ADDRESS this before standards go in effect.

learn more

hallelujah

learn more

WTF. This is so weird. Why the hell would they allow that as a deduction???? Especially when so many other actual job-related expenses are not allowed at all????

lordy. No higher ed.

can but not must; sounds like you have the choice to do either?

I don't fully understand this statement yet

this is an achievable bar

this article contradicts this statement:

due to the previous framing of 'university-wide modified operations,' I see this as applying toward the entire university. I imagine that it's likely ok to have decisions around evening classes only be made by the instructor/department? Check with JL.

(wx condx and predictions may be different for daytime classes than they are for late afternoon and evening classes)

the wording here is a bit misleading; I've never heard the mean described this way before (for good reason - this language typically refers to the mode, not the mean).

the term "score" can be misleading; others describe it as "the most frequently occurring VALUE"

this is not true! At least, per the following chart. 46% of instructors prefer digital course materials, and only 34% prefer print materials.

The student % is higher for digital, but both group's primary preferences are for digital - at least if the graph representation is correct...

new in 2024

"full-time faculty at the institution" - meaning affiliate faculty ARE able to be designated partially to, say, PSYC program, where Core faculty should not be (per advisement from CACREP).

this is 2016 standards, right? I think it changed for 2024 (the 'and prospective' part)

meh

wow, no wonder most institutions (I suspect) aren't flocking to add this coverage - the decisionmakers are rarely targeted...

testing

check into this more

argh! Does this mean what I think it means? (would not apply)?

?

what about adult student?

define

read the definition of 'suit'

what does this mean?

what constitutes a 'claim?'

which? Need specifics!

aka Standard? NO - standard is still one step up from this. The info here seems outdated, or at least incongruous with the pricing page.

the focus of this article is parents who work in academia - not parents who are students in higher ed

AE = adverse events

LOVE The term “enshittification,” coined by technology scholar Cory Doctorow, aptly describes this decline in user experience over time.

peer feedback

in WA State, since CACREP is now the state standard for SC programs, how does this impact the process and the potential to develop cert-only options by programs?

outlined in RCW 28A.410.226

COMMUNITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES ACT (Formerly: Community mental health services act)

Any school district in the state that has a student enrollment in its public schools of two thousand pupils or more, as shown by evidence acceptable to the educational service district superintendent and the superintendent of public instruction, is a school district of the first class. Any other school district is a school district of the second class.

https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=28A.300.065

pick up annotating here as I have time.

https://onelifetools.com/pages/who-you-are-matters

https://www.reflectory.ch/

AR recently worked to adjust this so it's not listed as a program requirement - only under certain condx. Check it's been corrected in 24-25 bulletin copy when time comes

and 621!

?

sounds fascinating for both 655 (and maybe my OER textbook) and also 630

um, but that's how many of us start drawing, doesn't make us schizophrenic. But I can see how it could correlate with weak self-awareness, in a develomental sense.

is this true across cultures and ethnicities? (I'm guessing it wouldn't be)

missing word?

2023 Week 4 slide 20: 3 conditions must be in place to fall under statutes: * protected relationship * private setting, where confidentiality could be reasonably expected * not shared

certain conditions when being involuntarily detained (antipsychotic medications, other situations that may impact the safety of others)

abuse of vulnerable adults

abuse of children

allows for the parties to review the recordings - but what about others? Privacy concerns. Wondering if institutions have the ability to broaden the scope of who the recordings are made available to - including rules around whether they can make copies of the recordings.

FIND OUT

are student evaluations considered privileged? If so, SB violated this.

impartial advisor

contact her?

of course it didn't - how could she justify that stance?

not from students who initiate frivolous, malicious claims in bad faith. The current guidelines are hardly adequate as is, in that regard. Imagine if we applied the proposed changes to courts of law. Tell me there wouldn't be extreme outrage and concern. We are watching the erosion of innocent until proven guilty. And that should deeply concern EVERYONE.

dang, Patty. It's so much more complex than that.

disproportionately perhaps, but don't conflate that with unjustly per se

why is this mentioned so prefunctorily here? The changes, as I understand them, were significant

"Brigham later repudiated much of his book, doubting the idea that there is universal human intelligence quotient. He also opposed the formation of the Educational Testing Service."

now encouraged to refer to it as an opportunity gap (gets more to the heart of the discrepancies in 'achievement')

what IS?

yes. Interesting reading more about this. Some proponents were hoping to use it for the opposite.

interesting choices for dimensions; read more on how these were selected as foci

wow, super judgmental. Is that what people want or need in a therapist?

I'm not getting the connection to the topic here. And to COUNSELING.

ok, and what does the actual research show?

true, but WTF does that have to do with how you approach providing care for your client? Who's the client here???

WTF??

really? Consider Ward v. Willbanks, as well as ACA Code of Ethics

define 'accrue' -

California (but many other courts, and professional codes as noted in next para with AMA, agree)

not sure what all this means; read more closely. Are they saying that it was ok to judge Dr. Miller on negligence based on info that was gained (and actions that occurred) after his judgment call back in May??

(the auto accident at hand was the preceding May)

to whom? and when? other Western State personnel prior to defendent's discharge from hospital?

why? Confidentiality, or...?

Unclear. Who is 'their' - client? There is no 'duty to control' their behavior.

"The 73-item Five Factor Wellness Inventory (5F-WEL) was developed through structural equation modeling. It uses a 4-point Likert scale for responses and a linear transformation to report scores to individuals. The scales are factors, and the items have all been subjected to rigorous testing. The factor scales should be capitalized in publications per the APA Manual. The scales measure the concepts in the empirically-derived Indivisible Self model of wellness." - https://www.csi-net.org/members/group_content_view.asp?group=162835&id=573530

"The 123-item Wellness Evaluation of Lifestyle Inventory (WEL) was developed from a theoretical model. It uses a 5-point Likert scale for responses and scores are reported as a percentage of 100. It is based in the theoretical Wheel of Wellness model, has never been factor analyzed, and contains a number of items with poor psychometric properties, yet which may be clinically useful with individual clients." -https://www.csi-net.org/members/group_content_view.asp?group=162835&id=573530

…"Examples of folk religions include African traditional religions, Chinese folk religions, Native American religions and Australian aboriginal religions."

Folk religion

..."Examples of folk religions include African traditional religions, Chinese folk religions, Native American religions and Australian aboriginal religions."

Jewish

Other religion

Buddhist

Hindu

unaffiliated

Muslim

Christian

"Statistical Manual for the Use of Institutions for the Insane (SMUII), which was developed in 1942 by the U.S. Census Bureau to estimate the rate of mental disorders in the United States (Surís et al., 2016). " (from above)

same header in 2016, no changes

formerly 'Assessment and Testing'

same heading, no changes

formerly Counseling and Helping Relationships

same heading, no change

formerly 3. Human Growth and Development

formerly 2. Social and Cultural Diversity

same heading, no changes

formerly Section 2: Professional Counseling Identity

?

a trait influenced by two or more genes

relating to symptoms or disease

systematic description of diseases

relating to or denoting certain principles, such as laws of nature, that are neither logically necessary nor theoretically explicable, but are simply taken as true. another term for nomothetic.

really? ugh.

a good, brief article. Great additional Qs to consider. Two helpful case studies.

and veracity; not sure why that's not in here. One of the 6 pillars in the preamble of the 2014 ACA Code of Ethics

no longer in standard: 'such as Psychological First Aid'

?

?

??

this is interesting, want to learn more

really? Limited knowledge of Title IX world seems to indicate otherwise (but that's based on a cursory impression)

source? I'm curious to know more

?

I would sure f'ing hope so.

in other words, need adequate sodium! Something the MindPump podcast folks have mentioned several times (in relation to the LMNT product they've endorsed)

coronary heart disease

again, how does this compare with other aspects of identity and conditions? Black person (accepted by many as ok) schizophrenic person (acknowledged as stigmatizing by most) Ultimately, does it really come down to individual members' preference? I'm thinking so.

I'd love to hear others' thoughts on this. When I think of some other 'categories,' I don't think of this the same way as described here. What about our use of 'person of color,' for example? That's not seen as demeaning, to my knowledge. Would 'person of autism' be more welcomed, as a corollary, or...?

Cronbach's alpha, correct?

I had to stop reading here; pick up and continue when I can

as compared to CASA 2010 I believe, per https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4267798/

per whom? Start here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4267798/

which we know we can't do (we can't PROVE a null hypothesis is wrong - we can only say we failed to find support that it is true.)

this is referring to the RESEARCH, or ALTERNATIVE, hypothesis - not the NULL hypothesis

effect size

why t, if sample n is 3000?

assuming this is true for conditional/emergency certified school counselors as well?

weird statement

what about 'teachers'???

this is not very accurate based on the data (at least the equally part - and directionality is another thing that I think this article seems to misrepresent. The data and models don't show universal overconfidence; upper quartile demonstrates underconfidence, no?)

FIT (ORS SRS)

citations?

a significant number

wow - coordinating?

I wonder if this was operationalized in the survey item/instructions

good to review and discuss

these numbers are lower than I would have thought!

known as "non-response bias," a form of selection bias

school districts with enrollment of 2,000 or more. Any other district is 'second class'

I believe this RCW basically clarifies that interns in an educational program are not considered employees

https://hyp.is/go?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapp.leg.wa.gov%2FRCW%2Fdefault.aspx%3Fcite%3D49.46.010&group=world

this RCW pertains to firefighters and reserve officers

source: https://ca-hwi.org/public/uploads/pdfs/HWI_Cultural_Professionalism_and_Competency.pdf

examples?

is this from this particular research study, or referencing other studies (or both)?

as determined by what??

quote is by whom?

this statement is consistent with Eric.S. guidance in recent workshops. CAN involve warning, but the duty by law is to 'act reasonably' - can be up to and through breaching confidentiality and directly warning foreseeable and identifiable victims

this is stricter than ACA Code of Ethics (which says at least 5y) and as such, supercedes it. Per E.S. 9-2022

E.S. says NEVER. 2022-9-16 webinar

'medical pain (e.g. ‘Receiving an injection in your hip/buttocks’).' https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/76752333/Peters_2005_The_Fear_of_Pain_Questionnaire.pdf p.340

weird. Why, and how is this relevant?

National Threat Assessment Center (NTAC)

full report: https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-18-258.pdf

not sure I fully understand or follow this yet. But sounds like it's because it

-took place off school grounds

-counselor's action neither increased or decreased harm. Well, the 'no affirmative action' increased it, but it doesn't fall under section 323 so it doesn't matter? Or am I misunderstanding that 'no affirmative action' statement? (does it mean, that she failed to take affirmative action, which ended up increasing the risk? Or does it mean that none of the actions that she did take, increased the risk?)

so it was a procedural thing, NOT that misfeasance/malfeasance wasn't potentially or actually occurring

did she have his permission to share this with others? If not, did she because she felt it was warranted bc of an 'imminent threat to self or others?' And if she did feel that way, wouldn't it also follow that notifying parents/guardians too would be critical?

'the Eisel v. Montgomery County Board of Education court case (1991) led to a duty owed to try and intervene to prevent a student’s suicide. Eisel strengthened school counselors’ legal obligation to students by satisfying for the first time the primary element of negligence, declaring school counselors have a special relationship with students and owe a duty to try to act when placed on notice that a student is possibly suicidal.

The Maryland Court of Appeals in the Eisel case ruled that school counselors had a duty to notify the parents of a 13-year-old student who made suicidal statements to her classmates. Nicole Eisel allegedly became involved in Satanism and told several friends and fellow students of her intention to kill herself. Some of these friends told their school counselor of Eisel’s intentions, and this school counselor in turn informed Eisel’s school counselor. The two school counselors questioned Eisel about the statements, and she denied making them. The school counselors did not notify either the parents or the school administrators about these events. Shortly thereafter, in a public park, Eisel and a friend tragically consummated their suicide pact. Unlike the Delaware court case, the appeals court in Maryland cited as critical to the Eisel case the in loco parentis doctrine, which states that educators, including school counselors, legally stand in the place of parents. Furthermore, school counselors owe a special duty to exercise reasonable care to protect a student from harm.' https://www.schoolcounselor.org/Magazines/September-October-2013/Suicide-Err-on-the-Side-of-Caution

due in part, I'm sure, to the changeable nature of how changeable mood states can be in general

relates to Public Health and Safety- control and treatment of STDs https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=70.24

were all sections of 70.24 repealed? Looks like it to me

.210 relates to approved research studies https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=70.02.210

to try so hard to improve something that you spoil it, for example by making it seem exaggerated or extreme

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/over-egg-the-pudding

I wonder when they will come out with the latest version...

28) "Social service counselor" means anyone engaged in a professional capacity during the regular course of employment in encouraging or promoting the health, welfare, support, or education of children, or providing social services to adults or families, including mental health, drug and alcohol treatment, and domestic violence programs, whether in an individual capacity, or as an employee or agent of any public or private organization or institution.

an important finding that relates to application (selecting goals and potential interventions - and a rationale for considering use of this instrument) in your clinical practices!

'saturation' is a term used in qualitative research that relates to establishing the 'trustworthiness' of the research (related to reliability and validity concepts in quantitative research

this doesn't relate to content validity per se, but it does serve as a method for increasing the reliability of the instrument due to better testing protocols

https://www.samhsa.gov/newsroom/press-announcements/202007131330

treatment recordsdisclosures

interesting. I thought Spearman's rho was for ordinal data. Read up.

relates to range

.

fidelity

autonomy

nonmaleficence. And cost-benefit analysis

meant in the way I think, as in, a 'loaded topic?' or does this mean something else here?

"administrative fees are based on the amount of the claim or counterclaim and are to be paid by the party bringing the claim or counterclaim at the time the demand or claim is filed with the AAA. Arbitrator compensation is not included in either schedule. Unless the parties’ agreement provides otherwise, arbitrator compensation and administrative fees are subject to allocation by an arbitrator in an award." https://adr.org/sites/default/files/Commercial_Arbitration_Fee_Schedule_1.pdf

currently range from $2k to $25k

relief that has the primary purpose and effect of prohibiting unlawful acts, including false advertising, that threaten future injury to others out in the general public

another way companies force people into arbitration vs. other means of resolving disputes (like lawsuits)

.

Plea of not guilty due to insanity—Doubt as to competency—Evaluation<br> https://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=10.77.060

learn more about this

tests/assessments

be prepared to explain similar use of assessments/tests and their adequacy for use in any particular instance

tests and assessments

this

"Malingering is the purposeful production of falsely or grossly exaggerated physical and/or psychological symptoms with the goal of receiving a reward. This reward may include money, an insurance settlement, drugs, release from incarceration, or the avoidance of punishment, work, jury duty, the military, or some other kind of service." https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/conditions/malingering

Some important details are missing here. the reduction was ONLY significant for the group that wore the masks the longest: 3-4 hours. For other groups, the difference was not significant. It's also important to understand what the word 'significant' means in research studies. Statistical significance indicates a difference based on some preset criteria, but it does not in any way imply the MAGNITUDE (or severity) of that difference. Bottom line, good to consider this, but be very cautious of making overreaching claims, as the author of this newsletter article has.

First, this study was from 1989 and did not involve coronavirus. It had to do with a 'MOUSE HEPATITIS VIRUS STRAIN.' So we're already starting off with an iffy claim that should make anyone who understands the importance of reading citations to make sure they claim they are attached to is actually well-founded.

In this article's 'defense,' they did not technically state which virus they were talking about, lol (not).

First off, one should not attack and insult anyone. Can we all agree on that? And take personal responsibility for actually aligning our actions with that? Unfortunately, there has also been a lot of attacking and insulting (insert dismissive 'sheeple' insult) from those in both polarities.. Let's substitute science for attacks and insults, shall we? Or do we really want to continue on in the current caustic world of our own creation?

The second part of this sentence is not a very good justification for the first part's statement, however, due to all of the points brought to the readers' attention above.

this article has to do with hypoxia found in tumor cells, NOT hypoxia related to breathing air with lower amounts of oxygen than recommended. Two very different conditions.

this study had to do with induced colon cancer in white mice. Not natural conditions, and not humans (though results still are important to consider- just be careful with what you can claim from them).

many nuances in this article that are important to consider. The experiment was conducted by injecting stuff into the footpads of mice and measuring after 72 hours. The focus is more about the mice's ABILITY TO ADAPT to hypoxia.

Also, follow-up studies have added further clarification and discredited some of the claims in this article.

to be clear, 'these findings' (the ones listed above) never mention immunity. So, poorly written at best. Immunity information follows, and we'll address that next.

read on...

would be helpful to at least have one citation here

N95 masks are very different than cloth masks, as dependable sources have consistently acknowledged