11 Matching Annotations
  1. Dec 2019
    1. For most of human history,

      While convergence culture has brought about this new paradigm in transmedia storytelling through digital, people have been using different media to tell stories for added comprehension for a long time.

    1. experiencing/continuously creating their shared identity through engaging in and contributing to the practices of their communities.

      Teenagers specifically are constantly negotiating their identities

  2. pdfs.semanticscholar.org pdfs.semanticscholar.org
    1. Most prominent were allegations of censorship that dogged the forum

      Links as evidence to my initial thoughts that this is always problematic of moderation in online discussions.

    2. Greeter: making people feel welcome•Conversation Stimulator: posing new questions and topics, playing devil’s advocate in existing conversations•Conflict Resolver: mediating conflicts towards collective agree-ments (or agreeing to disagree)•Summarizer of debates •Problem Solver: directing questions to relevant people for response •Supporter: bringing in external information to enrich debates, sup-port arguments•Welcomer: bringing in new participants, either citizens or politi-cians/civil servants•‘Cybrarian’: providing expert knowledge on particular topics •Open Censor: deleting messages deemed inappropriate, normally against predefined rules and criteria. Feedback is given to explain why, and an opportunity to rewrite is provided•Covert Censor: deleting messages deemed inappropriate, but with-out explaining why•Cleaner: removing or closing dead threads, hiving off subdiscus-sions into separate threads

      Useful information if we would like to discuss different roles of moderation?

    1. A value judgment (or value judgement) is a judgment of the rightness or wrongness of something or someone, or of the usefulness of something or someone

      "Right", "wrong", and "useful" are all subjective values. In my understanding of this definition, if a moderator were to make an evaluation with limited information, it is hard to see how this could possibly be democratic - given people's different opinions on "right", "wrong" and "useful".