Zhang and Abernethy (2025) propose deploying LLMs as quality checkers to surface critical problems instead of
Is this the only empirical work? I thought there were others underway. Worth our digging into. Fwiw I can do an elicit.org query.
4 Matching Annotations
- Last 7 days
-
llm-uj-research-eval.netlify.app llm-uj-research-eval.netlify.app
-
-
but still recommend human oversight.
why? based on some evidence of LLM limitations or risks?
-
emphasize
I'd say 'they argue' instead of 'emphasize'; the latter seems like a statement of absolute truth that we agree with.
-
-
llm-uj-research-eval.netlify.app llm-uj-research-eval.netlify.app
-
The population of papers
Should we adjust "the population of papers" to "the reference is" ? to be more explicit?
-