For Baldwin, the ultimate hatred that white people need to overcome is the hatred they feel for themselves as mortal and vulnerable beings.
self hatred for weakness
For Baldwin, the ultimate hatred that white people need to overcome is the hatred they feel for themselves as mortal and vulnerable beings.
self hatred for weakness
In his essay ‘Of Superstition and Enthusiasm’ (1741) he described how ‘the mind of man’ is ‘subject to an unaccountable elevation and presumption’. In this state of mind, humanity gets above itself, thinking it has within it the divine. This gives rise to a form of ‘false religion’ in which ‘no sublunary beauties or enjoyments can correspond’ and ‘every thing mortal and perishable vanishes as unworthy of attention’. The best prophylactic against this is to fully embrace our humanity and, with that, humility, accepting our limitations. Secular enthusiasts who elevate human rationality and nobility too highly make the very same mistake, creating a kind of godless religion of humankind which is just as pernicious.
above humanity, beyond death, eschewing anything temporary, illusion of separate self
I think experience supports his model of morality better than the main competitors. The best human beings have not been driven by ideology, moral philosophy, and certainly not logic. They have always been people who have put the response to human need above creed or doctrine.
ecological identity - arising from unclouded emotion, not confined by form of what is right and wrong? Guided by that to respond to emotion? letting go of it as doctrine?
We behave well to others for no other reason than that we see in them the capacity to suffer or to thrive, and we respond accordingly. Someone who does not feel such sympathy is emotionally, not rationally, deficient.
compassion - lacking due to mental thought patterns? Construction of identity preventing empathy - obstruction of emotions - rationality will only serve experience
ultimately everything that we are and do is just a cosmic interplay between seemingly separate manifestations of consciousness. Most people never realize it’s a game. As a result, they are slaves to the ebbs and flows of what’s played.But there are people who slowly realize that it’s just a game. Some of these people find out by refusing to play. Some find out by simply stopping and paying attention. Some find out by almost being removed from the game. Some realize it by watching others being removed before their eyes. But in the end, for whatever reason, they realize it’s just a game. And because it’s just a game, they have no reason to be worried or afraid, ever, because it’s just a game. And whoever wins or loses doesn’t matter because it’s just going to start all over again.
climate change, snowball earth
If we’re going to truly evolve, we do so by including and integrating what came before into something greater, not by wiping it out.
we are, already, something greater, but we can't see it? What happens to those that truly believe it
There’s tremendous value in coming into yourself as a person. Why wouldn’t that be true online, too? Recognizing that my online self was lacking, I decided to learn how to be myself on the internet.
It is impossible to present yourself truly on the internet, to come into yourself as a person, when everything is highly self conscious and selective, as well as limited and misleading. In person we struggle to understand eachother. This may be because of the internet so I have no frame of reference, but how is the internet any better? Maybe because your inner dreams and thoughts can be shared alongside pictures of you - I am realizing what I know of internet representation of people is basically instagram and snapchat so I can't imagine a different reality. To accurately represent oneself you must be honest, a quality we are all incapable of to an extent, and I think the internet and its way of falsely representing things might create so much insecurity that this only pushes us further from honesty. You can't hide nearly as much when you are in front of people.
I blogged every day.
This is wild to me, when as an 11 year old I got on instagram and began the endless cycle of consumption and lost hours and hours to posts designed to attract my attention, lost so much of my ability to concentrate, focus, and thus think critically and constructively. I fear for my generation, brains developed around this, but also everyone else whose brains have been molded by these patterns
Did we meet on MySpace, Tinder, or LinkedIn? Does it matter?
Yes, very much so. Both that people are online to meet each other, where the version of socializing is incredibly limited and artificial, and that people only interact with people that share their same viewpoints, making it harder and harder for people to forget their identities to connect with eachother, to understand and empathize with differences, to adapt to challenges, etc.
the lines are blurred. Our society relies on goods and services that depend on fossil fuels and extraction, and reinventing these systems means changing cultures in fundamental ways. And it’s become something of a truism that people resist change, especially the more radical they are.
must want change : existential consequences
reflected the organic desires of local communities defined and led by their people.
do we have youth that identify with the desires of their local community?
sent field organizers into contentious communities, encouraged them to act, trained them in various tactics, helped them to establish their own independent organizations, and left them to pursue self-identified goals via self-defined strategies
how to do this when our communities are online? When your comments can just be scrolled past ... can we still organize in person?