3 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. Since scav-5 and scav-6 are paralogs of scav-4, we analysed their functions in lipid accumulation using scav-5(ok1606) deletion mutants and scav-6 knockout alleles generated in this study through CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing (Figure 4B). We found that when fed with JUb74, both scav-5(-) and scav-6(-) mutants had moderately reduced LD sizes, but not to the extent of scav-4(-) mutants (Figure 4E). Previous promoter reporter studies showed that scav-5 and scav-6 were expressed in the intestine.34 We constructed translational reporters for both genes and found weak or no signals for SCAV-5::TagRFP possibly due to low protein levels. The SCAV-6::TagRFP fusion protein was expressed in the intestine and was localized to the apical membrane (Figure 4C). From the fluorescent intensity, the scav-6 expression appeared to be weaker than the scav-4 expression. Moreover, scav-4(-) scav-6(-) double mutants had the same LD diameter as scav-4(-) single mutants (Figure 4F). The above results suggested that SCAV-4 may play a more significant role than the other two paralogs in intestinal lipid uptake.

      I'm surprised that the scav-5 and scav-6 paralogs were both able to reduce the large LD phenotype to the same extent as scav-4 (there doesn't appear to be significant difference between the mutants). To me this suggests either they each contribute a third of the BCFA uptake, or that they operate together to internalize BCFAs. The scav-4;scav-6 double mutant suggests the first idea isn't correct as you don't see a stronger effect there. Do you think its possible these transporters are working as a complex? I would be interested to see if you can rescue each of these mutants with scav-4 expression, or if rescue requires all receptors to be present.

    2. In a small-scale screen of a few thousand haploid genomes, we isolated an allele unk28, which led to the formation of supersized LDs under the JUb74 diet (Figure 4A).

      It's amazing you were able to find a GOF mutation that exacerbated this phenotype! I think it would help accentuate this if you included a picture of wt animals on the JUb74 food, next to the L462F animals on JUB74 food in Fig 4A to contrast that shift in LD size.

    3. Conversely, we also supplemented either specific BCFAs or a mixture of them to the OP50 culture but were not able to increase the BCFA levels above 30%, likely because OP50 could not take in large amount of BCFAs (Figure S2C). Feeding those BCFA-treated OP50 to wild-type C. elegans did not induce large LDs (Figure S2D). Thus, we concluded that, in addition to the dosage effect, a threshold existed for the minimal level of BCFAs that could induce large LDs.

      Could you preform the experiment in C. elegans defined media supplemented with BCFAs? That would fully remove other variables from the Microbacterium and confirm this is solely due to BCFAs.