two weeks off.
Months. He was actually concussed for months! Almost gave up playing football entirely. Funny hearing how I/we first reacted.
Nothing to do with speaker switching, but ;-)
two weeks off.
Months. He was actually concussed for months! Almost gave up playing football entirely. Funny hearing how I/we first reacted.
Nothing to do with speaker switching, but ;-)
We are looking for a limited number of institutions to collaborate with us for our phase I trial in coming weeks.
Unfortunately, while we experienced good general interest from a number of organizations when this was first published we did not receive sufficient concrete expressions of interest to run the Phase I Trial at that time.
That said, should this situation change we remain open and ready to run a Phase I trial with interested parties.
(We’d appreciate some guidance on which method would be preferred)
Thoughts on this would be appreciated - how do you want to interact with the API during the trial?
The mechanisms for submitting, and annotating claims for ‘check worthiness’ will be in place, but agents will be rated only on their ‘truthiness’ estimates.
We're really hoping that agents will be submitting check-worthy claims via this mechanism during the trial, but to reduce risk it seemed like it would be better to commit to hand-curation for the first trial.
We need (and would appreciate) your thoughts!
Sign up for hypothes.is is free and easy - see signup/login above.
We wish to be guided by our members as to the necessity and preferred format for this end point.
What formats would suits you best for bulk export? A TSV download, JSON,? As a streaming feed or as simple downloadable files?