yeoman
farmer of sorts
yeoman
farmer of sorts
Fat as the Fiends that feed on blood, Fresh and warm from the fields of Spain, Where Ruin ploughs her gory way, Where the shoots of earth are nipped in the bud, Where Hell is the Victor's prey, Its glory the meed of the slain.
reference to the war in Spain
In short, we see the separate lines of work taking place within a context that rapidly changes as an opportunity and not as a problem.
I feel like this is an important distinction to make. Seeing all of the changes that have happened within technology and the Internet in such a short span of time can be daunting, but instead of seeing them as a problem to over come, we can view this changing atmosphere as constant opportunities of growth and expansion.
nstead of all decisions ema-nating from the top of an organization, teams within lower levels of organizations are empowered to identify and solve important problems that generate new knowledge and lead to better ways of producing goods or providing services. These high-performance workplaces seek to use the intellectual capital of every employee to increase effective decision making and increase productivity. The effective use of information to solve problems allows a horizontally organized workplace to become much more productive and com-petitive
This is a very interesting workplace development. As companies are moving more towards the horizontal structure of management and away from the vertical model, more emphasis is being places on individuals with high level collaboration skills based in online literacy.
Apps that merely promote the consumption of information, whether through standardized or individualized tracks of learning activities and instruction, are not doing anything previously unimaginable; they are, instead, only trying to minimize the complexity of content consumption.
this is not a redefinition of a learning experience. this is only a reorganization of information and presenting the information in a new way
over-reliance on technology to individualize instruction can result in kids being placed in front of computers, siphoned into silos with few opportunities to build agency and connection with teachers and classmates.
SAMR is missing human connection
The problem with many personalized learning tools is that they live mostly in realm of Substitution or Augmentation tasks. While there may be some functional improvement with regard to delivering content and collecting assessment data, there is little to no redefinition of the learning experience, which still sees students simply consuming and regurgitating materials, albeit through more efficient digital means.
Technology is not being used to it's fullest potential in the classroom. This could be because of a generational gap, teachers may not have enough training to feel confident to integrate a technology they don't fully understand in order to redefine a learning experience.
. As Alan November explained in his NEXT keynote address, "We should be designing assignments that students can't Google."
Google should be used as a resource, not the end game. We cannot create assessments on instructions that students can just look up the answers to. We must change with the times. Technologies like search engines are great resources for our students but we should be teaching them how to use them to connect ideas, not just look up answers.
Educators talk about incorporating technology into lessons on a regular basis, but are you doing it in a meaningful way?
This is "the" question. Educators are pushed so much to integrate technology, many are forced to do so with little training and the result is an unorganized lesson/unit. This model provides structure for teachers to begin small with integration and work their way up if need be so they are not so overwhelmed.
Teachers need to master more than the subject matter they teach; they must also have a deep understanding of the manner in which the subject matter (or the kinds of representations that can be constructed) can be changed by the application of particular technologies.
Teachers should understand how their subject area is applies in technology and in digital spaces. For instance, the engineering teacher should understand the implications a 3D printer may have in their classroom, but an English teacher may not need these implications. They would need an understanding of pod cast and eBooks and ways in which authors are sharing literature through digital spaces and other technologies.
FITness goes beyond traditional notions of computer literacy to require that persons understand information technology broadly enough to apply it productively at work and in their everyday lives, to recognize when information technology can assist or impede the achievement of a goal, and to continually adapt to changes in information technology.
to be technologically knowledgeably, one must understand information technology broadly and be able to apply it to their every day lives, recognizing ways it can improve his/her tasks, and when it will hinder these tasks (knowing WHEN and WHERE to apply it efficiently).
this transformation occurs as the teacher interprets the subject matter, finds multiple ways to represent it, and adapts and tailors the instructional materials to alternative conceptions and students’ prior knowledge.
Teaching is a fluid movement. There is no path set in stone that says every English teacher must teach these things this way, every teacher must take their subject matter and represent it in a way their students will relate to.
A teacher with deep pedagogical knowledge understands how students construct knowledge and acquire skills and how they develop habits of mind and positive dispositions toward learning.
This statement is so important for educators to understand. A person can have an extensive amount of knowledge about their subject, they can be an expert in their field. But if they do not understand how the developing brain acquires and stores and connects information, then they do not know how to teach efficiently. This is seen a lot at higher levels of teaching like professing. Many colleges will hire someone with a doctorate in a field of biology to teach a bio 101 class, and they have no idea how to structure their lessons so that their students actually learn the material. Granted, at this point in their educational career, students should be able to learn in these environments, but it is a good comparison to make.
Understanding how these affordances and constraints of specific technologies influence what teachers do in their classrooms is not straightforward and may require rethinking teacher education and teacher professional development.
This is an important fact to understand as an educator so that you do not become overwhelmed. Integrating technology into the classroom is a gradual process and not one that can be taken lightly. Each digital feature serves the purpose it was made for, therefore it will have uses in the classroom, but it could also hinder the educators overall goal if they attempt to integrate a technology or too much technology without understanding its actual function and what it is really meant to do.
Most traditional pedagogical technologies are characterized by specificity (a pencil is for writing, while a microscope is for viewing small objects); stability (pencils, pendulums, and chalkboards have not changed a great deal over time); and transparency of function (the inner workings of the pencil or the pendulum are simple and directly related to their function) (Simon, 1969). Over time, these technologies achieve a transparency of perception (Bruce & Hogan, 1998); they become commonplace and, in most cases, are not even considered to be technologies.
As our technologies change, so does the way we define "technology." As stated, at one point in time, a pencil was considered a technology created so assist in writing. We have upgraded since then to digital forms of writing and the pencil has been phased out. Our educational system cannot be left using pencils when almost every job we are preparing our students for uses keyboards.
Connected learning environments link learning in school, home and community because learners achieve best when their learning is reinforced and supported in multiple settings.
This is key in emphasizing to students the importance of being a life-long learner. If they are able to understand that the classroom is not the only setting in which learning takes place, they will be able to leave the school with the confidence that their education will continue because they are the ones responsible for it.
When academic studies and institutions draw from and connect to young people’s peer culture, communities and interest-driven pursuits, learners flourish and realize their true potential.
The job of an educator is to show students that what they are learning will apply to their life when they leave the school building. The academics that students dread learning, will have implications in the real world and students will care about them if they are shown how to connect them to their own culture and communities.
Powered with possibilities made available by today’s social media, this peer culture can produce learning that’s engaging and powerful.
"on going participation" That is what social media and most all digital spaces is all about. Students interact with there peers all throughout the day online, texting, sending pictures, updating statuses; they are already engaged online. Educators can use this engagement to display the learning possibilities the digital world can also hold for students.
Connected learning prizes the learning that comes from actively producing, creating, experimenting and designing
True process of creation displays a true understanding of a topic. If a student is able to take creative liberty and design some sort of product (whatever that product be) they have to have a good understanding of the ideals behind the topic.
Interests foster the drive to gain knowledge and expertise.
Everyone is more invested in something if they have an interest in it. Students will be more willing to put in effort to develop their understanding of a topic if it interests them in some way, they will want to know more about it.
While wealthy families are embracing the potential of new technologies for learning, and investing more and more in out-of-school and connected learning, less privileged kids are being left behind.
Wealthy families are able to begin educating their children in the ways of technology from a much younger age because they have the means to afford it. Less privileged children are being left behind in this aspect because as classrooms integrate more technology, there becomes a standard of knowledge of digital aspects that teachers assume students will understand when they enter their classroom. Children who have not had the opportunity to use the same amount of technology have a harder learning curve than others and will potentially be left behind.
The culture clash between formal education and interest-driven, out-of-school learning is escalating in today’s world where social communication and interactive content is always at our fingertips. We need to harness these new technologies for learning rather than distraction.
If the purpose of formal education is to prepare students for a future in which they will be able to participate efficiently in the society around them, then we cannot stick to the 'traditional' forms of education. Our education system should grow and change with our society so that our students leave our schools with the skills they need to succeed.
Rather than see technology as a means toward more efficient and automated forms of education, connected learning puts progressive, experiential, and learner-centered approaches at the center of technology-enhanced learning
Connected learning is about interacting through technology. Sometimes we tend to see our digital spaces as means to farther isolate ourselves, as there is so much information and functions at the touch of a finger now. However, connected learning is about using our digital spaces to their greatest potentials of collaboration so that we might learn and grow together.
Differentiating between appropriate and inappropriate behavior and actions to the purpose of the interaction and audience.
I think this is very important in the era of today. As educators we need to make sure our students are aware of who there audiences are and what content is appropriate to put out in respect of that. Many students do this already, as what they post to Snapchat (for example) is more casual when compared to what they post to their Instagram. Most likely, their family follows them on Instagram so they save casual friendly content for their snapchat where their audience consists mostly of friends their own age.
To hold information-age jobs, people also need to think deeply about issues, solve problems creatively, work in teams, communicate clearly in many media, learn ever-changing technologies.
Educators in this "information-age" must be able to adapt and evolve with the times. Students need should be prepared to work in team with others to problem solve and create. They need to be able to realize there is an infinite amount of information around them, but understand how to sift through and decipher what sources are reliable. Schools should be graduating students who are knowledgeable about the web and their presence on it, and how to use it to their greatest resource.
A healthy online community
The phrase "healthy online community" is interesting to me because I am not entirely sure how to define it, but from experience I know what it is not. A healthy online community should have all of the things mentioned later in the paragraph, but so much of our online space today has turned into spaces of competition instead of collaboration. As I am learning more about online literary, I am understanding that the web, at its beginnings, was meant to be a place meant specifically for collaboration. But as people realized their online identity can be validated through the amount of access people have to it, so arises the state of things today in which competition has pushed collaboration to the side.
“Our lessons, units, and courses should be logically inferred from the results sought, not derived from the methods, books, and activities with which we are most comfortable. Curriculum should lay out the most effective ways of achieving specific results… in short, the best designs derive backward from the learnings sought.”
I really enjoy this quote and I think it does a good job laying out the goals of Backward Design (especially from the video) . I am more of a "big picture" person, therefore I feel like I have used this method in many aspects of my life already, and this plan will be very helpful when I am setting up my course schedule for my classroom. I think that starting out with the end result in mind is very important. Identifying your goal before you begin and identifying ways in which you can achieve this, ensures that you will get there. If you begin in the middle (creating lessons and units with little continuity) you are setting yourself up for failure. Your students may obtain the content however you distributed it, but did they reach your goal of understanding?
This can be hard for many educators to accept, but it’s not necessarily a bad thing. In our quickly evolving technological world, we are all learners, and teachers who are willing to share responsibility with students are more likely to be comfortable – and effective – in a networked classroom.
I think, as a teacher, it is important to establish that you are a co-learner. Your job is to facilitate to your students and foster their learning, but there are many ways to get to the same destination. Technology provides so many resources and many different ways to present, engage with, and assess learning. As a teacher, you are there as a resource for your students, but you will not have the answer to everything. When you don't, take the time to learn with your students, show them the importance of trying different approaches, of using what you do know to accumulate more knowledge. Learning is a never ending process and teachers should demonstrate to their students what it means to be a life-long-learner.
The images of ourselves we create online have an extra impact on us because they embody who we imagine (or wish) ourselves to be
There is an interesting parallel displayed in this paragraph that holds a lot of truth. We struggle online with "empathy traps" and feeling confident enough in our anonymity through the internet to be unsympathetic; we may feel like we don't have an identity online and see the Internet as just a resource that is for our use alone, forgetting about everyone behind every media post. However, we are constantly creating an identity for ourselves through everything we put out into the web through social media and other forms of media. And, the identity we create for ourselves may not even be the one that is really us, because when we are given the chance to choose what we want to display of ourselves we, of course, only choose to put on our best.
These key concepts of digital literacy apply to traditional media as well, with the difference being that while the aspects they describe are relatively rare in traditional media, they are dominant in digital media. Communicating these concepts is essential for enabling students to transfer their learning to different contexts: for example, teaching students to authenticate information for assignments may motivate them to do this for schoolwork, but they may not see the need to do so in other situations. When young people understand how the networked nature of digital media makes it possible for anyone to create online content, however, this helps them to understand why this is important.
I like this statement that, while these concepts were created to provide a guide to understanding digital media and what it means to be digitally literate, they are also applicable to non-digital forms. I think this is very important to realize as an educator. Creating a classroom environment that is digitally knowledgeable is important not only to provide relevance for students of a digital age but also to make students aware of the resources it can provide, along with how to use these resources to their success. However, there will be a transition period, and it is important for students and teachers to view technology and the internet as sources of learning just as in the traditional sense. Learning can be measured by the students ability to use, understand, and create whether they are using online resources or using a single hardback textbook.