strong
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
strong
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Simply puttingsomething online is not digital research
![]()
How will the project “live” and beaccessible in the future, and what sort of infrastructurewill be necessary to support it?
"Simply click this link to access the database used in our study!" Error 404
The same digital artifact can leadmultiple lives on multiple platforms, with multipleauthors. It can undergo remixing by others before,during, and after its “completion.”
This reminds me of an idea from semiotics that I learned from a course in translation studies: That the moment a text transitions from "author" to "reader", the character of the text is fundamentally altered within the mind of the reader; undergoing a kind of remixing. To me, this adds a level of cohesion between pre-digital and digital artifacts. It's like a perceivable, actualized, and real-time form of the mental processes we've been doing to pre-digital artifacts the whole time.
researcher,designer, programmer, modeler, editor, and the like
I'd like to hear some first-hand accounts of what it's like to try and wear all (or most) of these hats at once. I think it could provide a refreshing sense of perspective :')
production
I think reproduction of existing studies is also an important factor to consider during project development. While reproducing the results of another study may be too time-consuming depending on the scope of a project, it can serve as a saving grace from the pain of discovering that a highly-cited paper didn't actually perform the statistical proofs they claimed to have done (thus dooming parts of the project that hinged on such research). I'm 100% projecting by saying that, but I do truly believe that reproduction for the sake of veracity is under-appreciated.