Daniel and Ariel do a great job of motivating us with speeches after trainings and before our competitions.
Your description of these members illustrate the close relationship you have as members, the unity you have with one another. This assists your claim as a discourse.
Brazilian Jiu Jitsu
The way you described your DC is simply defined for non-members such as myself. As someone who doesn't hear much about jiu jitsu, I easily grasp the concept from your description provided from this paragraph
you need to have credibility and threshold level of expertise and emotions that we share with other members in the community.
I like the way you defined DC in a clear way that can be easily be understood
Some terms we used while discussing in my community would be: Hardware, software/OS, GPU, CPU, & RAM.
The description of your DC is well explained. I can clearly understand the similarities and differences when it comes to androids and iOS.
One person I asked was Jayme,
I really enjoyed the feedback you got from your friends. it helped create balance in your paper. From your own experience and opinions to another.
she believes that people buy the latest phone (iPhone in this case) for status.
I think thats true. Many people at a young age seem to be focused on big brands and having the latest gadgets for their status. Like in middle school, many kids would go bragging of what brands they wore and the iphones they had.
He recently upgraded his phone and said it would be unnecessary.
I agree with Jonas, why buy a new phone if the one you have is working perfectly? It would be unnecessary.
When I was younger, specifically around the time I was in middle school mobile operating systems fascinated me.
Rayon started off straight forward and used a narrative style to convey his DC which I found interesting and different from my own.
I used these methods because they allowed me to take a direct look at what the coaches were saying and then get a look at the thought process behind it. The interviews involved open-ended questions that helped bring out coaching philosophies on many different issues, including the issue of reading their players and the game. This idea of reading players and the game is directly reflective of Tony Mirabelli’s idea of multiple literacies.
Branick uses methods for his interview to bring out coaching philosophies that directly highlights Tony Mirabelli's idea.
Have I been approaching all of my work the wrong way when it comes to revision?
After reading Murray's essay, I also had similar questions. It made me realize things I never paid mind to when it comes to revising.
If we aren’t professional writers where do we find where to improve our writing besides fixing small grammar mistakes.
This statement caught my attention, It really had me questioning all the possible ways to revise our writing that we may be unfamiliar with.