This article is clearly on the side of not supporting or merely recognizing transgender identity. Yet, transgender activists haven taken this article as as opportunity to shine their own light against this argument and clarify some misconceptions. This is the perfect example of taking an argument and use it to engage in more critical thinking.

This whole article seems to trickle down to this overall main point. No matter how subjectively flawed an argument may seem, they serve the purpose of creating critical thinking and discussion even if it's to refute the original argument.

This shows us that an argument doesn't necessarily need to be convincing or even relevant but that it sheds validity on the topic itself. It can lead to more conversations of the main ideas or opposing the argument itself.