Call-outs are often louder and more vicious on the internet
digital migration of call-out culture
Call-outs are often louder and more vicious on the internet
digital migration of call-out culture
For most of human history,
While convergence culture has brought about this new paradigm in transmedia storytelling through digital, people have been using different media to tell stories for added comprehension for a long time.
any given product is a point of entry into the franchise as a whole.
A big incentive to collaborate, not compete.
all uses of technology that are very much aligned with the peer-to-peer learning typical of communities of practice
Suggested quote
experiencing/continuously creating their shared identity through engaging in and contributing to the practices of their communities.
Teenagers specifically are constantly negotiating their identities
primarily a structural problem caused by poorly designed and poorly advertized rules
I disagree with this inference. Interested if others agree?
Most prominent were allegations of censorship that dogged the forum
Links as evidence to my initial thoughts that this is always problematic of moderation in online discussions.
Greeter: making people feel welcome•Conversation Stimulator: posing new questions and topics, playing devil’s advocate in existing conversations•Conflict Resolver: mediating conflicts towards collective agree-ments (or agreeing to disagree)•Summarizer of debates •Problem Solver: directing questions to relevant people for response •Supporter: bringing in external information to enrich debates, sup-port arguments•Welcomer: bringing in new participants, either citizens or politi-cians/civil servants•‘Cybrarian’: providing expert knowledge on particular topics •Open Censor: deleting messages deemed inappropriate, normally against predefined rules and criteria. Feedback is given to explain why, and an opportunity to rewrite is provided•Covert Censor: deleting messages deemed inappropriate, but with-out explaining why•Cleaner: removing or closing dead threads, hiving off subdiscus-sions into separate threads
Useful information if we would like to discuss different roles of moderation?
A value judgment (or value judgement) is a judgment of the rightness or wrongness of something or someone, or of the usefulness of something or someone
"Right", "wrong", and "useful" are all subjective values. In my understanding of this definition, if a moderator were to make an evaluation with limited information, it is hard to see how this could possibly be democratic - given people's different opinions on "right", "wrong" and "useful".
They were later released without charge.
Is the strategy effective, then?
piss the public off
Yet a few days after this article, some members disrupted services on the Tube. Is this due to a decentralised structure?