In order to have needs fulfilled, don't you need rights?

While neutrality can be an effective way to appeal to a wider audience, many humanitarian issues cannot be solved without partiality, and more specifically, a game plan. Neutrality often makes issues seem as if they are less urgent and important than they truly are.

Many humanitarian organizations advocate for things like veganism or gender rights in the Middle-East. They are advocating for what they believe is the right thing to do. How do these organizations maintain neutrality without appearing elitist?

This contest is important to note. Unfortunately, cruelty (wars, drama, etc.) is usually what "sells" in the media. Humanity (peace, compassion, etc.) is more difficult to sell because though most people want it, it is not as interesting.