153 Matching Annotations
  1. Dec 2022
    1. Tennis is notoriously punishing to the psyche, even without the complex dynamics that come with being a private person in a very public position, or a young woman of color in a sport run predominantly by white men, or an ambitious athlete who, on even her bad days, is expected to win every match. But, then, it’s impossible for any of us to know what is happening in Osaka’s mind, beyond what she tells us.

      Mental health matters most narrative

    2. “Whenever things go wrong I blame myself 100%, I have a tendency to shut down because I don’t want to burden anyone with my thoughts or problems,”

      Supports the idea of how Osaka has struggled with mental health before

    3. “I think that’s so important to have a sounding board, whether it’s someone at the W.T.A. or whether it’s someone in your life,” Williams said. “Maybe it’s someone that you just talk to on a weekly basis. I’ve been in that position, too. I’ve definitely had opportunities to talk to people, kind of get things off my chest that I can’t necessarily talk to anyone in my family or anyone that I know.”

      This provides credibility in the article and background information for the story. It's interesting to note that Serena Williams was the chosen person to compare in this story –– she's in a similar position to Osaka and understands the mental health aspects of being a professional athlete.

    1. "We have advised Naomi Osaka that should she continue to ignore her media obligations during the tournament, she would be exposing herself to possible further Code of Conduct infringement consequences. As might be expected, repeat violations attract tougher sanctions including default from the tournament (Code of Conduct article III T.) and the trigger of a major offence investigation that could lead to more substantial fines and future Grand Slam suspensions (Code of Conduct article IV A.3.).

      Do your job narrative

    2. "Naomi Osaka today chose not to honour her contractual media obligations. The Roland-Garros referee has therefore issued her a $15,000 fine, in keeping with article III H. of the Code of Conduct.

      Terms of Osaka's agreement –– outcome of her not doing her job

    1. The NBA guard Kyrie Irving, who himself has been fined a total of $60,000 for skipping media obligations this season, commented: “We are all with you Queen. Just be you, that will always be enough.”

      Who's choosing to voice their thoughts? Athletes with prominent backgrounds

    2. Withdrawing was the option to minimise her stress. With her departure, she explained that she suffers from depression and is struck by anxiety before press encounters.

      Impact on mental health

    3. With their heavy-handed statement, the grand slam tournaments have much for which to answer. They responded to Osaka as if she was a threat, an all-too-familiar sensation for black athletes who step outside of the box. Osaka said she expected to receive fines, as other players have received for skipping press in the past, and she was prepared to pay them and then discuss further solutions after the event. That should have been enough for the time being.

      Going against the do your job narrative

    4. For some players, their thoughts and discomfort in the press room follow them home and it is logical that it can affect their mental health. Osaka is also a black and Asian woman charged with fielding questions to an audience of majority white men, a dynamic that has led to numerous uncomfortable questions over the years.

      Impact of race and gender

    1. The issues that Osaka has raised aren’t going away. These days athletes would much rather tell their own stories than let reporters do it for them. Not long ago, players couldn’t win any power struggles against the media, much less their own league. Now they can.

      Mental health matters –– telling what they want to is important

    2. During the U.S. Open final against Osaka in 2018, Serena Williams lost her composure after being cited for multiple rule violations during the match. Williams got into a heated argument with an umpire after he accused her of receiving coaching from the stands. The episode culminated in Williams slamming her racquet against the ground. Following her loss, an Australian newspaper published an editorial cartoon that deployed racist imagery reminiscent of the Jim Crow era to depict Williams as a poor sport. Williams’s lips were overexaggerated, and her body was drawn ludicrously big.

      Is it a gender issue? How are women represented versus men?

    3. cross all sports, top athletes are no longer willing to stay silent about anything—their own personal struggles or the social and political issues they care about.

      IMportance of speaking out and being active

    4. The end result—Osaka completely out of the tournament—benefited no one. Osaka’s subsequent explanation for her decision made tennis officials look all the more callous.

      Writer's opinion –– mental health matters most

    5. But tournament leaders weren’t satisfied with a fine. Officials from across the tennis world felt the need to put Osaka in her place. In a statement signed by the heads of all four Grand Slam tournaments—Wimbledon, the Australian Open, the U.S. Open, and the French Open—Osaka was warned that she could face suspension from future Grand Slam tournaments and harsher penalties if she did not fulfill her media obligations.

      Wanting her to do her job completely and fully

    6. Rather than figure out a way to support Osaka or come to a workable compromise, French Open officials fined her $15,000 after she didn’t participate in the mandatory news conference following her first-round win on Sunday. The fine was not a surprise. In the past, other tennis stars have skipped news conferences and received the same treatment.

      Punishment for Osaka not doing "her job"

    7. But even for seasoned journalists, the experience can be awkward. Most of us would prefer to conduct private interviews with athletes, but logistically that’s not feasible. Even if athletes could spend one-on-one time with several different news outlets, they would be subjected to a lot of the same questions. Still, the reliance on press conferences means that journalists often have to ask intrusive questions in front of a crowd.

      Point of view of journalist –– brings a different perspective

    8. As a sportswriter for more than 20 years, I have attended many of the postgame news conferences that so unsettle Osaka.

      First person point of view –– changes direction of the story since we're accounting for the author's viewpoint and opinion

    9. Critics quickly portrayed Osaka as shirking one of her fundamental duties: communicating with the public. In reality, the episode laid bare some of the deeper tensions in big-money athletics. Who controls a sport—the leagues that organize the competition, or the athletes who actually play?

      What's important here? Is money the objective?

    10. “We’re often sat there and asked questions that we’ve been asked multiple times before or asked questions that bring doubt into our minds, and I’m just not going to subject myself to people that doubt me.”

      Rationale behind Osaka's decision

    11. power struggle with tournament officials over whether she would attend obligatory press conferences.

      "power struggle" –– what kind of picture does this paint about the story

    1. "As a sport there is nothing more important than ensuring no player has an unfair advantage over another, which unfortunately is the case in this situation if one player refuses to dedicate time to participate in media commitments while the others all honor their commitments."

      Is it really an advantage?

    2. "We want to underline that rules are in place to ensure all players are treated exactly the same, no matter their stature, beliefs or achievement," top tennis officials from France, Australia, England, and the U.S. said in a joint statement on Sunday.

      "do your job" narrative

    3. The French Tennis Federation announced a fine of $15,000 and Osaka was facing further fines and possible expulsion from the tournament if she continued to refuse to attend media events.

      What happens if Osaka doesn't "do her job"

    1. The absence of someone who is among tennis's biggest drawcards is another blow to a sport whose international nature has meant it being hit harder than most by the past year's pandemic.

      Osaka is seen for her abilities and less for being a human being

    2. Osaka also has to cope with agreeing to the demands of satisfying a huge roster of commercial sponsors, who helped make her the best paid female athlete on earth last year at an income reckoned to be close to £40 million.

      Lots of outside stressors and work –– contributes to mental health

    3. Following the lack of engagement by Naomi Osaka, the Australian Open, Roland-Garros, Wimbledon and the US Open jointly wrote to her to check on her well-being and offer support, underline their commitment to all athletes' well-being and suggest dialogue on the issues. She was also reminded of her obligations, the consequences of not meeting them and that rules should equally apply to all players.

      "Do your job.. you signed up for it" narrative

    4. stated that she had suffered 'long bouts of depression' since winning the US Open in 2018, and that she needed a break from the controversy that has enveloped her in the past week

      Factual information –– provides an explanation for the reader and a bit of clarity as to how this came about.

    5. exasperation in the statement from the four Majors, which referred to the 'lack of engagement by Naomi Osaka' after they reached out to her.

      This is painting more of a picture of that "do your job" narrative... showing the surprise people have that Osaka dropped out

    6. The declaration from the French Open and the three other Grand Slams that she ran the risk of being banned, and not just fined, also took seasoned observers aback in its swiftness and uncompromising nature.

      Narrative of it's your job...you've got to do your job.

  2. Nov 2022
    1. Shortly after her announcement, the president of the French tennis federation, Gilles Moretton, read a statement wishing Osaka a speedy “recovery.” Without any apparent awareness of the irony, he did not take questions from the press.

      This shows a bit of bias on the writer's end, particularly with the use of "recovery"

    2. What was unusual was the decision to opt out of them entirely, ahead of time, and to publicly question the rules and practices surrounding them.

      This is the author's opinion –– it's subjective. What is most unusual about it?

    3. Her fellow-players, almost to a person, took a more nuanced view: when asked about her stance, they said that they respected Osaka but understood the need for exposure, and that talking to the press was part of their job.

      Narrative on "it's your job".

    4. The press, particularly at the Grand Slams, can include people who are not well versed in tennis; tabloid reporters; and, not infrequently, people who ask ham-handed and offensive questions, particularly of Black women. Just the other day, a reporter who wanted to get a quote from the seventeen-year-old star Coco Gauff about the possibility of playing Serena Williams began by saying, “You are often compared to the Williams sisters. Maybe it’s because you’re Black. But I guess it’s because you’re talented and maybe American, too.”

      The writer might be constructing a narrative that points to the role of genders and how women are represented in sports. What are they supposed to/not supposed to do? How are they meant to act?

    5. Her image was on the cover of Vogue and on billboards towering over Los Angeles and Tokyo. She became an icon, and she did iconic things. She helped design sneakers for Nike, a salad for Sweetgreen. In May, Sportico estimated that she had earned more than fifty million dollars during the previous year, which made her the highest-paid female athlete in history, breaking her own record. A recent Times feature about her ran under the headline “How Naomi Osaka Became Everyone’s Favorite Spokesmodel.”

      Background information showing Osaka's prominence. How does this influence our narrative about Osaka and how we perceive her? Does this make us more sympathetic towards Osaka?

    6. It happened in 2018, during the U.S. Open trophy presentation, after a match marred by controversy surrounding a confrontation between Serena Williams and the umpire. The crowd, which had been on Williams’s side, booed as Osaka was named the champion. Osaka cried, and tried to hide her face.

      Uses story-like information to construct a timeline and narrative of Osaka's past experiences

    7. I’ve seen her half-hide her smile countless times.

      First-person commentary from the writer. This shows that we may be getting opinions in this article rather than all fact-based information

    1. Two-time NBA MVP Stephen Curry wrote that it was “impressive taking the high road when the powers that be dont protect their own. major respect.”

      This is interesting to note since it shows who chooses to share their thoughts and opinions with the public and which thoughts are taken into account. Steph Curry is a world-renowned basketball player and athlete, so we listen to what he has to say.

    2. Tennis players are required to attend news conferences if requested to do so. The maximum fine of $20,000 is not a big deal to Osaka, the world’s highest-earning female athlete thanks to endorsement contracts totaling tens of millions of dollars.

      This is a pretty significant fine, even if it doesn't impact Osaka, personally. Would this feat matter as much if the fine were less?

    3. “I feel for Naomi. I feel like I wish I could give her a hug because I know what it’s like. ... I’ve been in those positions,” Williams said. “We have different personalities, and people are different. Not everyone is the same. I’m thick; other people are thin. Everyone is different and everyone handles things differently. You just have to let her handle it the way she wants to, in the best way she thinks she can, and that’s the only thing I can say. I think she’s doing the best that she can.”

      The story presents Serena Williams' perspective on the matter and how she sees it. This shows a credible source since Williams is said to be one of the greatest athletes in the world and has experience with performing on the biggest stages.

    4. She framed the matter as a mental health issue, saying that it can create self-doubt to have to answer questions after a loss.

      Another narrative to look at with this story. It being a matter of mental health and mental health being the priority.

    5. fined $15,000 for skipping the postmatch news conference after her first-round victory at the French Open. She also was threatened by all four Grand Slam tournaments with possible additional punishment, including disqualification or suspension, if she continued with her intention — which Osaka revealed last week on Twitter — to not “do any press during Roland Garros.”

      This shows the repercussions of Osaka's actions. Presents a narrative on "do your job" and what happens if you don't.

    6. Osaka’s agent, Stuart Duguid, confirmed in an email to The Associated Press that the world’s No. 2-ranked tennis player was pulling out before her second-round match at the clay-court tournament in Paris.

      Presented people from Osaka's team to confirm that she wasn't returning for the remainder of the tournament. This is factual information that the reader can rely on, knowing that she won't in fact be partaking further.

    7. “huge waves of anxiety” before speaking to the media and revealed she has “suffered long bouts of depression.

      This is factual information that Osaka provided in her social media posts when she formally withdrew from the French Open

    8. HOWARD FENDRICH

      Howard Fendrich has been a sports writer for Associated Press for 28 years. He writes specifically for the tennis column. This means that he has expertise in this area and some degree of credibility.

    9. anxiety

      This also adds to the idea of unusualness. Many times when athletes aren't able to play in a tournament it's due to an injury. This brings up a new idea that we haven't faced much.

    10. out of French Open

      Unusualness: It isn't very often that a top player withdraws from a grand slam. This captures the reader's attention since Osaka might have been favored to win the tournament or do well in it.

    11. “Mental health and awareness around it is one of the highest priorities to the WTA,” the women’s tennis tour said in a statement emailed by a spokeswoman. “We have invested significant resources, staffing and educational tools in this area for the past 20-plus years and continue to develop our mental health support system for the betterment of the athletes and the organization. We remain here to support and assist Naomi in any way possible and we hope to see her back on the court soon.”

      It's a high priority.. but is doing their job more of a priority? This remains unclear from reading but is something important to account for with the naratives shown

    1. On issues, Shapiro leads big among voters who say abortion is very important in their vote.  And he maintains his large lead from September among women, one that grows to more than 40 points among women who prioritize the issue of abortion.

      This provides more context to readers about what Shapiro stands for and who supports him heavily.

    2. The "extreme" label is hurting Mastriano among independent voters. Most independents describe his views that way, and those who do are voting for Shapiro. 

      This is an important piece of information to make sense of the current results. What does this say about what people want in a governor?

    3. Democrat Josh Shapiro is ahead by nine points over Republican Doug Mastriano in the race for Pennsylvania governor. Shapiro led by 11 points last month.  

      Timeliness: this article was written before the election and provides predictions and values of who is ahead in the PA governor race.

    4. 1,084 registered voters in Pennsylvania

      This is the sample population, which CBS News shares the number of people who took part in it and specified their classification as registered voters, specifically in Pennsylvania. This shows that the respondents weren't randomly selected since it only looked at registered voters.

    5. The margin of error is ±4.1 points. 

      They provide the margin of error to show the amount of random sampling error in the results. This shows whether the results are reliable or not.

    6. CBS News/YouGov Battleground Tracker survey

      Reliable researcher/pollster: this shows that the polling data can be trusted more because it comes from CBS News, which is a reliable news source.

    1. QAnon is the umbrella term for a set of internet conspiracy theories that allege, falsely, that the world is run by a cabal of Satan-worshiping pedophiles.

      Definition: provides context for readers with an understanding of what QAnon is

    2. A December poll by NPR and Ipsos found that 17 percent of Americans believed that the core falsehood of QAnon — that “a group of Satan-worshiping elites who run a child sex ring are trying to control our politics and media” — was true.

      This is an example of a fact because it is a direct statistic from a poll

    1. When conservatives take up the mantle of child sexual abuse with conspiracy theories and disinformation, they are assuming a moral position that is usually occupied by liberals: defending the powerless, the voiceless, the disenfranchised.

      Nefarious intent

    2. It’s not dissimilar to the psychological function of conservative opposition to abortion rights – it’s about conservatives’ need to see themselves not as the inflictors of pain and needless suffering, but as defenders of the innocent

      Persecuted victim

    3. According to the Centers for Disease Control, about one in four girls and one in 13 boys experience sexual abuse sometime in childhood – an alarmingly high number. A sizable minority of those abuses are committed by other children. The prevalence of children being sexually abused by adults is about one in nine girls and one in 53 boys, according to Rainn – a lower but still alarming number. By and large, the adults who sexually abuse children are not strangers or traffickers (or national Democratic politicians). Instead, they tend to be men – and overwhelmingly it is men who sexually abuse children – whom the abused child knows. Ninety-three per-cent of child molesters are known to their victims. fifty-nine per-cent are acquaintances or family friends, and 34% are family members.

      Immune to evidence: ignoring evidence and statistics from the CDC

    4. Donald Trump, according to this fantasy, is the only person willing and able to mount an attack against them.

      Persecuted Victim: only Trump can rescue people from the pedophilic Democrats

    5. The conspiracy has spread widely during the pandemic, migrating out of the dark shadows of the internet and on to Facebook, where it is now spreading among an audience of frightened and credulous parents.

      Nefarious intent: this conspiracy theory has now spread to parents and is influencing those who have children

    1. “Either you are Pro-pedophile and Pro-transgender biological men or you defend children and women. Period. There is no other option.”

      This is contradictory because Greene is asserting what position people can be even though there are other options

    2. “This is the party of their identity, and their identity is the most disgusting, evil, horrible things happening in our country,”

      Persecuted victim: Greene is trying to insinuate that Democrats are evil and that the country and children are victims to these "pedophiles"

    3. “top Democrats are involved in elite child sex-trafficking rings,

      Nefarious intent: "top Democrats" makes a dig at those in positions of power and this could make it more difficult for them to get elected

    4. Almost half of Republicans and more than half of Trump 2020 voters think top Democrats are involved in pedophilia cabals

      This is an example of nefarious intent because QAnon conspiracy theorists and some Republicans and Trump supporters are alleging that Democrats are engaged in illegal behavior

    1. That was a perfect game in Game 5 in 1956, when catcher Yogi Berra famously leaped into his arms to celebrate. Wednesday, Houston catcher Christian Vázquez had his choice of pitchers with whom to celebrate.

      Prominence

    2. The way Javier was pitching, that was all Houston needed.

      This is an informed opinion because the writer determined that this is what Houston needed but doesn't know that for certain.

    3. Though Alvarado jumped ahead of the next hitter, putting Alex Bregman into an 0 and 2 hole, Bregman fought back by belting a two-run double to push Houston’s lead to 3-0. Kyle Tucker’s sacrifice fly and Yuli Gurriel’s R.B.I. single extended it to 5-0.

      These are facts from the game to provide context about how the game progressed

    4. Astros hitters continued spinning the combination lock that was their offense until the right numbers appeared

      This is an example of a metaphor for how the Astros hitters were hitting perfectly in the game. The writer used this to demonstrate their hitting abilities

    5. But one too many losses and, suddenly, the nights turn restless and the days jittery.

      This is a metaphor about the anticipation leading up to games and the feeling after playing the games and waiting for the next one.

    6. lifted the Astros into the history books

      This is an example of a metaphor because Ryan Pressly didn't actually lift the Astros into the history books but rather the writer is showing how newsworthy his playing was

    7. throwing six no-hit innings at Philadelphia to start the first combined no-hitter in World Series history.

      This is an example of a fact that the writer provides as context for the reader depicting the game and the series so far

    1. You know you’re a serious economics nerd when you’re waiting on pins and needles for the latest JOLTS — Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey — results.

      This is an example of a metaphor because the writer is not actually waiting on pins and needles but rather is showing his anticipation and eagerness. He shows this in a more exciting, enticing way with how he's worded it.

    1. Philadelphia Flyers coach John Tortorella had just gotten out of his car at the adjacent Wells Fargo Center when the Phillies broke loose in a playoff game."It was shaking over where I was. That was pretty cool," Tortorella said. "That's what I love about being here."

      This is an example of informed opinion because the writer is using a well-known Philadelphia coach to speak about the Phillies and the atmosphere.

    2. His last start came on Oct. 15 in the NL Division Series against Atlanta when he gave up one run in three innings.

      This is a fact because there is direct evidence to support Syndergaard playing on Oct. 15 and the statistics from that game. This provides more context and information about Syndergaard.

  3. Oct 2022
    1. good, not great compared with several top teams - the Phillies have become monster mashers at home in playoffs.

      This is an opinion from the writer because he's determining what he sees fit as "great", in comparison to other teams. He then gives his opinion about how the Phillies are playing at home in the playoffs and does not offer evidence to support that claim.

    2. Think that was loud? Just wait till the World Series returns to Philadelphia for the first time since 2009. On Halloween night, too, with the Phillie Phanatic sure to be in rare form.

      This is speculation, as the writer is speculating about what the ambiance will be like at Game 3. There is no evidence to support how the night will be, but the author is determining what he thinks it will be like.

    3. Philadelphia went 5-0 at home in eliminating defending World Series champion Atlanta and San Diego in the playoffs, outscoring them by a total of 35-15.

      This is a fact used to create a timeline of how the Phillies have arrived at their current place in the World Series finals. This provides more context for the reader, especially if they aren't keeping up with the World Series.

    4. Schmidt is widely expected to be at the ballpark for the pregame festivities when the Series resumes after a travel day. And he's certain to draw a standing ovation and hear loud cheers - indeed, the City of Brotherly Love is in love with all of its Phillies these days.

      This shows speculation that the writer has concluded. While we don't know for a fact whether Schmidt will be there or not and whether he'll draw a large crowd and cheer, the writer came to this conclusion without facts.

    1. emphatic start expected of the Cowboys franchise quarterback.

      This sounds like an opinion because the writer is mentioning what they think is expected of Dak Prescott, even though it isn't fact-based

    1. The police said he forcibly entered through the back door of the Pelosi house in San Francisco,

      This is also factual because the police provided the information since they were at the scene. This allows readers to believe that the information they're getting is accurate.

    2. Federal prosecutors charged the man accused of breaking into the home of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi with attempting to kidnap Ms. Pelosi and with assaulting a relative of a federal official, according to charging documents filed on Monday.

      This is a fact because the writers state where the information is coming from, showing that it is factual and not opinion-based.

    1. I think Eagles GM Howie Roseman isn’t done.

      This is an example of an opinion because the writer is making a statement about what they think without backing it up with evidence.

    1. Corden, who gained widespread notoriety for his “Carpool Karaoke” segments, is set to depart from his role as host of “The Late Late Show” by summer 2023, he announced in April.

      Relevance to the article subject? Sounds like Corden promotion

    2. But late Monday evening, McNally said he was reversing the ban on Corden after the comedian called to apologize.

      How do we know this information? Was it posted on social media? How do we know what we know?

    3. publicly banned

      News value: prominence The idea of it being a public ban is to cater to a widespread crowd and draw attention to the restaurant. In theory, the ban could have been kept between Carter and McNally, but McNally made a decision to bring it to the public's attention

    4. McNally has a reputation for being provocative, at least in his Instagram posts and defenses of controversial celebrities; he has defended Woody Allen, whose daughter Dylan accused him of sexual abuse.

      What's the relevance of these statements? Could this be considered Pietsch being biased against McNally? Or is it more so a way of showing both people's backgrounds?

    5. McNally’s ban on Corden was not the first time he had taken to Instagram to bar a customer from one of his restaurants.

      This suggests that McNally cares about his image and how his employees are treated. This is important for readers to note because it shows McNally in a more positive light

    6. A representative for Corden did not immediately respond to a request for comment. A manager at Balthazar declined to comment when reached by phone late Monday evening.

      Why is this? To avoid confrontation and drama? How is the public supposed to digest this?

    7. citing a manager’s report from the incident.

      How we know the information. It is important to know where direct quotations come from, which is why Pietsch cited the information from McNally and the manager.

    8. which was apparently the last straw for Corden.

      Bias from the writer. This shows that Pietsch is making a dig at Corden and is likely questioning Corden's actions. This is seen through the word choice of "apparently" and "last straw", as last straw typically means final.

    9. said in an Instagram post on Monday that he did not often “86” a customer — meaning banning or refusing service to someone — but that Corden had earned it after two incidents when he mistreated workers at the French restaurant.

      Source of the information. It is important to note that critical parts of the story, such as why Corden was banned, was cited from social media posts produced by Keith McNally or some form of PR team for him. As such, the public can assume that this message is true since the owner wouldn't necessarily have a reason to make it up

    10. ‘abusive’

      This word choice in the headline correlates with the news value of "unusualness" and "conflict". With that, people are intrigued by sad, surprising events, which is why the headline is effective in grabbing the reader's attention

    11. NYC restaurant and celeb hot spot briefly bans ‘abusive’ James Corden

      News value: human interest - people are interested in celebrities, especially when there's drama surrounding said celebrity. Especially with a headline using words such as "abusive", this can also be troubling and surprising to the public.