143 Matching Annotations
  1. Mar 2017
    1. But with all the other subjects we’re mandated to have, all we have left for recess is 15 minutes.

      15 minutes is not enough time!

    2. The kids get recharged. They get back into the classrooms ready to learn

      Reason for keeping recess

    3. eliminated swings from their playgrounds, along with merry-go-rounds, tube slides, track rides, arch climbers and teeter-totters

      And tag? Recess would not be useful if there is nothing to do

    4. Roughly 40 percent of U.S. school districts either have eliminated recess or are considering eliminating it

      Schools are eliminating some kid's only chance for outside play

    1. uberty also pressures kids to stay up later because the normal sense of tiredness that builds up during the day is slower to develop among teens, so they can’t fall asleep earlier even if they wanted to

      more with that counter claim! Even if they weren't staying up all night doing work they can't fall asleep easily on time

    2. puberty may biologically wire teens to stay up late and wake up late—which means that forcing them to bed earlier won’t do much good.

      more with that counter point I mentioned above...

    3. inadequate sleep among teens—which means anything less than 8.5 hours to nine hours a night on school days—can contribute to health issues such as obesity, diabetes, mood changes and behavior problems

      inadequate sleep is unhealthy. shocker.

      What about the responsibility of students to ensure they get enough sleep? Well, what about all of the homework and assignments that they can't make up if its not in on time?

    4. supports pushing back start times for older kids, particularly teens, because it’s better for their mental and physical health

      Later start times for older kids is healthy!!!

    1. the opportunity and output gaps related to today’s achievement gap can be substantially closed

      There is hope for improving!!!

    2. 9at once is tremendously challenging

      With previous highlight, this shows that America is reaching for a lot and falling short

    3. he primary purpose of school is to pre-pare every student to read, write, calculate, and analyze. But most Americans also hold schools to a more far-reaching mandate

      America is reaching too far?

    4. holding students to high expectations for learning and behavior

      part of the reason America is behind?

    5. must focus on two inter-related dimensions of the organization and execution of the educational program to generate the intended effects of more time on student learning

      a better organized and executed system would help

    6. more learning time is not the standalone factor of ef-fective school

      expanding learning time into the summer is the best option, not expanding it into more per day

    7. Fryer determined that instructional time of at least 300 more hours than the conventional district calendar is one of the stron-gest predictors of higher achievement (along with high-dosage tutoring, consistent feedback to teach-ers, use of data, and high expectations).

      this additional time could be found in fewer days off of school rather than in extra hours each day

    8. The evidence makes clear that expanding school time holds this potential because, when planned and imple-mented well, it confers three distinct, though interdepen-dent, benefits to both students and teachers:a. More engaged time in academic classes, allowing broader and deeper coverage of curricula, as well as more individualized learning support;b. More dedicated time for teacher collaboration and embedded professional development that enable educa-tors to strengthen instruction and develop a shared com-mitment to upholding high expectations; andc. More time devoted to enrichment classes and activi-ties that expand students’ educational experiences and boost engagement in school.

      benefits of expanding school time that will improve actual learning and retainment

    9. Consider that while the expectations for how schools prepare the next generation of American workers and citizens have risen dramatically, education and policy leaders have usually not updated policies and practices around learning time to meet these mounting demands

      There are more pressures on what kids should learn and when, but there have been no changes in the school calendar to help relieve these pressures

    1. Kids’ access to physical education has declined, obesity rates through the U.S. continue to rise, and test scores remain average at best. It’s time to change that.

      It is time to change play time. Taking it away has not provided benefits (the US is still falling in rankings)

    2. Children were more disciplined and focused in the classroom. Off-task behaviors like fidgeting decreased in the intervention schools consistently by 25 percent while the control school students maintained higher percentages of off-task behaviors from pre to post assessments

      more play time could help with ADHD symptoms?

    3. The children looked forward to each recess and demonstrated social growth and development through the change in peer interactions from pre to post assessments

      huge benefit in producing kids who will one day be functioning members of society

    4. adding extra recess can improve student discipline, focus and academic success without increasing the length of the school day or taking time away from classroom activities

      we don't need more time focusing on our math facts, but we need time to move as well

    5. Movement and activity stimulate the neurons that fire in the brain. When we sit, those neurons aren’t firing

      moving around will actually help form connections in the brain

    6. When any human sits for longer than about 20 minutes, the physiology of the brain and body changes, robbing the brain of needed oxygen and glucose, or brain fuel

      Children should be allowed to play more in school or they will continue to rob the brain of oxygen

    7. It not only helps to break up the day, but it allows kids to blow off steam and apply what is taught in the classroom to a play environment where the mind-body connection can flourish

      benefits of recess and other outdoor breaks in the day

    1. As if all of this weren’t enough, teens who don’t get enough sleep are more at risk for drug and alcohol use, depression and suicide

      other reasons to shift school later besides improving the minds of the youth

    2. Student athletes who get enough sleep are far less likely to get injured

      getting sleep would benefit the athletes too

    3. estimates that a one-hour change produces the same benefit as shrinking class size by one-third or replacing a teacher in the 50th percentile of effectiveness with one in the 84th percentile

      sleep really does have a big impact on education

    4. Repeated studies also show that when the school day starts later and teens get more sleep, both grades and standardized test scores go up

      this would help America rise again instead of continuing to fall

    5. the shift as too expensive and disruptive

      use with quote about $41 billion return in a year from another source

    6. 40% started before 8 a.m

      use with source about starting at 10 AM to show how early schools force kids to get up

      it's not just about the time they start, but also about how early kids wake up to be there on time

    7. fighting their body clocks so they can get to class on time

      can't be good for health

    1. “A 30-minute lunch period would enable most students to have a sufficient amount of seated time in cafeterias

      feeding children is important in readying them for learning

    2. the less time kids had to eat, the less likely they were to put fruit on their cafeteria trays

      they probably only cared about the bulk of their meals, the main course

    3. as little as 20 minutes for lunch. Some of that time had to be spent getting to the cafeteria and standing in line when they got there. By the time they finally sat down with their trays, some kids had only 10 minutes to eat.

      Not enough time for anyone to really eat

    4. the more time students had to finish their lunches, the more fruits and vegetables they ate and the more milk they drank

      brain food

    1. when people are held back by malnutrition, nations as a whole are held back as well

      things other than summer vacation may be a cause of education short comings

    2. Yet to reach the SDGs, we will need to fuel the brain power that will ultimately drive their success.

      providing better school lunches would benefit children as well as changing the school schedule

    3. How can a child focus on school if his brain isn’t ready to learn and his body can’t fight off infection?

      about food, relates to sleep

    1. Money does not solve all problems but, in this case, more equitable funding and educational innovation for the middle grades will demonstrate our commitment to ensuring our children get the highest quality education for the entirety of their K-12 careers.

      Again, money doesn't solve everything. This doesn't mean we should cut funding! We should be smart about where the money goes.

    2. And this focus on either end of education is expanding, as federal and state policy-makers push more funding into early education and higher education, leaving the central role of the middle years behind

      I should address this in my paper somehow

    3. Money alone will not solve the problem, but the middle grades fell behind on that score

      money alone will not solve the problem, yet it's all America wants to do

    4. in key ways, middle school is more important than high school for a child’s future, that “the level of academic achievement that students attain by eighth grade has a larger impact on their college and career readiness by the time they graduate from high school than anything that happens academically in high school.

      we need to make sure our middle schoolers have the foundations for a better education

    1. Heck, a lot of our kids' summers and holiday breaks are already structured around Amateur Athletic Union practices and tournaments.

      so we are making sports more important (of course there should be time for it)

    2. This stunning finding may be explained because students here are being commended for work that would not be acceptable in high-performing education systems."

      We still need to encourage our students, but we need to raise the bar

    3. The organization estimates that by boosting our scores for reading, math and science by 25 points over the next 20 years, the United States would gain $41 trillion over the lifetime of the generation born in 2010

      That's a huge payoff for dealing with additional costs to keep schools open.

    4. It's so bad in some schools, educators have a nickname for them: dropout factories.

      That's horrible! Educators should not say this but should work towards bettering education

    5. As a nation, either our kids are getting dumber or everyone else's are getting smarter

      This is a cool way to bring to light the truth that America is falling behind.

    1. Our fancy colleges are getting more expensive rather than getting bigger or better.

      diminishing returns

    2. America has traditionally been the best educated country in the world

      use for section about how America has fallen behind

    3. earlier initiatives in America's history were refreshingly progressive, timely, and economically beneficial

      it's gotten harder to educate kids as our own knowledge has grown... more to teach

    4. educational attainment is increasing slower than it used to

      law of diminishing returns applies to school too

    1. Physical activity can improve blood flow to the brain, fueling memory, attention and creativity, which are essential to learning

      importance of recess

    2. some administrators believe students need to spend more time in the classroom instead of on the playground

      evidence against this from other sources

    3. students need about one hour of physical activity every day to remain healthy

      length of recess?

    4. the more children moved, the better their grades were in school, particularly in the basic subjects of math, English and reading

      these are the subject we fall behind in

    5. hildren who get more exercise, whether at school or on their own, tend to have higher GPAs and better scores on standardized tests

      useful for showing the importance of regular education breaks to get children moving

    1. Where you get your break -- from an hour on blogs, a day in the park, or a week golfing at Martha's Vineyard -- doesn't matter so much as that you get it

      so it doesn't matter how long the break is? Maybe 2 months is still too much

    2. Most people have better life perspective and are more motivated to achieve their goals after a vacation, even if it is a 24-hour time-out

      reasons for summer vacation

    3. Just as small breaks improve concentration, long breaks replenish job performanc

      reason for summer vacation

    4. short breaks allow people to maintain their focus on a task without the loss of quality that normally occurs over time

      another reason for breaks

    5. Study after study indicates that short bursts of attention punctuated with equally deliberate breaks are the surest way to harness our full capacity to be productive

      apply to school students

    6. Overtime binges lead to bursts of output that exert a hangover effect in later days

      students need breaks too

    7. productivity returns diminished steadily after his workers toiled eight hours a day, five days a week

      relates to "the law of diminishing marginal returns" from economics

      show the importance of breaks

    1. traditional summer-school programs—which generally provide more of the same from the traditional school year—have been disappointing, leading to few academic gains for students

      why would any summer program that wasn't an actual school day do anything different?

    2. Rather than lengthening the school day, which exhausts young children and deprives older children of the opportunity to engage in extracurricular activities and sports

      these things won't help... harms of lengthening the school day

    3. The myth that American students spend less time learning than students in other industrialized nations is not true

      even though we don't spend less time in school, we do still fall behind other countries

    4. It is also clear from studies that increasing school time is very expensive and there is little return in achievement

      lengthening the time spent in school is not the answer to helping America's education system.

    5. The days, the years, can feel fearsomely long—to teachers and students both.  Nobody's learning enough to justify all those hours.

      there are a lot of hours spent in school... roughly 1,260 a year.

      we aren't getting better with this amount of time

    6. two weeks every season. This will diminish the frequency and extent of summer learning loss, reduce the need to review at the start of the school year for certain subjects, and provide more time and opportunities to go into more depth in the curriculum

      this would really benefit everyone...

    1. this has to happen for the health of kids

      it's not going to be about other activities, it should be focused on the health of kids

    2. Getting school systems to change takes more than just presenting scientific evidence

      NOT FOR PAPER: people will believe and act on what they want to believe and act on; even if there is scientific evidence

    3. later start times will hurt high-school sports.

      Wouldn't it help sports if students did not get out later? They would have the sleep required to put in more effort

    4. parents are often reluctant to have teens start later, whether because they rely on having older children at home in the afternoons to take care of younger siblings or because they’re concerned that it will interfere with extracurricular opportunities

      Students could still get out at the same time (and have time for other things) if school expands into the summer

    5. In some districts, the start times are largely dictated by local transportation companies, with school boards and superintendents contending they lack the funds or authority to change things

      I hadn't thought about difficulties in changing the school start time

    6. It’s typically more difficult for adolescents to fall asleep earlier in the evening than it is for other age demographics. And while teenagers are going to bed later, their school start times are often becoming earlier as they advance through middle and high school

      it's literally hard for younglings to go to bed earlier in the night

    7. shifting the school day later in the morning resulted in a boost in attendance, test scores, and grades in math, English, science, and social studies. Schools also saw a decrease in tardiness, substance abuse, and symptoms of depression. Some even had a dramatic drop in teen car crashes.

      Sleep is important for education and other stuff!

    8. And while later start times won’t replace other important interventions—like parents making sure their children get enough rest—schools clearly play an important role in students’ daily schedules, the report concluded.

      Parents do have a responsibility, but there is more schools can do to help students sleep (and with more sleep, they can learn more)

    9. federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is urging education policymakers to start middle- and high-school classes later in the morning. The idea is to improve the odds of adolescents getting sufficient sleep so they can thrive both physically and academically

      People really do need sleep to function. The CDC knows this and said schools should start later so that students have more of a chance to get enough sleep.

    1. Fifteen percent of the American score variation is explained by socio-economic differences between students.

      more proof that students of different economic class have different abilities to hire tutors and get extra help

    2. Educators around the world have called for tempered reactions to the PISA scores and questioned the usefulness of the tests

      standardized testing is a little questionable... some students are just bad at taking tests.

    3. The U.S. ranks fifth in spending per student

      We spend a lot of money "per student" but we are so far behind in knowledge!

    4. This year, the U.S. scores below average in math and ranks 17th among the 34 OECD countries.

      We are no longer mediocre, but now we are really falling behind the averages of the world.

    1. er learning programs, 83 percent of parents supported spending public funds on such programs and 67 percent of low-income parents said their children would enroll in a summer program if they could

      evidence against my claim earlier

    2. Pittsburgh is offering full-day summer programs framed as “camp” for all their elementary and middle school students that incorporate academics along with enrichment activities like judo and rowing

      This may be a way to get kids and parents excited about spending time in school over summer break. They would still need to provide transportation (buses) and lunches.

    3. good summer programs with individualized instruction, parental involvement and small classes can keep children from falling behind and reduce the achievement gap.

      Parental involvement is unreliable. Some parents literally cannot help. Not every kid has the transportation or money for individualized summer programs and instruction. This isn't really on option to reduce the achievement gap

    4. two-thirds of the achievement gap between lower- and higher-income ninth graders could be explained by summer learning loss during the elementary school years.

      This difference in knowledge lost in elementary school is evident in high school

    5. More troubling is that it disproportionately affects low-income students: they lose two months of reading skills, while their higher-income peers — whose parents can send them to enriching camps, take them on educational vacations and surround them with books during the summer — make slight gains

      Summer breaks actually help divide those of different economic class. Richer kids lose less knowledge than poorer kids. Even so, they both lose knowledge over summer break.

    1. Give more kids a chance to run free. It may not be “expanded learning time.” It can expand you just the same.

      Time in the summer for non-school activities is a way to develop individuals rather than just developing learners

    2. When school ended two weeks ago, I noticed my kids seemed almost instantly healthier and more engaged with what was going on around them. Less weary.

      benefits of breaks... healthier kids? Perhaps its the sleep they get.

    3. 19th century was a belief that “too much schooling impaired a child’s and a teacher’s health.”

      really? This quote from Ken Gold could show that we still need breaks

      What about non teachers and students? Why would year-long work not be harmful for health for everyone?

    4. Kids who are struggling also deserve tutors, and after-school or year-round help (it is a local embarrassment that Seattle cut its summer catch-up classes this year).

      alternatives to lessening the education gap... except kids still lose knowledge over the summer

    5. How about kids will go to school six, seven days a week when Congress agrees to work more than four.

      This is a really good point, expect that States have the power over their education programs.

    6. At least 300 hours more schooling each year (currently there are about 1,100 hours). It could come in much longer days. Six-day weeks. Or year-round schooling — meaning the end of summer vacation.

      longer days won't work, neither would taking away weekends, but a much shorter summer vacation would help

    1. Then, with one copy of the DNA in each half of the cell, the cell's membrane would pinch itself in the middle and split apart, making two new cells, each pretty much the same as the old cell (except if copying mistakes had happened during the copying of the DNA).

      so by some mixture we get cells that can multiply and divide

    2. Sometime around four billion or 3.5 billion years ago, lipid membranes and RNA or DNA got together to form the earliest living cells on Earth. Nobody understands exactly how this happened.

      if we don't know how this happened, why do we assume this is what happened?

      What needs to mix to get a cell?

    1. Instead, they investigate the mechanisms of evolution, how rapidly evolution can take place, and related questions.

      scientists are so confident they don't even question if, but how

    2. In science, a "fact" typically refers to an observation, measurement, or other form of evidence that can be expected to occur the same way under similar circumstances

      a fact is the evidence, not the theory itself

    3. subject to continuing refinement

      theories will always be called theories even if there is literally no evidence against it

      technologies do develop quickly now

    4. Like these other foundational scientific theories, the theory of evolution is supported by so many observations and confirming experiments that scientists are confident that the basic components of the theory will not be overturned by new evidence

      Scientists are confident about their theory even though it is still a theory

    5. formal scientific definition of theory is quite different from the everyday meaning of the word. It refers to a comprehensive explanation of some aspect of nature that is supported by a vast body of evidence.

      Everyday usage of the word is a conclusion based on a fragment of evidence, but the scientific community uses it for "a comprehensive explanation" based on a lot of evidence.

  2. Feb 2017
    1. Whereas a non-edited view of the self (i.e., mirror) islikely to decrease self-esteem, these findings suggest that theextra care involved in digital self-presentations may actuallyimprove self-esteem

      Whereas a non-edited view of the self (i.e., mirror) islikely to decrease self-esteem, these findings suggest that theextra care involved in digital self-presentations may actuallyimprove self-esteem

    2. The negative effects of objective self-awareness onself-esteem originated from work in the early 1970s.9,13–15Social-networking sites, a product of the 21st century, pro-vide new access to the self as an object

      Interesting... a study from before the internet was made deemed negative self-esteem cam from self-awareness, but social networking sites actually help us see ourselves as the best us

    3. By allowing people to present preferredor positive information about the self, Facebook is a uniquesource of self-awareness stimuli in that it enhances awarenessof the optimal self

      So rather than have people who see how they aren't like the social norms, these people see that they are their optimal selves on Facebook

    4. Thestudy suggests that selective self-presentation, afforded bydigitally mediated environments can have a positive influ-ence on self-esteem

      This contradicts what I predicted

    5. Northeastern university

      I may not be able to use the actual study or the conclusions... but some college students are still teenagers?

    6. because most peopleoften fall short of social standards when self-awareness isheightened, positive affect and self-esteem typically de-crease when people are exposed to objective self-awarenessstimuli

      because most peopleoften fall short of social standards when self-awareness isheightened, positive affect and self-esteem typically de-crease when people are exposed to objective self-awarenessstimuli

    7. becauseself-stimuli are most likely to be on one’s own profilepage, we would expect that participants who only view theirown profile page would report higher self-esteem than par-ticipants who view other profiles within Facebook

      But who only looks at their profile? If social media is for connecting with others, as stated by another source, then we would look at other people's pages.

    8. Evidence of selective self-presentation is found in a variety ofInternet spaces, including e-mails,19discussion boards,20andonline dating Web sites

      So there is proof that people do try to make themselves look really good online

    9. Furthermore, research in computer-mediatedcommunication has found that information online is oftenover-interpreted relative to the same information providedoffline,17leading to exaggerated or stereotyped impres-sions.

      This could be dangerous. We are over-thinking all of the experiences we see online

    10. This information could make people aware of their own lim-itations and shortcomings, which would lower self-esteem

      my thoughts exactly

    1. Thus, although individuals with low self-esteem may view SNSs as a useful way to feel connected to others, supporting the social compensation hypothesis (McKenna, Green, & Gleason, 2002), those with poor social skills may be at risk for opening themselves up to harmful feedback from others.

      This could be really helpful in tying together my last few comments

    2. With adolescents likely to post interesting, upbeat, and attention-grabbing details of their lives, online comparisons may be harsher than warranted

      Specific to teens

    3. Adolescents are particularly likely to engage in social comparison, be it upward or downward, and these types of comparisons can have a strong impact on their self-esteem

      Exactly what I need

    4. With adolescents controlling what information and photographs they wish to share to a broad audience through SNS profiles, there is considerable speculation that some adolescents may post misinformation or at least idealized versions of themselves.

      We seek to alter other's perceptions of us. That has to affect how we see ourselves

    5. Dutch adolescents who frequently received negative feedback from their SNS profiles also reported lower social self-esteem

      This supports my hypothesis that social media hurts self-esteem and anxiety

    6. Facebook users with low, compared to high, self-esteem posted status updates that were rated as lower in positivity and higher in negativity by trained undergraduate coders

      So those with low self-esteem feel that social media helps them, but really they still post higher negative comments

    7. in support of the social compensation hypothesis, an interaction effect revealed that those with low self-esteem and low life satisfaction particularly benefitted from Facebook use in terms of more emotional suppor

      So social media can be perceived to help those with low self-esteem

    8. In a study of younger participants, Reich and colleagues (2012) reported that 43% of their high school student participants believed that SNS use made them feel closer to their friends

      That's a lot of teens who feel a positive impact. Are we even aware of the negative impacts?

    9. A factor analysis indicated “Facebook connectedness” as a distinct construct from general connectedness that was uniquely related to general well-being and negatively related to depression and anxiety

      While we may use social media to keep in touch, it does have a negative relation to depression and anxiety

    10. Considerable attention has been directed to the negative side of SNSs, namely online bullying, harassment, and humiliation, which have been extensively detailed in other reviews

      So even if social media doesn't negatively affect our anxiety and self-esteem, it does bring these things

    11. SNSs potentially offer additional avenues for support and communication—crucial to the development of age-appropriate adolescent relationships

      A reminder that the changes in anxiety and self-esteem could be positive

    12. The sheer amount of time that adolescents and young adults spend using electronic media is perhaps the most revealing: on average, 11–18 year-olds spend over 11 hours per day exposed to electronic media

      How could something we are so engaged with not affect our lives and the ways we see ourselves?

    13. quite similar to more traditional forms of communication—to stay in touch with friends, make plans, get to know people better, and present oneself to others

      So we could do this without social media?

    1. exhibited significantly greater body dissatisfaction, weight-related thoughts, weight-regulatory thoughts, levels of depression, and dejection- and agitation-related mood, as well as lower appearance-related and total self-esteem

      exposure once during this study effected women... think about the constant exposure

    2. M= 18.68, SD= 2.16, median age = 18

      That means (empirical's rule) that roughly 68% of the women in the study were between the ages of 16 and 21, which is mostly in my age group of teenagers

    3. Self-awareness research (e.g., Duval & Wicklund, 1972) suggests that self-relevance increases the likelihood for social comparison

      Social media has made us focus on ourselves and on creating an alter ego (book quote to support)

    4. Social comparison theory states that we seek to compare ourselves to others we believe are similar to ourselves, particularly to determine our own levels of abilities and successes

      This could be used to explain why social media effects how we perceive ourselves. We seek to compare ourselves

    5. However, other research has shown either no relationship between media exposure and negative effects (e.g., Champion & Furnham, 1999) or inconsistent results (e.g., Cash, Cash, & Butters, 1983; Irving, 1990)

      The studies with no correlation were before the internet really became popular (1991) and before social media took off. The studies after the internet are the ones that show a correlation between what we see and how we feel.

    1. Two lines of evidence suggest a possible geneticpredisposition for SAD.

      If social anxiety is genetic, then social media would not really affect it.

    2. Eachof these experiences has the potential to set in motionnegative feedback loops involving anxiety, avoidancebehaviors, and potential deficits in social competence.

      If experiences that provide negative feedback can cause social anxiety, the social media can definitely affect social anxiety.

    3. Adolescence is widely agreed to be a crit-ical developmental stage of identity formation andsocial skill development, in which concerns aboutpeer acceptance and body image become paramoun

      of course teens worried about self-image before 2006

    4. many parents simply see their childrenas “shy” and do not realize that they suffer from a po-tentially treatable anxiety disorder

      In the other study 10 years after this was written, parents thought their teens were shy more than teens thought they were shy. Far less than those whose parents thought they were shy actually demonstrated the potential for lifetime social anxiety

    5. Recent research suggests that SAD is quite com-mon among adolescents, with lifetime prevalencerates of between 5 to 15% of adolescents in the UnitedStates

      matches the 12% in the other source (which was 10 years later)

    6. In contrast to most otheranxiety and mood disorders, there is considerable ev-idence that the onset of SAD occurs at a relativelyearly age, with a mean onset of 15.5 years (Schneieret al., 1992), and children diagnosed as young as age8 (Beidel & Turner, 1988)

      People were affected young even before social media became popular in 2006

    7. Social anxiety disorder (SAD), also known associal phobia, is a common anxiety disorder charac-terized by intense fear of embarrassment, humilia-tion, and negative evaluation by others in social situ-ations, and a tendency to avoid feared situations

      Use as definition for social anxiety?

    1. As shown, 62.4% of parents reported that their adolescents were shy, whereas a more-moderate 46.7% of adolescents thought that they were shy. In contrast, only 8.6% of adolescents met DSM-IV criteria for social phobia at some point in their lifetime

      Parents may know shyness differently than teenagers. Even if so, far fewer than those identifying as "shy" actually experienced social phobia.

    2. Lifetime disorders assessed include social phobia and other anxiety disorders (separation anxiety disorder, specific phobia, agoraphobia, panic disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder), mood disorders (major depressive disorder and dysthymic disorder)

      So, this study does cover social phobia in the form of anxiety.

    3. Those within the scientific community, however, contend that social phobia and shyness are not synonymous; rather, investigators have maintained that social phobia is a persistent, disabling, psychiatric condition

      If it is true that social phobia is not the same as shyness, then what causes social phobia? This may need to be investigated further.

    4. Only 12% of the youth who identified themselves as shy also met the criteria for lifetime social phobia

      Teens who are faced with social anxiety may outgrow their social phobia as they age because only 12% showed signs of lifetime social phobia.

    1. continuous partial attention

      I have heard that continuous partial attention can actually benefit those with ADHD. For example, if someone with ADHD jiggles their leg while they work on math, they will be better able to focus on that math.

    2. keeping up.

      Being a part of social media (and being constantly available through our cell phones) creates a feeling that we always have something to do. This need to keep up with what others post is why people constantly check their feeds for updates (even when there is no way someone posted something new in the minute you looked away).

    3. getting cut off

      My sister would get cut off from Pinterest because Pinterest's algorithm thought she was spamming people. I didn't think this happened on Twitter.

      His posting habits of 30+ tweets every day seems excessive and reminds me that we often feel a need to post online.

    4. more than 36,000 Twitter followers

      This reminds me of the app/extension that deleted numbers from Facebook. Instead of seeing "36,000 followers," he would have seen "followers." I know you don't follow people on Facebook, but this is what I thought of.