ven more powerfully, universitiescould adopt regulations that do not punish people for an initial violation ofpolicies on prohibited speech. They could simply identify the speech asunprotected and warn that a second violation could lead to punishment.The warning would provide clear notice of what is prohibited, and the in-terests of those whose education is jeopardized by the expression would berecognized through the warning and possible subsequent punishment.Warnings rather than initial discipline, moreover, seem consistent with theeducational functions of a university.
wesleyan