255 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2021
    1. . Social categories are powerful and pervasive cognitivetools for organizing the social world and enhancing the speedand efficacy of person perception processes

      I completely agree with this although, I am a bit confused by the way it is worded. When it says organizing the social world does this mean the many different social groups people are in? Meaning, the understanding of who people are and the power of culture?

    Annotators

  2. Nov 2020
    1. We are being propelled into this new century with no plan, no control, no brakes. Have wealready gone too far down the path to alter course?

      soem say altering technology is not possible because its too advanced

    2. What are the moral implications here? If we must move beyond Earth this quickly in orderfor the species to survive, who accepts the responsibility for the fate of those (most of us,after all) who are left behind? And even if we scatter to the stars, isn't it likely that we maytake our problems with us or find, later, that they have followed us? The fate of our specieson Earth and our fate in the galaxy seem inextricably linked

      we are all responsible for that

    3. Faced with such assessments, some serious people are already suggesting that we simplymove beyond Earth as quickly as possible.

      what do u mean "move beyond the earth"

    4. It seems to me far more likely that a robotic existence wouldnot be like a human one in any sense that we understand,

      it wouldnt be a world at that point itd be creating life for machines rather than the human race

    5. A second dream of robotics is that we will gradually replace ourselves with our robotictechnology, achieving near immortality by downloading our consciousnesses;

      this sounds so scary, living in a world where we are basically replaced by metal

    6. that intelligent machines can do our work for us, allowingus lives of leisure,

      what about money

    7. But now, with the prospect of human-level computing power in about 30 years, a new ideasuggests itself: that I may be working to create tools which will enable the construction ofthe technology that may replace our species

      well we definitely cant have that. It'll put people out of work

    8. I have long realized that the big advances in information technology come not from thework of computer scientists, computer architects, or electrical engineers, but from that ofphysical scientists.

      so does this mean we should be telling them to slow down

    9. field, or at least not so soon

      no one realized how fast technology was advancing

    10. My life has been driven by a deep need to ask questions and find answers. When I was 3, Iwas already reading, so my father took me to the elementary school, where I sat on theprincipal's lap and read him a story. I started school early, later skipped a grade, andescaped into books—I was incredibly motivated to learn. I asked lots of questions, oftendriving adults to distraction

      must be nice @dafina

    11. Uncontrolled self-replication in these newer technologies runs a much greater risk: a risk of substantialdamage in the physical world

      technology is developing more quickly than we though which put the human race at a disadvantage because we dont know what is developing anymore

    12. They can self-replicate.

      this is why we need to slow down technology a bit to understand what is going on here

    13. peoplewill let machines make more of their decisions for them, simply because machine-madedecisions will bring better results than man-made ones.

      There are places in which they do not even need humans anymore because technology has advance so much that machines do it

    14. machines would willfullyseize power

      Is this because they are developing so quickly that we cant even stop them

    15. became involved in the creation of new technologies, their ethicaldimensions have concerned me, but it was only in the autumn of 1998 that I becameanxiously aware of how great are the dangers facing us in the 21st century

      Technology has been improving at a rapid speed

    Annotators

    1. By making that choice, you decided that certain values are more impor-tant than others.

      there are moments where an individual can decipher between the two but not everyone

    2. Libertarians claim that even if an action is undetermined by past events, it can nevertheless be free as long as it is caused by a self or agent

      free will

    3. We argue that what looks like a pre-conscious decision process may not in fact reflect a decision at all.

      meaning....?

    4. Driving a car is a conscious, free action even though we may not be con-sciously aware of the conscious actions it involves

      While I see what he's trying to say here its still pretty confusing relating it to other scenarios

    5. Control Yourself225Again, the point is that we can consciously and freely do something without being consciously aware that we are consciously doing it. Roskies gives the example of driving a car.

      I think this is a fair point to make

    6. According to Reid, acting freely requires deciding for yourself what desires you’re going to act on.

      people ick and choose and when they are faces with something it is a matter of a decision

    7. But Einstein doesn’t believe that we can.

      I dont know about this one... i THINK WE CAN

    Annotators

    1. If we put aside the misleading idea that free will depends onsupernatural souls rather than our quite miraculous brain

      supernatural.... no

    2. True, the mind sciences willcontinue to show that consciousness does not work in just the wayswe thought

      our minds are more complex then we know

    3. oesn’t neuroscience show thatour brains make decisions before we are conscious of them suchthat our conscious decisions are bypassed?

      Honestly i did not know this

    4. So, if people mistakenly take causal determinism tomean that everything that happens is inevitable no matter whatyou think or try to do, then they conclude that we have no free will

      while there is a path for everyone we cant think like this we have to believe that people will choose right from wrong and

    5. We act of our own free will to the extent that we have theopportunity to exercise these capacities, without unreasonableexternal or internal pressure

      Agreed

    6. Our brains are the most complexly organized things in the knownuniverse

      doctors ad scientist are studying the brain daily and discovering new things each day

    7. But to conclude that consciousness orfree will is thereby an illusion is too quick

      WHat I have been arguing for my discussion post!

    8. flawed notion of free will

      Im interested to see what he has to say

    9. Indeed, free will matters in part because it is a precondition fordeserving blame for bad acts and deserving credit forachievements

      well then why commit the action We should be blaming the individual they had a choice

    10. s free will an illusion?

      to a certain extent

    Annotators

    1. No wonder the belief in freewill is so prevalent in society—the very survival of those“selfishfree-will genes”is predicated on their capacity to con one intobelieving in free will

      Everyone does believe in it because people clearly do what they want but we need order!

    2. A belief in free will is akin to religious beliefs

      i do not agree with this

    3. Wootton, the British criminologist,“If mental health and ill-health cannot be defined in objective scientific terms that are freeof subjective moral judgments, it follows that we have no reliablecriterion by which to distinguish the sick from the healthy mind.The road is then wide open...to dispense with the concept ofresponsibility altogether

      UHHHHH what

    4. f free will is an illusion, then it becomes more difficult to holdpeople responsible for their actions.

      I mean we can say that it is an illusion and hold individuals accountable for thinking a certain way due to believing there is such thing as free will now

    5. Thelawsofnature are uniform throughout, and these laws do not accommodatethe concept of free will. Some will argue that once we understandbetter the mechanistic details that underlie consciousness, then wewill understand free will.

      i think many of us do not understand the concept and I would be lying if I sat here and said that I understood the ins and the outs. So yes, I think it is important for us to be taught details that underlie consciousness in order to understand free will

    6. Many believe that the consequences of a society lacking freewill would be disastrous. In contrast, I argue that we do notnecessarily need to be pessimistic about confronting a worldlacking free will. Indeed, it is quite possible that progress in someof the more vexing sociological problems may be better achievedonce we clarify our thinking concerning the concepts of free willand fault.

      I think we need free will BUT only to a certain extent. l

    7. as livingsystems we are nothing more than a bag of chemicals

      interesting way of putting it

    8. to make conscious decisionsthat are not simply a reflection of their makeup and the sur-rounding environment.

      Exactly what I have been trying to point out

    9. t is my belief that, as more attention is given to the mechanismsthat govern human behavior, it will increasingly be seen that theconcept of free will is an illusion, and the fallacy of a basic premiseof the judicial system will become more apparent.

      completely agree. free will is an illusion! individuals have this notion that they can do, say, and act how they want when realistically we cant

    10. But if free will does notexist, there can be no responsibility, and the structure of humansocieties must be revised”

      HMMM i think it is important to have rules and structure. Individuals shouldn't just be allowed to have or do what they want there needs to be rules and there needs to be people who want to follow these rules so criminals like the individuals in clockwork orange do not exist

    11. n individualcannot be held responsible for either his genes or his environment

      yeah an individual cannot be held accountable for his/her genes but I still believe that the environment that they choose to stay in it entirely up to them (sometimes)

    12. nature versus nurture

      I honestly struggle with this because while i believe criminals might have something to do with Nature v nurture, I do not believe it is the whole story

    Annotators

  3. Oct 2020
    1. Should the Fourth Amendmentprotect our minds in the same way that it protects our houses?

      No i do not agree with thsi

    2. ‘read out’ the witness’s memorie

      That would be crazy

    3. that we have not free willbut “free won’t.”

      interesting terminology

    4. If adolescent brains caused all adolescent behavior, “we would expectthe rates of homicide to be the same for 16- and 17-year-olds everywhere inthe world — their brains are alike — but in fact, the homicide rates of Danishand Finnish youths are very different than American youths.” Morse agrees

      I dont know about this one I think it depends on how one is raised

    5. “To a neuroscientist, you are your brain; nothing causes your behavior otherthan the operations of your brain,”

      while i always thought you decide your actions it is not that it is purely the brain

    6. Under these circumstances, most people say it’s not O.K. to kill one personto save five.

      some people would go against all

    7. adolescents are less able thanadults to control their impulses and should not be held fully accountable“for the immaturity of their neural anatomy.”

      makes sense.

    8. “You were focusing on the intent, and the others focusedon the harm,” Buckholtz said reassuringly.

      i wonder what the people around me would do or how they would act

    9. ” I was told to press buttons indicating theappropriate level of punishment, from 0 to 9, as the magnet recorded mybrain activity

      There was a show that was very similar to this

    10. We then made our way to the scanner. After removing all metal objects —including a belt and a stray dry-cleaning tag with a staple

      Everythingmetal need yo be removed?

    11. Lawyers routinely orderscans of convicted defendants’ brains and argue that a neurologicalimpairment prevented them from controlling themselves. The prosecution

      I did not know this but I think that it is good to have this done

    12. But if you suffer from such aserious defect, the law generally doesn’t care why

      I think it is important to care why someone is performing an act

    Annotators

    1. Even the most reliable neurological results,the jury must decide whether competing evidence aboutwitness credibility should take precedence.

      It need to be taken into consideration

    2. “reasonable expectation of pri-Q3vacy” any time that law enforcement agents seek informa-tion about subjects’ inner bodily processes.

      I understand the importance of privacy but I also thing that it is important to understand that this can potentially help someone.

    3. MRItechniques identify differences in images of brain activation25produced during truthful and deceptive acts by holding asubject’s head stationary inside a strong magnetic field tomeasure regional blood oxygenation levels.

      continuing to relate back to why it shoulld be an addition to the courtroom

    4. Memory detection technologies could transform the charac-ter of criminal justice in the United States

      This is very accurate

    Annotators

    1. When someone is telling the truth, the areas of the brain shown here in green become active. If he is lying, the parts of thebrain shown in red display even more activity.

      this is honestly so cool

    2. Butwe'llallfeelabitsaferifthiskindoftechnologyisusedinplaceslikeairports

      Maybe it can prevent commotion from happening

    3. explainsthathisgoalistocreateawearabledevice"thatletsmeknowwhatyou'rethinkingwithoutyoutellingme.IfIaskyouaquestion,I'dliketoknowbeforeyouanswerwhetheryou'regoingtobetruthful."

      I think this is very far fetched and too much of an invasion of privacy

    4. escannersarehugeandthereforenotportable,andaslightshakeofthehead–letaloneoutrightrefusaltobescanned–candisrupttheprocedure

      I dont know is this is such a negative

    5. PeoplesayfMRIisexpensive,"Farocontinues,"butwhat'sthecostofasix-monthjurytrial?Andwhat'sthecosttoAmericaformissingaterrorist?

      Very interesting way of looking at it

    6. We'rereallypushingthepositivesideofthis,"Huizengasays."Butthisisacompany–we'reheretomakemoney.

      This is wrong

    7. ThesciencebehindfMRIliedetectionhasmaturedwithastonishingspeed

      Its going to keep getting better and better as time goes on.

    8. Butthereismoreactivityonthedeceptionscans,asifmymindhadtoworkhardertogeneratethefictitiousnarrative.Crucially,theareasofmybrainassociatedwithemotion,conflict,andcognitivecontrol–theamygdala,rostralcingulate,caudate,andthalamus–were"hot"whenIwaslyingbut"cold"whenIwastellingthetruth.

      This all seems to make a lot of sense

    9. I'maloneagainintheprivacyofmythoughts

      I dont really know how I feel about this. I understand why someone might feel like they are not in private but I still think it is an interesting way to say it nor did I think of it in that way

    10. Whatapolygraphactuallymeasuresisthestressoftellingalie

      I think this is a great way to indicate an individuals thoughts.

    Annotators

    1. ecollections are among our most precious assets. Maybe false memories can be just as precious

      Just no

    2. our personalities would no longer be genuine, our life decisions no longer truly ours.

      I agree. Its something that is making us change our personal identities. What we originally were made up to do is completely changed.

    3. So, just putting false thoughts into someone's thoughts(sic)does not seem nearly as invasive or potentially harmful.

      I think the complete opposite. I think it is very invasive even more so to put a false memory into someone mind. Like i've said memories make us who we are.

    4. One worry is that memory implants would rob us of our free will and sense of identity

      I dont think this is the right terminology. I wouldn't really say its robbing us of our free will when someone wants it to be done. Everyone has free will its a free country

    5. And in a separate Pew poll published this July, 23% of American adults said it would be morally acceptable to surgically implant devices in healthy people’s brains to improve their cognitive abilities

      i disagree with this

    6. In fact, whereas 41% of respondents said it would generally be unacceptable for a therapist to treat them in this way if they were obese, 48% said that it would beacceptable

      What are the reasons to this?

    7. The therapist, however, would only reveal their deception many months after the therapy was complete

      Wouldn't that possible mess with an individuals well being making them confused on what is real and what is not

    8. Without this client’s knowledge, the therapist would attempt to plant false childhood events in the client’s memory –events designed to change the client’s unhealthy relationship with fatty foods.

      Isn't that wrong for people to do?

    9. have tackled their clients’ psychological troubles by manipulating their memories. Asking ourselves whether this kind of intervention is justifiable,

      Im having trouble while reading this whether or not it should be justified

    10. Could planting ‘beneficial’ false memories be the next big thing for tacklingobesity, or myriad other health complaints from fear of the dentist to depression

      How can it tackle these disorders.

    11. false memory could have positive effects on your life.

      How can a memory that did not happen influence an individual in a positive way

    12. it isn’t too far-fetched in principle that somebody could deliberately give you a false memory

      I feel like it is far fetched though

    13. , memory researchers have known for decades that our recollections of the past are often inaccurate

      I sometimes have these vivid memories that I really think happened, but then I question if it actually happened that way

    14. and that sometimes we remember entire events that never happened at all

      How is that even possible?

    15. memory researchers have known for decades that our recollections of the past are often inaccurate

      Often time I feel that individuals are able to remember the past pretty specifically.

    16. Suppose, for example, that some well-intentioned person could have deliberately planted a vivid false memory of this fictional event in your consciousness

      I think thats really scary to think about

    Annotators

  4. Sep 2020
    1. My present character is different from my ten-year-old character. However, both belong to my identical life, which is why I have numerical identity.

      But erasing your ten year old memories would probably make you a different person. A different numerical identity

    2. Liv-ing with painful memories and learning lessons from these painful memories are part of our well-being

      We have to grow from our past. That is what it means to be human, we learn fro our mistakes and we grow from them

    3. Because of these effects, propranolol is regarded as a memory erasing drug

      When I looked it up it gave me a completely different definition

    4. If seeking happiness is a common dream of all human beings

      I agree with this. Every individual wants to be happy no one wants to be sad

    5. ultimate human desire.

      Eh I don't know about that. Maybe for some individuals but it is not the ultimate desire for everyone

    Annotators

    1. If we modify thesememories, we might deprive ourselves of the opportunityto learn how we might act in similar circumstances in thefuture

      memories lead to others

    2. Ultimately, the point of using memory modification formost of us will be to enhance our personal well-being

      our well being is very important

    3. might face unpleasant surprises upon learningevidence of his past,

      individuals oftentimes block out events liek these that really make them forget what happened

    4. n practice we are still some distance awayfrom being able to achieve this, but it does not seemunreasonable to think that within the next decade wewill be able to control the erasing of memory

      I agree. Technology has become so advanced that I woudl not put it past anyone that this becomes available

    5. Such research raises hope for treatingconditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder(PTSD)

      In times like these i feel like it would be appropriate. If someone is suffering so much to the point where theyre having episodes then yes I believe it can be beneficial

    Annotators

    1. For instance, if someonehas been abused, he would still feel a sense of unease if he met the abuseragain, even if the memory had been “deleted,”

      This make sense. I feel like if this were to happen then the individual would feel like something is missing. There bodies or there minds might feel like they know the person but cant put it together because their memory was altered

    2. that memories could not just be disrupted, but pinpointedand deleted entirely

      I think I would be scared if hat was possible. Pinpointing a memory and completely deleting it... then did it even happen?

    3. “Changing or losing memories could make you happier or sadderdepending on if you’re losing sad or happy memories.

      I guess this makes sense, i didnt think about it like that

    4. lives are complex

      Everyone has complicated lives and that mean complicated memories as well

    5. “Our memories and our experiences are fundamental to our personhood, toour lives, to everything that makes us who we are,” said Dr. Judy Illes, professorof neurology and Canada research chair in neuoroethics at the University ofBritish Columbia. “When you pull one brick out of the wall of memories, manyother memories go with it. Memories are incredibly interlocked with oneanother.”

      memories are all intertwined, if one goes the other follows. It becomes a chain reaction because one memory leads to the next. Now if you take a memory away from someone then all your memories start to go

    6. Manyexperts believe that to disrupt one memory runs the risk of disrupting everything.

      i believe this

    7. To do away with our memories is to do awaywith the past, and to do away with the past is to do away with the present.

      powerful quote right there

    8. then to delete our memories would be to destroy apart of ourselves.

      I agree with this. Our memories is a part of who we are

    9. value of a memory

      memories are the most valuable thing to an individual.

    10. Such a finding raises serious questions, not least of which is: Should we betampering with our memories?

      I think this is a great question. I believe that some people might jump to say that it is okay to tamper with the memories of an individual, but there are also other that might say that it is wrong to do such a thing. I for one believe that tampering with someones memory is an invasion of privacy

    11. electroshock treatment were significantly worse atremembering details from the stories than those who were either anesthetizedor given no treatment at all.

      So does this mean that it is not a helpful treatment

    12. That’s to say, memories were partially, and in some cases almost entirely,erased from participants who underwent ECT

      That is crazy

    13. schizophrenia, mania, and catatonia.

      What does it do for these illnesses?

    14. A common perception of ECT is that it is an antiquated and gruesometreatment,

      I think it is very common nowadays

    15. electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) i

      Was electroshock but then became electroconvulsive therapy. Name change

    16. electroshock therapy

      electroshock therapy is a psychiatric treatment in which seizures in the brain (without muscular convulsions) are electrically induced in patients to provide relief from mental disorders

    17. physical pain couldbring her to orgasm

      uhh what?

    18. Butit wasn’t until Sigmund Freud came along that electroshock therapy took on itsmore modern form

      Learnt about electroshock therapy in my psych course.

    Annotators

    1. Couldcriminals be given the option, as an alternative to prison, of a drug-releasing implant that would make them less likely to harm others?

      I do not think it should be an alternative

    2. “morality pill”

      The morality pill seems like a great idea although it does make me nervous on how society will go about it

    3. If continuing brain research does in fact show biochemicaldifferences between the brains of those who help others and thebrains of those who do not, could this lead to a “morality pill”

      It could if there was mandatory testing on everyone and the ones that do not have empathy for others take the pill

    4. Evenwhen the free rats could eat up all of a quantity of chocolate beforefreeing the trapped rat, they mostly preferred to free their cage-mate. The experimenters interpret their findings as demonstratingempathy in rats.

      It is almost like rats have more empathy than humans, but i guess this is what our question is

    5. Why are some people prepared to risk their lives to help a strangerwhen others won’t even stop to dial an emergency number?

      Like singer said above, all individuals behave in different ways

    6. Yet people can, and often do, behave in very different ways.

      this is true, no one is the same. People do what they want when they want and frankly act the way they want. Whether it be good or bad

    7. Last October, in Foshan, China, a 2-year-old girl was run over by avan. The driver did not stop. Over the next seven minutes, morethan a dozen people walked or bicycled past the injured child. Asecond truck ran over her.

      This is crazy how we live in a society where people neglect individuals who are injured because it has nothing to do with them

    Annotators

    1. It is comparatively easy to cause great harm, much easier than to benefit to thesame extent.

      Like I said above, This is why it might be a. disadvantage to do moral enhancement

    2. First, it is, as arule, much easier to harm than to benefit.

      Exactly, I agree. People are so easily able to do harm then to do good because often times people need to put on a whole different face to be nice

    3. only be effected if significant scientific advances were made

      tHi sis what I touched on in my discussion post

    4. we may already be too smart for our owngood,

      I think that this is true to a certain extent because not all individuals can access their intelligence

    5. Criminality has been linked to MAO mutation on the X chromosome, especiallywhen coupled with social deprivation

      so does this have to do with mental disorders

    6. Cognitive enhancement will reduce the incidence of such failures and willthereby increase the probability that we do what we should do.44 We are more likely tosucceed in doing what we ought to do if, owing to cognitive enhancement, it is easierfor us to retrieve available information and to rationally process it

      This is putting everyone at an advantage though?

    7. Too little gratitude may provoke anger and aggression inbenefactors rather than further favours; too much anger in response to aggressors mayspark off an escalation of violence rather than simply deterrence of future violence, andtoo little anger might not be a sufficient deterrent; the same is true of too little andtoo much forgiveness

      This related back to my discussion post

    8. Racial differences signify lack of kinship

      i agree i think there is a huge gap when people have racial difference

    9. Since we can hardly intentionally retrace our cognitive steps

      What does he mean by this? Why cant we retrace our cognitive steps

    10. He argued that humanity still faced extinction,

      This is such an intriguing way to state how humanity is

    11. mental energy borders on mood enhancement

      This is true peoples mental energy is very much dependent on their mood

    12. ego depletion

      Ego depletion refers to the idea that self-control or willpower draws upon a limited pool of mental resources that can be used up (with the word "ego" used in the psychoanalytic sense rather than the colloquial sense)

    13. Enriched rearing environments have been found to increase brain developmentand improve cognition.17 There is evidence that another class of drugs (cholinestraseinhibitors) slow cognitive decline18 in patients with Alzheimer’s Disease by producinga more robust and plastic neural structure

      I had a family member die from this disease and it always makes me research deeply on different studies. I wonder if they can expand on this and find some type of cure? If this already slows it down hopefully there can be other ways

    14. Genetic memory enhancement has been demonstrated in rats and mice.

      I did not know that they test genetic memory on rats and mice. How do they even come to conclusions?

    15. your cognitive enhancement is likely to be bad news forothers, just as their cognitive enhancement is likely to be bad news for you, since itwill undercut the boost of your prudential success or well-being that your cognitiveenhancement by itself promises

      No one knows what people will agree on with you or disagree

    16. What is prudentially good for you may, however, be prudentially bad for other

      Everyone considers good and bad in different ways. Itis often very hard for people to come to an agreeable conclusion

    17. Cognitive enhancement is prudentially goodfor you when it makes you more proficient in pursuing your individual prudential endsand helps you ensure that your individual ends are internally consistent and

      This is true people should be takingit to do the good.

    Annotators

    1. A skill is any existing ability, learned or not.

      i believe people can become skillful in a certain area

    2. If an employee isqualified for a position, but in need of an accommodationto perform his job, the employer must offer a reasonableaccommodation for that employee.

      They should not discriminate against anyone and should provide any necessary needs to their employees

    3. One of the earliest of those exceptions is the Fair LaborStandards Acts of 1938 (FLSA), which provides protec-tions for overtime pay and wage standards.

      Is this still in effect?

    4. Is shebeing unfair?

      Yes she is being unfair

    5. Group loyalty

      Everyone should work together

    6. The types of neurointerventions that are possible varywidely, but in general we can think of them falling intothree categories: observational, scalable, and existentialneurointerventions.

      i did not know there were so many type of neurointerventions

    7. While skills and the capability for learning more skillsare typically the more explicit qualities that employers lookfor, less obvious traits such as attitudes and moral characterare often crucial aspects of job performance.

      Employers want to hire people who would be capable at learning new things and would be able to trust in the work environment

    8. ‘‘Capability’’ is sometimes used synonymouslywith ‘‘ability’’ but the term connotes not simply what one isable to currently do but what one is ableto learn to do.2It

      This is such an interesting way to look at things. I didnt really think of it in this way

    9. While the purpose of thisresearch has often been to understand brain function better,the ability to alter mental states and behaviors, evenwithout understanding how those alterations work, hascaptured the attention of those interested in changingthemselves and others.

      I also think it is so interesting. The body and the brain are so complex so to figure out how things happen would be interesting

    10. She tells Zach that she has regularly usedsuch techniques before and assures him and thecompany that she will continue to do so

      People of course taking advantage of it

    11. Before Zach continues, however, Alice says that onething people increasingly do in order to perform well atthis kind of job is make use of certain performanceenhancer

      Now im confused I thought they were not able to take any drugs like these. I think this is wrong

    12. So, Alice would have

      The fact that this is a thing shows that there is an issue with individuals taking drugs like these who do not have cognitive deficit

    13. We do not recommend a specific moral judg-ment but instead introduce the issues

      Argumentative

    14. Neurotechnology

      Neurotechnology is any technology that has a fundamental influence on how people understand the brain and various aspects of consciousness, thought, and higher order activities in the brain.

    15. nars, and skills training. Employees have also long usedtechniques for making themselves more competitive andproductive for purposes of securing new positions or pro-motions.

      everyone has their own notions of improving themselves in the workplace in order to be looked at in a different light and get promoted

    Annotators

    1. Finally, it should be noted that all forms of enhancementbased on neurostimulation look, at present, extremely promising,although they still present risks.

      I think there can be risks to any procedure

    2. Mind Reading and Privac

      Mind reading?!?!?

    3. ndividual’s learning rate

      Other then what is listed below are their any other events where this can work

    4. Brain-activity recording technologies can be used to improvetraining.

      what kind of training?

    5. Situation awarenes

      This is similar to 5 categories in personhood

    6. involvement of working memory

      so doctors?

    7. Individual Decision Making

      People often struggle with making decision especially when it comes down to drugs

    8. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an invasive brain-stimulationtechnology widely used for the treatment of movement (e

      would this worrk on an individual who has muscle deterioration

    9. lectroconvulsive therapy

      formerly known as electroshock therapy, is a psychiatric treatment in which seizures are electrically induced in patients to provide relief from mental disorders.

    10. herefore, cognitiveaugmentation research on humans with invasive technologieshas been so far very limited and carried out with individualswho have implanted devices for other clinical reasons

      I dont blame people. An invasive technology can be very hard to get passed. I do not know how I would feel about this either

    11. The most popular non-invasive technologies for recording neuralactivity are electroencephalography (EEG), functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), functional magnetic resonanceimaging (fMRI), and magnetoencephalography (MEG).

      Yeah the same with me I learnt a lot about brain activity and what not in learning and behavior

    12. Particularly, we consider human enhancement applications inthe areas of communication, cognitive enhancement, memory,decision making, attention monitoring/enhancement, situationawareness, social interactions, and complex problem solving.

      I guess this answered my previous questions

    13. Human enhancementrefers to a very broad range of techniques and approaches aimedataugmenting body or cognitive functions, through performance-enhancing drugs, prosthetics,medical implants, human-computer teaming, etc., that resultin improved characteristics andcapabilities, sometimes beyond the existing human range

      is human enhancement in the same category as cognitive

    14. Human enhancementrefers to a very broad range of techniques and approaches aimedataugmenting body or cognitive functions, through performance-enhancing drugs, prosthetics,medical implants, human-computer teaming,

      This improves an individual overall abilities

    Annotators

    1. And that's a real question, the question of whether I should keep hammering away at the things that I do and try to do them better, or whether I should make some kind of radical change and go into some new area, or a diversity of areas, and I think that if the technologies we're talking about are developed it's going to add to the scope of that kind of choice, and I think that's probably a good thing

      No doub that these technologies will develop in the future

    2. large amounts of people feel this pressure to use a drug even though they would prefer not to do it, and it's happening in a kind of unregulated context as it is now (with Adderall) and many people may be led to set aside reasonable worries about bad side effects because of this pressure, this soft coercion you're talking about.

      i think this is becoming a huge problem in colleges today as well

    3. Cognitive enhancement is something that's relatively easy for people to understand, because it's easier for people to see what's controversial about it because it's easier to see what counts as a boost in cognitive performance.

      See its boost in performance which would not be fair to others

    4. moral enhancements

      "Moral enhancement (abbreviated ME), also called moral bioenhancement (abbreviated MBE), is the use of biomedical technology to morally improve individuals".

    5. At present we don't know enough about the connections between intelligence and personality to know how serious a risk that is but I think it's a risk worth considering.

      I disagree

    6. So if that's the direction that we go, there might be very serious problems of inequality.

      I think in the future this will be a thing

    7. summit of perfection

      I dont think there is such thing as perfection everyone grows and everyone transforms into different people over time

    8. human nature

      human nature = "Human nature is a concept that denotes the fundamental dispositions and characteristics—including ways of thinking, feeling, and acting—that humans are said to have naturally"

    9. Yes, in one sense we might say that it's part of human nature to strive to improve our capacities.

      Everyone wants to be looked at as an intelligent individual

    10. Part of your response to that argument, if I understand it correctly, has been to say that the drive toward enhancement is actually very much a part of human nature.

      Its like an addictive drug

    11. Last week I spoke with Buchanan at length about the ethics of deep brain stimulation, the history of cognitive enhancement, and what a world of cognitively enhanced human beings might look like.

      Do you think this is going to happen in a few years where people take pills to enhance their thinking just like the movie limitless

    12. smart pills

      I dont know if I would use the term smart pill

    13. Of course, not everyone is convinced that the technology will pan out. Some remainskepticalof TDCS,

      I would to

    14. "artificially"

      ?? I've never heard of this comparing to a drug

    Annotators

    1. “I’m talking about being able to take on twice the responsibility, work twice as fast, write more effectively, manage better, be more attentive, devise better and more creative strategies.”

      Well then if someone really feels like they need this enhancement drug then they obviously need to speak to someone

    2. Suppose you’re preparing for the SAT, or going for a job interview —in those situations where you have to perform on that day, these drugs will be very attractive,

      I mean yeah they would be but for someone to take them when they don't actually need them is inconsiderate to the people who actually need it. People take advantage of these drugs

    3. were more likely to use the drugs as study aids and bring along those habits as they moved up the ladder

      So are individual using this drug just to aid them in their studies. Do people not actually need it?

    4. I think the analogy with sports doping is really misleading, because in sports it’s all about competition, only about who’s the best runner or home run hitter,”

      I think this is an inaccurate statement, I think many people dont look at it as who is best. There are so many people who play for the fun and its not all about competition

    5. Among high school students, abuse of prescription medications is second only to cannabis use.”

      Thats news to me i did not think that cannabis would be second to other drugs

    6. misuse and abus

      I think this is accurate, many people can abuse the drug making it very dangerous on individuals

    7. The original purpose of medicine is to heal the sick, not turn healthy people into gods.”

      I think this is a very dramatic statement and very inaccurate, the people who have mental health disorders should not be put in the category of the sick

    8. Some argue that such use could be worse, given the potentially deep impact on society. And the behavior of academics

      I feel like the individuals who argue this dont understand how crucial the drug really is.Individuals who use this drug need it in order to perform at their best because they can't off of it

    9. considered moreeffective

      I think this drug is very affective in order t help individuals focus

    10. dozen of their colleagues had admitted to regular use of prescription drugs like Adderall, a stimulant, and Provigil, which promoteswakefulness, to improve their academic performance

      I think this type of drug has become so normalized on college campuses.

    11. dozen of their colleagues had admitted to regular use of prescription drugs like Adderall, a stimulant, and Provigil, which promoteswakefulness, to improve their academic performance.

      Thats crazy that so many people use this drug.

    Annotators

    1. “If one assaults a woman, even unintentionally, and her child is born prematurely, he must pay the value of the child to the husband and the compensation for injury and pain to the woman

      What about everything else? And is she allowed to get an abortion because she was assaulted?

    2. he unborn fetus is not legally a person and, therefore, there is no question of murder involved when a fetus

      Im jewish and these laws have never come to my attention so im kind of shocked.

    3. When men fight and one of them pushes a pregnant woman and a miscarriage results, but no other misfortune ensues, the one responsible shall be fined as the woman’s husband may exact from him, the payment to be based on judges’ reckoning. But if other misfortune ensues, the penalty shall be life for life.

      I don't really understand what this means. This was confusing?

    4. An unborn fetus in Jewish law is not considered a person (Heb.nefesh,lit. “soul”) until it has been born.

      Im jewish and i did not know the in the jewish law a fetus is not considered a person until born? I think this goes against many peoples beliefs

    Annotators

    1. They can look in a mirror

      That actually really cool and I never knew this

    2. Dolphins had a sense of self which could be tested bythe way they recognise themselves in mirrors, sheadded

      This is interesting because it bring me back to thinking how some people do not recognize themselves in the mirror

    3. a lot of intelligence and complexity to not onlybeing an enormous brain but an enormous brain withan enormous amount of complexity, and a complexitythat rivals our own.

      So does this mean they dont have similar traits?

    Annotators