52 Matching Annotations
  1. May 2025
    1. I then said to him that I thought this would be about the last battle of the war. I sincerely hoped so and I said further I took it that most of the men in the ranks were small farmers. The whole country had been so raided by the two armies that it was doubtful whether they would be able to put in a crop to carry themselves and their families through the next winter without the aid of the horses they were then riding. The United States did not want them and I would therefore instruct the officers I left behind to receive the paroles of his troops to let every man of the Confederate army who claimed to own a horse or mule take the animal to his home. Lee remarked again that this would have a happy effect.

      I don't know why, but I really liked this little detail. Although it's a relatively small consultation, it would no doubt do much to help heal a fractured nation. There would be little to gain for the Union to apprehend these horses, but much to gain for post war veterans to heal.

    1. Section 5. Be it further enacted that if any freedman, free Negro, or mulatto convicted of any of the misdemeanors provided against in this act shall fail or refuse for the space of five days after conviction to pay the fine and costs imposed, such person shall be hired out by the sheriff or other officer, at public outcry, to any white person who will pay said fine and all costs and take such convict for the shortest time.

      First it must be addressed that the fines themselves are largely nonsensical, it's scary to live in a society where you can be fined for congregating while unemployed. And I am interpreting this final paragraph as to suggest that the freed man would be forced back to servitude, had he not been able to pay his fines. It's crazy, really.

    1. And you may perhaps remember the admission made by one of the provisional governors, over two months after the close of the war, that the people of his State still indulged in a lingering hope slavery might yet be preserved or to introduce into the new system that element of physical compulsion which would make the negro work

      It's incredible how integrated this mindset is for people to have believed this way of life would not come to an end, even after the end of the war. One who lived their lives surrounded by the slavery infrastructure know only this type of way, it seems.

  2. Apr 2025
    1. Not only does the institution of slavery elevate the character of the master and where the master is free render his devotion to liberty a high and holy feeling, fortify it and render it invincible. But where, as in our country, the slave is of a different race, marked and set apart by his color, it elevates the character not only of the master, the actual owner of slaves, but of all who wear the color of the freeman. With us, color not money marks the class. Black is the badge of slavery, white the color of the freeman. And the white man, however poor, whatever be his occupation, feels himself a sovereign. Though his estate be but an empty title, he will not disgrace his station by stooping for money’s sake to become the slave of another. He will treat with others as his equals, exchange his labor for their money, not honored by their service but reciprocating the favor of equal to equal. His class respects him, with the jealousy of rank will stand by him, and for the sake of their order will sustain him.

      This is the first time I've heard the argument that slavery breaks the socio economic class system by arbitrarily inflating the status of every white person in relation to a slave's status. This is, of course, a terrible argument, but an important one to hear to understand how some people thought in this era.

    1. At a time like this scorching irony, not convincing argument, is needed. O! Had I the ability and could I reach the nation’s ear, I would today pour out a fiery stream of biting ridicule, blasting reproach, withering sarcasm, and stern rebuke. For it is not light that is needed, but fire. It is not the gentle shower, but thunder. We need the storm, the whirlwind, and the earthquake. The feeling of the nation must be quickened. The conscience of the nation must be roused. The propriety of the nation must be startled. The hypocrisy of the nation must be exposed and its crimes against God and man must be proclaimed and denounced.

      What a well spoken passage. You can read the urgency in Fredrick Douglass's words. It's clear that the nation was quickly approaching an impasse that would that we now know to be the civil war.

    1. “to resort to any measures, either openly or secretly, which can tend to disturb the internal tranquility of the slaveholding States and thereby affect the tranquility of this Union”, he at the same time regards with deep concern the avowal for the first time made to this Government, “that Great Britain desires and is constantly exerting herself to procure the general abolition of slavery throughout the world.”

      It's an interesting detail on how the slave ownership of Texas influenced this decision of annexation, and how the Union, much like Great Britain at this point had taken a strong abolitionist position.

    2. If any European nation entertains any ambitious designs upon Texas such as that of colonizing her or in any way subjugating her, I should regard it as the imperative duty of the Government of the United States to oppose to such designs the most firm and determined resistance, to the extent if necessary of appealing to arms to prevent the accomplishment of any such designs

      The author had mentioned how Mexico was unable to seriously threaten the US, but the idea of European nations getting involved in these affairs with Texas presents itself as a very interesting what-if-scenario. I like to imagine how their culture would be effected to this day, had the Dutch invested into Texas.

    3. And that since I left the farm in the morning thirty hogs had been sacrificed by the side of a running stream not far off. These were destined to serve as winter provisions for the negroes, of whom there were about a hundred on this plantation

      I'm used to hearing of the harsh conditions endured by slaves, so it's new for me to read this more cheerful account of their living conditions. While it's important to take these optimistic accounts with a large grain of salt, the details suggest that these slave owners had a relationship that was more positive than average.

    4. That was the last sun that shone on Black Hawk. His heart is dead and no longer beats quick in his bosom. He is now a prisoner to the white men, they will do with him as they wish. But he can stand torture and is not afraid of death. He is no coward. Black Hawk is an Indian.

      The tone of this excerpt I feel demonstrates Black Hawk's warrior spirit very well. While he is writing to express his own bravery and pride as a warrior, he is also writing in a way that almost comes off as apologetic being unable to hinder the enemy more than he had. To me it reads as, "I wished to be a more fearsome enemy, but your force was too great for me to give you a proper challenge." This world view is expressed very well through his own words.

    5. His engine could not have weighed a ton but he saw in it a principle which the forty-ton engines of today have but served to develop and demonstrate.

      It's amazing how revolutionary this innovation must have been to allow for large shipments of goods to be brought to areas without access to waterways. Peter Cooper's invention came at the perfect time to benefit America's rapid expansion and development into the west, and it's amazing how elements of this design are still used to a degree in this modern era.

    6. I have listened to much dull and heavy conversation in America but rarely to any that I could strictly call silly. They appear to me to have clear heads and active intellects, are more ignorant on subjects that are only of conventional value than on such as are of intrinsic importance but there is no charm, no grace in their conversation

      I interpret this as commentary on small talk culture here in America. I'm relieved that while the author criticizes these norms, he acknowledges that it doesn't lead him to the conclusion that these simple conversations are for simple minded people. I've known a few people who believed that small talk is for simpletons, which I believe to be fallacious and rather mean spirited.

    7. This was said with an air of authority that almost precluded reply but I ventured a sort of apologistic hint that we were strangers and unaccustomed to the manners of the country.“Our manners are very good manners and we don’t wish any changes from England.”

      I've been to several other countries and have had similar moments of etiquette misunderstandings. This tea scenario seemed all too familiar to my own stories.

    8. Where the Narragansetts, the Mohawks, Pocanokets, and many other once powerful tribes of our race? They have vanished before the avarice and oppression of the white men as snow before a summer sun. In the vain hope of alone defending their ancient possessions, they have fallen in the wars with the white men. Look abroad over their once beautiful country and what see you now? Naught but the ravages of the paleface destroyers meet our eyes.

      It must have been terribly alarming to see the vanishing of known tribes as the Americans expanded west. It's not so surprising as to how he believed that, "War or extermination is now our only choice" as he no longer saw them as compassionate or capable of reason.

    9. It was during the session of 1808-1809 that the embargo, unlimited in duration and extent, was passed at the instance of Mr. Jefferson as a retaliatory measure upon England

      It's so crazy that embargos on England were being placed as early as 1808. The United States wasted zero time in exercising their power to retain independence.

    1. Woman, I turn to thee. Is it not thy mission to visit the poor? To shed the tear of sympathy? To relieve the wants of the suffering? Where will you find objects more needing sympathy than among the slaves!

      I'm glad that, at least to some, this statement was self evident. The growing abolitionist sentiment must have been too prevalent at this point to ignore.

    1. We were detained here three or four days and nights — but such nights and days may I never see again! The mosquitoes fell upon us like a shower of burning coals. It was a joyful moment when we took leave of the Wabash and were again on the bosom of the majestic Ohio, now occupying a broad expanse

      Sleeping exposed to mosquitoes on the Ohio River for 3-4 nights sounds terrible. A shower of burning coals sounds like a perfectly accurate descriptor for such an experience.

  3. Mar 2025
    1. We arrived at the forks about four o’clock but unluckily Captain Lewis’s note had been left on a green pole which the beaver had cut down and carried off with the note, an accident which deprived us of all information as to the character of the two branches of the river. Observing therefore that the northwest fork was most in our direction and contained as much water as the other, we ascended it. We found it extremely rapid and its waters were scattered in such a manner that for a quarter of a mile we were forced to cut a passage through the willow brush that leaned over the little channels and united at the top.

      These firsthand accounts are so useful for painting an image of these experiences. The cartoonish account of the beaver carrying away the green poll containing Captain Lewis's note and the subsequent choices that had to be made with their best intuition made for great and immersive reading.

    2. The body of the people in this country are not so ignorant as those in England were in the time of the Interregnum Parliament. They are better educated. So well assured are they that their liberties are best secured by their own frequent and free election of fit persons to be the essential sharers in the administration of their government and that this form of government is truly republican that the body of the people will not be persuaded nor compelled to “renounce, detest, and execrate” the very word republican “as the English do

      I found it funny how Samuel Adams was able to insult the people and governance of England while making a distinction as to how new founded America will be better. It is immediately clear how this man could be the leader of the Sons of Liberty with his sharp wit and personality.

    1. I conceive it fully appears to be the interest of the people of the Western country to remain a part of the United States. If it be said that they may be separated and yet retain all the advantages of trade here mentioned, I answer that it is possible but by no means probable. For (admitting the separation was not hostile) it is by no means reasonable to suppose that the legislature of the United States would pay the same attention to the subjects of a foreign power as to their own. Nor is it to be presumed that those people will ever forget that while they remain a part of the union they will have their voice in the councils of the nation and that no law can pass but what must affect their brethren on this side the mountains as well as themselves

      The unity that was needed to break off from British rule seems to still be present, as settlers pushing out to the west wished to remain part of the United States. Rather than subjugate themselves to neighboring Spanish and French control, these people retained loyal, despite these foreign incentives.

    1. He will distinguish a positive and a negative principle in their legislation and in their opinions. I call that principle positive which in so enlightened a moment as the present, reason alone could dictate to a people making choice of that government which suited them the best. I call that a negative principle which they oppose to the laws and usages of a powerful enemy for whom they had contracted a well-founded aversion. Struck with the example of the inconveniences offered by the English government, they had recourse to the opposite extreme, convinced that it was impossible to deviate from it too much

      It is completely understandable where the conflict arose. The colonists had a vision of a more ideal government, one which was not compatible with the one imposed by the British. The threat of an imposing force as well as the idea of liberating from this force are an easy set of positive and negative principles.

    1. “Be fruitful and multiply; replenish the earth and subdue it”, has operated in full manifestation of his will. This might have been indeed, the spirit of the British Empire, America being a part of it. This is the spirit of the government of the new Empire of America, Great Britain being no part of it.

      It's impressive how in a relatively short period of time, the British colonies have went from an expansion of British power to a potential rival in their empire of trade. The previous paragraph emphasized (in all Caps) how fast this has come to be.

    1. It is an old maxim that the surest way to make a good peace is to be well prepared for war.

      George Washington, of all people, understood this quote. It's unsurprising that he would prescribe to this reasoning, as he had demonstrated his willingness to fight the British.

    2. How many have fallen, we know not. The constant roar of the cannon is so distressing that we cannot eat, drink, or sleep. I shall tarry here till it is thought unsafe by my friends and then I have secured myself a retreat at your brother’s, who has kindly offered me part of his house. I cannot compose myself to write any further at present. I will add more as I hear further.

      I am accustomed to being disconnected from conflict and to be frequently updated with news reports. It's difficult to imagine being imbedded in the location of conflict. To feel the force of cannons in the distance, and yet there is no way to know what is happening without reliable communication.

    3. They say the actors were Indians from Narragansett. Whether they were or not, to a transient observer they appeared as such, being clothed in Blankets with the heads muffled and copper-colored countenances

      I wonder what the main purpose of the disguises were. Was it more to prevent retaliation from the British, or to bring blame to the Narragansett? There must have been a good reason, as simply dressing in cloaks would likely be sufficient.

    4. Hence as a private man has a right to say what wages he will give in his private affairs, so has a community to determine what they will give and grant of their substance for the administration of public affairs. And in both cases, more are ready to offer their service at the proposed and stipulated price than are able and willing to perform their duty.

      It's interesting to hear Samuel Adams' phrasing on the relation between a man and his natural liberty and the society he is a part of. It's a distinctly individual, yet utilitarian minded view, one that many Americans have today.

    5. among which Mr. Edward’s did not escape

      I believe the phrasing implies that Mr. Edward was killed by the mob, given the description of their rage filled attacks and clubs wielded. He could have simply been captured, but at the very least, many must have feared for their lives.

    6. Run away the 7th of this instant July, from Matthew Forsyth of Chesterfield, Burlington county, an apprentice lad named Elisha Bullingham, by trade a house-carpenter, about 16 years of age. Had on, or took with him, a half worn felt hat, old brown drugget [coarse fabric] coat, one pair leather breeches, two ozenbrigs shirts, and two pair of ozenbrigs trousers. His hair is newly cut off and he has his indentures with him. Whoever takes up and secures said apprentice so that his master may have him again shall have forty shillings reward and reasonable charges, paid by me, Matthew Forsyth N. B. He is supposed to be going towards New-England; wherefore all masters of vessels, or others, are forbid to carry him off at their peril. — The Pennsylvania Gazette July 13, 1749.

      Reading all of these postings is a bit surprising as to the level of detail that these slave owners would have on each of them. To keep a mental note of exactly what they were wearing in addition to other physical descriptors must show the "value" they had.

    1. it would seem very easy for them to get the better of the French in America. It is however of great advantage to the crown of England that the North American colonies are near a country under the government of the French, like Canada. There is reason to believe that the king never was earnest in his attempts to expel the French from their possessions there, though it might have been done with little difficulty. For the English colonies in this part of the world have increased so much in their number of inhabitants and in their riches that they almost vie with Old England.

      This comes as a surprise to me, as it's essentially saying, "Britain could have easily secured control over Canada, but we let the French keep it because it benefitted us." I can't help but feel that it's largely posturing, but it does make sense that the threat of the French would be useful for Britain to control its colonies in North America.

    2. Capt. Fletcher has had the misfortune to lose ten men by the Indians: seven killed and three taken prisoners. They went ashore ten miles above where we lay to get wood and keeping no guard, were beset by the Indians and cut off.

      This sounds like a difficult situation, to be fighting not only the French, but indigenous tribes as well. For something as trivial as gathering wood to result in ten men lost shows the desperate situation this must have been.

    3. some of the young people especially have shamefully lost their liveliness and vigor in religion and much of the seriousness and solemnity of their spirits.

      It's interesting to hear talking points from the great awakening that wouldn't feel out of place in the modern era.

  4. Feb 2025
    1. That the negroes would not have made this insurrection had they not depended on St. Augustine for a place of reception afterwards was very certain. And that the Spaniards had a hand in prompting them to this particular action, there was but little room to doubt.

      It's a fascinating thing to imagine Spain's influence towards inciting rebellion, even in British controlled colonies. It seems that this is a reoccurring tactic that they liked to implement, considering their success with it in South America.

    1. Every little will do something and a great number of small benefactions will amount to a sum capable of doing a great deal of good. If any person, moved with the calamities of the unfortunate, shall be inclined to contribute towards their relief, they are desired to pay their benefactions in to the Bank of England, on account of the Trustees for establishing the Colony of Georgia in America.

      I wasn't aware of Georgia's importance to the British during this period, with goods such as silk, wine, etc. I'm still uncertain as to how a system of Trustees can be relied on for such an important gain, but I don't know how else Britain would have been able to manage this effectively.

    1. This certainly was Mr. Bacon’s crime, who after he had once launched into rebellion and upon submission had been pardoned for it and also restored, as if he had committed no such heinous offense, to his former honor and dignities

      It's amazing that Bacon had been pardoned in spite of the rebellion. Even considering that the pardon was used as an attempt to recruit him to fight native tribes, it's still hard to believe as he would continue to burn Jamestown to the ground.

    1. The Massachusetts having made a law that every Indian drunk should pay 10 s. [shillings] or be whipped, according to the discretion of the magistrate. Many of these poor people willingly offered their backs to the lash to save their money

      The idea of willingly being whipped to save ten shillings is boggling. This is a good insight to the early attitudes that colonists had towards the natives in New England.

    1. A family is a little commonwealth and a commonwealth is a great family. Now as a family is not bound to entertain all comers (otherwise than by way of hospitality) no more is a commonwealth. It is a general received rule, turpius ejicitur quam non admittitur hospes [a quote from Ovid], it is worse to receive a man whom we must cast out again than to deny him admittance.

      I can't help but feel that this seems a bit hypocritical in relation to the settler's interactions with natives as guests in their land. Still, it's an interesting perspective that many people can find themselves relating to

    1. Sometimes the Scripture declares women and children must perish with their parents. Sometime the case alters but we will not dispute it now. We had sufficient light from the word of God for our proceedings.

      Using the bible to justify an entire camp, including women and children is sickening. It's entirely shameful for them to try to justify their action in this way. However, it is a good resource as to the mindsets of many settlers who had participated in things like this.

    1. VI. They shall forever own and possess and hold from the Company as a perpetual fief of inheritance, all the land lying within the aforesaid limits together with the fruits, plants, minerals, rivers and springs thereof, rights of fishing, fowling and grinding, to the exclusion of all others. No fishing or fowling shall be carried on by anyone but the patroons and such as they shall permit.

      It's actually really interesting to see how elements private property and self governance are beginning to shape early American values.

    1. which they built and completed a fort named “Orange” with 4 bastions, on an island by them called Castle Island

      It's not a very important point of observation, but I just found "Fort Orange" to be an odd name. Apparently, it's named after the royal family of the Netherlands (House of Orange). I assume that French settlers deciding on this name ties into their goals to expand trade in the region, as discussed in the previous chapter.

    1. So that I have not a penny to help me to either spice or sugar or strong waters, without the which one cannot live here. For as strong beer in England does fatten and strengthen them, so water here does wash and weaken these here [and] only keeps life and soul together. But I am not half a quarter so strong as I was in England and all is for want of victuals, for I do protest unto you that I have eaten more in [one] day at home than I have allowed me here for a week

      The writer does well to emphasize how malnourished he is, and to compare the difference in lifestyle between his previous life and his new life in America. To be so poor, and yet steal cloaks from one another is a desperate situation to be in.

  5. Jan 2025
    1. Spaniards’ plantation in the River of Plate and the Straits of Magellan suffered also in so much that having eaten up all their horses to sustain themselves

      Horses must have been very valuable to have in these times, as most of which I'd assume were brought over from over seas. To be forced to eat these horses really emphasizes the dire situation these men were in.

    1. Experience teaches us that it is dangerous to our state to enterprise a discovery and not to proceed therein even to the very sifting of it to the utmost. For not only disreputation grows thereby but disability and weak power reveals our own idleness and want of counsel to manage our enterprises, as if the glorious state of ours were rather broached by the virtue of our ancestry than of our own worthiness.

      I interpreted this segment as stating that Britain has an obligation to demonstrate that they are capable of living up to their ancestor's accomplishments. Therefore, they are inclined to maintain their trade influence by expanding west, and to do so with commitment. Anything less would negatively affect their reputation.

    2. It is publicly known that trade with our neighbor countries is beginning to be of small request, the game seldom answering the merchants’ adventure. And foreign states either have already or at this present time are preparing to enrich themselves with wool and cloth of their own which they heretofore borrowed of us, which purpose of theirs is now being achieved in France as it already has been done in Spain and Italy. Therefore we must of necessity forgo our great showing if we do not wish to prepare a place fit for the vent of our wares and so set our mariners to work, who daily run to serve foreign nations for want of employment and cannot be restrained by any law when necessity forces them to serve in the hire of a stranger rather than to serve at home.

      This is an interesting bit of insight as to an English perspective on their changing state in trade influence, and by extension, degree in power and wealth. It was stated earlier that England was late to the game when it comes to pushing out into the west; without context, one could infer that it was largely in response to these effects that Britain decided to take action and establish colonies in the Americas.

    1. The Jamestown adventurers believed they would find instant wealth in the New World, as the Spanish had a century earlier, and did not actually expect to have to perform work

      It's such a baffling perspective to try to understand. It must have been a humbling experience for these settlers to be forced to confront these hardships without the needed help.

    2. How did the French approach to the Americas differ from that of England?

      It seemed like France cared more about establishing relationships which were beneficial towards trading, whereas England wanted to expand its empire and establish colonies

    3. He also objected to the Catholic Church’s taxation of ordinary Germans and delivery of Mass in Latin.

      It's interesting to imagine attending a service where you cannot understand the language. Martin Luther's impact on the reformation of the church was huge

    1. Although Norse explorers such as Leif Erikson, the son of Erik the Red who led the Norse territory of Greenland, had reached and established a colony in northern Canada roughly five hundred years prior to Christopher Columbus’s voyage, it was explorers sailing for Portugal and Spain who traversed the Atlantic throughout the fifteenth century and ushered in an unprecedented age of exploration and permanent contact with North America

      It's interesting how Leif Erikson's relevance isn't as great as Christopher Columbus, despite how he had "discovered" the Americas first. It's a great testament to this second discovery's impact on Europe and the Americas, there seems to be a clear divide between pre and post new world discovery eras.

    2. How do these details about Mesoamerican culture, and especially the Aztecs, line up with what you previously knew about them?

      I believe the Aztecs are most well known for their complex architecture and practice of human sacrifice, but I was also aware of their sophisticated agriculture and use of complex floating gardens. I'm glad that it was mentioned in this chapter, as it's something that I find to be the most amazing about ancient Aztec civilization.

    3. The Inca ruler took a third, and the final  third was set aside in a kind of welfare system for those unable to work. Huge storehouses were filled with food for times of need. Each peasant also worked for the Inca society a number of days per month on public works projects, in a labor requirement known as the mita. In return, the Inca overlord provided laws, protection, and relief in times of famine.

      It's very impressive how developed the Incan empire was for its peasants to survive with only a third of their crop, and to be able to support their leaders, as well as a system of welfare.

    1. The poorer sort are the most indolent people in the world or they would never be wretched in so plentiful a country as this

      Eliza must believe this new land she has come to must be full of opportunity if only the most lazy people can't find wealth. As someone who would run her family's estates in South Carolina, she must have a committed view on hard work and success.

    2. Sent for cucumber seed

      A funny thing to imagine waiting several weeks to months for a shipment of cucumber seeds. I'm used to a having access to my local garden center.

    3. Japaning

      I was curious about the origins of this term. In East Asia, sap from the Chinese lacquer tree is used for lacquering. Europeans weren't able to replicate this technique because they didn't have access to this tree sap, but they were able to imitate it using different materials that produced a similar result. This European form of lacquering began in the late 1600s, so it probably would have been a relatively new and trendy thing for Eliza to be interested in.