109 Matching Annotations
  1. Jan 2019
    1. Parachutes are routinely used to prevent death or major traumatic injury among individuals jumping from aircraft.

      The little trick in this article makes me think a lot about how easily things like fake news are spread SO easily all over the internet

    2. However, the trial was only able to enroll participants on small stationary aircraft on the ground, suggesting cautious extrapolation to high altitude jumps.

      I love how they played with us like this, they totally got me cause I was so lost and confused/concerned at first

  2. Apr 2018
    1. OER provide instructors with free and legal permissions to engage in continuous quality-improvement processes such as incremental adaptation and revision, empowering instructors to take ownership and control over their courses and textbooks in a manner not previously possible.

      you can change things up to make them more useful for you personally

    2. College students spend an average of $900 per year on textbooks—26 percent of the cost of tuition at a public, four-year university.

      absolutely ridiculous

    1. Open Pedagogy is not a magical panacea for the crises that currently challenge higher ed. That being said, we both feel that Open Pedagogy offers a set of dynamic commitments that could help faculty and students articulate a sustainable, vibrant, and inclusive future for our educational institutions.

      it is certainly something we should give a chance

    2. What are your hopes for education, particularly for higher education? What vision do you work toward when you design your daily professional practices in and out of the classroom? How do you see the roles of the learner and the teacher? What challenges do your students face in their learning environments, and how does your pedagogy address them?

      all these questions will lead to open pedagogy

    1. Why? because it’s not information that was dumped on me. It’s not information that I was forced to regurgitate. It’s information that I voluntarily sought out and connect with my personal interests.

      you always remember things like research projects or things you can choose to study more

    2. I have always been an outstanding student and I assumed, until recently, that it meant that I was a good learner (and under the conventional structure, I was).

      relate 100%

    3. Little did I know that being accustomed to this form of learning would end up being the very issue I had with learning.

      I feel that, sometimes I like a more traditional and structured class

    1. “The federal Department of Health and Human Services estimates that only 17% of the US population is functioning at optimal mental health.”

      thats mind-blowing to me

    2. One of your biggest priorities should honestly be your well being and how productive you are relates to how you are feeling at that time in your life.

      very true, sometimes in order to be productive you have to take a break

  3. Mar 2018
    1. Instead of graduating with a comprehensive understanding of a single discipline like anthropology or economics, they graduate with a smattering of knowledge, spread across many fields.

      this is both good and bad

    2. sometimes the structures across departments do not align with one another, making interdisciplinarity collaboration a challenge.

      common in science/medicine

    3. The first barrier facing interdisciplinary students is attitude.

      Attitude can be a result of frustration of not understanding; I'd say this can be a barrier for any discipline

    4. Society needs people to be masters in specific areas because they contribute to the understanding of the world at large

      what about people who are somewhat mastered in multiple things?

    1. “Relevancy” is an essential component of interdisciplinarity. First, what does it mean for something to be relevant?

      I think interdisciplinarity is a chance to make something more relevant for a wider audience

    2. The relevancy of education is often overlooked by students, especially young students who have not yet graduated from high school.

      I can understand this, sometimes it is extremely hard to see how something you're learning is important

    1. Despite the clear benefits of interdisciplinary studies, many politicians and educators continue to cut resources to the humanities, arguing that an education should be skills-based and career oriented

      I think one big issue is the fact that there is so much information that needs to be packed in, there isn't time for other disciplines. Is the sacrifice worth it?

    2. If an applicant can’t work in a team, write a grant, or engage meaningfully with other people, he may be turned away from a job or his career may not flourish.

      key example in opposition to my previous comment

    3. negative consequences of a specialized education are becoming more apparent

      In certain fields I'd say its more important to be specialized, such as health

    4. Specialized education was in high demand, changing the structure of many colleges and universities across the United States of America and the world.

      change in the work force proceeded change in education system. What if we could predict shifts in work force?

    5. Interdisciplinary studies, as a concept, would not be possible without the foundational structure of disciplinary studies

      to go with the smoothie example again, you can't make it without the fruits

    1. Students have been learning and teachers have been teaching since the beginning of human existence, probably often without even knowing it.

      it is how we survive

    2. During the first half of the twentieth century, the higher education landscape was heavily influenced by economic demands.

      creating employees more than thinkers

    3. The objective definition of “discipline,” and the disciplines themselves are continuously changing as time goes on, making the idea more difficult to define.

      more continue to come up as well

    4. Universities of this time focused on faith because it was the foundation of their civilizations.

      also probably because they didn't want people to have power (knowledge)

    1. would be the number one use for interdisciplinary study.

      it is difficult to make medical fields interdisciplinary during education because there is so much to learn in so little time. They have to worry about board exams and things like that

    2. but it wasn’t their specialty, so they didn’t have the insight on potential impacts than an environmental scientist would have had.

      important to work with people from other disciplines

    3. The disciplines, where we find wealths of specific knowledge and, on occasion, narrow-minded specialists, are the very building blocks of interdisciplinary studies.

      I also feel as though the quote is relevant to a career/life in general, not just our educations

    1. It never really came to mind that teachers of the same subject were together during the school day simply to discuss developments in their field; I just thought it worked out that they were friends

      my experience was slightly different because everyone lived and worked together outside the classroom. They were each others social lives as well

    1. The case for interdisciplinary education, it seems to me, is not as straightforward as its knowledge and research counterparts.

      question becomes this: which is more important, having an array of knowledge but not mastering it? Or being a master of a specific subject?

    2. Even under the best circumstances, an interdisciplinarian is unlikely to gain as complete a mastery of her broad area as the specialists upon whose work her own endeavor is based.

      Could get close with time though

    3. Social Change: Although the modern university is rich in intellectual resources, it is only mildly effective as an agent of social change. One would expect a stronghold of professional thinkers to have a fundamental impact on politics, but it doesn’t: the academy enjoys little success in mobilizing its vast intellectual resources to improve society.

      Why is this? too busy with other things?

    4. On the other hand, scientists in a divided culture provide a knowledge of some potentialities which is theirs alone.

      Scientists must be able to communicate to be successful. Otherwise their work could go to waste

    5. Disciplinary Cracks: According to most interdisciplinary theorists, some problems of knowledge are neglected because they “fail to fit in with disciplinary boundaries thus falling in the interstices between them”

      I can see how this is where information gets lost

    6. An outsider’s perspective, then, is particularly valuable at times of crisis.

      like how we can give advice to others but when we're in the same situation it is much harder

    7. Yet there is an unexpected quality about it

      interesting- I took a class called "the sociological imagination" and it all seemed to be common sense to me

    8. The most widely cited attempts break down interdisciplinarity into components such as multidisciplinarity, pluridisciplinarity, crossdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity

      key terms to know

    9. the ideal of the unity of knowledge–that a genuine scholar ought to be familiar with the sum total of humanity’s intellectual and artistic output–gave way to specialization.

      many people considered to be smart are educated in one very specific thing

    1. Both are very useful for interdisciplinarians, since breaking a problem or concept down may help us see the different disciplines that are involved, which will then allow us to organize our research approach.

      makes me wonder about reconstructing after breaking things down

    1. “Interdisciplinarity” is more like a fruit smoothie, where the disciplines are blended together–integrated– to create something new.

      great metaphor

    1. Today Stanford continues to offer interdisciplinary courses like “History, Literature, and the Arts,” and “History, Science, and Medicine.”

      Great idea, but can be hard due to a lack of time to get enough knowledge from different disciplines all in one course

    2. bring groups of students and faculty members together to work over a sustained period of time

      a relationship with a professor can change a students education and can promote life long learning

    3. The university’s lack of a meaningful liberal arts curriculum understandably sends many anxious students into the safer harbors of study that lead directly to positions in the job market.

      there's also pressure from outside the university system. if you don't have a major with a clear objective, there's a lot of pressure from those asking "so what are you gonna do with that? what career will you have?" as if we are expected to know

    4. Clearly we have to re-evaluate our entire system of education for what it is: an 18- year learning continuum that prepares citizens for a life of learning.

      i think another key is to make learning enjoyable... develop a love for learning young instead of making people dread school

    5. “The computer cannot provide an organizing moral framework. It cannot tell us what questions are worth asking.”

      and we shouldn't want it to, we should want to be able to know this on our own by trusting our gut

    6. When we ask to improve a situation, particularly if it is a public one, we find ourselves facing not a problem, but a cluster of problems … and none of these problems can be tackled using linear or sequential methods.”

      connectedness of everything is key

    7. requires us to have a better understanding of the relationships and connections between all fields that intersect and overlap

      we study things so specific, but in the real world we will have to work with other disciplines and it is important to understand them

    8. Colleges are becoming academic superstores, vast collections of courses, stacked up like sinks and lumber for do-it-yourselfers to try to assemble on their own into a meaningful whole.

      sometimes it feels like colleges just want to get students through... like a factory

    9. the degree needed to obtain decent employment.

      the amount of times I've been told "you need to go to college so you can get a good job" is unreal. No one ever says "go to college to find yourself/your passion

    10. But a major failure of our higher-education system is that it has largely come to serve as a job-readiness program.

      I agree, there isn't much self-exploration involved

    11. 80 percent said it is “very important” for them to find work that “will make a positive difference in people’s lives.”

      I wonder how many people actually mean this... I feel like its one of those questions that people want to answer one way even if they don't actually feel that way

  4. Feb 2018
    1. And that feels really good because unlike many other majors where it is easy to feel trapped or to feel stuck in this routine that everyone who has graduated with your degree has gone through- the same process; this study has me standing alone and in this case, that isn’t a bad thing.

      The switch has been very liberating for me as well

    2. Just think about it, if everyone just stuck to guidelines and tradition, the world would never grow and would never have the chance to become any better.

      another key part about this is persistence. Lots of times good ideas get shot down at first because they're new and different

    1. For students who have relied on these aids, the freedom to explore and create is the last thing on their minds, so deeply has it been discouraged.

      I relate to this a lot... I can't navigate a lot of technology without guides and youtube videos. We learn how to do specific things or fix specific issues but we don't get a deep knowledge or technological platforms we are using.

    2. Sometimes, however, progress means looping back to earlier ideas whose vitality and importance were unrecognized or underexplored at the time, and bringing those ideas back into play in a new context.

      like when you're trying to improve but need to go back to the basics or where you started

    1. “I want to know where my ones and zeros are stored,” said Bryan Jackson, referring to the basic binary code in which computers ‘think.’ “And I want my students to know that that’s something they can ask about, and learn to manage for themselves.”

      taking control of our knowledge

    2. Even if students are encouraged to create online portfolios or to use services like Google Apps for Education in order to store all their work, they don’t actually get to take that work with them when they move or graduate

      often its too hard to access our own records and data even before a class is over

    3. rarely do schools give students the opportunity to demonstrate the good work that they do publicly. Nor do schools give students the opportunity to decide what and when and how that public, online display should look like.

      most of the time schools use students social media to get them in trouble or to investigate... hardly ever to really connect, see what students are going for good, or to get to know students. its used as a threat instead of a tool

    4. Having one’s own domain means that students have much more say over what they present to the world, in terms of their public profiles, professional portfolios, and digital identities.

      I wonder if they can post/share things on their domain publicly without receiving feedback from the school.

    5. that it is important to have one’s own space in order to develop one’s ideas and one’s craft.

      We can do this on our own though... we don't necessarily need a school to facilitate it for us

    6. the domain and all its content are the student’s to take with them. It is, after all, their education, their intellectual development, their work.

      I've found that keeping my work from old classes can be very helpful, it's good to have as a resource to look back on

    7. need

      maybe I'm being picky, but I don't think "need" is the right word. it could be beneficial, yes, but there are many ways to be productive, especially if a student is motivated

    8. But almost all arguments about student privacy, whether those calling for more restrictions or fewer, fail to give students themselves a voice, let alone some assistance in deciding what to share online. Students have little agency when it comes to education technology – much like they have little agency in education itself.

      incredibly accurate. Students opinions, even when heard, are often ignored or viewed as unimportant

    9. arguments that restrictions on data might hinder research or the development of learning analytics or data-driven educational software.

      to improve teaching we can look more into learning by studying students work. I get that privacy is important but isn't it also important to improve how we teach future generations?

    1. It makes sense when students find ownership in what they choose to create, how they put it online, and how it engages a broader audience.

      allows students to think and create vs. regurgitate information

    2. They are questioning how their student’s ‘domains’ can engage broader audiences and promote high quality, original scholarship.

      there is potential, but finding a solution to fit all students would be a challenge.

    3. Can ‘ownership’ and ‘assignment’ go hand in hand?

      yes and no. While technically, yes it is your work and thought so you own your work for the assignment, it might feel or be detached and impersonal.

    4. The web is a network for conversations, and if students still see their audience as a teacher with a red pen, then nothing changes.

      writing for a grade vs writing for a different audience can be complete opposites. I know I tend to hold back and be more proper/structured when I'm writing for a grade

    5. Traditional assignments don’t necessarily empower students when they have to post them in a public space.

      lots of traditional assignments don't empower students even if it isn't posted in a public space... the professor wants to hear what they want to hear, and sometimes to get the A we need we have to simply write whatever it is the professor wants us to hear, which limits our creative license

    6. “To own one’s domain gives students an understanding of how Web technologies work. It puts them in a much better position to control their work, their data, their identity online.”

      its great practice for the real world

    7. andrewrikard.com

      seems like the type of title tons of people in our class went with (including myself)... sometimes its hard to think of anything else thats "good"