4 Matching Annotations
  1. May 2018
    1. “Parents as Problems” can be traced to government policies that aim to protect students and aid teachers in having the most control in the edu-cation of young students. The trope of “Parents as First Teachers,” while seemingly benign in its recognition of the claim that parents are the preeminent socializing agents in a child’s life, presents pedagogical substitutions aimed at deemphasizing

      Again, so interesting to critically examine the use of language here and what values we are promoting with the use of these buzz word terms.

    2. We think that an examination of these tropes could be useful for teachers and other professionals to critically assess the goals of programs and initiatives and the effects that they might have in creating inclusive or dismissive roles for parents. Although “antideficit rhetoric” is common-place in contemporary parent involvement program models (e.g., the ubiquitous use of a discourse of “strengths”), E. Auerbach (1995) warns that this shift may operate as a neodeficit ideology in which even “strength-based” program models could continue to function within a deficit framework.

      Yes, this is crucial. We must be self-reflective and think critically about the ideologies we are asked to engage in as educators. So many of the boxed curriculum, or boxed diversity/ engagement models use language that would appear to indicate an understanding of these tropes, thereby rejecting a deficit view/ model are actually perpetuating deficit thinking. I appreciate the authors' term "neodeficit ideology."

  2. doc-14-6k-docs.googleusercontent.com doc-14-6k-docs.googleusercontent.com
    1. A more critical understanding of the situation of oppression does not yet liberate the oppressed. But the revelation is a step in the right direc-tion. Now the person who has this new understanding can engage in a political struggle for the transformation of the concrete conditions in which the oppression prevails. (1992, pp. 30-31)

      I am reminded here, and throughout this whole section on the authors' description of Freire's philosophy, of the Adichie video, and how important re-framing and dialogue is in order to understand people. When we have just one idea of who people in poverty are, then we are incapable of actually transforming the situation. So too, we must develop a critical understanding of the situation itself - such as described here, the situation of oppression, and while this may not yet liberate us, it is a step toward the ability to do so.

    1. Research on the ecology of hu-man development should include experiments in-volving the innovative restructuring of prevailingecological systems in ways that depart from exist-ing institutional ideologies and structures by re-defining goals, roles, and activities and providinginterconnections between systems previously iso-lated from each other.Pr

      This is an interesting point, because ultimately the benefit of such research, to my mind, would actually be the restructuring of "prevailing ecological systems," and here he is suggesting that in order to perform the research, we must redefine and depart from institutional ideologies. I suppose upon first read, it feels like a bit of a catch 22, but really it makes perfect sense. In order to prove the need for institutional change, research must show the benefits of such change. Recently I entered my children into a study wherein in exchange for participating, children receive a free genetic test for Celiac disease and Type 1 Diabetes. These tests are not currently covered by most insurance, and are not part of routine pediatric screening, yet the diseases are reaching epidemic levels in the youth of our country. The researchers are hoping that by screening 70,000 children in Colorado they will be able to prove the need to make these screenings routine and a covered expense, so that children receive early treatment and intervention.