8 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2018
    1. Regarding: Excerpts from The Overall Survey of the Ocean’s Shores

      From this reading I appreciate the detail in which the writer wishes to report the geography, social hierarchy, and the nature of the people along the way to be very objective. It appears to serve the purpose of informing future travelers from China of the whole picture of these places and peoples.

      From these two excerpts that we were given, the contrast between the two societies of what is now modern Sumatra and that of Arabia, shows that the author meant to point out great detail in examples of the contrast between the societies they discovered on their journey. For example, the tyrannical chief that robs passers by and the "no poverty-stricken families" of Arabia. The authors were impressed by seemingly “a most happy country," so much so, that they adopted their religion. I wonder, was this first journey from Asia and did it begin the growth of the Muslim religion in Asia?

    2. The Overall Survey of the Ocean’s Shores. It records the distances to the lands of the island barbarians,11 the changes in the countries, the places which adjoin the boundaries, and the arrangement of cities and suburbs, with the differences of costume, the varieties of diet, the punishments and prohibitions, laws and regulations, customs and products.12 Nothing is left unrecorded;13 because it was this gentleman’s intention, [and] his whole wish, to make the people of the future, for a thousand years hereafter, realize that the way of our country is in harmony with nature and that we have achieved this measure of success in civilizing the barbarians of the south and east.

      This to me is a history recorded of a civilization that is convinced that it has found peace or balance and wished to expand and share it with the rest of the world. They also wanted to learn about other cultures, trade with them, and document their way of life. They also wanted to map the world as they discovered it.

    3. And it is a custom of his people that if one of them should have reared a beautiful daughter he offers her to the king as a concubine (ama mawtu-’ a) and he possesses her without a marriage ceremony as slaves are possessed, and this in spite of the fact that Islam has triumphed among them and that they follow the Malikite school and that this sultan Musa was pious and assiduous in prayer, Koran reading, and mentioning God [dhikr]. “I said to him (said lbn Amir Hajib) that this was not permissible for a Muslim, whether in law (shar’) or reason (‘aql), and he said: ‘Not even for kings?’ and I replied: ‘No! not even for kings! Ask the scholars!’ He said: ‘By God, I did not know that. I hereby leave it and abandon it utterly!’ “I saw that this sultan Musa loved virtue and people of virtue. He left his kingdom and appointed as his deputy there his son Muhammad and emigrated to God and His Messenger. He accomplished the obligations of the Pilgrimage, visited [the tomb of] the Prophet [at Medina] (God’s blessing and peace be upon him!) and returned to his country with the intention of handing over his sovereignty to his son and abandoning it entirely to him and returning to Mecca the Venerated to remain there as a dweller near the sanctuary (muja-wir); but death overtook him, may God (who is great) have mercy upon him.

      Wow, these phrases really took me by surprise because until this I was convinced he was a self-important person who gave generously but only in a very narcissistic way. His arrogance in his gold giving and his need to be acknowledged for it were only to serve his own need for superiority. While he thought he was a religious muslim, this trip and the wisdom shared with him by lbn Amir Hajib seems to have clearly helped him realize that he was not following true Muslim scripture so much so that he became willing to give his power away and return to Mecca. Just to say it, I think handing down your power and wealth to your son (successor) and not to the poor (for example) is in itself an expression of power and superiority. I knew nothing about this history before reading this. I think the writer portrayed Musa, the Sultans and this period in a way that I could understand them.

    4. “I asked him if he had enemies with whom he fought wars and he said: ‘Yes, we have a violent enemy who is to the Sudan as the Tatars are to you.

      Even though it's spelled differently, (Tartars vs Tatars) is this referring to the same people? The Turks? The Mongols invading Russian cities in the other readings?

  2. learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet02-xythos.learn.cloudflare.blackboardcdn.com learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet02-xythos.learn.cloudflare.blackboardcdn.com
    1. Prior to this, before the flesh ofthe sheep is served, the master takes what pleases him; and furthermore if he gives to anyone a special piece, it is the custom, that he who receives it shall eat it himself, and he may not give it to another; but if he cannot eat it all he carries it off with him, or gives it to his servant if he be present, who keeps it; otherwise he puts it away in his captargac, which is a square bag which they carry to put such things in, in which they store away bones when they have not time to gnaw them well, so that they can gnaw them later and that nothing of the food be lost.

      The Mongols/Tartars/Mo'al have what looks like a sophisticated unwritten hierarchy and also seem to be generous to others within that patriarchal system.

    2. Then an attendant goes out of the dwelling with a cup and liquor, and sprinkles three times to the south, each time bending the knee, and that to do reverence to the fire; then to the east, and that to do reverence to the air; then to the west to do reverence to the water; to the north they sprinkle for the dead.

      This reminds me of American Indian traditions paying homage to the four directions and elements air, fire, water and to the dead, which usually represents the earth or ground element. William of Rubrick is a friar and seems to give a very detailed and a non-judgmental account of their lifestyle.

    3. And the accursed ones began to ride through the streets, writing down the Christian houses; because for our sins God has brought wild beasts out of the desert to eat the flesh of the strong, and to drink the blood of the Boyars.

      my interpretation of this phrase is that the writer wants to show that christians were being targeted and that they were so unfortunate due to their belief that their "sins" have caused this.

    4. God alone knows who they are and whence they came out. Very wise men know them exactly, who understand books; but we do not know who they are, but have written of them here for the sake of the memory of the Russian Princes and of the misfortune which came to them from them. For we have heard that they have captured many countries...

      The writer is trying to show that God and the educated are the only ones who could understand why the Mongols invaded. The writer believes they were successful because they had help from within Novgorod and the Prince.