24 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2020
    1. As this chapter demonstrates, we invent and are invented by the conversations we have on IM and Facebook, the photos and videos we post and view on Flickr and YouTube, and the blogs we read and compose: the commonplaces associated with invention that we seek out and discuss are multimodal, not only text-based maxims but also literal and metaphorical visual and audio representations of ideas and topics, which we've discovered as audience members and remixed for our audience(s).

      Electracy and participatory culture!!! Invention happens at such a higher rate through these technologies.

    2. we view collaboration as crucial to invention as a social act

      Absolutely! Ideas can be juxtaposed with each other and invent new understanding and concepts. Good stuff.

    3. he use of writing groups in and out of classroom settings (Bruffee 1984; Macrorie 1988; Moss, Highberg & Nicolas 2004; Murray 1985) allows writers to respond to each other's work less as a form of critique than as a way to engage in a conversation that is beneficial to all participants.

      This is incredibly important. Especially for pedagogy and the writing process. I believe group revisions and critiques are essential to help students find new ideas, new ways to look at their piece, and see their topic in a different light.

    4. s evidenced by Plato's use of dialogues throughout his work (even if they are fictionalized conversations), talking to and with other people allows for a pooling of knowledge that can then be rearticulated by a rhetor to further complicate the values and beliefs of a community.

      Would this be an example of juxtaposing different beliefs to create a new understanding or idea?

    5. 1. even when a writer composes as an individual, "the inventing 'self' is socially influenced

      Is this referring to audiences/readers generating their personal connections in order to shape their understanding of the themes, characters, and plots of narrative and texts?

    1. the flesh-colored body forms the backdrop of the entire text, and white folded sheets of paper scatter over the body, ordered, structurally balanced, yet non linear—each sheet of paper contains a deeper, entangled narrative tributary that builds toward a larger, intertextual argument.

      Such a cool way to describe the blurred line between body as text and material text.

    2. "I'm a text. Sometimes I think this metaphor is faulty, especially since my body isn't booklike, and, although I do have a spine, I don't have pages or a cover....My body is text personified"

      I am getting strong Jim Corder vibes here. Good stuff!

    3. We can transform our methodologies; we can move the body from the background to the foreground, as enacted by feminist and disability studies scholars in a variety of media.

      Important and profound statement. If we don't utilize the gift that is our bodies, we become empty vessels in a silent space.

    4. We tend to metaphorically replace or cover the body with 'text,' passively reading the body as a figurative representation of social and cultural codes perhaps in order to resist the binary reading of the body as biological, as expressive.

      I will never be able to view body language the same ever again.

    5. The body’s competencies and skills are distinct from discourse, although in some cases they can produce discourse or can be read discursively”

      Oh, this is cool. If I'm following right, it seems this is saying that our body's process is separate from vocal communication but there are instances where the two combine. Something like that? Someone help me! hahaha

    6. The body is intricately entangled with a multitude of overlapping domains and branches, opening passages and possibilities for diverse meaning-making encounters.

      Another important statement. When I see branches, I think of us as trees or plants and that the mass amounts of information running through us is the sugary substance we need to grow. To invent new meanings and ideas.

    7. a corporeal literacy points us to the material dimension of writing-reading, to meaning's reliance on our physical participation in the world"

      I'm not quite following the quote here. Is this saying that writing and reading requires more cognitive energy?

    8. The body rhetorically functions as a topos, or commonplace, across disciplines, across theoretical stances and epistemologies, and across experiential standpoints.

      This is a great line. I immediately though of the body as a commons where all sorts of disciplines, theories, and concepts converge into invention of new possibilities. Maybe I'm off here. I still seem to get it even if I can't quite articulate it.

    1. Along with incorporating associative, remixed composing into our pedagogy, it's also important that composition and rhetoric specialists (at least sometimes) compose scholarly texts that resist linear print models--that we compose texts which show rather than tell (Ball 2004) about the ways in which associative juxtaposition can provoke new insight.

      Seems like a battle or juxtaposition of literacy and electracy here.

    2. For example, Jeff Rice has drawn on analysis of hip-hop composing practices to argue for a writing pedagogy that "favors discovery over the restricted topic sentence since writers composing with juxtapositions do not begin with an understanding of what they will be writing about...Instead, writers look for ways to juxtapose from a variety of categories and subjects (the sampling process of juxtaposition) in order to invent"

      I like the connection with music samples and remixes here. It definitely changes the argument that rap and EDM are easy and simple because they take from other music. But with the idea of juxtaposition and invention, they are actually complicating music composition and putting in a ton of effort for invention.

    3. -crafting new knowledge through the process of making and interpreting unexpected connections

      I got the image of the "telephone" writing game form school. How new knowledge and narrative are made from unexpected connections provided by the previous writing.

    4. and others have shown), it is also true that digital technologies open up new possibilities for practicing creative juxtaposition in our pedagogy and scholarship.

      New technologies, as we discovered, actually generate just as much if not more ideas through juxtaposition. We saw that with the youtube videos and participatory culture. In fact. Participatory culture seems to be the driving force behind juxtaposition and invention. This definitely goes for pedagogy as well.

    5. In order to generate chaos, writers need to resist narrowing focus and coming to closure too quickly; rather, writers who learn the "uses of chaos" (Berthoff 1981 p. 68) come to value the process of gathering and juxtaposing disparate materials in order to generate a 'new' idea.

      Again, love the writing connection. This passage makes me realize how I have been juxtaposing evidence and arguments in order to generate new ones for essays, etc.

    6. "meanings don't come out of the air, we make them out of a chaos of images, half-truths, remembrances, syntactic fragments, from the mysterious and unformed. When we teach pre-writing as a phase of the composing process, what we are teaching is not how to get a thesis statement but the generation and uses of chaos"

      I love the reference to the pre-writing process. I will keep this relationship in mind during my teaching courses. It really is a chaotic mash up of different topics and when placed together, generate new ideas and concepts for an argument, exposition, and narrative. It truly is chaotic. I closed my eyes and tried the "thin air" attempt. All i got were juxtapositions of previous images and memories colliding and creating new ideas and emotions. It's cool!

    7. Composing is a process of making connections, rearranging materials (words, images, concepts) in unexpected ways. The first words, images, and concepts that come to our minds are often the most obvious / the most expected / the most banal. Thus, if we wish to be creative, we can benefit greatly by gathering a wide array of disparate materials and then taking the time to experiment with combining and re-arranging these materials in novel ways (Hogan 2003).

      This whole passage makes me think of Legos. I remember making the craziest buildings and landscapes with all the different legos. What can you do with one lego? Not a whole lot. With many? So many inventions!

    8. “There is only one way in which a person acquires a new idea: the combination or association of two or more ideas he (sic) already has into a new juxtaposition in such a manner as to discover a relationship among them of which he was previously unaware”

      After reading this line, I immediately thought about Issac Newton and the apple falling. How he juxtaposed the apple with the falling motion and mathematically invented gravity. When you think about it, invention really does need more than one item or else you're just thinking/looking at that one concept.