0.1
In the original, the decimal was in the wrong place
0.1
In the original, the decimal was in the wrong place
0.1 and 0.5
In the original, these numbers had the decimal in the wrong place.
a 5% false positive rate meansthat at least one out of every 20 non-existent effects studied invisualization (potentially several each year!) is incorrectly reportedas being a likely effect
In the original publication, we left out that the 5% false positive rate applies to non-existent effects
coun-terproductive
minor clarification: The reason it is counterproductive is that authors have zero requirement or incentive to be helpful or even reply to emails
can predicted
can be predicted?