186 Matching Annotations
  1. May 2017
    1. we give them breakfast, lunch, and dinner, we provide them with recess, [we provide a lot of opportunities for them], but we really haven’t done the social-emotional piece yet, and I see it every day in this job.

      So SO true!

    2. lthough many benefits of music education take time to show, once they do, they are very strong and impactful.

      I totally realize this now, after reading your awesome paper.

    3. Many schools throughout America have only one music teacher and 1000 students, meaning not all students get the same amount (or any) music.

      So true! There is only 1 music teacher for 3 schools in my school district. :(

    4. ,

      add a space

    5. it

      in

    6. Nature

      Italicize

    7. This means that instrumental musical training can improve motor and auditory functions, aiding neural development.

      I never knew this! So interesting

    8. For example, by listening to music, you are practicing recognizing pitch, rhythm, and tempo, elements which are also essential for language acquisition

      Such a good example!!

    9. school

      Is this supposed to be school(s)?

    10. -

      I would put a : here

    11. Important Definitions-

      Love this idea! I think I will do it too.

    12. US

      Is it U.S. with the periods? I don't know if it matters or not.

  2. Mar 2017
    1. they should use social media in their professional practice, we must recognize that if we engage professionally with these practices ourselves, our advocacy comes from a position of power

      For example, our PLN twitter accounts represent us in a professional way. We are able to advocate and share our knowledge and opinions which put us in a position of power of our own learning and educating.

    2. Where there is freedom to share and collaborate, there is often also freedom to abuse and exploit, so we should be careful not to indulge in idealized notions of participation, sharing, and openness that may be misguided.

      So true. An interesting thing to keep in mind.

    3. filter bubble

      When your searching for something on google but all you can find is things you have already looked at before - this is that filter bubble getting in the way of your research.

    4. The tendency to connect with similar or like-minded individuals online as offline, what Thelwall (2009) calls homophily, means that social media may not foster diverse spaces for knowledge exchange and negotiation, leading instead to “echo chambers,” a situation in which we share knowledge and perspectives with individuals who already share the same views as ourselves

      I definitely agree with this. Compare who you follow on instagram versus someone else.. we have very different interests and communicating with only people of these interests may diminish other possible connections.

    5. social media tools currently structure relationships and power structures in relatively flat and non-hierarchical manners

      This is true. Sometimes social media is all about the likes & the follows. We tend to think someone is awesome if they have a lot of followers.

    6. scholars not only need to understand the participatory nature of the Web, they also need to develop the social and digital literacies and skills essential for effective engagement with such networks. Unequal access to technology and/or lack of digital literacies is referred to as the participation gap

      Not everyone knows about web etiquette and has access to internet or a computer so the participation gap must be met with potential solutions for learners struggling.

    7. the type of education offered by these initiatives appears to be reserved for students who are intrinsically motivated, self-directed, and have the necessary prior knowledge to succeed;

      I definitely think that students struggle in online courses because they are much different than traditional face to face classes and you absolutely must be organized and self determined in order to succeed in theses classes, without a face to face professor reminding you about assignments.

    8. that charge authors (and by extension their institutions) to publish their manuscripts limits the diversity of voices in the scholarly process to those able to pay for publication.

      I don't blame an author for not sharing their work if they are being charged crazy amounts for their hard work. It is sad that this is even an issue because all students are effected by this.

    9. variety of others including reduced cost of delivery, improved efficiency, greater accuracy, and so forth.

      We already pay so much money for education & then we have to pay for textbooks and online codes. It's not practical.

    10. digital participation for enhanced scholarly outcomes. Arguments for openness tend to focus on addressing the short-comings and limitations of current institutionalized practices through faculty participation in online spaces.

      I love technology and I feel it makes learning easier and more fun. I enjoy taking notes on my laptop that way I am able to keep all information for all my classes in one space, instead of in a million notebooks. Many teachers are completely against technology in their classes and I feel this limits the students' ability to converse and interact. For example, I learn a lot from online discussion forums. People are not always able to think of or remember what to say face to face, so online spaces really help students flourish.

    11. We believe that all human beings are endowed with a capacity to learn, improve, and progress. Educational opportunity is the mechanism by which we fulfill that capacity.

      YES! People ask me, "you want to go to graduate school? why do not want to continue to torture yourself with education?" and honestly I love learning and I feel like school gives me a purpose to learn, improve, and progress. Everyone should want to learn new things and get better at ones they already know.

    12. building a future in which research and education in every part of the world are … more free to flourish

      I love this. When researching for other classes, I have a difficult time finding and getting access to research and sources from other countries. Education and knowledge should be able to freely flow to allow students of all countries and cultures to interact.

    1. “Open teaching” began as a practice of using technology to open formal university courses for free, informal participation by individuals not officially enrolled in the course.

      This is such a cool idea as all students can access it for free, no matter their major. I wish there was more of this!

    2. asking students to post homework assignments and other course artifacts on publicly viewable blogs or wikis, so they can catalyze further discussion of relevant topics;

      When I'm studying for exams, sometimes I will google a homework question and I end up finding other students who completed similar homeworks and I love it because I compared their answers to mine and I always end up gaining new knowledge from a different perspective.

    3. As governments move to require open policies, hundreds of billions of dollars of educational and research resources will be freely and legally available to the public that paid for them. Every taxpayer has a reasonable expectation of access to educational materials and research products whose creation tax dollars supported.

      If we pay for it, we should be able to continuously access the information. For example, when we graduate we lose access to the online library databases because we are not considered a PSU student anymore. Well, considering I will still be paying money through students loans to PSU I feel like I should still be able to access these databases.

    4. it is unthinkable that we might simply start taking books apart in order to assemble exactly what we want and exactly what our students need.

      It shouldn't be unthinkable! Here's my OER textbook for my abnormal psychology class this semester: http://nobaproject.com/textbooks/kathleen-herzig-new-textbook ANYONE can read it, ANYTIME, for FREE!

    5. When we can’t find a single textbook that meets our needs, it is not uncommon for us to assign two or more textbooks, intending only to use parts of each.

      I have literally had to purchase over 4 textbooks for 1 nursing class.. and we only used three chapters out of each book. SO expensive. If OER was more prominent, I could have read those 12 chapters all at once, on my ipad, and I wouldn't have had to carry around 4 books wondering when we will use them.

    6. The cost of textbooks is a significant factor in the cost of higher education, growing beyond the reach of more individuals each year. OER have considerable potential to be a part of the solution to this problem.

      Not only are textbook ridiculously expensive, the worst part is that MANY professors I have had do not even use the textbook at all. Wasting money is not fun. OER would easily solve this problem and allow us to have access to millions of books, all the time, on our computers or phones.

    7. Today, the cost of having a 250-page book transcribed by hand is about $250. The cost of printing that same book with a print-on-demand service is about $5. The cost of copying an online version of that same book (e.g., an ePub file) is about $0.0008. The cost of shipping either the handwritten or printed book is about $5. The cost of distributing an electronic copy of the book over the Internet is approximately $0.0007.

      The internet allows for students to gain educational knowledge in resources for free!

    8. Those educators who share the most thoroughly of themselves with the greatest proportion of their students are the ones we deem most successful.

      Definitely agree. A passionate, open instructor makes a course more fun, memorable, and enjoyable.

    9. If an instructor is not sharing what he or she knows with students, there is no education happening.

      Exactly! And vice versa, if students are not sharing, the instructor may not be learning either. Collaboration is key.

    10. In both cases, every person in the world enjoys free (no cost) access to the OER and free (no cost) permission to engage in the “4R” activities

      Some of my professors believe in OER & have currated a textbook of openly licensed readings online so we do not have to purchase a textbook. I LOVE this. Why should I have to pay hundreds of dollars to read a book that took little to no money to write?

  3. Feb 2017
    1. the need for learning contexts that bring together in-school and out-of-school learning and activity.

      People always sit through some classes & think "Why do I need to know this?" or "Why is this needed for my major?" and I think that connected learning brings meaningful real world, hands on applications to the classroom that allows us to gain experience and expertise in our fields of interest.

    2. a disconnect between classroom and everyday learning,

      I really like online and hybrid classes like ours. Personally it is much more interesting to me to have an online component of a class instead of just sitting in a boring lecture and reading a standardized textbook.

    3. Connected learning is socially embedded, interest-driven, a

      From experience, I do much better in my classes when I'm actually interested and find the information relevant to my life. I'm sure everyone can agree.

    4. lower barriers to access for knowledge and information

      I can't even imagine doing research without a laptop or with the internet. The internet and connected learning allows us to retrieve SO much knowledge, easily, and all at once! We often take this for granted I think.

    1. Without the disciplines, Interdisciplinary Studies would have nothing to build on, nothing to incorporate or weave together in order to find solutions to societal problems.

      Disciplines create the building blocks for IDS.

    2. The great aspect of the twenty-first century is that mostly all disciplines encompass aspects of other disciplines creating a multidisciplinary approach.

      ALL of my classes whether they are science, math, or psychology combine and take away information from each other.

    3. Today, technology permeates our daily lives, drives our economy, and delivers our higher education.

      I LOVE technology. Technology makes learning easier and fun in my opinion. I don't understand why some professors are so against technology.. I can't use my laptop to take notes in some of my classes!

    4. students were taught how to reflect on past history to make a difference in their future.

      Thats how we are taught now as well. We focus on moving forward from the past based on what has and hasn't worked.

    5. geometry, music, dancing, and astronomy.

      So diverse & random!

    6. Online courses provide the convenience of not having a designated time to learn, but they at first lacked the legitimacy of a physical university.  

      Distance learning is SO important to me because I am a commuter student. I can learn the same things as everyone else, even if I am not physically there. I plan to attend 100% online graduate school so I'm glad these programs are considered more legit in today's society.

    7. The University of Al-Karaouine in Morocco, Africa is the oldest continuously operating, degree-granting university in the world.

      So cool!

    8. The academy began with teachers simply preaching a topic of their interest.

      This is still true today in some cases. Teachers usually teach what they are passionate about and what they enjoy. That's why it's awesome when you have a passionate teacher because you will learn so much more.

    9. Taylor Martin

      woooohoooo :)

    1. But content, methods, and epistemologies are the central building blocks of disciplines,

      I like this quote because if you build a block tower of all the different disciplines, you can see how many of them connect.

    2. epistemology explains the why of a discipline: why it focuses on certain content and why it chooses the methods that it chooses.

      I think the "why" of many disciplines come from cultural and societal needs and pushes. We are being taught what society wants us to learn most of the time.

    3.  qualitative, using interviews, case studies, and observations of human behavior to understand its content

      I think it is really important to know what method you are using in your own major and why. I think that my major combines quantitative and qualitative properties because a lot of my research is quantitative but to test and implement the research is qualitative.

    1. Sometimes we actually don’t want to carve a problem or concept into small bits, but instead want to see how something specific fits into a larger pattern or fabric

      Sometimes you may lose the big important aspects of a problem if you break it down!

    2. since breaking a problem or concept down may help us see the different disciplines that are involved, which will then allow us to organize our research approach.

      I have recently used this approach a lot when writing papers. Breaking apart a problem makes it easier to solve piece by piece.

    1. ack of a system of recognition for interdisciplinary scholars.

      For me personally, I have had problems registering for classes because I am an IDS major and not a specific discipline major. Many teachers have not let me have an override because they do not feel that my IDS education is adequate enough apparently.

    2. Academic Freedom: Freedom to study our interests, in the way we best comprehend knowledge.

      The #1 reason I LOVE IDS. I can learn about all different things I'm passionate about.

    3. Social Change: Interdisciplinarians work to build connections across divided ideas, and we seek out new ways of conceptualizing knowledge. This can lead us to truly change the world, structure our world differently, and see ourselves as connected in a wide web of humanity.

      I think that many people on campus are divided by major. People may think their major may be more important than someone else's major but by combining and perhaps forcing these two majors per se to work together, we can structure new ways of thinking.

    4. Unity of Knowledge: Being able to learn more so that you have the ability to connect with more knowledge. Most majors and fields look at parts of the world, but there is something beautiful and exciting about trying to step back and see how things connect.

      I feel that we learn much more, in a shorter amount of time in IDS because we can take many classes in all different disciplines and fields and connect them together.

    5. Creative Breakthroughs: Taking a new perspective from a different angle can yield unexpected pathways that were not visible before.

      Yes! With different disciplines and fresh perspectives, you may learn something new you have never even thought of.

    1. Have you been part of a disciplinary community in high school or college so far? What did you do as part of that community?

      In high school I was in many clubs that had 1 soul purpose such as prom committee (planning/setting up prom) or national honor society (getting good grades & completing volunteer work).

    2. Allen F. Repko suggests that “multidisciplinarity” is like a fruit bowl, where different disciplines are represented by the different fruits that are placed together in a bowl but which do not mix much or change shape themselves.

      I like this! So everyone in a multidisciplinary group holds their same shape but comes together with others who may offer something different.

    3. Interdisciplinarity:

      This allows for more fun and engaging ways to learn!

  4. Nov 2016
    1. Require commitments from university administration to qualify for funding for interdisciplinary efforts.

      University staff should be the one's who are committed and trying to get people to know about IDS.

    2. Such educational experiences require the opportunity to add to basic knowledge in one or more disciplinary skills or to broaden one's knowledge, not necessarily to create the capacity to conduct wholly different research alone, but, rather, to learn enough about other disciplines to work as a productive team member.

      Lifelong learning is so important!

    3. Accessibility at the speed of the Internet is making it far easier to learn what is being done in other disciplines, although the language and jargon barriers cited above will continue to haunt those developing the search engines for on-line publications.

      Online journal publications make it easier for anyone to gather new knowledge but it's definitely challenging to research online journals because the jargon used may trip you up.

    4. Private industry offers another avenue for those with interdisciplinary training. Representatives of industry indicated that they are looking for people who can work in an interdisciplinary environment

      Yay!!

    5. Some have reported difficulties in finding positions for graduate students who received interdisciplinary training.

      A lot of people have asked me, "What is IDS? Can you even get a job?" It is frustrating.

    6. The committee similarly believes that extending these loan repayment programs could provide an increased incentive to pursue interdisciplinary research training.

      I think this would help a lot more people continue their education!

    7. These programs allow NIH to repay up to $35,000 per year in eligible education loans for participants who obtain research employment at NIH.

      This is cool! I know a few grad schools who give students money/grants just for furthering their education.

    8. To pay for their training, many students are taking loans for their undergraduate or professional education

      I don't know a single person who doesn't take out loans for their education, let's be real.

    9. The explosion of information in each scientific discipline raises concerns about how long it would take to attain expertise in one, let alone two or more, fields.

      But this is why interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary work is so important. We are able to learn twice the information at the same time by combining disciplines.

    10. The length of time required to complete training in more than one field—whether in the basic or clinical sciences or in a combination of the two—can be discouraging.

      The amount of time & money spent is discouraging. There's so many things I want to learn about and do but I don't think I could afford it.

    11. Even if all disciplines covered by a proposal are represented in a review committee, unless the committee members themselves have tried to do interdisciplinary research in the field in question, they might not appreciate the issues.

      Exactly. People who have never experienced interdisciplinary work might not understand the benefits of it therefore they won't see it as important.

    12. Professional organizations and journals are key ingredients of disciplinary identity.10 Their major impact is in providing an outlet for dissemination of information.

      Definitely true! When I took nursing courses we were required to follow some nursing professional organizations such as the ANA so we could keep up to date with new information. We are sharing knowledge and information of IDS through our E-ports which is kind of the same thing.

    13. Interdisciplinary research requires a commitment from university administration. A cross-departmental program can suffer if the administration does not consider the needs for faculty, space, and funds. Through control of faculty positions, the university leadership can promote collaboration, for example, by requiring a position to be jointly supported by two departments

      luckily for us, there are many faculty members on the IDS board representing IDS for the entire school!

    14. Some allocate funds and resources among the investigators and their units, but others credit only the person listed as the principal investigator. That can penalize coinvestigators in other departments, in that their home departments might get no credit. The cross-departmental nature of interdisciplinary research is likely to compound the problems of allocation of credit and research resources when grants are funded across departments or schools.52

      I bet funds are super hard to get for interdisciplinary studies work because some people don't understand what it is. Some people may think it is stupid. It's a matter of opinion, until they learn the benefits of IDS.

    15. However, departmental organization changes relatively slowly. The priority given to contributions in fields that correspond to departmental structures can inhibit interdisciplinary approaches.

      I think the lack of evolvement and change in departments inhibits learning for the students.

    16. sserted that the modern university is “partitioned along academic lines that no longer truly reflect today's intellectual life

      Information is constantly changing and education should reflect these changes. I feel that we are taught the same things for many years with no changes. For example, I recently started substitute teaching at my old middle school and I noticed that the students still use the same textbooks I did 7 years ago. Education must evolve constantly to teach students as much as possible!

    17. Washington University invested $28 million in a new laboratory building to house a shared imaging facility, animal facility, and psychology laboratories with the intent of encouraging interdisciplinary collaboration.43 More recently, the University of California, Berkeley launched an interdisciplinary “Health Sciences Initiative” that includes the construction of two buildings that will house laboratories of researchers from several departments.

      This is awesome!

    18. Buildings that isolate laboratories and research groups from one another can limit this type of interaction. But, bringing people together through the creation of central facilities or common areas can increase its probability.

      This happens on campuses everywhere. At PSU, science majors are mostly in Boyd while psychology majors are in Hyde. There should be a common place to meet and collaborate with others. I like how our class meets in a common ground such as the library. This way everyone feels welcome because they are in a familiar space.

    19. Leaders need to have vision, creativity, and perseverance. To establish a successful interdisciplinary program requires education of scientific colleagues and administrators about the potential value of interdisciplinary research. To coordinate the efforts of a diverse team requires credibility as a research scientist, skill in modulating strong personalities, the ability to draw out individual strengths, and skill in the use of group dynamics to blend individual strengths into a team.

      I feel like this is a big challenge because no one really wants to step up to the plate and be the leader we need. Also, people may not know enough about other disciplines and colleagues to make interdisciplinary research work.

    20. In building an interdisciplinary team, clarity regarding roles, expectations, and authority—particularly with regard to sharing of data and resources—is important for success

      Clarity of roles within a group is necessary to succeed. When we start group projects of some sort usually we naturally pick jobs and parts of the project for each person to do. This makes research and collaboration even and easier.

    21. A feeling of community can facilitate interactions in an interdisciplinary team

      A feeling of a welcoming community facilitates an environment for collaboration and a sense of belonging.

    22. Good communication skills are helpful in alleviating such problems, but most members of interdisciplinary teams lack training and proficiency in such skills.

      I think people definitely lack the necessary skills to make interdisciplinary research work. People need to be optimistic and have an open mind instead of bashing one another! Communication is key with anything in life.

    23. Heated discussions can result when people with different backgrounds try to assert the correctness of their views

      This happens all too often.

    24. As a consequence, other disciplines might be viewed as less rigorous or important.

      I feel like this happens a lot. Barriers to interdisciplinary collaboration result from people thinking they are "better" or "smarter." Just like in college when people compare majors and it starts arguments over who's major is more difficult.

    25. Communicating with another discipline requires time and work. An extensive effort must be made to learn the language of another field and to teach others the language of one's own. Many have recognized that this barrier must be overcome before successful collaboration can occur

      People may not like interdisciplinary work because you have to work a little harder to understand one another like this example, but the outcome is great once everyone is able to collaborate.

    26. We speak the language of our discipline, which raises two problems: first, we may not understand the languages of the other disciplines; second, more dangerously, we may think that we understand these, but do not, because although the same terms are used in different disciplines, they mean something very different in each.

      Always seek clarification and don't pretend you know something you don't!

    27. Scientists trained in a discipline learn to speak a specific language and adopt the analytical and methodological constructs that have accumulated in that discipline. This constitutes a form of professional socialization that serves as an important part of the training experience, but it can present obstacles to interdisciplinary research.

      I definitely agree that jargon presents obstacles to problem solving and research. For example, in nursing school we take a whole class on medical terminology so we know what words mean and what other health professionals are saying. When a doctor talks to a patient in medical jargon, the patient may not understand what they are saying.

    28. those who do collaborative work could not succeed in their own discipline; they would be lost in a team effort and “lose their professional identity.”

      I'm surprised people do not think they can succeed while working with different disciplines. But I can see where they are coming from. If someone has no idea about your field of study, they may get in the way of your research, but they still bring a different perspective to the table which is valuable.

    29. psychology and medicine who expressed opinions on obstacles to interdisciplinary research.52 Some of the comments indicated concerns: working in interdisciplinary research was not “pure”; it was “less challenging” or “high risk”; those who do collaborative work could not succeed in their own discipline; they would be lost in a team effort and “lose their professional identity.”

      This is really interesting considering medicine and healthcare is some of the most interdisciplinary work there is - coming together to help a sick patient get back to optimal health.

    30. most significant scientific problems cannot be accommodated within arbitrary disciplinary structures.

      Exactly!

    31. Most scientists recognize a need for interdisciplinary research, many are reluctant to abandon their disciplinary focus.

      I imagine this is how most educational departments feel too, being reluctant to change as well.

    1. nterdisciplinary education promotes knowledge transfer as students learn to use the skills and concepts attained in one field and apply it to another.

      This is the most important part of my IDS journey so far.

    2. urthermore, students have more ways to associatelearning with their interests and relatelearning experiences with real-world application [12] as “knowledge in the real world is not applied in bits and pieces but in an integrated fashion”

      Exactly!

    3. Inquiry-Based Learning engages students inthe learning process andchanges the traditional role of instructor from lecturer to learningfacilitator, coach, and model [35]. Inquiry-Based Learningispredicated on building knowledge as opposed to passive learning which follows the more traditional collegiate instructional model based primarily on lecture.

      I like this type of teaching & learning because students are forced to be engaged in the material, yet still making all of the work very personal. And it is much more fun than sitting in a boring lecture.

    4. Opponents of interdisciplinary education assert it creates “jack-of-all-trades, but master of nonegraduates.

      A lot of people have asked me, "Your major is IDS? What can you possibly do what that degree? Can you even get a job?" I don't know where this IDS stigma came from but I hope when more people figure out how awesome it is, this will go away.

    5. Beyond desire, instructors shouldchallenge studentsbypresenting them with questions addressingskills and conceptsslightly above their existing levelof competence. When students reach a newlevel, an entirely new set of challenges should bepresented, once again slightly above their existing level of competence.

      This allows for growth. If we are not pondering certain concepts or addressing certain skills above our competence, we are just learning the same thing over and over again instead of new information.

    6. Inquiry-Based Learning engages students inthe learning process andchanges the traditional role of instructor from lecturer to learningfacilitator, coach, and model [35]. Inquiry-Based Learningispredicated on building knowledge as opposed to passive learning which follows the more traditional collegiate instructional model based primarily on lecture.

      I like this type of teaching & learning because students are forced to be engaged in the material, yet still making all of the work very personal. And it is much more fun than sitting in a boring lecture.

    7. Inquiry-Based Learning engages students inthe learning process andchanges the traditional role of instructor from lecturer to learningfacilitator, coach, and model [35]. Inquiry-Based Learningispredicated on building knowledge as opposed to passive learning which follows the more traditional collegiate instructional model based primarily on lecture.

      I like this type of teaching & learning because students are forced to be engaged in the material, yet still making all of the work very personal. And it is much more fun than sitting in a boring lecture.

    8. instructors rarely have the required competencies to implement interdisciplinary educational models.

      Not only that, some instructors don't even know what interdisciplinary studies is.

    9. instructors rarely have the required competencies to implement interdisciplinary educational models.

      Not only that, some instructors don't even know what interdisciplinary studies is.

    10. Moreover, interdisciplinary education helps to increase student achievement by promoting positive attitudes toward subject matter, creating curricular flexibility, and integratingrapidly changing information with increased efficiency

      IDS has allowed me to be excited about learning by allowing me to choose my own classes based on my own interests and aspirations.

    11. Encouraging students to reach beyond the typical constraints of a single contentarea and engage in interdisciplinary learning fosters critical thinking, creativity, collaboration and communication skills.

      This allows for more experienced & diversified employees!

    12. interdisciplinary education is an important tool in creating new ways of thinking and helping toconnect fragmentedknowledge in a coherent way

      IDS has allowed me to tie together all of my interests and classes in a way that makes them all important.

    13. If the purpose of teaching is to help prepare for adulthood including meaningful careers, then one can understand why young adults tend to tune out instruction that is focused solelyon the acquisition of content.

      My high school certainly did not prepare me for adulthood with the basic classes offered there.

    14. Educators areincreasinglycoming to the realization that teaching skills and vague concepts without connectionto real-world applicationsare seen by students as irrelevant andin turn, are easily forgotten[

      It is hard to memorize and retain information that will never be used again by that student. Students don't find some educational information important if they don't think they will use it.

    15. eam-basedmindset whereby integrated skills and concepts areapplied across awide range of courses.

      A lot like IDS!

  5. Oct 2016
    1. At the global level, this implies a wide range of disciplinary and interdisciplinary educational programs. At the institutional level, this implies encouraging students to take at least one consciously integrative course.

      Students have to take courses outside of their major, in a new discipline so they can connect disciplines and information.

    2. Disciplines serve not only as a convenient . . . way of dividing knowledge into its components, but . . . they also serve as a basis for organizing the institutionand hence the professionals engaged in teaching and research--into autonomous fiefs"

      Exactly, disciplines are the starting point to all education. Disciplines break off into sub-disciplines and beyond.

    3. According to most interdisciplinary theorists, some problems of knowledge are neglected because they "fail to fit in with disciplinary boundaries thus falling in the interstices between them

      Think of all the life skills we are not formally taught in a classroom - mostly because there is no way to teach them or they don't fit in with any specific discipline.

    4. career mobility . . . is among the most potent sources of innovation and development within a discipline." For instance, seventeen out of forty-one scientists in the phage group (which played a decisive role in mid-century biology) were physicists or chemists by training.

      Innovation at its finest!

    5. Thus, if chance favors the prepared mind, and if preparation often involves grounding in two or more disciplines, then those who wish to speed up the growth of knowledge should promote, or at least tolerate, interdisciplinary knowledge and research.

      By combining disciplines, we are able to learn so much more information, so much faster.

    1. Students are highly motivated as they have a vested interest in pursuing topics that are interesting to them. As a result, the content is often rooted in life experiences, giving an authentic purpose for the learning and connecting it to a real world context. Consequently, the learning becomes meaningful, purposeful and deeper resulting in learning experiences that stay with the student for a lifetime.

      Yes, learning becomes fun and much more purposeful.

    2. Students engaging in interdisciplinary study are therefore creating their own understanding and knowledge of the world through their study choices

      That's why interdisciplinary studies is awesome :)

    3. It goes on to suggest that when students encounter something new, they have to integrate it with previous ideas and experiences by connecting the new knowledge to something already known. 

      This is how we learn new things. We have to draw information from past experiences to understand and connect new things.

    4. Interdisciplinary teaching and learning is maximised when professionals from different disciplines work together to serve a common purpose and to help students make the connections between different disciplines or subject areas.

      Definitely true. Unfortunately, a lot of teachers don't want to work with other disciplines because that is more work for them.

    5. This can occur by allowing students to choose their own subjects and their learning is deepened when they reflect on the connections between what they are learning in different disciplines.

      By letting students choose their own subjects, they are more apt to actually enjoy learning!

    6. Students learning in this way are able to apply the knowledge gained in one discipline to another different discipline as a way to deepen the learning experience.

      This is the best. I love learning about separate disciplines but I notice that they always come together. This allows me to critically think and integrate and share information with others.

    1. Greenwald does depict the challenges of teaching interdisciplinary knowledge, however Robin has done a fantastic job not only teaching me about interdisciplinary knowledge, but how to apply my chosen disciplines to the world of interdisciplinarity!

      Teaching about interdisciplinary is difficult, I know from experience from writing chapter 1 in our class textbook. I'm glad we have an awesome and passionate professor like Robin to help us learn and grow! :)

    2. Gruenwald speaks particularly on interdisciplinary sciences. He believes that remarkably, the natural sciences have turned into interdisciplinary engagement by the inner logic of discovery.

      From personal experience, the most interdisciplinary jobs I have witnessed are in the medical field.

    3. According to Grunewald colleges must be redesigned as completely interdisciplinary. I couldn’t even imagine my excitement if I attended a school with zero majors. If every single person build his or her degree from the bottom up, how creative and amazing would that be?

      So true! This would give people great pride and allow them to learn whatever they want and choose. This would also serve to decrease the amount of people arguing that their major is "harder" than someone else's. Everyone would be equal.

    4. interdisciplinary studies is proven to broaden our intellectual horizons, therefore we must fund this type of education!

      Interdisciplinary studies has allowed me to take many different classes in many different disciplines, yet they all interrelate. I have learned so much more now, than when I was a nursing major.

    5. First let me start of by saying, higher education is a key component to a successful life in my opinion.

      Personally I agree because it teaches you how to manage time and have a work ethic but I also think you can be successful without higher education it depends what you want to do in life.

  6. spinmelikearecord.wordpress.com spinmelikearecord.wordpress.com
    1. And that feels really good because unlike many other majors where it is easy to feel trapped or to feel stuck in this routine that everyone who has graduated with your degree has gone through- the same process; this study has me standing alone and in this case, that isn’t a bad thing.

      I don't feel "stuck" in a major anymore, like I was before. Now I feel excited an empowered to learn all I possibly can!

    2. Just think about it, if everyone just stuck to guidelines and tradition, the world would never grow and would never have the chance to become any better.

      Exactly!

    3. I am creating and envisioning a possibility that others may not see or may not have the confidence to direct

      I like the idea of creating my own possibilities, but I definitely agree that others do not see or understand what I am doing or what interdisciplinary studies is.

    4. Engaging in Interdisciplinary studies has broadened my understanding of entrepreneurship, abstract thinking, metacognition, and love of learning.

      Totally agree with this. By branching out and away from nursing I have been able to learn, grow, and pursue other interests and classes I have always wanted to learn about.

    1. In the real world, interdisciplinary is just now starting to enter the discussion. A recent article about Minneapolis Psychiatry attests to the fact that “Now children’s mental health care is interdisciplinary.” The author, Gail Rosenblum, then lists the psychologists, school social workers, case managers, occupational therapists, physical therapists and nurses who are present in developing and preserving a child’s mental well-being.

      One important thing I learned as a nursing major and as a hospital worker, healthcare is all about interdisciplinarity.

    2. Our society is only starting to get the ball rolling on interdisciplinary communication.

      I feel IDS will grow much more once people realize what it is. When I tell people my major is "interdisciplinary studies" they look at me like I have 10 heads.

    3. Even when grouping together to attempt solving a problem as a team, an interdisciplinary attempt can end up being multidisciplinary, where insights can come from two or more disciplines, but lack integration.

      This is so true. Narrow minded people/specialties could probably solve problems with others but everyone may have a different idea how to solve the problem rather than incorporating everyone's ideas.

    4. f it ever seems as though the disciplines are scorned, the only thing we deem negative is their lack of integration with other disciplines.

      This is true.

    5. “…the disciplines are the place where we begin, but not where we end.” This quote from Introduction to Interdisciplinary Studies by Allen F. Repko captures the essence of where interdisciplinary study comes from.

      Love this!

    6. “…the disciplines are the place where we begin, but not where we end.” This quote from Introduction to Interdisciplinary Studies by Allen F. Repko captures the essence of where interdisciplinary study comes from.

      Love this!

    1. Many people as students observe professors and teachers in high school and middle school as being a part of individual social groups, kind of like cliques.

      I never saw this in high school actually. I never saw any teachers from the same disciplines hanging out.

    2. “These faculty members share common formative experiences…and appreciate a common canon of writings by the “founding fathers” of the disciplines” (Repko, 90)

      It is easy to converse with people who have shared what you have experienced.

    1. Discipline was introduced as “discipline” by the Romans and was originally applied to the professions because of the need that was perceived to relate education to specific political, economic, and ecclesiastical ends.

      A discipline is just a way/a name to define a certain field of study.

    1. In response to the expanding definition of higher education, the ability to navigate institutions became a preoccupation.

      I feel this is still an issue. From my experience, it is difficult to transfer schools because a lot of schools do not accept Plymouth's credits. Each school has different criteria for specific disciplines.

    2. The onset of the Great Depression illustrated an interesting phenomenon: college enrollments increased during times of national financial hardship.

      Well that's strange!

    3. The onset of the Great Depression illustrated an interesting phenomenon: college enrollments increased during times of national financial hardship.

      Well that's strange!

    4. Employers seldom required college degrees, therefore college presidents faced the perpetual challenge of persuading young adults to delay pursuing their life's enterprises by spending four years on campus.

      I feel like now it is completely the opposite.

    5. Employers seldom required college degrees, therefore college presidents faced the perpetual challenge of persuading young adults to delay pursuing their life's enterprises by spending four years on campus.

      I feel like now it is completely the opposite.

    6. Going to college early in the nineteenth century was not particularly expensive.

      Too bad it still isn't cheap!

    7. Although the classical languages and liberal studies of the bachelor of arts degree remained central to the character of American higher education in this era, several new fields gained a foothold in formal study. Engineering and science acquired a presence on the campus.

      New disciplines growing!

  7. Sep 2016
    1. Only white Christian males were allowed to matriculate. Women and African-Americans were denied participation by statute and custom

      This is crazy to me that men were the only ones allowed to go to school.

    2. As the First Great Awakening of the 1730s to 1770s initiated growth in a wider variety of Protestant churches, each denomination often desired its own seminary. Furthermore, each colony tended to favor a particular denomination and so the new colleges took on an importance for regional development as well. Presbyterians in New Jersey founded the College of New Jersey (later renamed Princeton). The College of William and Mary in Virginia maintained a strong Anglican orientation

      Interesting that colleges were first formed out of religion.

    3. The colonists created institutions for higher education for several reasons. New England settlers included many alumni of the royally chartered British universities, Cambridge and Oxford, and therefore believed education was essential.

      Education is definitely essential, educational disciplines are changing every year to incorporate more and more information. Just think about how much education has changed from it's earliest years in the British universities.

    1. In the nineteenth century, the mission of higher education changed radically to include “practical subjects” like agriculture and engineering

      Disciplines are always changing depending on what is needed in the world.

    2. Early colonial institutions like Harvard were founded to provide education to those going into the ministry, but after the American Revolution, colleges began to broaden their focus to include education for the ministry, medicine and law

      Super interesting that the only disciplines were ministry, medicine, and law.

    1. There is Violet Degnan and her project, “New Black Masculinity and Hip-hop.” Degnan places this piece within a network of links, articles, and images while also abiding by strict scholarly standards. Also explore the satirical online store by John Chavez, dubbed “Stitcht,” which ‘hacks’ digital conceptualizations of gender. These two projects engage in public scholarship in creative ways: Degnan’s project participates in the very public conversation surrounding black masculinity, while Chavez uses the form of a satirical store to force an audience to question their assumptions around the online economy.

      Work like this is so much more fun to learn and read about than a boring textbook.

    2. ’m not arguing against putting class assignments online, but the assignments must be framed by a conversation about audience and the way the ‘domain’ represents the author to that audience.

      A lot of my assignments for different classes are forum postings where we all reply to each other. I think this is good because we can feed off each other and share ideas.

    3. Can ‘ownership’ and ‘assignment’ go hand in hand?

      Yes! You have to put your own twist on things to show your creativity.

    4. How often do traditional ‘assignments’ misrepresent student interests, passion, and rigor?

      I think this is true to an extent. Sometimes assignments force students out of their shell.

    5. The web is a network for conversations, and if students still see their audience as a teacher with a red pen, then nothing changes.

      Definitely true! We need to be open and communicate with one another, stop worrying about what other people think or "the grade."

    6. If no one wants to read the hastily constructed blog post for a class participation grade, then what is the purpose of making it public?

      Definitely agree. Why put so much work into it if no one is even going to read it?

    7. Traditional assignments don’t necessarily empower students when they have to post them in a public space.

      I think this is true. Sometimes when you have to share your work, you may feel judged therefore you don't share your true colors.

    8. “To own one’s domain gives students an understanding of how Web technologies work. It puts them in a much better position to control their work, their data, their identity online.”

      I love the idea of this because we get to show people who we really are by showing off our hard work. It also teaches us students responsibility and technological functioning.

    9. I could even keep the domain after graduation. It is a living portfolio, my representation in the digital world.

      This idea of a E-portfolio is too good! You can keep it for as long as you want and carry it with you at all times. All universities should provide this.

    1. On our campuses, we must create an intellectual climate that encourages faculty members and students to make connections among seemingly disparate disciplines, discoveries, events, and trends — and to build bridges among them that benefit the understanding of us all.

      I think this is the key to interdisciplinary studies and I am so glad that PSU has a program like this. We are enabled to make connections with our own passions to make our own major and spread knowledge to others.

    2. A reform agenda must also include the creation of a balance between specialists and generalists

      This is super important, like a ying and yang effect. To learn a specific subject we obviously have to focus on specialization but in order to fully understand a subject and how it came about, we have to pull information from outside, more general sources.

    3. Another promising avenue is the Carnegie Corporation of New York's "Teachers for a New Era" program, which includes top-level collaboration between university faculty members in the arts and sciences with those in schools of education to ensure that prospective teachers are well grounded in specific disciplines and provided a liberal-arts education.

      This is a really cool idea. Professors and students from different schools should collaborate.

    4. Many novel approaches to revitalizing the liberal arts on campuses have been proposed, among them: learning by doing — including the use of community service, field study, internships, and research projects to integrate experience and application with academic work

      Not only does learning by doing help students learn more efficiently, it helps students realize if what they are doing is really for them. I think that every major should have a clinical portion to help students learn.

    5. The renewal and transformation of the liberal arts, however, remain the key to providing students with a rich and wide-ranging body of knowledge that will equip them to be both problem solvers and communicators and to assess situations and make effective, balanced, and timely judgments — skills that are essential in a knowledge-based, globalizing world.

      I love this statement. This is the most important aspect of this entire article as well as the renewal of the education system to teach students how to be better people.

    6. Within disciplines, of course, teaching should encourage students to draw knowledge together from many sources.

      If this wasn't done, classes would be incredibly dull and boring.

    7. Colleges must develop strategies to enable their faculty members, who are steeped in different disciplines, to have opportunities for multidisciplinary work as they continue their own lifelong learning

      In college, the professors have the greatest influence on us students. Professors should have to learn with us!

    8. Without liberal arts to provide a context for technical training, young people cannot be expected to understand the general nature and structure of our society, the role of the university, or the importance of values.

      We need liberal arts to understand how the world works. Learning about philosophy, sciences, literature, math and more helps us become more compassionate individuals.

    9. In particular, higher-education reform must focus on a revival of the liberal arts. Yet, paradoxically, liberal education is in decline just when we need it the most

      I was just reading an article earlier today from this link http://www.currentlycollege.com/top-10-worthless-college-majors-of-2016/ Who knows how accurate it is, but it basically says how awful and a waste of time liberal arts degrees are.

    10. Unfortunately, many of those student workers say that holding a job hurts their grades, as well as limits their choice of courses. By one estimate, college students typically spend less than half the time on their studies than the faculty expects.

      This is the sad truth. This past summer I had to quit my job because I couldn't keep up with my homework and clinicals that come with nursing. Many of my other friends have to work to pay their bills and feed their families, therefore it takes twice or three times as long to get a degree than it normally would.

    11. Because many high schools don't do their jobs, 53 percent of college students, including those who attend community colleges, require remedial courses.

      High schools definitely do not do their jobs or at least mine didn't. With four years of Spanish and 4 years (5 types of math) I struggled with both in college. There needs to be a change in the educational system to better prepare students for college.

    12. Sometimes that vacuum is filled by esoteric ideas, cults, and extremist programs — which are very appealing because they provide answers for absolutely everything.

      Groups like this fail to see both sides of things which cause fragmented spread of information. This is the easy way out with an answer.

    13. But while technology allows us to access more information, faster and in a more usable form, we must keep in mind the author and media critic Neil Postman's caution: "The computer cannot provide an organizing moral framework. It cannot tell us what questions are worth asking."

      Technology is really amazing. It allows us to search whatever we want and communicate and share with others BUT we are the ones who must type into the search bar what we want to learn. We are the ones behind the technology. Technology shouldn't rule us.

    14. Of course, the same information technologies that have been the driving force behind the explosion of information and its fragmentation also present us with profoundly integrative tools

      For instance, you can search wikipedia and google to find anything in the world you could want, but that doesn't make it correct.

    15. Yet the skills of synthesis and systemic thinking are not just luxuries, they are invaluable. Information — of all varieties, all levels of priority, and all without much context — is bombarding us from all directions all the time.

      Systemic and critical thinking are required for all academic work we do on a daily basis so why is the education system not the same? The education system needs to be changed so that we are learning new knowledge to teach to others. We shouldn't be reading the same novel our grandparents read in school. We should be learning impactful information to try and change the world.

    16. As a society, we tend to pay lip service to the complexity of problems and then continue to gamble on simplistic solutions

      Sadly, I feel this is what happens with almost all the problems happening in the world.

    17. he complexity of the world requires us to have a better understanding of the relationships and connections between all fields that intersect and overlap — economics and sociology, law and psychology, business and history, physics and medicine, anthropology and political science

      This is so true! Within any major there are overlapping concepts that are vital to understanding the information being taught. For example, I learned as my time as a nursing major that nursing encompasses biology, medicine, psychology, social work, and a lot more. One subject majors are too linear.

    18. After all, political empowerment and economic opportunity stem from the same root: the spread of knowledge. Thomas Jefferson fervently believed that a nation cannot be ignorant and free; I share this view as well as Jefferson's optimism that societies become more democratic as citizens become more knowledgeable and cultured.

      I also share this view. How would we know about anything in the world? BY SPREADING KNOWLEDGE. People need to be open to change and learning new things.

    19. Understanding the nature of knowledge, its unity, its varieties, its limitations, and its uses and abuses is necessary for the success of our democracy.

      In college, I feel that you are very judged by your major. I have literally seen people fighting on social media about which major is "harder" or "only smart people are in the _ major." This concept of "smart" is something that needs to be examined closer. What makes someone "smart?" Everyone brings knowledge and experiences to the table that one might have never even heard of and as a student body we should be nonjudgemental and open to learning new things.

    20. nstead of helping students learn and grow as individuals, find meaning in their lives, or understand their role in society, college has become a chaotic maze where students try to pick up something useful as they search for the exit: the degree needed to obtain decent employment.

      This is so true and sadly how I have felt sometimes. I have witnessed my friends who are majoring in communications or psychology being told, "good luck finding a job to pay off your student loans." So in many cases people switch to high demand majors, even if they don't like the subject only in hopes of a job after graduation. This is why interdisciplinary studies is so great because you can make your own major and follow your own passions, not a laid out program that hundreds of other students are doing.

    1. Giving students their own digital domain is a radical act. It gives them the ability to work on the Web and with the Web, to have their scholarship be meaningful and accessible by others. It allows them to demonstrate their learning to others beyond the classroom walls.

      It also allows us to grow and express ourselves creatively. We get to document our assignments and memories to look back on for personal growth.

    2. Education technology – and more broadly, the culture of education – does a terrible job with this sort of portability and interoperability.

      This is so true. No one likes carrying around a huge binder of work to show off when you could easily show your webpage anywhere, anytime.

    3. something that they themselves can reflect upon, not simply grades and assignments that are locked away in a proprietary system controlled by the school.

      I would rather look back on documented memories in my domain rather than a grade on a piece of paper.

    4. While some schools are turning to social media monitoring firms to keep an eye on students online, rarely do schools give students the opportunity to demonstrate the good work that they do publicly.

      Rarely ever have I seen social media used to display positive work someone has done. We were always taught to keep our lives off the internet for our own safety. I like this idea of showing off your good work publicly!

    5. These portfolios can contain text, images, video and audio recordings, giving students opportunities to express themselves in a variety of ways beyond the traditional pen-and-paper test or essay.

      I'm sure other students agree, assignments like this are way more fun than writing a traditional essay.

    6. There’s some pushback against these proposals too, with arguments that restrictions on data might hinder research

      I totally agree with this. I'm all about security and protecting my privacy as a student but I always have such a hard time doing research projects because there is what seems to be maximum security on articles that require you to have special permission and to gain permission can be a lengthy process sometimes. Has anyone else run into this?

    7. a growing number of other schools believe that students need a proprietary online space in order to be intellectually productive.

      I agree. It's awesome having your own space to share your knowledge, feelings, and opinions with others in a safe place you can call your own.

    8. the domain and all its content are the student’s to take with them. It is, after all, their education, their intellectual development, their work.

      Having your own domain to share with others allows for us to share our work. It's like a resume we can bring and show off everywhere we go.

    9. not only would acquire crucial technical skills for their digital lives but also would engage in work that provides richly teachable moments…. Fascinating and important innovations would emerge as students are able to shape their own cognition, learning, expression, and reflection in a digital age, in a digital medium. Students would frame, curate, share, and direct their own ‘engagement streams’ throughout the learning environment.

      Yes! These domains allow us to learn and grow and become responsible individuals online by being in charge of how we want others to see us as. Not only this, but we get to share and express ourselves with others.

    10. Having one’s own domain means that students have much more say over what they present to the world, in terms of their public profiles, professional portfolios, and digital identities.

      Sometimes traditional classroom assignments don't allow us students to show our true selves and all we have to offer the big world. By having our own domains we get to express ourselves freely.