2 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2024
    1. Moreover, gender as a binary has now become a template for categories of modern sexuality. Our contemporary binary of gender translates any fractures of masculinity into effeminization. Nineteenth-century Iranian culture, however, and perhaps before and beyond, had other ways of naming a young adolescent male and an adult man desiring to be objects of desire for adult men that were not equated with effeminacy.

      I think in this paragraph, the author contrasts the modern Western interpretation of gender and sexuality, where any variation from traditional masculinity is often viewed as feminization, with nineteenth-century Iranian culture. In that context, the relationships between adult men and young adolescent males were understood differently and not automatically framed as varied in the way contemporary gender norms might dictate. This suggests that the categories of masculinity and femininity, as well as heterosexuality and homosexuality, did not operate along the same lines in that cultural setting.

    2. First: For those of us who are historians of "beyond the Americas and the modern," how have we had to renegotiate meanings of gender and sexuality as well as their analytic utility? And what can we bring back to the Americas and the modern from this conceptual travel?3

      I think this line underscores the importance of understanding that concepts like gender and sexuality are historically and culturally specific. In many societies outside of the Western framework, these categories may not exist in the same form or may intersect with other societal structures like religion.