(ref geefigureref)
missing caption?
(ref geefigureref)
missing caption?
(glmm)
change to section reference
practiced
practice
ifelse(DEPLY==2, TRUE, FALSE)
This ifelse is redundant... DEPLY==2 will return the same logical vector
Here, ΣΣ\Sigma is the variance/covariance matrix for all of the observations. This matrix is what is referred to as block diagonal. The 0’s represent covariances for observations from different sites – these are 0, since we assume observations from different sites are independent. The ViViV_i contain the variance/covariances for cluster iii (eq. (18.10)).
Suggest adding for clarity that the 0 in the definition of Sigma is actually a matrix of 0's
the
suggest deleting
FIGURE 3.8: BLUPs for b0ib0ib_{0i} and b1ib1ib_{1i}, along with their uncertainty, plotted using the plot_model function in the sjPlot package.
is there a legend for the colors?
that we have considered is that
suggest rewriting
model think
duplicate words
= be
repetitive words/symbols
modeling modeling
duplicate words
There are other options for comparing models fit in a Bayesian framework. Two popular options are LOO (Vehtari & Lampinen, 2002) and WAIC (Watanabe & Opper, 2010), which are available in the loo package (Vehtari et al., 2020). Again, I recommend reading Hooten & Hobbs (2015) to learn more about these metrics; see also Vehtari, Gelman, & Gabry (2017).
There is another new information criterion: extended BIC
## beta[2] 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1 18777
Is this just rounding that these values are zero for three digits?
logL(^θs|y)logL(θ^s|y)logL(\hat{\theta}_s | y)
conditioning is swapped between equation and description
The goodness-of-fit tests suggest there are problems with this model
Can you reference specifically the information used to conclude this? There is a jump that I didn't catch as a reader
Let’s also load some other packages that will be useful in this section:
missing code to follow statement
FIGURE 11.4: Posterior distribution for p, the probability of detection a moose from a helicopter in MN surveys.
Suggestion: This is a good set up to make the classic plot showing the prior, posterior, and likelihood.
mle
duplicate assignment to mle.fit
equivalent
by default tibbles are printed in knitted documents with two decimal places; to see the true equivalence maybe adjust that option?
a new vector
Recommend conditioning this sentence on if the evaluated function returns a length one vector/scalar
i!
the i should be a subscript to y
j
should this be the function j(i)?
individuals
typo; suggest changing to singular
+
suggest deletion
P(
Extra open parenthesis
Y
missing closing bracket
n!=
maybe include how to pronounce (“n factorial”) similar to what was provided for the choose function
1
typo; suggest change to 0
bu
but
f(y)
inconsistent notation; suggest adding the ;theta to match others
number
maybe add in a given support as there are bounds to all the below examples
similar same
remove a word
by
suggest delete
vary
very
2trianRtrian2R^2_{trian}.
typo in train
LASSO
labels say Ridge
choose
chose
become
became
@ref())
missing reference
compare
comparing
by by
duplicate word
use
choose
tem
term
up speed
up to speed
evaluate evaluate
Repeated word
the the
Duplicate word
want intervene
want to intervene
an
and
trials
trails
in
Suggest deleting
each
Suggest delete
signifant
significant
consider
considering
diving
dividing
all
allow
Xi,1β1+Xi,2β2
This is not consistent with notation in chapter 3
enmeans
Typo
really
Delete really here
m
humus typo
linearities
Repeated word