10 Matching Annotations
  1. Feb 2018
  2. lti.hypothesislabs.com lti.hypothesislabs.com
    6c8c356ff1eabdd9934446ef3c03a070.pdf
    4
    1. sara_levene 06 Feb 2018
      If one were to regard father, older brother andruler like oneself, how could one not be filial

      I interpret this as saying that filial actions, though important, are not as important as all around respect. Rather than emphasizing and teaching children to be filial one should teach them to treat everyone with the respect that they would give a family member. If you teach respect people will automatically be filial. I.E if you abuse your inferiors they will revolt and cause disorder. Like how the orphans in Annie revolted because Miss Hannigan did not show them any kindness or respect.

    2. sara_levene 06 Feb 2018
      Even if a father does not feel affection forhis son, or an older brother does not feel affection for his youngerbrother, or a prince does not feel affection for his minister, this isalso what is spoken of as disorder in the world. When a fatherloves himself but does not love his son, then he disadvantages theson and benefits himself. When an older brother loves himself but

      top down chaos

    3. sara_levene 06 Feb 2018
      If a son loves himself and does notlove his father, then he disadvantages the father and benefitshimself.i If a younger brother loves himself and does not love hisolder brother, then he disadvantages the older brother and benefitshimself. If a minister loves himself and does not love his prince,then he disadvantages the prince and benefits himself. This is whatis spoken of as disorder.

      bottom up chaos

    Visit annotations in context

    Annotators

    URL

    lti.hypothesislabs.com/viewer/web/6c8c356ff1eabdd9934446ef3c03a070.pdf
  3. lti.hypothesislabs.com lti.hypothesislabs.com
    https://web-b-ebscohost-com.muhlenberg.idm.oclc.org/ehost/ebookdelivery/EbookPrint/bmxlYmtfXzY3NzM5OV9fQU41?sid=876f5ef8-aaff-48a3-b814-1e54399a8c64@sessionmgr120&vid=4&pdfData={"Pages":["Page-__-99","Page-__-100","Page-__-101","Page-__-102","Page-__-103","Page-__-104","Page-__-105"]}&format=EK&language=eng
    3
    1. sara_levene 06 Feb 2018
      IhaveheardthatthereisasacredtortoiseinChuthathasbeendeadforthreethousandyears.Thekingkeepsitwrappedinclothandboxed,andstoresitintheancestraltemple.Nowwouldthistortoiseratherbedeadandhaveitsbonesleftbehindandhonored?Orwoulditratherbealiveanddraggingitstailinthemud?”“Itwouldratherbealiveanddraggingitstailinthemud,”saidthetwoofficials.Zhuangzisaid,“Goaway!I’lldragmytailinthemud!”

      I like this part.

    3. sara_levene 06 Feb 2018
      itwasimpossibletodistinguishahorsefromacow

      I assume this a figure of speech...but it isn't logical it is very hard to mistake a cow for a horse. Also this expression would make more sense if it was foggy.

    Visit annotations in context

    Annotators

    URL

    lti.hypothesislabs.com/viewer/web/c4053bc3993b8861a4fa2a39839581e0.pdf
  4. lti.hypothesislabs.com lti.hypothesislabs.com
    Untitled
    3
    2. sara_levene 06 Feb 2018
      Lackingconstanthearts,theywillgoastrayandfallintoexcesses,stoppingatnothing.Topunishthemaftertheyhavefallenfoulofthelawistosetatrapforthepeople.Howcanabenevolentmaninauthorityallowhimselftosetatrapforthepeople?

      This is the exact opposite of Legalism which says that because man is naturally evil and selfish you should set laws with harsh punishments. I wonder if this is an intentional criticism of Legalism?

    Visit annotations in context

    Annotators

    URL

    lti.hypothesislabs.com/viewer/web/08db053e94ce38cf2a2090bff1384569.pdf