Transition
- May 2021
- Mar 2021
-
www.seanblanda.com www.seanblanda.com
-
ther Side is “right” but that they likely have real reasons to feel that way
Not 'right'
-
Don’t try to “win.”
Called out.
-
When you hear someone cite “facts”
Be open when peers provide facts/statistics
-
As
A discussion cannot take place if it's just one side flaunting info. We have to be able to see both sides before deciding if one side is outright wrong or to find a common ground.
-
Because refusing to truly understand those who disagree with you is intellectual laziness and worse, is usually worse than what you’re accusing the Other Side of doing.
mic drop
-
But I’d like to go a step further. We should all enter every issue with the very real possibility that we might be wrong this time.
More solutions
-
The solution is, as deBoer says, “You have to be willing to sacrifice your carefully curated social performance and be willing to work with people who are not like you.” In other words, you have to recognize that the Other Side is made of actual people.
Good one; Solutions!!!! deBoer's solution
-
true
People would rather share something inaccurate that supports their ideas than share actual facts that would make them less ignorant.
-
Where debunking an Internet fake once involved some research, it’s
that quote reminds me of the Netflix series "murder among the Mormons"
-
urious person and participate in social media in this way. We cannot consider ourselves “empathetic” only to turn around and belittle those who don’t agree with us.
Connection back to thesis
-
he misinformation is so rampant that the Washington Post stopped publishing its internet fact-checking column because people didn’t seem to care if stuff was true.
WOW
-
cardboard cut out
good phrase
-
It signals that we’d rather be smug assholes than consider alternative views.
real intention
-
genuine intellectual curiosity is the sharing
Instead of genuine intellectual curiosity .. sharing links?
-
“political correctness”
audience
-
“Hey, that person who tweets about the TV shows I like also dislikes injustice,” which over time becomes “I can identify an ally by the TV shows they like.” The fact that you can mine a Rihanna video for political content becomes, in that vague internety way, the sense that people who don’t see political content in Rihanna’s music aren’t on your side.
common interests in one thing does not mean you share all views; Common interest doesn’t mean your twins. What feels logical to us makes us think someone who differs opinion isn't thinking logically.
-
When someone communicates that they are not “on our side” our first reaction is to run away or dismiss them as stupid.
reaction; get defensive; close minded vs open
-
To be sure, there are hateful, racist, people not worthy of the small amount of electricity it takes just one of your synapses to fire.
Scope of his argument; metacommentary; audience awareness
-
Illustration
Same image. praising the homeland and bashing the other side same image. different labels its the way they look at each other assumptions about each othe
-
Controversial Opinion
Online: fb
-
But this holier-than-thou social media behavior is counterproductive, it’s self-aggrandizement at the cost of actual nuanced discourse and if we want to consider online discourse productive, we need to move past this.
THESIS I agree self-aggrandizement?
-
Note: this post was originally published on Medium, where it received more than 3.5 million reads and selected as one of the best Medium posts of the decade.]
Shows cred.
-