Recommendations can either go well or poorly, and the result can be decided by different users of the application or platform. That's why it's important to design things for users rather than for the designer itself 9in order to try and tip the scales to be in favor of "going well' for the algorithm.

A lot of the times, where similar platforms or programs compete against each other, it's usually a thing in time where these companies that are ompeting are really trying to just have the better algorithm, which determines a l0ot of their fate.

It's important to make sure you are designing the product for people who are going to be using your product thoughtfully. If you design it for yourself, you'll usually end up forgetting important details that will affect how others using your design will perceive.

It something worth thinking about that people with disabilities like autism are accomodated for kindly and thoughtfully if designing something for them, as it is something that could determine if we are being "ethical to them" or not.

This part raises an important point; If the purpose of data mining is usually to use data and present it in a way that gies insights and understandings, what would the point of having online surveys that use fake data and poisoning be as it will generate an inaccurate data representation?

This part is interesting about raising socil media, as it potentially let's us know abput the rough definitiion and meaning of data mining which is using data to present it in a way

It's dangerous to see how for the sake of entertainment or trying to make other people think one is witty that they are playing along with unethical actions

Its interesting how hazing is assumed to be physcially abusing usually but there is also a digital version of it which both cause damage

This part shows that parasocial relationships can be both authentic and unauthetic, it really depends on the ethics and morale behind the person. Like the Mr Rogers situation, it also shows how the same thing can be considered both authentic or unauthentic based on the person viewing (Jessica vs the author)

This line kind of insists the idea that authenticity can vary based on the person, and that some people consider something to be unauthentic while others believe the same ting is.

Many of these early social media sites were used to promote profiles for work mainly, not to post fun content. YouTube was also a self promotion site rather than a way to post entertainment and make money from it.

It's also interesting to know that the first ever version of the internet was just a connection of multiple computers at first and then evolved into this network where users could only read, to now doing so many stuff with it.

This part makes me wonder if when we place constraints in the python language, how the syntax would look like. Another thing that I wonder about here is what makes a string with letters like "a" different from emojis in the makeup.

It's interesting that from the human perspective we are just spelling out the word "Happy Birthday" as a whole, but never come to realize or pay attention to the fact that the string is actually a combination of the different letters taht make up the word.

In my opinion, this passage does a very good job of explainning the anatomy of a bot. A simple sentence like "I was at UW (University of Washington, Seattle) yesterday seems like such a simple sentence with no content to it but if you look deeper in a more detailed approach, you can see the different elements that it contains, including the order of words and clarifications. This shows how bots from the outside do a very simple thing repetitively but their anatomy inside is actually pretty detailed and needs thorough thought given to their making.

This part of the chapter is really interesting for me, as in my opinion I would think this is basiccally a bot. This is because the person hired is supposed to keep tapping from different devices to boost ratings of an app all day, and is essentially doing it for a whole day. However, the interesting part raised is how "bots" have to be electrical and have to use computer programming, instead of the effect or results achieved

The paragraph above shows the various different forms of definitions that "social media" can encompass, linking everything related to communication to be a form of social media. However, in this bare bone definition, social media was supposed to be computers and communication. This potentially is interesting to see how this class would be structured if social media were to be based on the first definition.

This is interesting how at that point in time the standards for being an exemplary person is now related to academics and being a good/kind person overall, instead of killing other nations as honor for your country determining if you are exemplary or not.