5 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2020
    1. We have to limit fortunes. Our present plan is that we will allow no one man to own more that $50,000,000. We think that with that limit we will be able to carry out the balance of the program. It may be necessary that we limit it to less than $50,000,000. It may be necessary, in working out of the plans that no man’s fortune would be more than $10,000,000 or $15,000,000. But be that as it may, it will still be more than any one man, or any one man and his children and their children, will be able to spend in their lifetimes; and it is not necessary or reasonable to have wealth piled up beyond that point where we cannot prevent poverty among the masses.

      The thing about “limiting” fortunes is that there is always going to be a loophole. Offshore accounts or something similar to that or them putting assets in other people’s names like their newborn children or some relative. To me it does not seem achievable.

    2. Now, my friends, if you were off on an island where there were 100 lunches, you could not let one man eat up the hundred lunches, or take the hundred lunches and not let anybody else eat any of them. If you did, there would not be anything else for the balance of the people to consume. …

      This to me is not a fair analogy comparing money being distributed to someone hoarding food. You will die without food within a matter of days, however you will not die because you do not have extra money.

    3. To me the first thing I thought as I am reading the speeches by Huey Long is the ideas screamed the theme of socialism. In my opinion when our founding fathers created the line “All men are created equal” they were not referring to one’s bank account. They were talking about rights and the establishment of divided classes. If you were a King, then you could do whatever you wanted including have people killed and no one even questioned it. If you were a stable boy, then you likely stayed within that class for your life and you married someone within your class and your children stayed within that class their lives as well. It was hard to change this from the things I have learned about through my various history classes. The beauty of America is that how we are born does not define the rest of our lives. We can change anything we want to. In a perfect world everyone having the same chances and same wealth as everyone else sounds great but in the real world it would never work. Huey brings up good points and reasoning behind his points but again in the real world it cannot work. But I can see why he was so popular poverty-stricken crowds and rose up so quickly. If someone came up to you and said hey my plan as president is to take this billionaire’s money and give you some of it just because I think he should not have that much money would you turn him down? Now think about this time period of the depression and all the people that struggled now would you really turn him down? Which is a clue to why he was assassinated. I am not sure if they found out who did it, but I would look at the local billionaires who he was threatening to slash their net worth.

    1. W.E.B. DuBois, a leading black intellectual and co-founder of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), agitated against discrimination and authored several noteworthy pieces on the black experience in the United States. The following, from his seminal, The Souls of Black Folk, argues against Booker T. Washington’s calls for compromise. Easily the most striking thing in history of the American Negro since 1876 is the ascendancy of Mr. Booker T. Washington. … Mr. Washington represents in Negro thought the old attitude of adjustment and submission; but adjustment at such a peculiar time as to make his programme unique. This is an age of unusual economic development, and Mr. Washington’s programme naturally takes an economic cast, becoming a gospel of Work and Money to such an extent as apparently almost completely to overshadow the higher aims of life. Moreover, this is an age when the more advanced races are coming in closer contact with the less developed races, and the race-feeling is therefore intensified; and Mr. Washington’s programme practically accepts the alleged inferiority of the Negro races. Again, in our own land, the reaction from the sentiment of war time has given impetus to race-prejudice against Negroes, and Mr. Washington withdraws many of the high demands of Negroes as men and American citizens. In other periods of intensified prejudice all the Negro’s tendency to self-assertion has been called forth; at this period a policy of submission is advocated. In the history of nearly all other races and peoples the doctrine preached at such crises has been that manly self-respect is worth more than lands and houses, and that a people who voluntarily surrender such respect, or cease striving for it, are not worth civilizing. In answer to this, it has been claimed that the Negro can survive only through submission. Mr. Washington distinctly asks that black people give up, at least for the present, three things, — First, political power, Second, insistence on civil rights, Third, higher education of Negro youth,– and concentrate all of their energies on industrial education, the accumulation of wealth, and the conciliation of the South. This policy has been courageously and insistently advocated for over fifteen years, and has been triumphant for perhaps ten years. As a result of this tender of the palm-beach, what has been the return? In these years there have occurred: The disfranchisement of the Negro The legal creation of a distinct status of civil inferiority for the Negro. The steady withdrawal of aid from institutions for the higher training of the Negro. These movements are not, to be sure, direct results of Mr. Washington’s teachings; but his propaganda has, without a shadow of doubt, helped their speedier accomplishment. The question then comes: Is it possible, and probable, that nine millions of men can make effective progress in economic lines if they are deprived of political rights, made a servile caste, and allowed only the most meagre chance for developing their exceptional men? If history and reason give any distinct answer to these questions, it is an emphatic No. 

      Well Mr. DuBois appears to have the opposite view of Mr. Washington on everything. I felt a respectful but sarcastic vibe from his speech. Throughout his speech he points out instances in the areas where African Americans are kept down like keeping the African American youth from higher education. In my opinion he views the South as this rock crushing down on all African Americans holding them down but still wanting them to work. In his eyes they are giving up all respect with nothing in return. He points out that Mr. Washington’s views leave African Americans being completely submissive. He also points out the same patterns that have been happening for years and years and maybe its time for a different approach. Although I see both views on each side of the table, I also see Mr. Dubois’s view and frustration from the years of discrimination and trying to build themselves up from slavery into citizens while still dealing with discrimination and all.

    2. Cast it down in agriculture, mechanics, in commerce, in domestic service, and in the professions. And in this connection it is well to bear in mind that whatever other sins the South may be called to bear, when it comes to business, pure and simple, it is in the South that the Negro is given a man’s chance in the commercial world, and in nothing is this Exposition more eloquent than in emphasizing this chance. Our greatest danger is that in the great leap from slavery to freedom we may overlook the fact that the masses of us are to live by the productions of our hands, and fail to keep in mind that we shall prosper in proportion as we learn to dignify and glorify common labour and put brains and skill into the common occupations of life; shall prosper in proportion as we learn to draw the line between the superficial and the substantial, the ornamental gewgaws [sic] of life and the useful. No race can prosper till it learns that there is as much dignity in tilling a field as in writing a poem. It is at the bottom of life we must begin, and not at the top. Nor should we permit our grievances to overshadow our opportunities. To those of the white race who look to the incoming of those of foreign birth and strange tongue and habits of the prosperity of the South, were I permitted I would repeat what I say to my own race: “Cast down your bucket where you are.” Cast it down among the eight millions of Negroes whose habits you know, whose fidelity and love you have tested in days when to have proved treacherous meant the ruin of your firesides. Cast down your bucket among these people who have, without strikes and labour wars, tilled your fields, cleared your forests, builded [sic] your railroads and cities, and brought forth treasures from the bowels of the earth, and helped make possible this magnificent representation of the progress of the South. Casting down your bucket among my people, helping and encouraging them as you are doing on these grounds, and to education of head, hand, and heart, you will find that they will buy your surplus land, make blossom the waste places in your fields, and run your factories. While doing this, you can be sure in the future, as in the past, that you and your families will be surrounded by the most patient, faithful, law-abiding, and unresentful people that the world has seen. As we have proved our loyalty to you in the past, nursing your children, watching by the sick-bed of your mothers and fathers, and often following them with tear-dimmed eyes to their graves, so in the future, in our humble way, we shall stand by you with a devotion that no foreigner can approach, ready to lay down our lives, if need be, in defence of yours, interlacing our industrial, commercial, civil, and religious life with yours in a way that shall make the interests of both races one. In all things that are purely social we can be as separate as the fingers, yet one as the hand in all things essential to mutual progress.

      In my opinion he is emphasizing to African Americans to "cast their bucket" down in the different fields they have never been previously allowed in. Trust in the process and know that they can thrive in any field if they are brave enough to just throw their bucket into it (metaphorically speaking). We are no longer in the slave’s position. Some of them forget that even though they were slaves they have skills that were created from being a slave that they can utilize in the commercial world within the South and have real jobs. Do not be so angry about your previous position that you miss out on the current opportunities. He also emphasizes to the “white people” that they need to remember that African Americans helped building of the railroads, creating farms, taking care of white children, and tending to families. That has been going on all along so why can’t you trust African Americans to be law abiding citizens and do their part for their country? I mean they have been doing the work for years without the benefits so to speak. Of course he says it in a more articulate way that is not so accusing.