
-
“most efficientway to spend money on the homeless might be to give it to them.”
This reminds me a lot of the system of Jon Sabrato who essentially built home for homeless individuals. I believe he leased the land/homes to these individuals for a dollar. There's been similar rich philanthropists who've adopted this model to wide success. Give people what they actually need.
-
-
drive.google.com drive.google.com
-
Humanagency gets priority. The mistakes are mine. Only the amateurblames the material for the errors of the hand. So even if this isa book about design and matter, the human actor is privileged.
uniquely human practice
-
the initial idealism is almost always betrayedby reality.
IS this possibly aiming at speculative work? Should we be analyzing it within the same lens?
-
“pensiero debole” (weak thought) as pointing towhat might be rather than what is fully realized, a concept thatwhispers of potential more than staking out a claim.
Emphasizing the exploration of possibilities and potentialities rather than making definite claims about what is fully realized or known. Directing attention towards openness to different interpretations, perspectives, and futures. Ambiguity is okay. "lowering the threshold of critical expectations"
-
, I often find that abstract concepts are not so easilytranslated into a simple material form that a student can buildwith the tools available in the model shop.
I find this particular section interesting because it does put into frame how even being in a design school can have it's limitations in the context of accessibility and time. 4 years broken down into 4/5 month long semesters isn't really enough time to fully experiment and continue iterations of a project. Even when given 1 year usually reserved for thesis, is only opening the threshold of oppurtunities for a project.
-
-
theopenutopia.org theopenutopia.org
-
anti-war protest and critique has become an integral part of war.
However, the mass opposition of Americans and the critique of the decisions of the Bush administration ultimately pulled troops out of Iraq. Yes there was an almost 10 year occupation, but this was in defiance of what most Americans wanted at the time.
-
Criticism threatens to undermine the very foundation of existence for those who build their lives on the edifice of belief.
But doesn't criticism and truth go hand in hand? It is impossible to simultaneously demonize criticism and glorify Truth. Belief therefor is an illusion, as spoken previously using the example of the "Emperors New Clothes".
-
But criticism has run its political course. What was once a potent weapon against totalitarianism has become an empty ritual, ineffectual at best and self-delusional at worst. What happened? History.
Interesting discourse on how criticism has essentially been a tool for totalitarianism instead of it's enemy.
-
Utopias, however, are usually the products of singular imaginations or, at best, the plans of a small group: a political vanguard or artistic avant-garde.
Isn't this a prevention of globalizing the idea of Utopia? Should Utopia be globalized?
-
Utopia offers this “other,” an interlocutor with which to argue, thereby clarifying and strengthening your own ideas and ideals (even if they lead to the conclusion that Utopia is undesirable). Without a vision of an alternative future, we can only look backwards nostalgically to the past, or unthinkingly maintain what we have, mired in the unholy apocalypse that is now. Politically, we need Utopia.
How do we sell this "other" or alternative lifestyle within in the main stream looking for an end to a polarizing political society? Are we romanticizing similar aspects in Utopias?
-