To call something a “walking simulator” became not just a complaint about pacing but an existential fight for survival, spiraling to include larger and larger questions of who gets to be a gamer and what should be “counted” as a game
A very important question is raised which really questions the definition of games and who gets to be a gamer. I think its important to question our definition of games in order better understand the content. Hence, this could initially be considered as a good step because it could potentially address our biases and give us some awareness. But too much critism and complete lockdown of your thoughts from listening is problematic.