Website Curated By Oral Historians: Gabrielle Harvey, Dixon Massingill, and Noble DeMarco
Awwww, I love this! 🥹
Website Curated By Oral Historians: Gabrielle Harvey, Dixon Massingill, and Noble DeMarco
Awwww, I love this! 🥹
Oral History Podcast
This was a solid podcast! Although the story was built around the oral history process itself, the structure is logical and well-thought out. I really found the exploration of the differences in internet access compelling, though I would have liked to hear more from Mr. Massingill; it seemed that his voice appeared a little less than the others... This may have been because of the questions y'all developed?
Transcript
GREAT job cleaning up your transcripts and spending time with your interviewees, getting them to flesh out their memories! By doing this, you create a resource for future historians!
Go Paladins!
🥹
Questions
I think the connection between these different perspectives could have been strengthened if the questions had been a little more uniform, for instance, building in a few more questions for Mark that got at his personal (and not just his professional) experience and, likewise, adding questions for Gregory and Dr. Raiana that pushed them explore how the early internet shaped how they interacted with small businesses...
Impact of the Internet At-Home
This section is a really unique, narrow historical overview, and I like that you drew on primary sources to craft it. But how could some secondary sources have helped you frame the significance of this development a bit more?
which gave voices behind a screen to those who would otherwise not be heard. 2.0 provided the foundation of media convergence, providing more background information on consumers so that media entities could monitor their site traffic and tailor their content to their intended audiences.6 Because of this increased audience awareness, small business owners used the new technology by acquiring websites to promote their work.
Building on my comment above, THIS gets at the connection a bit more—it seems that both groups benefitted from the increased exposure the Internet provided?
Historically, preservation has been a significant issue largely due to systematically discriminatory actions that have diminished the voices of marginalized communities. Without those voices, it is challenging to gain a clear insight into the realities of the events that have preceded the current state of the world. Unfortunately, many current entities have taken advantage of the omission of minority perspectives to create false realities that never existed. The integrity of history is based upon the perceptions of the privileged, which is a direct detriment to the well-rounded truths that never have the opportunity to be heard due to the lack of access.1Small businesses have been a massive part of the U.S. economy for centuries.2 Many businesses we pass by on our roads today are locally owned and operated, and have been for many years. With the advent of the internet, many of these small businesses were able to grow and flourish. However, the internet also gave many people easier access to information, entertainment, shopping, and more. This ease of access proved detrimental to some small businesses that made their living off of things like this, and the internet made them nearly useless.3 History often overlooks the importance of small businesses and independent enterprises, focusing mainly on large corporations that are internationally known. When the big companies at the top of the business world become the center of attention, not only in the present but historically, we lose the opportunity to learn about the cornerstones of American growth, small businesses. Supporting and learning about small businesses is essential because they have done so much for our country. We need to ensure that their history is not overshadowed by the larger companies that often take the spotlight.
Both of these paragraphs raise really important points, but they don't seem logically connected—they're sort of rhetorical "islands." How could the connection between these two ideas—marginalized communities and small business—be foregrounded a bit more?
oan, Van Tassel. 1997. "PIPELINE POTPOURRI: CABLERS AND COMPUTER MAKERS GO HEAD-TO-HEAD IN THE LIVING ROOM." The Hollywood Reporter (Archive: 1930-2015), Suppl.Trends and Forecasts 349 (43) (Oct 29): S-4. https://login.libproxy.furman.edu/login?auth=shib&url=https://www.proquest.com/trade-journals/pipeline-potpourri/docview/2469245487/se-2.Hettrick, Scott. 1995. "TCI Feeling @ Home on Internet." The Hollywood Reporter (Archive: 1930-2015) 337 (7) (May 05): 4-4, 79. https://login.libproxy.furman.edu/login?auth=shib&url=https://www.proquest.com/trade-journals/tci-feeling-home-on-internet/docview/2469278742/se-2.Sherman, Jay. 1999. "Microsoft Feels Home in Cable Internet Access." The Hollywood Reporter (Archive: 1930-2015) 357 (41) (May 14): 34. https://www.proquest.com/eima/docview/2469228430/AAEB3952309C47D2PQ/17?accountid=11012&sourcetype=Trade%20Journals
Great job including additional primary sources! It's helpful to get the industry/trade press perspective
Yahoo Finance. "10 Businesses That Got Killed by the Internet." Yahoo Finance, March 25, 2019.
I'm not sure if this is the most credible source—there are definitely scholarly sources that have analyzed this phenomenon and would have provided a bit more nuanced history than yahoo...
California State University, Los Angeles. Oral History: Legacies and Minorities. Perspectives. Accessed April 25, 2025. https://www.calstatela.edu/sites/default/files/oral_history.pdf.
This source is okay, but if you dig into it a bit more, you'll see that it's written by undergraduates and it doesn't seem to go through the peer review process. Perhaps using it as a source for other, even more credible sources would have been better...
Sources
Your source list is perhaps the most credible of any of the groups, but I do wish a few more sources (and perhaps some other primary sources?) had been included. I'm unsure if 3 credible, scholarly sources gives enough of a solid foundation for the project.
Music courtesy of Music Library - Royalty Free Music on YouTube. Photo courtesy of Freepik.
Thank you for crediting these!
Y2K: Bug or Bust?
As I mentioned in class, this podcast is very much aligned with what I envisoned the mini-doc to be: a weaving together of historical context and oral history clips to build a story that isn't focused on the oral history process. I love that you took a more creative approach (fun Simpson's clip!)—adding some primary audio clips would have been doubly cool (e.g., audio from contemporary news coverage, etc.). But given the time frame, well done!
nterview Transcripts
Good job cleaning all of these up—very easy to navigate!
5:33
Similar to my comment above, is this telling me that the interview was five minutes and some change?
2:24
Is this the total duration of the interview? A little over 2 minutes? Is this enough time to fully document the details of this memory? Typically oral history interviews are at least 30 minutes!
Interview Files
So that these are accessible to others wanting to use the database, upload the raw m4a file to either YouTube or Vimeo and then embed the clips so they'll continue to be accessible.
For Dr. Treu and Christina Harris:
I understand why Treu and Harris would need a few more specialized questions, but could the same be said for Hughes? What questions could she have answered that the other two might not be able to?
Interviewee Dossiers
I think, for the most, your interviewee selection was solid—I like that it's a variety of perspectives and that all of the subjects are a little older (thus making the preservation of their memories a bit more valuable)
Mini Doc Transcript
I LOVE that you included this! SO helpful! I'm actually going to make this a requirement for future semesters!
Transcripts
GREAT job cleaning up your transcripts! Very professional and easy to navigate—useful if researchers want to use this in the future!
Jerry requested to re-film his storytelling bit as he didn't like his first attempt, thus there are two interview clips.
Aw, Jerry! :)
JIll Davis- Transcript
This is a REALLY short interview—am I right in interpreting the time stamps and it only being ~4-5 minutes long? Is this enough time for the interviewee to fully flesh out their experiences?
Questions for Jill Davis
Why are the questions for Jill different than for Jerry and Kristi? How did the effect your "findings"?
Background
I would have liked to see a little more history "flexing" here—digging deeper than what I was able to cover in class. Your mini doc does some of that work, but here is another opportunity to show off your research skills.
Mini Documentary
As I mentioned in my email, this was an impressive mini doc given the fast turnaround time! I think y'all did a great job integrating course materials, and weaving the history in with the interview footage. Rather than a story about interviewing people, it really is a history about the internet!
Back Stage. Videotape Glossary. May 18, 1984. Accessed on April 30, 2025.
Great job bringing in an additional primary source!
Moore, Andrew. "The Internet Today." Media and Society. November 1, 2024.
Since this isn't actually published, it doesn't quite meet the requirements of a credible secondary source. Instead, why not cite info from the class textbook, which is not only published but also peer reviewed?
Podcast - World Wide Web 2.0
There are some great elements here—the vibe and voiceover are really engaging, and the narration provides thoughtful commentary on and connections between the interview tape. What could have been developed more was the story: rather than a metanarrative of the oral history process itself, tell the story of this particular moment, using only relevant clips from the oral history, along with other sources, clips, sounds, to substantiate and bring the history alive.
Citations
I'll be honest; I'm a little underwhelmed with the secondary sources. Of the FIVE you've included, two of them were assigned, and one (I think) is a song credit for the podcast. The point of the research requirement was to dig deeper than we can in class, to understand how this phenomenon is already represented in the historical record.
und Technology and the American Cinema : Perception, Representation, Modernity. New York: Columbia University Press, 2000.
Where did this source inform your project? Without any in-text citations, it's unclear how these sources were used and where!
convergence
How do you define convergence here? Why no in-text reference/citation to the Jenkins reading?
compare the formation of the celebrity by movie studios to the advent of an influencer by user interaction driven web platforms
Nice parallel here! I'm assuming you're referring to the Douglas readings (why no in-text citation?)...
Wallsten, Scott. Economic Development and Cultural Change , Vol. 53, No. 2 (January 2005), pp. 501-523
This is an incomplete citation—where is the title of the article?
Interviewee
I appreciate the time stamps on this transcript, but it could be cleaned up considerably—lots of attributions that are redundant and that make it difficult to navigate.
Transcrpits
Good job asking follow-up questions and approaching the interview as a conversation! It's clear your interviewees were invested and engaged in the project.
“cultural colonization”
What source(s) inspired this question? Mentioning it in the intro and citing it would be helpful
Brazilian/British “official” history of the rise of the internet
Did you research this? What is the official history from these national contexts?
Interview questions
These are really rich and thought-provoking questions! It seems that they were informed by some outside research, something I wish had been evidenced more in the intro/context given at the top of the page, with appropriate citations.
International students
As I mentioned in class, I'm still unconvinced that these interviewees qualify for an oral history project—web 2.0 isn't quite history yet; they're what researchers are studying right now, and in that way, a student attending a private liberal arts college and their experiences with the current technology will be/are represented quite thoroughly in the scholarship (especially in media effects research). I bring this up not because it affects your grade, but because I want to push you all to be more critically aware of the different methodologies.
Background Research
As I mentioned below in my comment on your citations, I'm a little underwhelmed by the research put into this section. Much of what's here is what I covered in class; the point of the research requirement was to dig deeper than we can in class!
Outernet Podcast
This is a solid attempt to combine your interviews, but it's not quite a story; it's more of a metanarrative of the interview process (e.g., first we asked this question, and here's what they said) with clips from the interviews interspersed. If you had to make a doc about this moment in history rather than the oral history project, how would you have restructured this podcast?
The Outernet
I dig this title!
Interview
Good job asking follow-up questions and approaching the interview as a conversation!
Dr. Kaniqua Robinson Interview Transcript
I appreciate the time stamps on this transcript, but it could be cleaned up considerably—lots of attributions that are redundant and that make it difficult to navigate.
Dr. Eiho Baba Interview Transcript
Good job cleaning up this transcript! It would be useful to add the time stamps too, if possible.
Hauben, Michael. History of ARPANET, n.d.
This is an incomplete citation—where is this from? Where is it published?
Abbate, Janet. “Chapter 1 .” Essay. In Inventing the Internet, n.d.
Also incomplete—simple googling should give you the full citation!
https://www.usg.edu/galileo/skills/unit07/internet07_02.phtml
This REALLY doesn't cut it as a citation. The site itself says it's no longer being maintained, and most of the information is what I covered in lecture. Secondary sources should deepen the info I covered in class rather than merely echo it.
What was your first interaction with the internet? When and how?What were your primary uses for the internet? social, personal, etc.?Did you feel that it was accessible?Did you feel any social pressures associated with it? getting access or sustaining it?How do you think that the internet has evolved today?
Considering the details you gave in the background section, I was expecting to see some of the questions getting at the shift from Web 1.0 to 2.0...
I'm also unsure how the last question gets at the history—it seems more focused on the present.
who lived through the rise of streaming platforms such as Hulu and Disney+
As I mentioned in class, I'm still unconvinced that this interviewee qualifies for an oral history project—streaming platforms aren't quite history yet; they're what researchers are studying right now, and in that way, a student attending a private liberal arts college and their experiences with the current technology will be/are represented quite thoroughly in the scholarship (especially in media effects research). I bring this up not because it affects your grade, but because I want to push you all to be more critically aware of the different methodologies.
Listen Here!
There are a lot of really great elements of the podcast. I liked the "convenience at a cost" angle, and I wish this had been developed a bit more, particularly by narrowing the scope a bit (for example, ONLY focusing on the rise of VHS). Moreover, rather than structuring the podcast as a metanarrative of the oral history process, it would have been a much more compelling story if only certain snippets of the oral histories were used, alongside other sources and audio elements (and music!), to tell the story of VHS and the convenience at a cost it brought. Rather than a conversation podcast, how could this be restructured to be a narrative nonfiction podcast?
While I'm impressed with the Daniel Herbert and Cinéaste citations, this section is a bit underdeveloped. Along with introducing visitors to the topic, it should also demonstrate how you've dug deeper into this historical moment—deeper than we were able to go in our regular class work (though citing Greenberg would have also been helpful!).
Elizabeth R. Gordon Interviewed by Lilia Bierman TranscriptElizabeth R. Gordon Interviewed by Lilia Bierman00:00:00:00 - 00:00:37:24LILIA: Okay. I'm recording. ERG: Okay. As I'm scratching my head. Please edit that out. (Laughs)LILIA: (laughs) I will. Okay, our topic is on the transition from VCR, VHS, and DVD rentals to online streaming. The first question is, how old were you when VCR, VHS, and DVD became a thing, and later, when digital became a big thing? 00:00:37:24 - 00:01:05:21ERGSo, VCR, I was 14. Okay. DVD, I think, is probably like college. So maybe 21, 22. So that would have been like in 1993, but they still weren't affordable. Yeah. And then streaming. We probably didn't start streaming anything till about five years ago. I was in my late forties. 00:01:05:21 - 00:01:31:15LILIAOkay. What was your experience adapting to the transition to digital away from VHS, DVD, and VCR? And what did you think about these social changes?00:01:32:15 - 00:01:58:12ERGLike, when you have DVDs, when they get scratched, you would have to deal with that. And that was problematic. A lot of my videos are still on videotape. So my wedding is on tape. Oh my son, all his first moments are also on videotape.So I've got to get those transitioned—and then streaming and digital stuff. I mean like I said, because I came in the generation where we did not have personal computers in college. Everything has had to be self-taught. Luckily, my husband is very good about this, and he helps me out. But now I feel very confident in streaming and doing things like that and having apps on my phone—stuff like that.00:01:58:28 - 00:02:19:10Unknown(LILIA) Okay. (ERG) And then what was the second part of that. (Lilia) And what did you think about these social changes. (ERG) What do you mean by that. (LILIA)I mean it's just like how it it kind of ties into the next question, how it kind of changed your everyday lifestyle, if at all. If you noticed any changes, was it more difficult to adapt to.00:02:19:12 - 00:02:36:24ERGI mean, you made it easier because you didn't have to carry all this technology around. You have this I can stream Netflix on my phone now. And you don't have to keep up with X, Y and Z. It, I thought it made it very, it made it much easier and I definitely would not want to go backwards.00:02:38:18 - 00:03:09:11ERGBut I like my parents who are in their 80s. There's no way that they, they like the idea of probably have a Netflix or Amazon Prime, but there's no way that my dad could handle that. Yeah. He has a smartphone that, you know, it's, tech support. Yeah. Smartphone. LILIA Yep. I get it. Were there any challenges that you or others that you know, faced while adapting to these new technologies, whether it was learning it or just kind of want to throw your computer at the wall?00:03:09:16 - 00:03:30:01ERGYou know, because we didn't have any computer classes in high school. Yeah. I think they had one section. But the computers that we had or what we did, especially when I was in college, like I wanted C plus programing, I had never it was never taught like word processing Microsoft Word I learned how to type on a typewriter.00:03:30:22 - 00:03:51:21ERGSo again everything was self-taught. It was very hard to begin with and made me kind of nervous. I know a lot of people, think that they can mess something up and can't get it back, and, and there was a lot of anxiety, with that transition. But I feel, you know, again, like, I don't know everything.00:03:51:23 - 00:04:11:10ERGAnd I have children that can help me out, but, you know, I've had to learn a lot. My generation has had to learn a lot. Yeah. And most of us have adapted well, I think. Yes. I'm in Gen X, so that's 1965 to about 1980. And and we've learned a lot and adapted. You know. Yeah. The generation before us.00:04:11:12 - 00:04:38:29ERGNo they're not going to do that. No they're not. In retrospect what were the pros and cons of these shifts in technology. You can get more data on things. So I remember when I was writing my thesis in graduate school, and I was still we we didn't have a lot of memory on computers and had to save it on disks, and it took like 6 or 7 deaths and it would be awful.00:04:38:29 - 00:05:01:07ERGAnd then I'd have to get another. So that was extremely frustrating. You know, being able to have things that are quicker and easier to access and knowing that I've got more space and understanding what a megabyte is, what a gigabyte is, and the storage, that is a lot, lot more helpful. But again, I, I, I've enjoyed the technology push.00:05:01:07 - 00:05:26:12ERGThe one thing I don't like about it is that, I'm glad that I raised my children before this. Because I think that kids that are now being raised, a lot of them, you know, this is, this is shoved in their direction in order to occupy them and they're missing out on reading books. They're missing out on dealing with time that you just have to entertain yourself.00:05:26:12 - 00:05:42:26ERGLike going to the doctor's office. We always read books, or we always did stories, or we always just talked about our day. And now I see, you know, like a two year old or one year old, the doctor's office and the parent says this. Yep, yep. And that is just. And then again, you know, my students, I say it's constant.00:05:42:28 - 00:06:08:01ERGYeah. They can't cut it all. No. Like you got to be professional and put it aside and make eye contact. So it's all like that. Yeah. No, I totally agree. Looking back, what are the biggest lasting impacts of this shift? I just like the fact that you have more information that's accessible. You do have to decipher what is true and what's not true.00:06:08:02 - 00:06:29:26ERG Yeah, but, you know, if I have a question, instead of having to go to a library and find the book or and I would have I mean, I've taken graduate classes since the shift and my papers, I can find so much more information to write about. Because it's more accessible than half in a way on interlibrary loan or going over there and looking something up.00:06:29:28 - 00:06:54:27ERGSo I do like that quick access to information. I do like the portability of it. And I think that has really changed. And then I mean, things like exposure, like medical records. And when I make a doctor's appointment, the reminder will shift through my cell phone, or I'll shift through the app and then I can find out my test, my blood test for that rather quickly, and have to rely on somebody to call me and tell.00:06:55:00 - 00:07:04:29LILIAYeah, I totally agree. So I love all that. Yeah, it is very helpful. How would you describe this shift in one word?00:07:05:24 - 00:07:10:15ERGOne word?00:07:11:18 - 00:07:35:04ERGI think it's exciting. Yeah, I think it really is. I mean, again, I've embraced it because I've been forced to embrace it as an educator. As a parent. So I've everything about I've like except for again that this is just steering people away from having relationships. Yeah. And learning how to deal with, you know just empty time.00:07:35:04 - 00:07:56:10ERGYou've, you've got to, I think, a lot of parents are missing out on that. They definitely are. LILIAYeah, I totally agree. Do you miss VCR, VHS or DVD? And if so, what aspects specifically do you miss?00:07:56:13 - 00:08:19:09ERGCan't miss it if it's never gone. And I still have all my children's Pixar stuff. We lived on it. They had portable DVD players that would hook into the car. Yeah. We had 13-hour (car) rides to go with it. LILIAI mean, you can't argue about that.00:08:19:15 - 00:08:40:27ERGNo, you cannot, but no, I don't miss this at all. You know, I need to get the one thing that I'm really concerned about, which is that I need to get all my son's videos transferred over, and I'm about to send them to somebody. Yeah. And then my wedding video. I need to get that transferred into something. So, no, I don't miss it.00:08:40:29 - 00:09:01:17ERGNo, I still have a bunch, and I still have a DVD player. We got rid of the VCR a couple of years ago. Oh, maybe we haven't. So I can't watch my wedding videos anymore. But now I don't miss this at all. Okay, well that's fair. I don't blame you, since it does, and there's nothing in your computer, so, like.00:09:01:23 - 00:09:37:29ERGNo, I can't know. And there used to be some laptops where you could plug in CD's. Yeah, I remember that. And then like, you know, in the cars when I was 16, you had just, you had a radio and then you had a tape. And then like if you're real fancy, you had a plug in DVD and you plug in a CD player, but like when you went over a bob it was and then came you know they installed and I think my car right now it's like a 2016 I think it has a cassette and a DVD player.00:09:38:12 - 00:09:54:03ERGMay not have the cassette probably then, but yeah, it's just and then all that trying to figure out your song that you want, I mean it's just so much easier. Yeah. Just to plug something in or auto-connect it. It's fantastic. LILIAYeah. Okay. Well, that was all of my questions.Steven Hawk Interviewed by Colby Hawk TranscriptDr. Steven Hawk Interviewed by Colby Hawk00:00:00:00 - 00:00:28:08 Steven: Okay. Go ahead. You can introduce yourself. Yes. My name is Doctor Steven Hawk and I am a licensed K through 12 English teacher. And I've been teaching in the public schools for eight years now. Colby: Cool. So, about how old were you? When, you know, you grew up with the, you know, VHS, VCR and everything, what was it like with that being a big thing back in the day? 00:00:28:08 - 00:00:48:04 Colby: What was your experiences with everyday life and having it having this technology? Steven: Yeah. From, from the age where I was able to really watch movies, I was watching VHS tapes. So, I had a very small collection of VHS tapes and pretty much just rewatched the same 2 or 3 movies again and again and again and again. 00:00:48:04 - 00:01:06:24 Steven: As my mom would tell you, she would say, I wore out Land Before Time on VHS and Home Alone. Those are my two movies that I pretty much would play ‘em rewind ‘em, play ‘em, rewind ‘em. So as a child, that was my experience was just VHS tapes. You could go to a blockbuster and rent a VHS tape at that point. 00:01:06:26 - 00:01:29:22 Steven: But you owned very few and you were able to rent very few. If you were able to rent, it was usually like once a week. So, you didn't watch a lot of movies. And when you did, hopefully it was something you really liked, and you just watched it again and again and again. Colby: Cool. Yeah. And having the technology and everything and, you know, the, you know, VHS mainly for you. 00:01:29:24 - 00:01:53:16 Colby: what was it like transitioning, to this digital, you know, internet age when you have iPhones in your pocket, MacBooks and streaming and all of that? Steven: Yeah. So, the, the, the chain for me, was we went from VHS to DVD probably when I was about 13 years old, around 13. We, we had DVDs and that was a big deal. 00:01:53:19 - 00:02:15:11 Steven: And then DVDs evolved into Blu rays. So, the quality of the DVD DVDs got better. I remember it was my sophomore year of high school when MP3's became a thing. So no longer do we have to carry Walkmans to listen to music, but which is like a DVD, right? we transitioned to MP3's, and so the digital age kind of came upon us. 00:02:15:15 - 00:02:42:09 Steven: It wasn't until I was probably 22 that I had my first iPhone. So growing up, you know, we didn't have internet for the most part of my life. We didn't have any kind of apps or streaming until I was in my probably early 20s. And so that was a huge change because of the amount of things that you could be, I guess, exposed to through streaming. 00:02:42:12 - 00:03:07:12 Steven: It went from having to have a physical copy of a movie or a disc for music to being able to just choose from a vast digital library of different genres and different artists, to then seek out things which isn't something you were able to do. No more than just going to blockbuster and looking through the shelves, could you really seek out different genres and different types of things. 00:03:07:12 - 00:03:29:03 Steven: So, it in a lot of ways it was very freeing because it introduced you to a lot of new things, and you were able to discover a lot of new, tastes, genres, artists, things like that. So, yeah, I would say I was probably about 22 when streaming really caught on in the United States. 00:03:29:05 - 00:03:49:05 Colby: Now, if when you were 22, when you were 22, you would have just gotten out of college. So when you were still at UTK, what was that like, you know, going, you know, if you wanted to go watch something with your friends or, you know, catch up on the newest whatever, what what was that experience like before you had access to all this? 00:03:49:06 - 00:04:11:11 Steven: Yeah. So it was still DVDs were still the thing. You know, when I was in college, we hadn't moved to streaming quite yet. We had the internet age where you were streaming games online with friends and multiplayer and stuff like that. But not really movies. Movies and TV were not mainstream stream. They were not streamed to the mainstream yet. 00:04:11:14 - 00:04:33:23 Steven: And so for me, it was still going to the movies, you know, my friends and I, we would go to the movie theater if there was a movie coming out. You knew the release date and you would you would set a date and a time to go see the movie with your friends physically at a theater. So it wasn't like we stayed in our dorms or apartments and were able to stream the newest movie or TV show. 00:04:33:25 - 00:05:03:12 Steven: So, for me, that was it was still kind of what you would consider an old school experience. I know I've told you Facebook came out in 2005 when I first went to college. And, you know, so social media and the evolution of all streaming from internet, computer platforms, to digital media, for movies, and games, and music, that all really, you know, came mainstream after my college experience. Not during. 00:05:03:15 - 00:05:25:03 Colby: Now, the one big thing I think, and most everybody knows about right is blockbuster. Steven Yeah. Colby So, can you tell me a little bit more about your experiences with blockbuster? You know, was there like a membership program? Was there like certain deals that they had? What was it like going into one of these stores and renting and picking out your favorite flicks? 00:05:25:05 - 00:05:51:07 Steven: Yeah. If there was a membership program, I'm not aware. As a small child, I don't remember if there was a membership program. But what I do remember, and I tell people often, it was always like Christmas morning for me. I loved blockbuster. I think everyone kind of had the same experience where it was 1 or 2 times a week that you might be fortunate enough to go to a blockbuster and get to rent a new movie that you had never seen. 00:05:51:10 - 00:06:09:23 Steven: It was usually a Friday night, and you've been going to school all week and you're just looking forward to Friday night, because that's the one time your parents get to take you to blockbuster and you walk in the store, and it was like toys R us. You have all these movies, and it was just the covers of the movies with a DVD behind it. 00:06:09:25 - 00:06:32:09 Steven: And if you wanted to watch that movie, you had to take the cover out of the way and see if the DVD was still left. And if there was no DVD, then someone had already rented that movie. And if there were enough left, then you got to take one home. But very often they'd already been rented, and so some, some nights you would go for a certain movie, a new release, and it wasn't there. 00:06:32:14 - 00:06:50:03 Steven: And you'd be a little bummed, but you would just go pick out another movie and you would be excited because you didn't get to watch movies, but maybe once or twice a week. like, at all. You didn't get to watch any more than 1 or 2 movies a week. And so, it was a big deal to watch a movie back then, and it was a lot of fun. 00:06:50:04 - 00:07:15:08 Steven: It was something you really look forward to for Monday. You look forward to getting to Friday and Saturday so you could watch a movie and, and so yeah. It was really special back then. And, it had its. Looking back, you could say it had its difficulties. Like I said, you know, the movie may not be there for you to rent, but we dealt with that disappointment really well, I think, and just say, hey, maybe it'll be back by tomorrow. 00:07:15:08 - 00:07:36:02 Steven: Maybe we could rent it on Saturday night. If not, maybe next week. That'll be the movie. So, you know, we didn't get mad about it. It was part of the deal when you went to blockbuster. So I feel like, you know, movies were so much more special back then because they were so much more rare, and they're not rare anymore. 00:07:36:05 - 00:07:56:08 Steven: And so, you know, I miss I miss blockbuster, I miss the excitement of going into the store and the excitement of seeing if the DVD is still there and the excitement of taking it home and watching it. In the VHSs, you had to be kind and rewind is what you had to do. You know, you rewound the tape for the next person to use it. 00:07:56:15 - 00:08:14:18 Steven: When DVDs came along, it was special because you no longer had to rewind the movie. You could just return the disc. So that was a big deal for us. And then of course, as it moved to streaming, you could watch whatever you wanted whenever, you know, whatever day of the week. You didn't have to worry about rewinding or anything. 00:08:14:18 - 00:08:37:21 Steven: So, it was definitely an evolution. But, for me, blockbuster was really special. And not just blockbuster, but, you know, even Redbox later and, you know, any form of renting a movie during the week was really special. Colby: Yeah. And, you're talking about how, you know, now it's not as you know, it's not special. You know, it's not, you know, you have easy access to everything. 00:08:37:21 - 00:09:10:19 Colby: And, kind of on that note, like looking back at your experiences having, you know, dealt with DVDs, VHS, all this stuff, and then having Disney+ and Netflix, and, whatever, Hulu, whatever. You know, how has that changed, like your lifestyle or, you know, just society today and, and like what what would you say or like in some of the pros and cons with having this easy access through, you know, the internet or whatever, you know. 00:09:10:24 - 00:09:35:04 Steven: Yeah. Definitely, it's a double edged sword. To kind of go back to say, Netflix started as a DVD subscription process, and then that turned into a digital streaming process. I didn't jump into that process, probably for a couple of years into when Netflix became a digital subscription service. Netflix was the first one that I subscribed to. 00:09:35:06 - 00:09:54:08 Steven: It was fairly cheap, and I thought, hey, this seems pretty neat, and I gave it a try. And that was my first foray into the digital streaming world. And I enjoyed it. You know, my first experience was, or my first thought was this, this is nice. This is a lot better than having to, you know, get out of my house and drive to a store and it may or may not be there. 00:09:54:08 - 00:10:20:06 Steven: And so, there were some pros there. There were some benefits to that process. But I think as time went on, and this is a year's process, right? As more and more things started to become, digital based, streaming based platforms, news, TV, movies, eventually, taking you out of the theater, even, and just leaving you in your living room. 00:10:20:08 - 00:10:50:07 Steven: Then the layers with Covid. You know, people not getting out of their house. They marketed streaming really heavily during the Covid years, and the years to follow Covid, as something to keep you safe. So it was a marketing ploy to really get you to binge watch and stream. So like I said, it became over time, I believe more of a negative thing had a negative impact on my life because it's so addictive. 00:10:50:09 - 00:11:27:02 Steven: Right? That word binge is probably not a positively connotated word in any other setting. If you binge on food per se, that would not be good. But to binge on Netflix has been marketed as a culturally positive thing. It's something that's good to do. And while it may seem good and may seem fun, and you may find a show or, you know, a series of shows that have five, seasons, and you can watch all of them in a matter of two weeks, I’m not sure that that’s healthy. 00:11:27:10 - 00:11:53:13 Steven: And, in my own life, personally, I think, I think it has had a negative impact to be totally honest. It’s much easier after a hard day of work to go to my bedroom and shut the door away from my kids and silence the house and just consume right? To not give anymore, but to just consume, to binge. 00:11:53:15 - 00:12:16:00 Steven: And that's not good. And I know that that's not good. And so, I feel like now I'm having to self-police. I'm having to say this much is okay, but this much is dangerous. This is not good, not healthy. And so, there's it's a fine line. I'm not exactly sure where the line is now because it's all an evolving process. 00:12:16:02 - 00:12:54:07 Steven: But for me personally, I know it's taking time from my kids, taking time from me reading books and things that I used to do more of, perhaps taking time away from, you know, talking to my wife and communicating. Giving myself a pass when things have been difficult to just sit there and binge and to stream. So, while there have been good things, I think you are, you're probably, kind of like the genres of music. You’re able to discover more through streaming, things that you didn't know existed or things that you didn't know perhaps you were interested in. 00:12:54:10 - 00:13:20:01 Steven: But the negative effect, I think, perhaps outweighs the positive. And that's just my experience. I know some people would disagree. Colby: Yeah, there's a lot of differing opinions on, streaming and everything. And I think, I mean, I don't even have time to binge these days anymore, which is probably a good thing. Steven: Yeah, I think so. Colby: So we talked, you know, you touched on, like, the society and the shift and changes. 00:13:20:01 - 00:13:51:08 Colby: That was very good. With online and all that. Were there any, I guess, you kind of talked about this maybe a little bit, but like any challenges that you or any others that you observed or faced with this challenge of going away from, you know, more analog, whatever, to digital? Steven: Yeah. I mean, nothing, nothing dramatic or drastic, but I think the first challenge was, of course, going from DVD to streaming because we were in an in-between stage there for a while. 00:13:51:13 - 00:14:07:23 Steven: You had streaming apps out there, and you had Netflix and things that you could, you know, sign up for and partake of, but it's like you kind of had a toe in that world, but you were still stuck to DVDs and you rented from, you know, once blockbuster went out, it was Redbox or, you know, stuff like that. 00:14:07:23 - 00:14:30:20 Steven: And then when I went full into streaming, then, I guess the challenge is, you know, part of its financial, to be totally honest. You’re, you're paying for things regularly that you didn't used to pay for, you know. Monthly, you're paying at a minimum, People are probably paying for one streaming app. Lots of people are paying for five or more streaming apps. 00:14:30:22 - 00:14:57:01 Steven: So what used to be free through cable is now charged through apps. So that's been a struggle. Just a financial struggle is like, where's the line between what's an appropriate amount to spend on this form of entertainment and what's not? What’s healthy, what's not? I know this was not for me, but for for some elderly people, there was a huge problem trying to transition to the digital streaming apps. 00:14:57:01 - 00:15:19:13 Steven: And, you know, they they had their TVs that they liked, but they weren't smart TVs. So, you know, they had to figure that they needed a new TV and how to work a new remote and how to download apps and work apps. And that wasn't a problem for me. But I did deal and try to help a lot of elderly people through that transition process to understand how to stream content. 00:15:19:16 - 00:15:40:17 Steven: But for me, you know, like I said, it was just kind of a. It was a learning phase then followed by a self-policing phase of what's. What do I need and what do I not need? Because everyone who develops a streaming app tells you that you need it. And it's kind of hard to select the right service, you know? Do you go with Hulu? 00:15:40:17 - 00:15:59:22 Steven: Do you go with, you know, Comcast? Which one do you go with? There are just so many to choose from that I had to do my research before I landed on the one that I would pay for. Yeah. Colby: So I think we've already talked about, like, looking back, what were the big impacts on that. 00:15:59:22 - 00:16:29:29 Colby: I think we already touched that. Steven: Yeah. Colby: How would you describe that shift in one word? Or that shift or like actually three things. How do you describe the shift? The time before the like the VHS DVDs, all that. And then the time now after this shift. Like three, I know upped it but three. Steven: Yeah. I would say for the time past, nostalgic. Nostalgic is my word because I miss it. 00:16:30:01 - 00:16:51:15 Steven: It's it's something you didn't know that you would miss when it when when it went away. there was sadness when blockbuster went out of business, but there was also an acceptance that this is just the new way of things. And sometimes the more we get into the new way, the more I wish it could become the old way. 00:16:51:18 - 00:17:19:01 Steven: So nostalgic would be that one. For the transition, I would say exciting would be the word I would use for that. I can remember being the only, high schooler, on the way to a baseball team with a new iPod that streamed. Or not streamed but you know, had the MP3 downloaded music that I could just select from a playlist, while all my friends had a Walkman disc that would skip if, you know, they didn't hold it right. 00:17:19:01 - 00:17:47:03 Steven: And so for me, it was exciting. It was a new frontier. It was a new challenge to learn the technology of it. What was for for the, what was the last question for now? I would say the word is dangerous. For the reasons I've stated already, you know, the, mainly the social reasons. What is marketed to us is that we, again, should binge these things. 00:17:47:09 - 00:18:15:27 Steven: We need these things. We can't live without these things. There's a lot of clever marketing that goes into it, and a lot of people that are persuaded by that marketing, including me to some extent. Right. Because I stream. I do watch shows and a lot of it, a lot more than I used to. What used to be one movie a week has turned into ten movies a week. And 20 episodes a week. And that's dangerous. 00:18:15:28 - 00:18:38:02 Steven: It’s dangerous because it's taking me from things that are more important. And it's giving me a pass when I'm tired to say I don't have to struggle with difficult things. I can just. I deserve this. To just sit quietly in my room, away from my children, away from my wife, away from whomever, and reward myself. I think that's a dangerous notion. 00:18:38:04 - 00:18:50:15 Steven: So dangerous, I think, would be the word. Colby: Cool. Yeah. And then. Yeah my battery’s giving me the warning. I think I've got 1 or 2. One more question. 00:18:50:15 - 00:19:10:24 Colby: Okay, so that two part thing, I guess if you could give me one more comment, like do you miss it? You know, do you miss the VHS? You know, rewinding and you know, having, you know, all that the blockbuster and what do you. What, if anything, would you change today? And then what were your favorite, you know, tapes? Or your. 00:19:10:28 - 00:19:34:01 Steven: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So I mentioned earlier, my two favorites when I was young was Land Before Time. The original Land Before time. The first one. Petrie, Longneck, and all the, Sharptooth. That was, I've watched that on repeat, I think. And, and then later when I was a little older, it was, Home Alone, the original Home Alone with Macaulay Culkin. And I just thought that was hilarious. 00:19:34:04 - 00:19:53:05 Steven: It’s kind of slapstick humor, you know? And so those are the two that were my favorite. As far as, you know, do I miss it? Absolutely. I miss the way things were, because I think I missed the way I was, and my family was, and other people were. That's what I missed. It's not that I miss blockbuster itself. 00:19:53:07 - 00:20:21:08 Steven: I miss the type of world that we lived in when we still had a blockbuster. When movies were still special. I didn't say earlier, but you know, as a, as a ninth-grade high school teacher, when we, when I was young and we had a special movie day that was like the best day ever. And so, as a teacher, I thought, hey, when they've really worked hard, I'm going to give them a special movie day occasionally, because I love that when I was young. And I tried that. 00:20:21:11 - 00:20:45:07 Steven: And I've learned that you can't get these kids to focus on a movie anymore. They're so desensitized. They're so overstimulated. They won't even watch a movie anymore. They don't care about movies anymore. I miss how much people cared about movies. So, yeah, I miss it. It's not that I miss VHS again. It's just I miss the way people were. 00:20:45:10 - 00:21:03:00 Steven: And I don't think we can ever get that back. I think we're too far away from that. I don't think we get back to that. So as far as the second part, you know, what could, I what would I change if I could change something? What would I want to change I don't think I have the power to change. 00:21:03:02 - 00:21:23:03 Steven: I want families to sit together on a couch on a Friday night, like I did with a couple pizzas and a show and watch it together, and laugh together, and have time together like family should. That's what I want to happen. but I can't make that happen for other people. I can try to make it happen in my home. 00:21:23:05 - 00:21:47:25 Steven: And, and I've been trying to do that more, you know? I've been consciously trying to do that more in my own home. But I can't do it for other peoples. And so, what I'm seeing in our culture is a shift away from, from loving one another, from spending time, quality time together, and for giving ourselves, as parents, a pass for spending time with our kids. 00:21:47:25 - 00:22:08:07 Steven: And sometimes, even for parenting our kids. Because it's easier just to put them in front of an iPad or a TV screen and just let them watch a movie than it is to discipline, or to ask them how their day was, or to troubleshoot things in their lives, or to help them with their math homework. 00:22:08:09 - 00:22:28:24 Steven: It’s easier just to let them stream something. So I don't know how we fix that, Colby. That's that's something that I've thought about a lot lately. How do we, as a society, as a culture, get back to at least some part of what we used to be when blockbuster still existed? I don't know, I don't know the answer to that. 00:22:28:24 - 00:22:52:17 Steven: I think it's a. It’s a question that people have to challenge themselves with personally. They have to know who they are, what they've become, what they want to be, and then find a way to, to find that middle ground between what's enough streaming and what's too much streaming for themselves as parents, as adults, and also for their children. 00:22:52:19 - 00:23:00:15 Steven: And I just don't have a good answer to that, even though I wish I could. Colby: Sweet. That was a very good answer.Paul Navis Interviewed by Cole Kennedy Transcript
Good job running the interviews as conversations rather than spitting the questions out, without any follow up questions! I also appreciate that the transcripts were cleaned up and made easier to navigate.
Meet The Team!
Aw, this is cute!
In retrospect, what were the pros and cons of these shifts in technology and, by extension, society?
As a way to keep the interview focused on the interviewee's unique experiences rather than their commentary/opinions on its effects, the questions should always stay focused on them. For instance, the question I've highlighted here could be reformulated as "What were the pros and cons of these shifts in technology on your consumption of media?"
blogs.loc.gov/loc/2013/03/mary-pickford-queen-of-the-movies/
This citation is formatted in a way that makes it misleading! There is an author attributed on the site, which you haven't credited
I'm a bit OBSESSED with the fun little animation banner ("Hello New York!")—such an eye-catching visual element!
Mary Pickford and David Belasco- The Warrens of Virginia .
A little confused about these citations—where are the images actually from? These are only the titles...
The Warrens of Virginia
whoa, why do the characters in the background look like ghosts??
Trading Card
Are these the same type of cards that we read about in Douglas-McDonnell??
ten-twenty-thirties
What does this mean?
Princess Theater
Is the image of the Princess Theater?
Cultural Impact and Legacies
The navigation menu is a little confusing—the options are stacked oddly, making it unclear what order to advance through the pages
Take this quiz!
SO cute!
LOVE the timeline! Adds some nice visual variety!
1916 article
Where is this from? What publication?
hich detailed her home, daily routines, and interactions with fans.
Great find! Put it in conversation with Douglas-McDonnell: how does is engage with that readings' argument/ideas?
Really shows how popular she was.
Again, why not include this in the section of the exhibit that highlights this stage of her life?
Grew] from an obscure little actress earning only $25 a week to the highest salaried player the world has ever known
Two things: 1) include an inset of the zoomed in image so visitors can read this for themselves, and 2) this would've been great to use on the actual content pages rather than here at the end...
digital archive
Because so much of the images are pulled from the mary Pickford Foundation site, it begs the question: why shouldn't visitors go there instead of to your site?
commitment to the well-being of her peers
Do the fan magazines cover any of this work? I don't see any original research with primary sources, just info and images pulled from secondary sources...
Hollywood’s conscience
Again, prove this with your curated artifacts! Where do you see this being rhetorically shaped by Hollywood in the fan magazines?
She was Hollywood’s first close-up
Really??
redefined the role of women
A good opportunity to bring in Ward-Mahar, no?
emphasized her relatability,
Great—but substantiate this with artifacts! Curate and display artifacts (for example, "clip" some key examples) that prove your assertion. And include some "zoomed in" screenshots so your visitors can easily see the evidence
erved as a symbol of optimism and power for females in America.
Ok, include evidence of this from the film fan magazines—how does this symbolism come through in the way she's branded and commodified for fans??
emotional and expressive acting style that changed the tastes of Hollyw
Including a clip here so visitors could "witness" this for themselves would be helpful!
anded her first role in 1909 with Biograph.
This is somewhat redundant with the preceding page. Since that section was on her transition to silent film, there's no need to repeat that info here
of Film, 1909-1913.” Mary Pi
I like the idea behind the design here, but it's really difficult to read the text. Either fade out the picture more and use black text, or choose a contrasting shade so the writing stands out more
Through Biograph, Pickford was able to learn the film industry. She worked regularly at many different levels of production. Some of these included costumes, lighting, camerawork, makeup, etc. She even wrote scripts, three of which were sold to Biograph and produced by D.W. Griffith as moving pictures
This would have been a good time to bring in the Ward-Mahar reading!
My Baby
Is that Lillian Gish as the bride??
Early Moving Pictures
Rather than send your visitor to another website (which often means they don't return!), embed clips on your site.
This is a well-designed site! I know Google sites can be a little bare bones, but y'all have done a nice job making it visually pleasing and clear.
Beaver, Frank. “Lillian Gish.” Michigan Today, University of Michigan, 13 Apr. 2011, michigantoday.umich.edu/2011/04/13/a7964/. Accessed 18 Feb. 2025.Cofresi, Diana. “Lillian Gish ~ about Lillian Gish | American Masters | PBS.” American Masters, 29 Dec. 2001, www.pbs.org/wnet/americanmasters/lillian-gish-about-lillian-gish/614/.
These, the IMDb, and the encyclopedia citations seem to be the only secondary sources consulted, and none of them is academic or scholarly. How does this affect your exhibit's credibility?
"In defense of the Silent Film", she shares her opinion about the industry's lack of intent behind its transition into using sound in films (In Defense of the Silent Film, 1930)
This is a cool find! Where was it published?
director
was she able to still direct films for MGM? How does this align/challenge our assigned readings?
especially important
an interesting observation—explain more! Why is it significant?
Pictures and The Picturegoer
GOOD! This is a film fan magazine!
Lillian's reality
But is this "reality"? According to the Douglas readings, are fans really getting to see her private life?
within the film industry
yes, good, you're right that this periodical only spoke to those IN the industry! But what hasn't been evidenced yet is her wider stardom—pulling artifacts from the film fan magazines would do this
Michigan Today,
I see that a lot of your information has come from this source. I'm a little unsure of its credibility (what expertise does a magazine/newspaper in Michigan have about silent film?), but I'm also concerned about the lack of scholarly perspectives being considered—might this cause some bias in your narrative?
laborate bodily expressions
including a clip so visitors can witness this for themselves would be helpful!
Vaudeville with Griffith
This wasn't actually vaudeville!
As time went on the industry started to become more accepting of women who did good work.
Hm, this seems counter to what we've learned in class and in the assigned readings... 🤔
Griffith
Considering the very problematic position Griffith took regarding race, and that Gish starred in his most notoriously racist film (Birth of a Nation), how did she feel about this issue? Did she voice any regret for having been in it? This is an important cultural phenomenon that should be addressed—especially in light of your sentence that follows this one!
made her debut in 1912, starring in D.W. Griffith's An Unseen Enemy
This is a film, no?
Vaudeville
I don't see anything in the text below that discusses her time in vaudeville—did she ever perform in vaudeville?
Motion Picture News
This is actually an industry trade journal, so not something fans would have really accessed...
gain the attention of the public eye and gave her a public persona, leading to stardom
evidence of this in the film fan magazines?
also did live performances
explain this more—were these to promote her films? or were they standalone?
their mom
What kind of actress was their mother? Was she in vaudeville of the "respectable" stage?
age of 94
WHOA
Great tone you're striking here! It feels very much like I'm starting my journey through a museum exhibit!
Artifacts
The assignment instructions specifically asked that you use the film fan magazine collection; I don't see any evidence of that in your exhibit
Motion Picture Herald
This was an industry trade periodical, so another artifact that fans wouldn't have really accessed...
Pressbook
Another artifact that was actually for exhibitors rather than fans
The Film Renter and Moving Picture News
This isn't a film FAN magazine—it's for exhibitors! Knowing that's the audience, how does it change your interpretation?
Furthermore, the costumes in his 1924 film The Thief of Bagdad, epitomized the stereotypical image of what people thought of the Middle East.
Now this is more clearly harmful
harmful stereotypes
I'm not sure I understand what's harmful about what you describe—was he in brownface?
What all of these films had in common was that they allowed Fairbanks to continue to play roles which gave him the chance to demonstrate his now widely known personal athleticism
These are typically referred to as "Swashbucklers" and exemplify the star-genre "factory" approach we discussed in class
caused his celebrity status to expand even more
or this?
the public’s imagination
or this?
captured the public's imagination
Evidence of this in the film fan magazines?
The United Artists Corporation
This is another opportunity to do more secondary source research—there are books on UA and its significance would further substantiate Vance's perspective.
Charlie Chaplin and Mary Pictford.
But what about DW Griffith? Based on your narrative so far, it seems like Fairbanks knew Griffith the longest?
earned him the public moniker of “Everybody’s Hero.”
Finding evidence in the film fan magazines of this would have made your exhibit original in its primary source research...
Vance, p.25
So far, nearly every citation has been for Vance. Could this lead to some informational bias, seeing as it's all coming from one source? I know that Vance's book is helpful, but there are other books about Fairbanks and this particular moment of film history that could have enriched your narrative.
So with that Fairbanks set forth on a new journey moving to Hollywood in 1915, to be the next big thing in the motion picture. When arriving, set foot in Aitken’s business partners Griffth studio called the Fine Arts Flim Company.
Some basic proofreading would help here—I get the gist of what you're saying, but with the typos, there is some credibility lost...
Harry E. Aitken
Is this who's in the image below? Captions (and attribution!) would be really helpful!
vaudeville
What is a little confusing here are the different types of stage performance: is Fairbanks performing in vaudeville (which was made up of smaller acts of varying types, e.g., comedy, dance, monologues, etc.) or theater (which tended to be seen as more "high" art and consisted of a complete play)?
Young Life
Where did the info for 1, 2, and 3 come from?
Overall, a really eye-catching, snazzy design! Your tone is also on point—it mirrors museum exhibit rhetoric. Nicely done.
Rather than featuring the film on the home page, give visitors "access" to the film when it's covered in your narrative
Works Cited:
At first, I thought that each page would feature citations to the sources where the info was found, but I see that it's just repeated on each page, and the artifacts cited here are also repeated on the "Artifacts" page.
I also only see two secondary sources, both of which aren't the most credible or rigorous. Would exhibit-goers be all that impressed with this? And why no use of assigned readings?
Hell's Hinges (1916), The Dawn Maker (1916), Truthful Tulliver (1916), The Square Deal Man (1917), Travelin On (1922), Wild Bill Hickok (1923), Singer Jim McKee (1924), and his final film Tumbleweeds (1925)
including some clips from these films would have made the exhibit more engaging and would have showcased multiple types of media.
I'm a bit surprised at how few artifacts are on this page, and of the ones included, none offers evidence of his star power or his fan base...
was known around the world
how do you know this to be true? what artifacts did you find that support this claim??
Entertainment Industry Magazine Archive
The assignment instructions asked you to focus your attention on the Film Fan Magazine collection on the Media History Digital Library, but I don't see any citations to any of these magazines. The Entertainment Industry Magazine Archive is fine as a supplement, but you've missed the primary archival collection—looking at film FAN magazines. Kinematograph isn't a fan mag...
References
I don't see any citations for secondary sources!
establish a supportive fan base
There needs to be evidence from FAN magazines to prove this!
Tumbleweeds(1925)
to make the exhibit more multimedia, embed clips of the film here so people don't have to leave your site
dilapidated and dusty sets, sweeping landscapes, minimal action, and plain, drab, utilitarian costumes.”
also info given elsewhere
"credited for creating the role of the 'good bad guy'—a character that starts out living an immoral life (outlaw, gambler, etc...) but has a heart of gold, and is eventually set on the path of good, clean, honest living by the end of the movie".
this is the same info given on the previous page!
Poster of William S. Hart's last film, "Tumbleweeds"
I can't get over the fact that this photo looks like someone photoshopped Hart's head on someone else hahaha
Photo of The Pictures and Picturegoer Magazine, 1918.
This is the ONLY artifact from a film FAN magazine! Everything else is mostly from TRADE magazines—a very different audience!
"William S. Hart Museum History")
I notice that this is the only source cited in-text in this section... it leaves visitors wondering why they don't just visit that website instead!
The original work you're doing is synthesizing info from various credible sources to offer visitors new insights and connections, not just summarizing info from other websites.
William S. Hart grew up travelling all around the Old West area, which included states like North and South Dakota, Illinois, Wisconsin, and Minnesota. According Hart himself, he thrived on the West frontier, and even mentioned meeting many of the people that are portrayed in movies about "the West" at this time. These people included cowboys, Civil War veterans, cattle ranchers, gold prospectors, outlaws, and saloon keepers. He also spent a lot of his time there with Sioux children, learning how hunt with a bow and arrow and ride horses (William S. Hart Museum History"). It is here where his love for the West grew. He had an admiration and respect for the Western Frontier and Native American culture. This is important for his transition into silent film.
This echoes the info on the "Introduction" page—why the redundancy?
William S. Hart's family moved to New York City when he was a teenager, and while there he worked as a hotel messenger to get money to provide for his family. Sometimes when he would do extra work, he would get extra passes to the theater and go and watch performances, which sparked his want to pursue an acting career ("William S. Hart Museum History"). His debut to the stage came when he got his first role as Friar Laurence from Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet in 1888. After that he started to land major roles in other classic stage productions such as Much Ado About Nothing, The Queen of Sheba, Othello, and The Man in the Iron Mask. In 1899, he landed what is considered to be one of his most iconic roles from his time as a Vaudeville actor: the character Messala in Ben-Hur ("William S. Hart Museum History").
This all seems to belong on the previous page since it's all about how his stage career started.
What's also maybe getting conflated here is the different types of stage performance: is Hart performing in vaudeville (which was made up of smaller acts of varying types, e.g., comedy, dance, monologues, etc.) or theater (which tended to be seen as more "high" art and consisted of a complete play)?
The Transition
This heading is a bit confusing since the next section is focused on the transition to silent film
a touring western melodrama
I'm confused—is this a stage production or a film?
inaccurate and unrealistic western films
Including a clip from one of these "unrealistic" films would be really helpful for visitors to discern the differences and to see what Hart was seeing at the time
IMDb. “William S. Hart | Actor, Director, Producer.” IMDb,
both this and the Encyclopedia Britannica entry aren't the most credible. I was able to find in a few short minutes two ebooks in the FU library catalog that specifically look at William S. Hart and would be much more impressive to a virtual museum-goer...
Known for being Hollywood's "first cowboy star", he started with silent films in the early 1900s and learned how to use emotions rather than dialogue. As he stepped into the world of vaudeville with touring companies across the country, he performed in numerous melodramas and other similar productions that involved physical acting.
I'm a bit confused on the chronology here: did Hart start in film or vaudeville? The sentences I've highlighted (and the heading for this subsection) imply he started in film, which is a bit unorthodox, no? maybe worth explicitly pointing this out and clarifying...
After several successful film roles, such as The Virginian (1907) and The Trail of the Lonesome Pine (1912/14),
Is this info connected to his "early childhood"? seems like it's a bit later...
The aesthetics of your website are great! very clean (except for a minor font formatting error) and easy to navigate!
The only confusing thing is the menu at the top of the page doesn't correspond with the ToC 🤔
a small piece of his legacy
the fact that he secured a contract to have his autobiography published is rather significant, no?
Was he truly a unique and important, stand out actor, or just another run of the mill guy that did not really leave a mark on the industry. Are his stage triumphs truly just figments of the past and his film career not remembered by hardly anyone?
these questions hint at needing to do more research. Considering his family's legacy, did anyone think he was a "run of the mill guy"?
The Legit Reviews article to the left reports that "John Barrymore set the Hollywood standard for a certain type of drunken rashness, defining the image of an actor as charming, self destructive rogue that continues to this day. Sadly (or not) that's about the sum total of Barrymore's legacy, his stage triumphs lost to the past and his film career remembered by few and cherished by fewer." (Proquest)
what is this article reviewing, and when was it published? and is it enough "proof" that that's how most people feel about his legacy?
also his happy, almost too happy, some might even say "drunken" attitude
how do you know this to be the case? did you screen the film? or see a clip? If so, then letting your visitors see this would be helpful
the reason why women found the production so entertaining
where is evidence of this in the artifact?
was able to
this phrasing implies that Barrymore was lucky to work with Laemmle, but considering his star power, might it be the other way around?
We talked about Zukor in class
another opportunity to bring in some secondary sources to strengthen your discussion here
Some odd formatting shifts here—different font for this body graf than all the previous pages
which was one of the first two talkies that Warner Bros. created
I think this is factually incorrect...where did you find this info?
how the people made the celebrity
this needs to be explained further—HOW do people make the celebrity? Drawing on Douglas & McDonnell would've been helpful...
We talked in class
your audience is an online "visitor" to your exhibit; would they understand your phrasing here?
an award
what kind of award was this? what organization awarded it?
This was due to the set design being much more difficult with the technological constraints as well as the camera work required for such films.
Another claim that's debateable... Is this from a source? And if so, what source?
short-form B and A-list movies
were A films "short form"? And was this system in place by 1914?
because it was difficult for writers and directors to carry a cohesive narrative with no dialogue
hm, this claim is debateable; dialogue was possible via title cards!
hy he had
why the sudden switch to italics?
Why only one artifact? Your paragraph is making the claim that Barrymore's reputation evolves, but it's hard to see evidence of that with only this one artifact
front-page article about him and his Brother Lionel's first stage production together, A Great White Way, illustrates their early stardom in Vaudeville. As well, Barrymore often did Shakespearean works, such as Hamlet, and Richard the III which he was very well known for.
What might be getting conflated here is the different types of stage performance: is Barrymore performing in vaudeville (which was made up of smaller acts of varying types, e.g., comedy, dance, monologues, etc.) or theater (which tended to be seen as more "high" art and consisted of a complete play)?
The style and interface of your website is solid! I like the FAQ section at the bottom, and the various ways to navigate to the different pages.
his legendary portrayal of Richard III on Broadway, which would cement his reputation as one of America's finest classical actors
where is this info from? I don't see any citations to secondary sources on this page...
on the society page
of what publication? Assume your visitor is going to stay on your website and provide this info so they don't have to see the artifact in the archive/database
As silent films gave way to theatrical plays,
I'm not sure what you mean here... the syntax is clouding your meaning, I think
This significant turning point
What does "this" refer to? The artifact's headline is cut off, so I'm not sure if that's what it's referencing?
Gottlieb, Robert
This also strikes me as a promising source that rarely (never?) was cited in the exhibit....
Duckett, Victoria
I noticed a heavy use of Skinner throughout the exhibit but no citation of this, which seems like a key source! Skinner is pretty old (1967!), dancing along the edge of primary vs. secondary source. Including more contemporary scholarly work on Bernhardt would have made this exhibit stronger.
In 1912, Adolf Zukor, one of the founders of Paramount Pictures, bought the distribution rights to show Queen Elizabeth,
I find it really interesting that Zukor chose to import this type of film at this time... It strikes me as an attempt to make film "classier"
This also might be a better place to embed your clip from the film.
Film star advertisements
how do Bernhardt's ads compare to other stars'? how did they brand her differently? Did they?
When Sarah Bernhardt plays in a vaudeville theater, the remainder of the bill is always made up of the highest class of acts that can be booked.
What's interesting here is that a Bernhardt film would play in a vaudeville show, but I don't think Bernhardt did much touring with vaudeville! There's something about social class and "good" art being insinuated here...
to purchase films
were exhibitors still purchasing films? This would be a good place to revisit Chanan...
Exhibitioners purchase copies of film and the equipment and then travel around, showing their catalog to audiences.
Was this the industry "norm" by the 1910s??
one of the first documentaries, taking viewers into her home and through her day.
Wow! Where did you find this info? And how did that source know of this documentary's existence? Is it available??
to shoot a short adaptation of a scene from Shakespeare’s Hamlet.
Is this related to the clip shown on the homepage?
nearly all of these films are an hour long. how do you want visitors to navigate all of this? Or could you curate them so it includes clips strategically chosen to showcase some of the things discussed earlier?
The player style is really cool!
She was a true celebrity on a global scale, which she seemed to be very aware of. The press loved to write about her lavish lifestyle and all the things she indulged in; she would spend her money on ridiculous purchases such as multiple big game cats for her menagerie and how she received embroidered gifts from kings and queens
How does this statement correspond with the artifacts below? Be more explicit about that connection; right now, this section intro and the artifacts seem to exist as separate entities.
demonstrates how strong her legacy was
THIS seems to be the overarching theme of your artifacts in this section—I notice that most of them are published toward the end of her life, which serves as compelling evidence of, as you put it here, her lasting legacy. The opening mini "essay" should correspond more with the artifacts, and playing up this lasting legacy element is one way to do that.
In the second chapter of Celebrity: A History of Fame, the authors describe how the rise in theater occurred in tandem with the rise of the “penny press,” where gossip about theater stars was published, garnering public attention for the shows being put on and creating early celebrity culture (Douglas and McDonnell,103).
this is a good detail from D & McD, but I'm not sure I see the connection to the artifact... are you implying that such penny-press tactics evolved into this example by the 1930s?
tbh, this feels like one of the results from just doing a keyword search in the film fan magazine archive rather than something strategically chosen...
farewell
why "farewell"? How old was she by this point?
had to get her leg amputated in 1915 due to gangrene infections from an injury
whoa
vaudeville was becoming one of the most popular forms of entertainment among urban folk (Douglas and McDonnell, 78).
I like that you're bringing in Douglas & McDonnell, but I'm still not convinced that Bernhardt was acting in vaudeville. Were her shows made up of smaller, diverse acts (like comedy, dancing, etc.), or was it a full play? If it was the latter, then this would've been the "legitimate" theater.
Douglas
? I'm assuming you meant Bernhardt lol
I get the sense that she rose to fame in the classier theater rather than vaudeville (which tended to be slightly more "low" art).
gave birth to her son
was she married? having a baby out of wedlock at this time seems risque!
At 13, Bernhardt joined the Comédie Française, which was one of the most prestigious French theatres at the time.
how did her family feel about this? were they supportive?
“[One night] I was at a Bible study with my friends and I was outside having a panic attack because I was like, Oh my gosh, I haven't had a day off in like a month and I'm going to have to have another two months going forward, not having a day off and I was terrified.”
This opening sets up the reader to assume the narrative arc/conflict is about Victoria's burnout, but in fact, for the majority of the rest of the article, we don't follow this story.
She had spent the last three months fighting to make ends meet by working four jobs and to be frank, she was exhausted
Great tone here; you've struck a nice balance between conversational and professional.
Bridge City doesn't necessarily create the community, but it facilitates the beauty.
Nice use of pull quotes! it makes for a much more visually pleasing page!
t was clear to the owner, Gregory Ward, that Parizo was the perfect person to lead this project
This begs for a quote from Ward to substantiate your assertion (that "it was clear...Parizo was the perfect person..."). We can't just rely on Parizo's account here.
and someone to run it
The next paragraph actually echoes this phrase, and since what follows only focuses on acquiring the building, just mention needing someone to run it afterward.
Dubash secured a three year grant for 364,000 dollars.
I thought THIS was going to be the story! How could you "zoom in" on just this event and the conflict that you mentioned in your pitch?
Furman has given Dubash the unique opportunity to succeed in both of his passions, teaching and research. He has fully embraced the opportunity and is positively impacting the Furman community
This is a fine descriptive profile of Dubash, but it is missing a narrative arc. How is the Dubash at the beginning of the story different from the Dubash at the end? What's the conflict?
I suggest narrowing the scope of the story: by only focusing on one small event in Dubash's life, a conflict and resolution become more apparent. Remember, it's not necessary to tell your character's entire life story for this article; you only need to give a "snapshot" of one moment of conflict and growth.
A former student of Dubash, Nicolette Monnier, speaks highly of her experience exclaiming that Dubash has a “strong commitment to making sure that all of his students feel like they are empowered to make their own decisions about how they present their research.”
Structure the sentence so the focus is on the interviewee: A former student of Dubash, Nicolette Monnier (class of ??) speaks highly of her experience. He had "a strong commitment to making sure that all of his students felt like they were empowered to make their own decisions about how they present their research," said Monnier.
It is a hard balance to maintain, but Dubash takes it in stride. His office and his lab are spotless, a reflection of his mind: organized, strategic, and adaptable.
Ah ha! NOW I see the significance of the opening details! This should be given to the reader earlier, so they aren't confused why thesy're learning about Dubash's stubble and hair. :)