9 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2016
    1. "What great writers do is to turn you into the writer. In literary fiction, the incompleteness of the characters turns your mind to trying to understand the minds of others,

      I agree with the idea that you are turned into the writer . When you're reading a novel that has a storyline, and you are super invested and interested in the plot, you'll find yourself adding onto the story. You may add parts or scenes when you are trying to guess what is going to happen next. I don't think this applies though to the fact that turning you into the writer makes you try to understand the characters better.

    2. Scores were consistently higher for those who had read literary fiction than for those with popular fiction or non-fiction texts.

      not only do they give a real example they give the results to support their argument.

    3. In a series of five experiments, 1,000 participants were randomly assigned texts to read, either extracts of popular fiction such as bestseller Danielle Steel's The Sins of the Mother and Gone Girl by Gillian Flynn, or more literary texts, such as Orange-winner The Tiger's Wife by Téa Obreht, Don DeLillo's "The Runner", from his collection The Angel Esmeralda, or work by Anton Chekhov.

      A descriptive explanation of the details of such of an experiment make this theory much more believable.

    1. But this view may misunderstand what empathy really is, and its many limitations. As philosopher Jesse Prinz explained, “empathy is partial; we feel greater empathy for those who are similar to ourselves,”

      I agree that I think as humans empathy has many limitations and what can be expected is also limited. Our brains are not able to evolve during a day, therefore it might take longer to instinctively become empathetic to everyone not specifically similar.

    2. some argue that new technologies like virtual reality can cause us to “instinctively feel a surge of empathy for those whose experiences we are immersed in.”

      Virtual reality doesn't just have you read someones words off a paper, as doing that you can easily become uninterested and lose focus. Virtual reality makes you believe you are physically there and present in whatever situation is presented.

    1. But this was also the case when those studied watched a TV series, suggesting that it is fiction

      It makes more sense to me that the people who are watching a fictional television show are going to be able to better understand how people are feeling just from seeing their eyes. They have already seen the picture of the emotion before in the fictional situation.

    2. One of such study identified a decreased acceptance of norms about male–female relations in Algeria, contrasting the thoughts of those who read part of a novel about experiences of an Algerian woman, compared with people who read part of a nonfictional essay on the same topic.

      This does make some sense to me. A nonfictional essay is going to be a list of facts and statements that yes will make you empathetic but not as empathetic as a novel describing a womans specific experience.

    3. stimulating a social world which prompts empathy

      does that mean all fiction books with prompt empathy? I feel as though for example a Steven Spielberg novel will have different effects on a persons empathy then say a Nicholas Sparks novel.

    4. People thus show greater empathy when they read fiction.

      When reading fiction you feel the emotions of the characters through the authors description and use of imagery, aka his words. Unless it is a picture book you wont see what the character actually looks like in the scenario so how do we really know there is any correlation regarding fiction readers and being able to judge emotions on simply seeing someones eyes?