exact format for king's seal...as given in exodus?

Verse used

Throughout this article, the author uses the propaganda of media covering this incident to show how it has covered up this terrible scheme. Yet, the author also uses these same techniques, so how can we trust a writer's credibility when he is so hypocritical?

It would be truly helpful to this article, and the credibility of this author, to specify what exactly he means by his statements.

The author STILL doesn't explain what President Trump has to do with all of this? He is still just pinning his name to controversial topics to try and get a response out of his readers.

So Bernanke is pinning it on politicians instead of exposing himself and his big banking partners as the true adversaries.

Putting Bernie Sanders and Ron Paul as the "good guys" in this situation is a partisan statement. What evidence does he have to say that other Republican politicians don't care about the financial crisis as well?

Disproportionately to all white homeowners of all financial standings, or to white homeowners of the same financial standing?

Exactly, these buyers were POOR and statistically there are more minorities that are poor. I really don't think that these banks were specifically targeting minorities.

Was it really about race or about homeowner's financial standings?

Wouldn't this lead to an overall economic loss?

Here is another example of a, less direct, weasel word. What exactly does "underwater" mean in actual money terms? This is impossible to know, but because of the statistic attached to the sentence the audience forgets all about the deceiving word.

So, the public and even workers at these banks are not aware of this scandal.

So maybe instead of our selfish beliefs destroying the Capitalistic system, suggested in Overselling Capitalism, it is the expanding of corrupt businesses and banks in our economic system.

Here the author is angering his audience by relating these events to the aristocratic government which Americans have long despised.

So, maybe President Trump has something to do with this events through how he has decreased the taxes of major banks in America. But, to an uninformed observer, the author still provides no clear evidence tying him to these events.

Again relating these unfair events to the "common people" in America.

Here the author is again attempting to relate these events to the "plain folks" reading it by showing how it could effect their personal, local economy.

If the government obtained huge amounts of debt from these events, how could this have turned a profit? Is the author trying to say that this only profited the large banks and not the government as a whole?

So this simple prevention of major banking firms closing created a huge amount of debt that we still have to deal with today. But, again, how does President Trump factor into all of this? Or is the author just falsely associating his name with these events?

The author keeps using the term "legend" over and over again as a strategy to arouse the audience's emotions. The reality of this situation is that the press and public was fed misinformation, they didn't actively choose to create a "legend" to mislead the public.

So maybe all of this was just a ploy to keep this banks in business, because their mortgage scheme was crumbling.

The author makes this scheme relatable to to public by guilting them with stories of the victims.

Firstly, the author is using "universal" too loosely, because he has no way to prove that everyone believes the same way about this topic. Second, the "Cadillac-driving welfare queen" was a gross exaggeration of the amount of people exploiting welfare, but that doesn't mean that it was entirely inaccurate. Obviously there are the people in every system that will choose to exploit it, so I wouldn't go as far as saying that this idea is "asinine".

This is another use of analogies in this article, but for this circumstance, it seems mostly accurate. Admittedly, comparing this event to the Titanic where civilian lives were lost is inflammatory, but it doesn't seem like a huge stretch at this point.

Here, and in several other pieces of text, the author uses the "plain folks appeal" by incorporating popular culture references into his article.

These words are a propaganda technique, but the author can't act as if he isn't in on this game as well. Throughout this article, the author has used inflammatory and, most likely inaccurate, phrases.

The participants in this event, and the media covering it, used metaphors as a propaganda technique without truly justifying their accuracy.

So, the author is trying to say that President Donald Trump's election is the result of influential, yet inaccurate propaganda surrounding this event.

This also seems to be an example of the use of the "transfer" technique. President Trump obtaining office could have absolutely nothing to do with these events and the propaganda surrounding them. The author is "transferring" them onto Trump with, so far, no evidence to support his claim.

Also shows the use of faulty cause and effect.

This is rather hypocritical when after only glancing at this article I can see several cases of propaganda.

This text uses the weasel word "virtually" which leads this sentence to become effectively meaningless. Virtually every major bank could mean any number of banks or very few banks. This word is just used to attempt to signify the importance of this event without being entirely accurate.

Again they are relating this event to a hyperbolic analogy. Even if this event could lead to a large amount of debt for the major bankers of this country, this would only lead to economic slowing rather than the destruction all civilization.

This could be use of a false analogy. At this point, the audience doesn't know if this analogy is accurate or not because of the lack of information. Either way, comparing this event to a serious natural disaster seems like an overreaction.

I'm not sure if this is a specific propaganda technique, but this line does use hyperbolic language to elicit a response from its audience.

This section uses the propaganda technique of "name-calling" when it associates our President, Donald Trump, with "grotesque".

This article is a great example of how our capitalistic society has encouraged a mindset of uneeded exuberance for the wealthy and upper class while ignoring the lower class's real problems and needs.

Also another way Jeep is attempting to manipulate the public into buying from them. Both with celebrities actually participating in the event and sponsoring the event.

Jeep is also sponsoring this event. They are clearly using celebrities' influence on popular culture to encourage the public to buy from them.

Celebrities wasting their money on uneeded products like customized expensive vehicles. This is encouraging audiences to do the same.