According to this differential encod-ing account, students may fail to recognize how pronorm theirpublic behavior actually is, mistakenly believing that their pri-vate discomfort with alcohol practices is clear from their wordsand deeds. If students do suffer from an illusion oftransparency(Miller & McFarland, 1991), they might reasonably assume thatbecause the words and deeds of others signal more comfortthan they themselves feel (and supposedly express), they mustbe alone in their discomfort.
This makes me think about how often we assume that others are authentic in their behaviors and beliefs, even when we know that we are not. I wonder if in trying to seem "normal" we are actually being more disingenuous to our own beliefs and actions. We assume that others are acting on their values, but we are acting a certain way to fit in, even if it doesn't align with our beliefs. If everyone is doing that, then no one is being true to their own beliefs and values. Also it reminds me of the fundamental attribution error, where we assume that other's mistakes are reflective of intrinsic traits while our own are due to contextual factors. ex: she tripped because she's clumsy, but I tripped because there was a wire I didn't see.