Telephones emulated face-to-face communication, but they could not transmit the visible cues and physical gestures that allow face-to-face conversation to proceed smoothly, and this deficiency had to be overcome.
Facetime!!!
Telephones emulated face-to-face communication, but they could not transmit the visible cues and physical gestures that allow face-to-face conversation to proceed smoothly, and this deficiency had to be overcome.
Facetime!!!
Today, as our email addresses circulate through the ether, we find in our electronic mailboxes not just surprise communications from long-lost acquaintances who have tracked us down using Gopher and other Web browsers, but also unwelcome communiqués from intruders offering get-rich-quick schemes, questionable deals, and shoddy merchandise. Even unsolicited religious messages are now circulating freely on Netnews groups.
Privacy concerns are becoming more and more important these days. The ongoing challenges to preserving a private and safe online environment are brought to light by the need for effective strategies for dealing with unwanted and possibly harmful content.
He was convinced that no one would want the telephone because it was unable to provide any permanent record of a conversation.
Despite this worry, the use of cell phones shows how our needs and preferences can change - this shows the need to embrace unforeseen new possibilities in tech breakthroughs.
while writing cannot replace many speech functions, it allows us to communicate in ways that speech does not. Writing lacks such tonal cues of the human voice as pitch and stress, not to mention the physical cues that accompany face to face communication, but it also permits new ways of bridging time and space.
I believe that certain aspects of oral communication, such as physical presence and tone, are difficult to convey in writing. But writing offers interesting new means of communication over distances and time, and that's fascinating.
Plato was one leading thinker who spoke out strongly against writing, fearing that it would weaken our memories. Pessimistic complaints about new literacy technologies, like those made by Plato, by Bill Henderson, and by Henderson’s idol, Henry David Thoreau, are balanced by inflated predictions of how technologies will change our lives for the better.
I find it interesting how this highlights resistance to new tech, comparing it to Plato's skepticism about writing
human beings are powerful pattern-recognizers. This body ofwork argues that humans don’t often think best when they attempt to reasonvia logic and general abstract principles detached from experience. Rather,they think best when they reason on the basis of patterns they have picked upthrough their actual experiences in the world, patterns that, over time, can be-come generalized but that are still rooted in specific areas of experience
This explains how people are quite skilled at recognizing patterns. It makes the case that patterns created by what we do every day are a better way for humans to think than abstract reasoning. These patterns always begin from particular experiences, but they eventually become more complex
Is it a wonder, then, that byhigh school, very often both good students and bad ones, rich ones and poorones, don’t much like school?
I enjoy school, but I must say that, very often, there is so much information being thrown at you all at once that it becomes really hard to process in just one week, considering how many classes we have each day.
How are good video games designed to enhance getting them-selves learned—learned well and quickly so people can play and enjoy themeven when they are long and hard?
I think that designers slowly introduce their concepts (making the game longer) to start building or preparing the player for more difficult levels. Some games will even give you feedback and sometimes you can also change the difficulty. Games are cool. I like that they have communities too. The fact that you can make your own choices within the game also gives a sense of control.
Indeed, the video-game in-dustry makes as much or more money each year than the film industry.
Fun fact: Modern Walfare 2 sold $1 billion worth of sales in 10 days (I like to play COD from time to time)
(If you want to read about it) https://investor.activision.com/news-releases/news-release-details/modern-warfare-ii-crosses-1-billion-sell-through-10-days-fastest
It broughtback home to me, forcefully, that learning is or should be both frustratingand life enhancing.
Thinking about this made me consider mathematics. It's for sure my most challenging subject, yet I recognize the importance of having the necessary skills for the future. Its frustrating yet life enhancing.
“Wouldn’t it be great if kidswere willing to put in this much time on task on such challenging material inschool and enjoy it so much?”
Personally, I think that it depends on your interests. Anyone would put in a lot of time, pay attention to, and be dedicated to something if they love it.
Similarly, in contexts like texting or chat, where the default way of breaking up utterances is with a new line or a new message, the period takes on connotations of seriousness and formality, a slight deepening of the voice at the end of a sentence. Thus, a period can reinforce a negative message (“that’s rough.”) but undermine a positive one (“that’s fine.”). The latter style reads to many younger people as passive-aggressive, a sign that the writer could have used a sincere exclamation mark (“that’s fine!”) but decided not to.
The "." adds a layer of being very serious, which isn't the case in an essay for example. We have this belief that the person might be upset, setting an angry tone.